Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 The common layperson can use an AED, and even purchase one without a prescription now. So, if you carry one, you can use it, if trained to do so. Bruce ________________________________________________________________________ Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month! Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage. Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 The common layperson can use an AED, and even purchase one without a prescription now. So, if you carry one, you can use it, if trained to do so. Bruce ________________________________________________________________________ Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month! Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage. Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Sal, I haven’t taken a lay-person first-aid course in a long time, but believe that manual spinal precautions are well within the abilities and training of the lay rescuer. When I was a lifeguard we were trained in spinal immobilization precautions and in the use of manual spinal immobilization procedures. I would not however be so willing to place a cervical collar, KED, or move the patient to a back board with out a protocol in place. Also, any lay person can take the AED course from either the AHA or ARC. There are AED’s available for use by the general public everywhere now. Our schools here in Tyler have them hanging on the walls beside fire extinguishers. They are in the concourse at DFW International Airport. There are certain laws that apply to the purchase and use of AED’s. The Texas Health & Safety Code Chapter 779 deals exclusively with Automated External Defibrillators. I encourage you to read it and become familiar with it. http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/statutes.html Tater salvador capuchino wrote: Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes the most sense. Now I am worried about this issue because we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means that we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR because the common lay person is not trained in this. As for AEDs, we have training in using them, but no protocols, therefore, should we be using them? There are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs and are not registered as FROs, so I guess the liability here falls with the cities? Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P/Volunteer FF --- " E. Tate " wrote: > Sal, > > As a Volunteer FF you can treat patients. You can > provide anything that the common layperson can > provide even in the absence of a FR agreement or > protocols. There is no requirement that your FD be > a registered FRO to provide treatment or other > medical interventions. EMT’s and Paramedics are not > autonomous so you must have some type of medical > oversight to provide specialized treatments. > > In order to be able to provide these specialized > treatments (those that the common layperson can not > provide) you must have protocols to operate under. > So, the way I see it you have 4 options. > > Option 1: Your employer provides you with written > permission to operate under their protocols at all > times, even if off duty. > > Option 2: Your Volunteer FD is a registered FRO > and has protocols from a licensed EMS agency that > services your area to operate under their protocols. > > > Option 3: Your Volunteer FD has a written FR > agreement (even in the absence of being a registered > FRO) to operate under their protocols. > > Option 4: Your Volunteer FD contracts with a > medical director and they provide protocols for you > to operate under. > > I can’t think of another situation but I might > have missed one. Albuterol is a prescription > medication, and is not available to the common lay > person. Therefore, it can not be administered > without a protocol in place to allow such > administration. This would be no different than > administering oxygen, intubating, cardioverting, > starting an IV, administering morphine, or any other > skill that required a physician’s oversight. > > If you can go as a lay person to the local Red > Cross office and take a class on first aid and learn > a treatment, (bandaging & splinting, bleeding > control, shock prevention, etc) then you can do it > without a protocol in place. Otherwise, pick an > option above or formulate one that provides a > written binding agreement between you as a FD FR and > some medical control entity. > > > As for the Good Samaritan Law: The Texas Civil > Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 74 > > > > Subsection 74.152. UNLICENSED MEDICAL PERSONNEL. > Persons not licensed or certified in the healing > arts who in good faith administer emergency care as > emergency medical service personnel are not liable > in civil damages for an act performed in > administering the care unless the act is willfully > or wantonly negligent. This section applies without > regard to whether the care is provided for or in > expectation of remuneration. > > Subsection 74.153. STANDARD OF PROOF IN CASES > INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. In a suit > involving a health care liability claim against a > physician or health care provider for injury to or > death of a patient arising out of the provision of > emergency medical care in a hospital emergency > department or obstetrical unit or in a surgical > suite immediately following the evaluation or > treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency > department, the claimant bringing the suit may prove > that the treatment or lack of treatment by the > physician or health care provider departed from > accepted standards of medical care or health care > only if the claimant shows by a preponderance of the > evidence that the physician or health care provider, > with willful and wanton negligence, deviated from > the degree of care and skill that is reasonably > expected of an ordinarily prudent physician or > health care provider in the same or similar > circumstances. > > § 74.154. JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CASES INVOLVING > EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. (a) In an action for > damages that involves a claim of negligence arising > from the provision of emergency medical care in a > hospital emergency department or obstetrical unit or > in a surgical suite immediately following the > evaluation or treatment of a patient in a hospital > emergency department, the court shall instruct the > jury to consider, together with all other relevant > matters: > > (1) whether the person providing care did or did > not have the patient's medical history or was able > or unable to obtain a full medical history, > including the knowledge of preexisting medical > conditions, allergies, and medications; > > (2) the presence or lack of a preexisting > physician-patient relationship or health care > provider-patient relationship; > > (3) the circumstances constituting the emergency; > and > > (4) the circumstances surrounding the delivery of > the emergency medical care. > > ( The provisions of Subsection (a) do not apply > to medical care or treatment: > > (1) that occurs after the patient is stabilized and > is capable of receiving medical treatment as a > non-emergency patient; > > (2) that is unrelated to the original medical > emergency; or > > (3) that is related to an emergency caused in whole > or in part by the negligence of the defendant. > > > > Keep in mind; you’re talking Civil Damages when you > say the Good Samaritan Law. This simply means if > sued, you can claim this as a defense. This does > not mean that you can’t be prosecuted by the DA for > an act or censured by DSHS for acting outside your > certification. Don’t confuse criminal acts or > omissions with civil liability. They are completely > different things, remember OJ???? > > > Tater > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A > question for those of you familiar with fire > department based FROs. I was recently told that as > a > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > have > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > hospital, however some areas are even further. It > is > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > having > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff > and > a medic with another company. It was recognized > that > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff > who > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this > not > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > that > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > available? > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > training day at the FD required to have a fire > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or > PD? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Sal, I haven’t taken a lay-person first-aid course in a long time, but believe that manual spinal precautions are well within the abilities and training of the lay rescuer. When I was a lifeguard we were trained in spinal immobilization precautions and in the use of manual spinal immobilization procedures. I would not however be so willing to place a cervical collar, KED, or move the patient to a back board with out a protocol in place. Also, any lay person can take the AED course from either the AHA or ARC. There are AED’s available for use by the general public everywhere now. Our schools here in Tyler have them hanging on the walls beside fire extinguishers. They are in the concourse at DFW International Airport. There are certain laws that apply to the purchase and use of AED’s. The Texas Health & Safety Code Chapter 779 deals exclusively with Automated External Defibrillators. I encourage you to read it and become familiar with it. http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/statutes.html Tater salvador capuchino wrote: Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes the most sense. Now I am worried about this issue because we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means that we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR because the common lay person is not trained in this. As for AEDs, we have training in using them, but no protocols, therefore, should we be using them? There are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs and are not registered as FROs, so I guess the liability here falls with the cities? Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P/Volunteer FF --- " E. Tate " wrote: > Sal, > > As a Volunteer FF you can treat patients. You can > provide anything that the common layperson can > provide even in the absence of a FR agreement or > protocols. There is no requirement that your FD be > a registered FRO to provide treatment or other > medical interventions. EMT’s and Paramedics are not > autonomous so you must have some type of medical > oversight to provide specialized treatments. > > In order to be able to provide these specialized > treatments (those that the common layperson can not > provide) you must have protocols to operate under. > So, the way I see it you have 4 options. > > Option 1: Your employer provides you with written > permission to operate under their protocols at all > times, even if off duty. > > Option 2: Your Volunteer FD is a registered FRO > and has protocols from a licensed EMS agency that > services your area to operate under their protocols. > > > Option 3: Your Volunteer FD has a written FR > agreement (even in the absence of being a registered > FRO) to operate under their protocols. > > Option 4: Your Volunteer FD contracts with a > medical director and they provide protocols for you > to operate under. > > I can’t think of another situation but I might > have missed one. Albuterol is a prescription > medication, and is not available to the common lay > person. Therefore, it can not be administered > without a protocol in place to allow such > administration. This would be no different than > administering oxygen, intubating, cardioverting, > starting an IV, administering morphine, or any other > skill that required a physician’s oversight. > > If you can go as a lay person to the local Red > Cross office and take a class on first aid and learn > a treatment, (bandaging & splinting, bleeding > control, shock prevention, etc) then you can do it > without a protocol in place. Otherwise, pick an > option above or formulate one that provides a > written binding agreement between you as a FD FR and > some medical control entity. > > > As for the Good Samaritan Law: The Texas Civil > Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 74 > > > > Subsection 74.152. UNLICENSED MEDICAL PERSONNEL. > Persons not licensed or certified in the healing > arts who in good faith administer emergency care as > emergency medical service personnel are not liable > in civil damages for an act performed in > administering the care unless the act is willfully > or wantonly negligent. This section applies without > regard to whether the care is provided for or in > expectation of remuneration. > > Subsection 74.153. STANDARD OF PROOF IN CASES > INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. In a suit > involving a health care liability claim against a > physician or health care provider for injury to or > death of a patient arising out of the provision of > emergency medical care in a hospital emergency > department or obstetrical unit or in a surgical > suite immediately following the evaluation or > treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency > department, the claimant bringing the suit may prove > that the treatment or lack of treatment by the > physician or health care provider departed from > accepted standards of medical care or health care > only if the claimant shows by a preponderance of the > evidence that the physician or health care provider, > with willful and wanton negligence, deviated from > the degree of care and skill that is reasonably > expected of an ordinarily prudent physician or > health care provider in the same or similar > circumstances. > > § 74.154. JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CASES INVOLVING > EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. (a) In an action for > damages that involves a claim of negligence arising > from the provision of emergency medical care in a > hospital emergency department or obstetrical unit or > in a surgical suite immediately following the > evaluation or treatment of a patient in a hospital > emergency department, the court shall instruct the > jury to consider, together with all other relevant > matters: > > (1) whether the person providing care did or did > not have the patient's medical history or was able > or unable to obtain a full medical history, > including the knowledge of preexisting medical > conditions, allergies, and medications; > > (2) the presence or lack of a preexisting > physician-patient relationship or health care > provider-patient relationship; > > (3) the circumstances constituting the emergency; > and > > (4) the circumstances surrounding the delivery of > the emergency medical care. > > ( The provisions of Subsection (a) do not apply > to medical care or treatment: > > (1) that occurs after the patient is stabilized and > is capable of receiving medical treatment as a > non-emergency patient; > > (2) that is unrelated to the original medical > emergency; or > > (3) that is related to an emergency caused in whole > or in part by the negligence of the defendant. > > > > Keep in mind; you’re talking Civil Damages when you > say the Good Samaritan Law. This simply means if > sued, you can claim this as a defense. This does > not mean that you can’t be prosecuted by the DA for > an act or censured by DSHS for acting outside your > certification. Don’t confuse criminal acts or > omissions with civil liability. They are completely > different things, remember OJ???? > > > Tater > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A > question for those of you familiar with fire > department based FROs. I was recently told that as > a > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > have > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > hospital, however some areas are even further. It > is > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > having > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff > and > a medic with another company. It was recognized > that > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff > who > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this > not > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > that > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > available? > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > training day at the FD required to have a fire > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or > PD? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Damn, ! You're talking more and more like a lawyer. GG > Sal, >   >  As a Volunteer FF you can treat patients. You can provide anything that > the common layperson can provide even in the absence of a FR agreement or > protocols. There is no requirement that your FD be a registered FRO to provide > treatment or other medical interventions. EMT’s and Paramedics are not > autonomous so you must have some type of medical oversight to provide specialized > treatments. >   >  In order to be able to provide these specialized treatments (those that > the common layperson can not provide) you must have protocols to operate > under. So, the way I see it you have 4 options. >   >  Option 1: Your employer provides you with written permission to operate > under their protocols at all times, even if off duty. >   >  Option 2: Your Volunteer FD is a registered FRO and has protocols from a > licensed EMS agency that services your area to operate under their protocols. >   >  Option 3: Your Volunteer FD has a written FR agreement (even in the > absence of being a registered FRO) to operate under their protocols. >   >  Option 4: Your Volunteer FD contracts with a medical director and they > provide protocols for you to operate under. >   >  I can’t think of another situation but I might have missed one. Albuterol > is a prescription medication, and is not available to the common lay > person. Therefore, it can not be administered without a protocol in place to allow > such administration. This would be no different than administering oxygen, > intubating, cardioverting, starting an IV, administering morphine, or any > other skill that required a physician’s oversight. >   >  If you can go as a lay person to the local Red Cross office and take a > class on first aid and learn a treatment, (bandaging & splinting, bleeding > control, shock prevention, etc) then you can do it without a protocol in place. > Otherwise, pick an option above or formulate one that provides a written > binding agreement between you as a FD FR and some medical control entity. >   > > As for the Good Samaritan Law: The Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code > Chapter 74 > > > > Subsection 74.152. UNLICENSED MEDICAL PERSONNEL. Persons not licensed or > certified in the healing arts who in good faith administer emergency care as > emergency medical service personnel are not liable in civil damages for an act > performed in administering the care unless the act is willfully or wantonly > negligent. This section applies without regard to whether the care is provided > for or in expectation of remuneration. > > Subsection 74.153. STANDARD OF PROOF IN CASES INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL > CARE. In a suit involving a health care liability claim against a physician > or health care provider for injury to or death of a patient arising out of the > provision of emergency medical care in a hospital emergency department or > obstetrical unit or in a surgical suite immediately following the evaluation or > treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency department, the claimant > bringing the suit may prove that the treatment or lack of treatment by the > physician or health care provider departed from accepted standards of medical care > or health care only if the claimant shows by a preponderance of the evidence > that the physician or health care provider, with willful and wanton > negligence, deviated from the degree of care and skill that is reasonably expected of > an ordinarily prudent physician or health care provider in the same or > similar circumstances. > > § 74.154. JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CASES INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. > (a) In an action for damages that involves a claim of negligence arising from > the provision of emergency medical care in a hospital emergency department or > obstetrical unit or in a surgical suite immediately following the evaluation > or treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency department, the court shall > instruct the jury to consider, together with all other relevant matters: > > (1) whether the person providing care did or did not have the patient's > medical history or was able or unable to obtain a full medical history, > including the knowledge of preexisting medical conditions, allergies, and > medications; > > (2) the presence or lack of a preexisting physician-patient relationship or > health care provider-patient relationship; > > (3) the circumstances constituting the emergency; and          >   > > (4) the circumstances surrounding the delivery of the emergency medical > care. > > ( The provisions of Subsection (a) do not apply to medical care or > treatment: > > (1) that occurs after the patient is stabilized and is capable of receiving > medical treatment as a non-emergency patient; > > (2) that is unrelated to the original medical emergency; or        > > (3) that is related to an emergency caused in whole or in part by the > negligence of the defendant. > > > > Keep in mind; you’re talking Civil Damages when you say the Good Samaritan > Law. This simply means if sued, you can claim this as a defense. This does > not mean that you can’t be prosecuted by the DA for an act or censured by DSHS > for acting outside your certification. Don’t confuse criminal acts or > omissions with civil liability. They are completely different things, remember > OJ???? >   >   >  Tater > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A question for those of > you familiar with fire > department based FROs. I was recently told that as a > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and have > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > hospital, however some areas are even further. It is > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > about Albuterol being administered to a patient having > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff and > a medic with another company. It was recognized that > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff who > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this not > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact that > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > available? > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > training day at the FD required to have a fire > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or PD? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Damn, ! You're talking more and more like a lawyer. GG > Sal, >   >  As a Volunteer FF you can treat patients. You can provide anything that > the common layperson can provide even in the absence of a FR agreement or > protocols. There is no requirement that your FD be a registered FRO to provide > treatment or other medical interventions. EMT’s and Paramedics are not > autonomous so you must have some type of medical oversight to provide specialized > treatments. >   >  In order to be able to provide these specialized treatments (those that > the common layperson can not provide) you must have protocols to operate > under. So, the way I see it you have 4 options. >   >  Option 1: Your employer provides you with written permission to operate > under their protocols at all times, even if off duty. >   >  Option 2: Your Volunteer FD is a registered FRO and has protocols from a > licensed EMS agency that services your area to operate under their protocols. >   >  Option 3: Your Volunteer FD has a written FR agreement (even in the > absence of being a registered FRO) to operate under their protocols. >   >  Option 4: Your Volunteer FD contracts with a medical director and they > provide protocols for you to operate under. >   >  I can’t think of another situation but I might have missed one. Albuterol > is a prescription medication, and is not available to the common lay > person. Therefore, it can not be administered without a protocol in place to allow > such administration. This would be no different than administering oxygen, > intubating, cardioverting, starting an IV, administering morphine, or any > other skill that required a physician’s oversight. >   >  If you can go as a lay person to the local Red Cross office and take a > class on first aid and learn a treatment, (bandaging & splinting, bleeding > control, shock prevention, etc) then you can do it without a protocol in place. > Otherwise, pick an option above or formulate one that provides a written > binding agreement between you as a FD FR and some medical control entity. >   > > As for the Good Samaritan Law: The Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code > Chapter 74 > > > > Subsection 74.152. UNLICENSED MEDICAL PERSONNEL. Persons not licensed or > certified in the healing arts who in good faith administer emergency care as > emergency medical service personnel are not liable in civil damages for an act > performed in administering the care unless the act is willfully or wantonly > negligent. This section applies without regard to whether the care is provided > for or in expectation of remuneration. > > Subsection 74.153. STANDARD OF PROOF IN CASES INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL > CARE. In a suit involving a health care liability claim against a physician > or health care provider for injury to or death of a patient arising out of the > provision of emergency medical care in a hospital emergency department or > obstetrical unit or in a surgical suite immediately following the evaluation or > treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency department, the claimant > bringing the suit may prove that the treatment or lack of treatment by the > physician or health care provider departed from accepted standards of medical care > or health care only if the claimant shows by a preponderance of the evidence > that the physician or health care provider, with willful and wanton > negligence, deviated from the degree of care and skill that is reasonably expected of > an ordinarily prudent physician or health care provider in the same or > similar circumstances. > > § 74.154. JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CASES INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. > (a) In an action for damages that involves a claim of negligence arising from > the provision of emergency medical care in a hospital emergency department or > obstetrical unit or in a surgical suite immediately following the evaluation > or treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency department, the court shall > instruct the jury to consider, together with all other relevant matters: > > (1) whether the person providing care did or did not have the patient's > medical history or was able or unable to obtain a full medical history, > including the knowledge of preexisting medical conditions, allergies, and > medications; > > (2) the presence or lack of a preexisting physician-patient relationship or > health care provider-patient relationship; > > (3) the circumstances constituting the emergency; and          >   > > (4) the circumstances surrounding the delivery of the emergency medical > care. > > ( The provisions of Subsection (a) do not apply to medical care or > treatment: > > (1) that occurs after the patient is stabilized and is capable of receiving > medical treatment as a non-emergency patient; > > (2) that is unrelated to the original medical emergency; or        > > (3) that is related to an emergency caused in whole or in part by the > negligence of the defendant. > > > > Keep in mind; you’re talking Civil Damages when you say the Good Samaritan > Law. This simply means if sued, you can claim this as a defense. This does > not mean that you can’t be prosecuted by the DA for an act or censured by DSHS > for acting outside your certification. Don’t confuse criminal acts or > omissions with civil liability. They are completely different things, remember > OJ???? >   >   >  Tater > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A question for those of > you familiar with fire > department based FROs. I was recently told that as a > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and have > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > hospital, however some areas are even further. It is > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > about Albuterol being administered to a patient having > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff and > a medic with another company. It was recognized that > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff who > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this not > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact that > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > available? > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > training day at the FD required to have a fire > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or PD? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Damn, ! You're talking more and more like a lawyer. GG > Sal, >   >  As a Volunteer FF you can treat patients. You can provide anything that > the common layperson can provide even in the absence of a FR agreement or > protocols. There is no requirement that your FD be a registered FRO to provide > treatment or other medical interventions. EMT’s and Paramedics are not > autonomous so you must have some type of medical oversight to provide specialized > treatments. >   >  In order to be able to provide these specialized treatments (those that > the common layperson can not provide) you must have protocols to operate > under. So, the way I see it you have 4 options. >   >  Option 1: Your employer provides you with written permission to operate > under their protocols at all times, even if off duty. >   >  Option 2: Your Volunteer FD is a registered FRO and has protocols from a > licensed EMS agency that services your area to operate under their protocols. >   >  Option 3: Your Volunteer FD has a written FR agreement (even in the > absence of being a registered FRO) to operate under their protocols. >   >  Option 4: Your Volunteer FD contracts with a medical director and they > provide protocols for you to operate under. >   >  I can’t think of another situation but I might have missed one. Albuterol > is a prescription medication, and is not available to the common lay > person. Therefore, it can not be administered without a protocol in place to allow > such administration. This would be no different than administering oxygen, > intubating, cardioverting, starting an IV, administering morphine, or any > other skill that required a physician’s oversight. >   >  If you can go as a lay person to the local Red Cross office and take a > class on first aid and learn a treatment, (bandaging & splinting, bleeding > control, shock prevention, etc) then you can do it without a protocol in place. > Otherwise, pick an option above or formulate one that provides a written > binding agreement between you as a FD FR and some medical control entity. >   > > As for the Good Samaritan Law: The Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code > Chapter 74 > > > > Subsection 74.152. UNLICENSED MEDICAL PERSONNEL. Persons not licensed or > certified in the healing arts who in good faith administer emergency care as > emergency medical service personnel are not liable in civil damages for an act > performed in administering the care unless the act is willfully or wantonly > negligent. This section applies without regard to whether the care is provided > for or in expectation of remuneration. > > Subsection 74.153. STANDARD OF PROOF IN CASES INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL > CARE. In a suit involving a health care liability claim against a physician > or health care provider for injury to or death of a patient arising out of the > provision of emergency medical care in a hospital emergency department or > obstetrical unit or in a surgical suite immediately following the evaluation or > treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency department, the claimant > bringing the suit may prove that the treatment or lack of treatment by the > physician or health care provider departed from accepted standards of medical care > or health care only if the claimant shows by a preponderance of the evidence > that the physician or health care provider, with willful and wanton > negligence, deviated from the degree of care and skill that is reasonably expected of > an ordinarily prudent physician or health care provider in the same or > similar circumstances. > > § 74.154. JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CASES INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. > (a) In an action for damages that involves a claim of negligence arising from > the provision of emergency medical care in a hospital emergency department or > obstetrical unit or in a surgical suite immediately following the evaluation > or treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency department, the court shall > instruct the jury to consider, together with all other relevant matters: > > (1) whether the person providing care did or did not have the patient's > medical history or was able or unable to obtain a full medical history, > including the knowledge of preexisting medical conditions, allergies, and > medications; > > (2) the presence or lack of a preexisting physician-patient relationship or > health care provider-patient relationship; > > (3) the circumstances constituting the emergency; and          >   > > (4) the circumstances surrounding the delivery of the emergency medical > care. > > ( The provisions of Subsection (a) do not apply to medical care or > treatment: > > (1) that occurs after the patient is stabilized and is capable of receiving > medical treatment as a non-emergency patient; > > (2) that is unrelated to the original medical emergency; or        > > (3) that is related to an emergency caused in whole or in part by the > negligence of the defendant. > > > > Keep in mind; you’re talking Civil Damages when you say the Good Samaritan > Law. This simply means if sued, you can claim this as a defense. This does > not mean that you can’t be prosecuted by the DA for an act or censured by DSHS > for acting outside your certification. Don’t confuse criminal acts or > omissions with civil liability. They are completely different things, remember > OJ???? >   >   >  Tater > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A question for those of > you familiar with fire > department based FROs. I was recently told that as a > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and have > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > hospital, however some areas are even further. It is > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > about Albuterol being administered to a patient having > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff and > a medic with another company. It was recognized that > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff who > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this not > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact that > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > available? > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > training day at the FD required to have a fire > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or PD? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Sal, As a volunteer organization. You should have first responder protocols. I too went through this many years ago with my local VFD. They were a great bunch of guys but never really that organized in EMS. To protect you and your personnel you should have SOP’s and Protocols about your responses and what is expected from your personnel. Certified or not certified. For instance our uncertified people were put through a red cross first aid course and would provide that level of care. Our certified people would perform a little bit more. But our Paramedics were reigned in to BLS only at our VFD. But only because that is where the membership was willing to go. So work with in your organization to build these protocols and SOP’s. If you need help, you can email me off list. I would love to discuss these struggles with you. Good Luck, Tom _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of salvador capuchino Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:25 To: Subject: Re: Volunteer FF treating patients Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes the most sense. Now I am worried about this issue because we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means that we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR because the common lay person is not trained in this. As for AEDs, we have training in using them, but no protocols, therefore, should we be using them? There are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs and are not registered as FROs, so I guess the liability here falls with the cities? Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P/Volunteer FF --- " E. Tate " wrote: > Sal, > > As a Volunteer FF you can treat patients. You can > provide anything that the common layperson can > provide even in the absence of a FR agreement or > protocols. There is no requirement that your FD be > a registered FRO to provide treatment or other > medical interventions. EMT’s and Paramedics are not > autonomous so you must have some type of medical > oversight to provide specialized treatments. > > In order to be able to provide these specialized > treatments (those that the common layperson can not > provide) you must have protocols to operate under. > So, the way I see it you have 4 options. > > Option 1: Your employer provides you with written > permission to operate under their protocols at all > times, even if off duty. > > Option 2: Your Volunteer FD is a registered FRO > and has protocols from a licensed EMS agency that > services your area to operate under their protocols. > > > Option 3: Your Volunteer FD has a written FR > agreement (even in the absence of being a registered > FRO) to operate under their protocols. > > Option 4: Your Volunteer FD contracts with a > medical director and they provide protocols for you > to operate under. > > I can’t think of another situation but I might > have missed one. Albuterol is a prescription > medication, and is not available to the common lay > person. Therefore, it can not be administered > without a protocol in place to allow such > administration. This would be no different than > administering oxygen, intubating, cardioverting, > starting an IV, administering morphine, or any other > skill that required a physician’s oversight. > > If you can go as a lay person to the local Red > Cross office and take a class on first aid and learn > a treatment, (bandaging & splinting, bleeding > control, shock prevention, etc) then you can do it > without a protocol in place. Otherwise, pick an > option above or formulate one that provides a > written binding agreement between you as a FD FR and > some medical control entity. > > > As for the Good Samaritan Law: The Texas Civil > Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 74 > > > > Subsection 74.152. UNLICENSED MEDICAL PERSONNEL. > Persons not licensed or certified in the healing > arts who in good faith administer emergency care as > emergency medical service personnel are not liable > in civil damages for an act performed in > administering the care unless the act is willfully > or wantonly negligent. This section applies without > regard to whether the care is provided for or in > expectation of remuneration. > > Subsection 74.153. STANDARD OF PROOF IN CASES > INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. In a suit > involving a health care liability claim against a > physician or health care provider for injury to or > death of a patient arising out of the provision of > emergency medical care in a hospital emergency > department or obstetrical unit or in a surgical > suite immediately following the evaluation or > treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency > department, the claimant bringing the suit may prove > that the treatment or lack of treatment by the > physician or health care provider departed from > accepted standards of medical care or health care > only if the claimant shows by a preponderance of the > evidence that the physician or health care provider, > with willful and wanton negligence, deviated from > the degree of care and skill that is reasonably > expected of an ordinarily prudent physician or > health care provider in the same or similar > circumstances. > > § 74.154. JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CASES INVOLVING > EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. (a) In an action for > damages that involves a claim of negligence arising > from the provision of emergency medical care in a > hospital emergency department or obstetrical unit or > in a surgical suite immediately following the > evaluation or treatment of a patient in a hospital > emergency department, the court shall instruct the > jury to consider, together with all other relevant > matters: > > (1) whether the person providing care did or did > not have the patient's medical history or was able > or unable to obtain a full medical history, > including the knowledge of preexisting medical > conditions, allergies, and medications; > > (2) the presence or lack of a preexisting > physician-patient relationship or health care > provider-patient relationship; > > (3) the circumstances constituting the emergency; > and > > (4) the circumstances surrounding the delivery of > the emergency medical care. > > ( The provisions of Subsection (a) do not apply > to medical care or treatment: > > (1) that occurs after the patient is stabilized and > is capable of receiving medical treatment as a > non-emergency patient; > > (2) that is unrelated to the original medical > emergency; or > > (3) that is related to an emergency caused in whole > or in part by the negligence of the defendant. > > > > Keep in mind; you’re talking Civil Damages when you > say the Good Samaritan Law. This simply means if > sued, you can claim this as a defense. This does > not mean that you can’t be prosecuted by the DA for > an act or censured by DSHS for acting outside your > certification. Don’t confuse criminal acts or > omissions with civil liability. They are completely > different things, remember OJ???? > > > Tater > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A > question for those of you familiar with fire > department based FROs. I was recently told that as > a > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > have > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > hospital, however some areas are even further. It > is > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > having > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff > and > a medic with another company. It was recognized > that > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff > who > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this > not > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > that > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > available? > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > training day at the FD required to have a fire > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or > PD? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Sal, As a volunteer organization. You should have first responder protocols. I too went through this many years ago with my local VFD. They were a great bunch of guys but never really that organized in EMS. To protect you and your personnel you should have SOP’s and Protocols about your responses and what is expected from your personnel. Certified or not certified. For instance our uncertified people were put through a red cross first aid course and would provide that level of care. Our certified people would perform a little bit more. But our Paramedics were reigned in to BLS only at our VFD. But only because that is where the membership was willing to go. So work with in your organization to build these protocols and SOP’s. If you need help, you can email me off list. I would love to discuss these struggles with you. Good Luck, Tom _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of salvador capuchino Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:25 To: Subject: Re: Volunteer FF treating patients Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes the most sense. Now I am worried about this issue because we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means that we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR because the common lay person is not trained in this. As for AEDs, we have training in using them, but no protocols, therefore, should we be using them? There are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs and are not registered as FROs, so I guess the liability here falls with the cities? Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P/Volunteer FF --- " E. Tate " wrote: > Sal, > > As a Volunteer FF you can treat patients. You can > provide anything that the common layperson can > provide even in the absence of a FR agreement or > protocols. There is no requirement that your FD be > a registered FRO to provide treatment or other > medical interventions. EMT’s and Paramedics are not > autonomous so you must have some type of medical > oversight to provide specialized treatments. > > In order to be able to provide these specialized > treatments (those that the common layperson can not > provide) you must have protocols to operate under. > So, the way I see it you have 4 options. > > Option 1: Your employer provides you with written > permission to operate under their protocols at all > times, even if off duty. > > Option 2: Your Volunteer FD is a registered FRO > and has protocols from a licensed EMS agency that > services your area to operate under their protocols. > > > Option 3: Your Volunteer FD has a written FR > agreement (even in the absence of being a registered > FRO) to operate under their protocols. > > Option 4: Your Volunteer FD contracts with a > medical director and they provide protocols for you > to operate under. > > I can’t think of another situation but I might > have missed one. Albuterol is a prescription > medication, and is not available to the common lay > person. Therefore, it can not be administered > without a protocol in place to allow such > administration. This would be no different than > administering oxygen, intubating, cardioverting, > starting an IV, administering morphine, or any other > skill that required a physician’s oversight. > > If you can go as a lay person to the local Red > Cross office and take a class on first aid and learn > a treatment, (bandaging & splinting, bleeding > control, shock prevention, etc) then you can do it > without a protocol in place. Otherwise, pick an > option above or formulate one that provides a > written binding agreement between you as a FD FR and > some medical control entity. > > > As for the Good Samaritan Law: The Texas Civil > Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 74 > > > > Subsection 74.152. UNLICENSED MEDICAL PERSONNEL. > Persons not licensed or certified in the healing > arts who in good faith administer emergency care as > emergency medical service personnel are not liable > in civil damages for an act performed in > administering the care unless the act is willfully > or wantonly negligent. This section applies without > regard to whether the care is provided for or in > expectation of remuneration. > > Subsection 74.153. STANDARD OF PROOF IN CASES > INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. In a suit > involving a health care liability claim against a > physician or health care provider for injury to or > death of a patient arising out of the provision of > emergency medical care in a hospital emergency > department or obstetrical unit or in a surgical > suite immediately following the evaluation or > treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency > department, the claimant bringing the suit may prove > that the treatment or lack of treatment by the > physician or health care provider departed from > accepted standards of medical care or health care > only if the claimant shows by a preponderance of the > evidence that the physician or health care provider, > with willful and wanton negligence, deviated from > the degree of care and skill that is reasonably > expected of an ordinarily prudent physician or > health care provider in the same or similar > circumstances. > > § 74.154. JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CASES INVOLVING > EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. (a) In an action for > damages that involves a claim of negligence arising > from the provision of emergency medical care in a > hospital emergency department or obstetrical unit or > in a surgical suite immediately following the > evaluation or treatment of a patient in a hospital > emergency department, the court shall instruct the > jury to consider, together with all other relevant > matters: > > (1) whether the person providing care did or did > not have the patient's medical history or was able > or unable to obtain a full medical history, > including the knowledge of preexisting medical > conditions, allergies, and medications; > > (2) the presence or lack of a preexisting > physician-patient relationship or health care > provider-patient relationship; > > (3) the circumstances constituting the emergency; > and > > (4) the circumstances surrounding the delivery of > the emergency medical care. > > ( The provisions of Subsection (a) do not apply > to medical care or treatment: > > (1) that occurs after the patient is stabilized and > is capable of receiving medical treatment as a > non-emergency patient; > > (2) that is unrelated to the original medical > emergency; or > > (3) that is related to an emergency caused in whole > or in part by the negligence of the defendant. > > > > Keep in mind; you’re talking Civil Damages when you > say the Good Samaritan Law. This simply means if > sued, you can claim this as a defense. This does > not mean that you can’t be prosecuted by the DA for > an act or censured by DSHS for acting outside your > certification. Don’t confuse criminal acts or > omissions with civil liability. They are completely > different things, remember OJ???? > > > Tater > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A > question for those of you familiar with fire > department based FROs. I was recently told that as > a > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > have > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > hospital, however some areas are even further. It > is > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > having > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff > and > a medic with another company. It was recognized > that > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff > who > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this > not > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > that > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > available? > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > training day at the FD required to have a fire > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or > PD? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 " I was recently told that as a volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. " You need to stop. You were not told that you could not treat a pt, you were told that as a first responder you need protocols and medical direction to administer a " BLS " drug to a pt. Just because you are a paramedic outside of the first responder organization does not mean that you are allowed to operate as a paramedic within that FRO. You still need some kind of medical supervision within the department. As a paramedic I'm sure you know that even though albuterol is considered a " BLS " drug and its administration is taught to EMT-Basics, it is still a prescription drug and does carry side effects and risks with administration. For your department to be protected legally and you as a first responder to be protected, you NEED to have some kind of FRO agreement or protocol as Tater outlined. As for the FF who administered the medication, not only did he give a pt medication that he did not have protocol to administer, he gave the pt someone else's prescription medication. What I am NOT saying is that it was the wrong thing to do. I am sure that the FF was familiar with what an asthma attack looked like, and was familiar with the administration of albuterol. What I AM saying is that he opened not only himself up for legal action but put his department at risk. But what is right and what is legal and liable are not often the same. As far as placing pts on SMR at scenes, I would agree with a previous post that you need to have protocol and medical direction. I would think that the EMS agency that the FD routinly responds with would be more than happy to oblige you with a FRO. If this is not the case, find a doctor who will be of assistance. My two cents. -Kimberley Cunningham salvador capuchino said: > Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes the > most sense. Now I am worried about this issue because > we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means that > we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR because > the common lay person is not trained in this. As for > AEDs, we have training in using them, but no > protocols, therefore, should we be using them? There > are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs and > are not registered as FROs, so I guess the liability > here falls with the cities? > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-P/Volunteer FF > > --- " E. Tate " wrote: > > > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A > > question for those of you familiar with fire > > department based FROs. I was recently told that as > > a > > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > > have > > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > > hospital, however some areas are even further. It > > is > > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > > having > > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff > > and > > a medic with another company. It was recognized > > that > > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff > > who > > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this > > not > > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > > that > > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > > available? > > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > > training day at the FD required to have a fire > > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or > > PD? > > > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 " I was recently told that as a volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. " You need to stop. You were not told that you could not treat a pt, you were told that as a first responder you need protocols and medical direction to administer a " BLS " drug to a pt. Just because you are a paramedic outside of the first responder organization does not mean that you are allowed to operate as a paramedic within that FRO. You still need some kind of medical supervision within the department. As a paramedic I'm sure you know that even though albuterol is considered a " BLS " drug and its administration is taught to EMT-Basics, it is still a prescription drug and does carry side effects and risks with administration. For your department to be protected legally and you as a first responder to be protected, you NEED to have some kind of FRO agreement or protocol as Tater outlined. As for the FF who administered the medication, not only did he give a pt medication that he did not have protocol to administer, he gave the pt someone else's prescription medication. What I am NOT saying is that it was the wrong thing to do. I am sure that the FF was familiar with what an asthma attack looked like, and was familiar with the administration of albuterol. What I AM saying is that he opened not only himself up for legal action but put his department at risk. But what is right and what is legal and liable are not often the same. As far as placing pts on SMR at scenes, I would agree with a previous post that you need to have protocol and medical direction. I would think that the EMS agency that the FD routinly responds with would be more than happy to oblige you with a FRO. If this is not the case, find a doctor who will be of assistance. My two cents. -Kimberley Cunningham salvador capuchino said: > Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes the > most sense. Now I am worried about this issue because > we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means that > we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR because > the common lay person is not trained in this. As for > AEDs, we have training in using them, but no > protocols, therefore, should we be using them? There > are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs and > are not registered as FROs, so I guess the liability > here falls with the cities? > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-P/Volunteer FF > > --- " E. Tate " wrote: > > > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A > > question for those of you familiar with fire > > department based FROs. I was recently told that as > > a > > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > > have > > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > > hospital, however some areas are even further. It > > is > > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > > having > > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff > > and > > a medic with another company. It was recognized > > that > > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff > > who > > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this > > not > > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > > that > > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > > available? > > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > > training day at the FD required to have a fire > > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or > > PD? > > > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 " I was recently told that as a volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. " You need to stop. You were not told that you could not treat a pt, you were told that as a first responder you need protocols and medical direction to administer a " BLS " drug to a pt. Just because you are a paramedic outside of the first responder organization does not mean that you are allowed to operate as a paramedic within that FRO. You still need some kind of medical supervision within the department. As a paramedic I'm sure you know that even though albuterol is considered a " BLS " drug and its administration is taught to EMT-Basics, it is still a prescription drug and does carry side effects and risks with administration. For your department to be protected legally and you as a first responder to be protected, you NEED to have some kind of FRO agreement or protocol as Tater outlined. As for the FF who administered the medication, not only did he give a pt medication that he did not have protocol to administer, he gave the pt someone else's prescription medication. What I am NOT saying is that it was the wrong thing to do. I am sure that the FF was familiar with what an asthma attack looked like, and was familiar with the administration of albuterol. What I AM saying is that he opened not only himself up for legal action but put his department at risk. But what is right and what is legal and liable are not often the same. As far as placing pts on SMR at scenes, I would agree with a previous post that you need to have protocol and medical direction. I would think that the EMS agency that the FD routinly responds with would be more than happy to oblige you with a FRO. If this is not the case, find a doctor who will be of assistance. My two cents. -Kimberley Cunningham salvador capuchino said: > Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes the > most sense. Now I am worried about this issue because > we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means that > we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR because > the common lay person is not trained in this. As for > AEDs, we have training in using them, but no > protocols, therefore, should we be using them? There > are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs and > are not registered as FROs, so I guess the liability > here falls with the cities? > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-P/Volunteer FF > > --- " E. Tate " wrote: > > > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A > > question for those of you familiar with fire > > department based FROs. I was recently told that as > > a > > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > > have > > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > > hospital, however some areas are even further. It > > is > > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > > having > > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff > > and > > a medic with another company. It was recognized > > that > > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff > > who > > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this > > not > > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > > that > > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > > available? > > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > > training day at the FD required to have a fire > > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or > > PD? > > > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Tom, As always I applaud you for assisting Sal and his organization. I might also add that he should go to his local RAC and ask for assistance to get registered as a first responder. Being a registered first responder would open up his organization to apply for local project grants from the state. I would also like to offer my assistance if Sal wants to e-mail me privately. Take care my friend. Lt./LP Vernon College FIRE/EMS Training Program 4105 Maplewood Wichita Falls, Texas 76308 Office ext. 3233 Fax Re: Volunteer FF treating patients Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes the most sense. Now I am worried about this issue because we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means that we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR because the common lay person is not trained in this. As for AEDs, we have training in using them, but no protocols, therefore, should we be using them? There are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs and are not registered as FROs, so I guess the liability here falls with the cities? Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P/Volunteer FF --- " E. Tate " wrote: > Sal, > > As a Volunteer FF you can treat patients. You can > provide anything that the common layperson can > provide even in the absence of a FR agreement or > protocols. There is no requirement that your FD be > a registered FRO to provide treatment or other > medical interventions. EMT’s and Paramedics are not > autonomous so you must have some type of medical > oversight to provide specialized treatments. > > In order to be able to provide these specialized > treatments (those that the common layperson can not > provide) you must have protocols to operate under. > So, the way I see it you have 4 options. > > Option 1: Your employer provides you with written > permission to operate under their protocols at all > times, even if off duty. > > Option 2: Your Volunteer FD is a registered FRO > and has protocols from a licensed EMS agency that > services your area to operate under their protocols. > > > Option 3: Your Volunteer FD has a written FR > agreement (even in the absence of being a registered > FRO) to operate under their protocols. > > Option 4: Your Volunteer FD contracts with a > medical director and they provide protocols for you > to operate under. > > I can’t think of another situation but I might > have missed one. Albuterol is a prescription > medication, and is not available to the common lay > person. Therefore, it can not be administered > without a protocol in place to allow such > administration. This would be no different than > administering oxygen, intubating, cardioverting, > starting an IV, administering morphine, or any other > skill that required a physician’s oversight. > > If you can go as a lay person to the local Red > Cross office and take a class on first aid and learn > a treatment, (bandaging & splinting, bleeding > control, shock prevention, etc) then you can do it > without a protocol in place. Otherwise, pick an > option above or formulate one that provides a > written binding agreement between you as a FD FR and > some medical control entity. > > > As for the Good Samaritan Law: The Texas Civil > Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 74 > > > > Subsection 74.152. UNLICENSED MEDICAL PERSONNEL. > Persons not licensed or certified in the healing > arts who in good faith administer emergency care as > emergency medical service personnel are not liable > in civil damages for an act performed in > administering the care unless the act is willfully > or wantonly negligent. This section applies without > regard to whether the care is provided for or in > expectation of remuneration. > > Subsection 74.153. STANDARD OF PROOF IN CASES > INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. In a suit > involving a health care liability claim against a > physician or health care provider for injury to or > death of a patient arising out of the provision of > emergency medical care in a hospital emergency > department or obstetrical unit or in a surgical > suite immediately following the evaluation or > treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency > department, the claimant bringing the suit may prove > that the treatment or lack of treatment by the > physician or health care provider departed from > accepted standards of medical care or health care > only if the claimant shows by a preponderance of the > evidence that the physician or health care provider, > with willful and wanton negligence, deviated from > the degree of care and skill that is reasonably > expected of an ordinarily prudent physician or > health care provider in the same or similar > circumstances. > > § 74.154. JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CASES INVOLVING > EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. (a) In an action for > damages that involves a claim of negligence arising > from the provision of emergency medical care in a > hospital emergency department or obstetrical unit or > in a surgical suite immediately following the > evaluation or treatment of a patient in a hospital > emergency department, the court shall instruct the > jury to consider, together with all other relevant > matters: > > (1) whether the person providing care did or did > not have the patient's medical history or was able > or unable to obtain a full medical history, > including the knowledge of preexisting medical > conditions, allergies, and medications; > > (2) the presence or lack of a preexisting > physician-patient relationship or health care > provider-patient relationship; > > (3) the circumstances constituting the emergency; > and > > (4) the circumstances surrounding the delivery of > the emergency medical care. > > ( The provisions of Subsection (a) do not apply > to medical care or treatment: > > (1) that occurs after the patient is stabilized and > is capable of receiving medical treatment as a > non-emergency patient; > > (2) that is unrelated to the original medical > emergency; or > > (3) that is related to an emergency caused in whole > or in part by the negligence of the defendant. > > > > Keep in mind; you’re talking Civil Damages when you > say the Good Samaritan Law. This simply means if > sued, you can claim this as a defense. This does > not mean that you can’t be prosecuted by the DA for > an act or censured by DSHS for acting outside your > certification. Don’t confuse criminal acts or > omissions with civil liability. They are completely > different things, remember OJ???? > > > Tater > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A > question for those of you familiar with fire > department based FROs. I was recently told that as > a > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > have > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > hospital, however some areas are even further. It > is > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > having > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff > and > a medic with another company. It was recognized > that > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff > who > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this > not > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > that > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > available? > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > training day at the FD required to have a fire > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or > PD? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Tom, As always I applaud you for assisting Sal and his organization. I might also add that he should go to his local RAC and ask for assistance to get registered as a first responder. Being a registered first responder would open up his organization to apply for local project grants from the state. I would also like to offer my assistance if Sal wants to e-mail me privately. Take care my friend. Lt./LP Vernon College FIRE/EMS Training Program 4105 Maplewood Wichita Falls, Texas 76308 Office ext. 3233 Fax Re: Volunteer FF treating patients Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes the most sense. Now I am worried about this issue because we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means that we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR because the common lay person is not trained in this. As for AEDs, we have training in using them, but no protocols, therefore, should we be using them? There are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs and are not registered as FROs, so I guess the liability here falls with the cities? Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P/Volunteer FF --- " E. Tate " wrote: > Sal, > > As a Volunteer FF you can treat patients. You can > provide anything that the common layperson can > provide even in the absence of a FR agreement or > protocols. There is no requirement that your FD be > a registered FRO to provide treatment or other > medical interventions. EMT’s and Paramedics are not > autonomous so you must have some type of medical > oversight to provide specialized treatments. > > In order to be able to provide these specialized > treatments (those that the common layperson can not > provide) you must have protocols to operate under. > So, the way I see it you have 4 options. > > Option 1: Your employer provides you with written > permission to operate under their protocols at all > times, even if off duty. > > Option 2: Your Volunteer FD is a registered FRO > and has protocols from a licensed EMS agency that > services your area to operate under their protocols. > > > Option 3: Your Volunteer FD has a written FR > agreement (even in the absence of being a registered > FRO) to operate under their protocols. > > Option 4: Your Volunteer FD contracts with a > medical director and they provide protocols for you > to operate under. > > I can’t think of another situation but I might > have missed one. Albuterol is a prescription > medication, and is not available to the common lay > person. Therefore, it can not be administered > without a protocol in place to allow such > administration. This would be no different than > administering oxygen, intubating, cardioverting, > starting an IV, administering morphine, or any other > skill that required a physician’s oversight. > > If you can go as a lay person to the local Red > Cross office and take a class on first aid and learn > a treatment, (bandaging & splinting, bleeding > control, shock prevention, etc) then you can do it > without a protocol in place. Otherwise, pick an > option above or formulate one that provides a > written binding agreement between you as a FD FR and > some medical control entity. > > > As for the Good Samaritan Law: The Texas Civil > Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 74 > > > > Subsection 74.152. UNLICENSED MEDICAL PERSONNEL. > Persons not licensed or certified in the healing > arts who in good faith administer emergency care as > emergency medical service personnel are not liable > in civil damages for an act performed in > administering the care unless the act is willfully > or wantonly negligent. This section applies without > regard to whether the care is provided for or in > expectation of remuneration. > > Subsection 74.153. STANDARD OF PROOF IN CASES > INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. In a suit > involving a health care liability claim against a > physician or health care provider for injury to or > death of a patient arising out of the provision of > emergency medical care in a hospital emergency > department or obstetrical unit or in a surgical > suite immediately following the evaluation or > treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency > department, the claimant bringing the suit may prove > that the treatment or lack of treatment by the > physician or health care provider departed from > accepted standards of medical care or health care > only if the claimant shows by a preponderance of the > evidence that the physician or health care provider, > with willful and wanton negligence, deviated from > the degree of care and skill that is reasonably > expected of an ordinarily prudent physician or > health care provider in the same or similar > circumstances. > > § 74.154. JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CASES INVOLVING > EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. (a) In an action for > damages that involves a claim of negligence arising > from the provision of emergency medical care in a > hospital emergency department or obstetrical unit or > in a surgical suite immediately following the > evaluation or treatment of a patient in a hospital > emergency department, the court shall instruct the > jury to consider, together with all other relevant > matters: > > (1) whether the person providing care did or did > not have the patient's medical history or was able > or unable to obtain a full medical history, > including the knowledge of preexisting medical > conditions, allergies, and medications; > > (2) the presence or lack of a preexisting > physician-patient relationship or health care > provider-patient relationship; > > (3) the circumstances constituting the emergency; > and > > (4) the circumstances surrounding the delivery of > the emergency medical care. > > ( The provisions of Subsection (a) do not apply > to medical care or treatment: > > (1) that occurs after the patient is stabilized and > is capable of receiving medical treatment as a > non-emergency patient; > > (2) that is unrelated to the original medical > emergency; or > > (3) that is related to an emergency caused in whole > or in part by the negligence of the defendant. > > > > Keep in mind; you’re talking Civil Damages when you > say the Good Samaritan Law. This simply means if > sued, you can claim this as a defense. This does > not mean that you can’t be prosecuted by the DA for > an act or censured by DSHS for acting outside your > certification. Don’t confuse criminal acts or > omissions with civil liability. They are completely > different things, remember OJ???? > > > Tater > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A > question for those of you familiar with fire > department based FROs. I was recently told that as > a > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > have > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > hospital, however some areas are even further. It > is > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > having > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff > and > a medic with another company. It was recognized > that > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff > who > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this > not > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > that > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > available? > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > training day at the FD required to have a fire > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or > PD? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Tom, As always I applaud you for assisting Sal and his organization. I might also add that he should go to his local RAC and ask for assistance to get registered as a first responder. Being a registered first responder would open up his organization to apply for local project grants from the state. I would also like to offer my assistance if Sal wants to e-mail me privately. Take care my friend. Lt./LP Vernon College FIRE/EMS Training Program 4105 Maplewood Wichita Falls, Texas 76308 Office ext. 3233 Fax Re: Volunteer FF treating patients Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes the most sense. Now I am worried about this issue because we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means that we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR because the common lay person is not trained in this. As for AEDs, we have training in using them, but no protocols, therefore, should we be using them? There are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs and are not registered as FROs, so I guess the liability here falls with the cities? Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P/Volunteer FF --- " E. Tate " wrote: > Sal, > > As a Volunteer FF you can treat patients. You can > provide anything that the common layperson can > provide even in the absence of a FR agreement or > protocols. There is no requirement that your FD be > a registered FRO to provide treatment or other > medical interventions. EMT’s and Paramedics are not > autonomous so you must have some type of medical > oversight to provide specialized treatments. > > In order to be able to provide these specialized > treatments (those that the common layperson can not > provide) you must have protocols to operate under. > So, the way I see it you have 4 options. > > Option 1: Your employer provides you with written > permission to operate under their protocols at all > times, even if off duty. > > Option 2: Your Volunteer FD is a registered FRO > and has protocols from a licensed EMS agency that > services your area to operate under their protocols. > > > Option 3: Your Volunteer FD has a written FR > agreement (even in the absence of being a registered > FRO) to operate under their protocols. > > Option 4: Your Volunteer FD contracts with a > medical director and they provide protocols for you > to operate under. > > I can’t think of another situation but I might > have missed one. Albuterol is a prescription > medication, and is not available to the common lay > person. Therefore, it can not be administered > without a protocol in place to allow such > administration. This would be no different than > administering oxygen, intubating, cardioverting, > starting an IV, administering morphine, or any other > skill that required a physician’s oversight. > > If you can go as a lay person to the local Red > Cross office and take a class on first aid and learn > a treatment, (bandaging & splinting, bleeding > control, shock prevention, etc) then you can do it > without a protocol in place. Otherwise, pick an > option above or formulate one that provides a > written binding agreement between you as a FD FR and > some medical control entity. > > > As for the Good Samaritan Law: The Texas Civil > Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 74 > > > > Subsection 74.152. UNLICENSED MEDICAL PERSONNEL. > Persons not licensed or certified in the healing > arts who in good faith administer emergency care as > emergency medical service personnel are not liable > in civil damages for an act performed in > administering the care unless the act is willfully > or wantonly negligent. This section applies without > regard to whether the care is provided for or in > expectation of remuneration. > > Subsection 74.153. STANDARD OF PROOF IN CASES > INVOLVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. In a suit > involving a health care liability claim against a > physician or health care provider for injury to or > death of a patient arising out of the provision of > emergency medical care in a hospital emergency > department or obstetrical unit or in a surgical > suite immediately following the evaluation or > treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency > department, the claimant bringing the suit may prove > that the treatment or lack of treatment by the > physician or health care provider departed from > accepted standards of medical care or health care > only if the claimant shows by a preponderance of the > evidence that the physician or health care provider, > with willful and wanton negligence, deviated from > the degree of care and skill that is reasonably > expected of an ordinarily prudent physician or > health care provider in the same or similar > circumstances. > > § 74.154. JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CASES INVOLVING > EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. (a) In an action for > damages that involves a claim of negligence arising > from the provision of emergency medical care in a > hospital emergency department or obstetrical unit or > in a surgical suite immediately following the > evaluation or treatment of a patient in a hospital > emergency department, the court shall instruct the > jury to consider, together with all other relevant > matters: > > (1) whether the person providing care did or did > not have the patient's medical history or was able > or unable to obtain a full medical history, > including the knowledge of preexisting medical > conditions, allergies, and medications; > > (2) the presence or lack of a preexisting > physician-patient relationship or health care > provider-patient relationship; > > (3) the circumstances constituting the emergency; > and > > (4) the circumstances surrounding the delivery of > the emergency medical care. > > ( The provisions of Subsection (a) do not apply > to medical care or treatment: > > (1) that occurs after the patient is stabilized and > is capable of receiving medical treatment as a > non-emergency patient; > > (2) that is unrelated to the original medical > emergency; or > > (3) that is related to an emergency caused in whole > or in part by the negligence of the defendant. > > > > Keep in mind; you’re talking Civil Damages when you > say the Good Samaritan Law. This simply means if > sued, you can claim this as a defense. This does > not mean that you can’t be prosecuted by the DA for > an act or censured by DSHS for acting outside your > certification. Don’t confuse criminal acts or > omissions with civil liability. They are completely > different things, remember OJ???? > > > Tater > > > salvador capuchino wrote: A > question for those of you familiar with fire > department based FROs. I was recently told that as > a > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > have > an agreement with the EMS company who transports. > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a > hospital, however some areas are even further. It > is > considered a rural area. The EMS service complained > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > having > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff > and > a medic with another company. It was recognized > that > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff > who > has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this > not > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > that > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would > recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if > available? > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > training day at the FD required to have a fire > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or > PD? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 What concerns me is the statement that was made that medics who are FF should not be treating patients unless the FD is registered as an FRO and has the use of protocols. This concerns me because for those who work/volunteer in rural areas know that sometimes EMS crews have about 20 minutes to arrive on-scene. SMR, AED use, oxygen use for SOB is all treating patients. I was told that most FDs are not registered as FROs and really should not be treating patients. But it is more a civil liability to the city and the people involved. I just wasnt to clarify the issue and hear what everyone has to say. Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P --- " bdaley4@... " wrote: > The common layperson can use an AED, and even > purchase one without a prescription now. So, if you > carry one, you can use it, if trained to do so. > Bruce > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month! > Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage. > Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today! > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 What concerns me is the statement that was made that medics who are FF should not be treating patients unless the FD is registered as an FRO and has the use of protocols. This concerns me because for those who work/volunteer in rural areas know that sometimes EMS crews have about 20 minutes to arrive on-scene. SMR, AED use, oxygen use for SOB is all treating patients. I was told that most FDs are not registered as FROs and really should not be treating patients. But it is more a civil liability to the city and the people involved. I just wasnt to clarify the issue and hear what everyone has to say. Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P --- " bdaley4@... " wrote: > The common layperson can use an AED, and even > purchase one without a prescription now. So, if you > carry one, you can use it, if trained to do so. > Bruce > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month! > Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage. > Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today! > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 What concerns me is the statement that was made that medics who are FF should not be treating patients unless the FD is registered as an FRO and has the use of protocols. This concerns me because for those who work/volunteer in rural areas know that sometimes EMS crews have about 20 minutes to arrive on-scene. SMR, AED use, oxygen use for SOB is all treating patients. I was told that most FDs are not registered as FROs and really should not be treating patients. But it is more a civil liability to the city and the people involved. I just wasnt to clarify the issue and hear what everyone has to say. Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P --- " bdaley4@... " wrote: > The common layperson can use an AED, and even > purchase one without a prescription now. So, if you > carry one, you can use it, if trained to do so. > Bruce > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month! > Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage. > Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today! > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Okay, you were not involved in the conversation I had and yes I was told that we should not be treating patients. My concern is not for the individual involved, but for the city and others who routinely respond to these calls. Let's just say I want everything to be legal. Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P --- " Cunningham, Kimberley R " wrote: > " I was recently told that as a volunteer ff I > cannot treat a patient. " > You need to stop. You were not told that you could > not treat a pt, you were > told that as a first responder you need protocols > and medical direction to > administer a " BLS " drug to a pt. Just because you > are a paramedic outside of > the first responder organization does not mean that > you are allowed to > operate as a paramedic within that FRO. You still > need some kind of medical > supervision within the department. As a paramedic > I'm sure you know that even > though albuterol is considered a " BLS " drug and its > administration is taught > to EMT-Basics, it is still a prescription drug and > does carry side effects > and risks with administration. For your department > to be protected legally > and you as a first responder to be protected, you > NEED to have some kind of > FRO agreement or protocol as Tater outlined. > As for the FF who administered the medication, not > only did he give a pt > medication that he did not have protocol to > administer, he gave the pt > someone else's prescription medication. > > What I am NOT saying is that it was the wrong thing > to do. I am sure that the > FF was familiar with what an asthma attack looked > like, and was familiar with > the administration of albuterol. What I AM saying is > that he opened not only > himself up for legal action but put his department > at risk. But what is right > and what is legal and liable are not often the same. > > > As far as placing pts on SMR at scenes, I would > agree with a previous post > that you need to have protocol and medical > direction. > > I would think that the EMS agency that the FD > routinly responds with would be > more than happy to oblige you with a FRO. If this is > not the case, find a > doctor who will be of assistance. > > My two cents. > -Kimberley Cunningham > > > salvador capuchino said: > > > Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes > the > > most sense. Now I am worried about this issue > because > > we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means > that > > we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR > because > > the common lay person is not trained in this. As > for > > AEDs, we have training in using them, but no > > protocols, therefore, should we be using them? > There > > are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs > and > > are not registered as FROs, so I guess the > liability > > here falls with the cities? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > > EMT-P/Volunteer FF > > > > --- " E. Tate " wrote: > > > > > > > > salvador capuchino wrote: > A > > > question for those of you familiar with fire > > > department based FROs. I was recently told that > as > > > a > > > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was > told > > > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > > > have > > > an agreement with the EMS company who > transports. > > > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from > a > > > hospital, however some areas are even further. > It > > > is > > > considered a rural area. The EMS service > complained > > > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > > > having > > > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer > ff > > > and > > > a medic with another company. It was recognized > > > that > > > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a > ff > > > who > > > has a child with asthma routinely carries > oxygen, > > > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would > this > > > not > > > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > > > that > > > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers > would > > > recognize and attack and know to give a > treatment if > > > available? > > > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > > > training day at the FD required to have a fire > > > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS > or > > > PD? > > > > > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > > > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Okay, you were not involved in the conversation I had and yes I was told that we should not be treating patients. My concern is not for the individual involved, but for the city and others who routinely respond to these calls. Let's just say I want everything to be legal. Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P --- " Cunningham, Kimberley R " wrote: > " I was recently told that as a volunteer ff I > cannot treat a patient. " > You need to stop. You were not told that you could > not treat a pt, you were > told that as a first responder you need protocols > and medical direction to > administer a " BLS " drug to a pt. Just because you > are a paramedic outside of > the first responder organization does not mean that > you are allowed to > operate as a paramedic within that FRO. You still > need some kind of medical > supervision within the department. As a paramedic > I'm sure you know that even > though albuterol is considered a " BLS " drug and its > administration is taught > to EMT-Basics, it is still a prescription drug and > does carry side effects > and risks with administration. For your department > to be protected legally > and you as a first responder to be protected, you > NEED to have some kind of > FRO agreement or protocol as Tater outlined. > As for the FF who administered the medication, not > only did he give a pt > medication that he did not have protocol to > administer, he gave the pt > someone else's prescription medication. > > What I am NOT saying is that it was the wrong thing > to do. I am sure that the > FF was familiar with what an asthma attack looked > like, and was familiar with > the administration of albuterol. What I AM saying is > that he opened not only > himself up for legal action but put his department > at risk. But what is right > and what is legal and liable are not often the same. > > > As far as placing pts on SMR at scenes, I would > agree with a previous post > that you need to have protocol and medical > direction. > > I would think that the EMS agency that the FD > routinly responds with would be > more than happy to oblige you with a FRO. If this is > not the case, find a > doctor who will be of assistance. > > My two cents. > -Kimberley Cunningham > > > salvador capuchino said: > > > Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes > the > > most sense. Now I am worried about this issue > because > > we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means > that > > we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR > because > > the common lay person is not trained in this. As > for > > AEDs, we have training in using them, but no > > protocols, therefore, should we be using them? > There > > are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs > and > > are not registered as FROs, so I guess the > liability > > here falls with the cities? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > > EMT-P/Volunteer FF > > > > --- " E. Tate " wrote: > > > > > > > > salvador capuchino wrote: > A > > > question for those of you familiar with fire > > > department based FROs. I was recently told that > as > > > a > > > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was > told > > > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > > > have > > > an agreement with the EMS company who > transports. > > > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from > a > > > hospital, however some areas are even further. > It > > > is > > > considered a rural area. The EMS service > complained > > > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > > > having > > > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer > ff > > > and > > > a medic with another company. It was recognized > > > that > > > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a > ff > > > who > > > has a child with asthma routinely carries > oxygen, > > > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would > this > > > not > > > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > > > that > > > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers > would > > > recognize and attack and know to give a > treatment if > > > available? > > > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > > > training day at the FD required to have a fire > > > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS > or > > > PD? > > > > > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > > > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Okay, you were not involved in the conversation I had and yes I was told that we should not be treating patients. My concern is not for the individual involved, but for the city and others who routinely respond to these calls. Let's just say I want everything to be legal. Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-P --- " Cunningham, Kimberley R " wrote: > " I was recently told that as a volunteer ff I > cannot treat a patient. " > You need to stop. You were not told that you could > not treat a pt, you were > told that as a first responder you need protocols > and medical direction to > administer a " BLS " drug to a pt. Just because you > are a paramedic outside of > the first responder organization does not mean that > you are allowed to > operate as a paramedic within that FRO. You still > need some kind of medical > supervision within the department. As a paramedic > I'm sure you know that even > though albuterol is considered a " BLS " drug and its > administration is taught > to EMT-Basics, it is still a prescription drug and > does carry side effects > and risks with administration. For your department > to be protected legally > and you as a first responder to be protected, you > NEED to have some kind of > FRO agreement or protocol as Tater outlined. > As for the FF who administered the medication, not > only did he give a pt > medication that he did not have protocol to > administer, he gave the pt > someone else's prescription medication. > > What I am NOT saying is that it was the wrong thing > to do. I am sure that the > FF was familiar with what an asthma attack looked > like, and was familiar with > the administration of albuterol. What I AM saying is > that he opened not only > himself up for legal action but put his department > at risk. But what is right > and what is legal and liable are not often the same. > > > As far as placing pts on SMR at scenes, I would > agree with a previous post > that you need to have protocol and medical > direction. > > I would think that the EMS agency that the FD > routinly responds with would be > more than happy to oblige you with a FRO. If this is > not the case, find a > doctor who will be of assistance. > > My two cents. > -Kimberley Cunningham > > > salvador capuchino said: > > > Okay Tateer, out of all the responses, yours akes > the > > most sense. Now I am worried about this issue > because > > we respond to all MVCs in the area, so this means > that > > we shouldn't even be placing patients on SMR > because > > the common lay person is not trained in this. As > for > > AEDs, we have training in using them, but no > > protocols, therefore, should we be using them? > There > > are aot of FDs here in the Valley that carry AEDs > and > > are not registered as FROs, so I guess the > liability > > here falls with the cities? > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > > EMT-P/Volunteer FF > > > > --- " E. Tate " wrote: > > > > > > > > salvador capuchino wrote: > A > > > question for those of you familiar with fire > > > department based FROs. I was recently told that > as > > > a > > > volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was > told > > > that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and > > > have > > > an agreement with the EMS company who > transports. > > > This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from > a > > > hospital, however some areas are even further. > It > > > is > > > considered a rural area. The EMS service > complained > > > about Albuterol being administered to a patient > > > having > > > an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer > ff > > > and > > > a medic with another company. It was recognized > > > that > > > the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a > ff > > > who > > > has a child with asthma routinely carries > oxygen, > > > nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would > this > > > not > > > fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact > > > that > > > anyone who has been around asthma sufferers > would > > > recognize and attack and know to give a > treatment if > > > available? > > > Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on > > > training day at the FD required to have a fire > > > specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS > or > > > PD? > > > > > > Salvador Capuchino Jr > > > EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 In a message dated 01-Mar-06 13:04:51 Central Standard Time, bdaley4@... writes: The common layperson can use an AED, and even purchase one without a prescription now. So, if you carry one, you can use it, if trained to do so. Bruce Not so in Louisiana. I'm not sure about Missouri yet, as I've just got here... but in Louisiana, if you are officially trained, you are supposed to be part of an organized group and have a medical director before being able to 'own' an AED...at least that was the case 3 years ago when two different first responder outfits contacted me to help them set up their AED programs. ck S. Krin, DO FAAFP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 Salvador, As I understand it, the EMS service (fire or ems only based) is the hosting or sponsering service for the selected area. Thus you would be operating under their protocols. If that sponsering service only allows basic treatment under basic protocols that they provide-this means that no advance protocols would be allowed. I would think that you would need to contact the sponsering service for that area and possibly contact TDH for that area to find out who the sponsering service is. I think this is correct, if you find that this is wrong, let me know. salvador capuchino wrote: A question for those of you familiar with fire department based FROs. I was recently told that as a volunteer ff I cannot treat a patient. I was told that the FD needs to be registered as an FRO and have an agreement with the EMS company who transports. This area the FD covers is around 10 miles from a hospital, however some areas are even further. It is considered a rural area. The EMS service complained about Albuterol being administered to a patient having an asthma attack by a medic who is a volunteer ff and a medic with another company. It was recognized that the pt was having a severe asthma attack, and a ff who has a child with asthma routinely carries oxygen, nebulizers and Albuterol just in case. Would this not fall under Good Samaritan laws based on the fact that anyone who has been around asthma sufferers would recognize and attack and know to give a treatment if available? Also does a person who is teaching ff classes on training day at the FD required to have a fire specific instructor cert or can it also be EMS or PD? Salvador Capuchino Jr EMT-Paramedic/Volunteer FF __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.