Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 and others, I agree that 97% is probably not the right number....but lets look at a 24 hour system. How many shifts should you be allowed to call off for because of everyday sickness (not serious medical issues).... 24-48 hour shifts work 122 shifts a year...so 97% would mean you could be sick for 3.66 shifts a year...90% would be 12.2 shifts...80% would be 24 shifts....where should that line be drawn...or should excessive absenteeism be left up solely to supervisor descretion? Remember, calling off sick in an EMS only system (and many fire departments) puts undue hardship on co-workers...through either mandatory overtime, working to fill shifts, or keeping that ambulance out of service for the shift....someone else has to cover that hole...other people are affected when these callouts occur.. So, as a supervisor or manager, how do we balance the needs of the employee who calls off sick (because we know folks only do that when they are sick) versus the needs of the co-workers who have to suck up the extra work when it occurs? Dudley Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time Marisa, Your computation of the sick time policy does not work out mathematically. Crews working a 12 hour shift on a 48 hour week are scheduled for 624 hours in a 3 month (13 week) period. I use 3 months because that is the time frame the policy calls for. There are 4 - 3 month cycles in a year. If a person works 624 hours in a 3 month period and is expected to be present 97% of the time, that means he or she must be present 605.28 hours. This is a difference of 18.72 (3% of 624) hours. That is just over 1.5 shifts in a 3 month period, not each month. This policy allows a person to be sick 6.24 shifts per year. Approximately half of what you quoted. This sounds like a lot of time, until you compute in sick time for children, a spouse, etc. I stand by my assertion that this policy SUCKS and the real problem of employee morale, and / or other problems need to be addressed instead of building a gallows in from of MedStar Headquarters. It is the employees benefit time, allow them to use it as they deem necessary. Correct staffing issues by bringing the number of units up to an acceptable and necessary level would be a good start. Tater Marisa stroup wrote: The gentleman that wrote that article, to my understanding, was in attendance of one of our " meetings " . Unfortunately he left out all the good and made the entire article about the absenteeism. Yes, absenteeism is a habitual problem with some, but not all employees. There are also a lot of other issues, that were left out. In Jack Eades defense, he at no time blamed the compliance issue on the crews solely. Yes, there are days where we have been down a few shifts, and at times that would contribute, but there are other factors as well. Thanks to a gentleman that came in from another busy system (which shall remain nameless), we have a new posting plan as well. This posting plan has at times helped, but in the most part, has not helped so much. However, we have been hiring more medics, which will allow us to add more units to the schedule and more units to this posting plan. Once the new units and hours are added, this plan may work in this growing system. From a crew stand point, this new absentee policy that is being put into place is not rubbing us well. First of all, most of us only hear dof this policy through reading that article. We work a minimum of 48 hours a week. Four days on, three days off, 12 hour shifts. With those hours in mind, according to this new plan, we would be able to take one day off a month without being excessive. 97% attendance is about 12 days off a year. Granted there are those that just take days off to take days off in our system, you find them anywhere, but it really wasnt fair to group us as a whole. There were good points that were brought up as well. Crews that are going over and beyond, employees that are not excessive. Employees that are making times. The paper does not note the good points, and instead made a full page article about something bad, as though attempting to create controversy. We all work long hours, get held over our shifts for late calls, and bust our rumps to make compliance in this system, unfortunately there are issues that remain that keep us from doing this and it is not because of habitual persons that call off sick. That is a group of maybe 10-15 employees. I beleive this guy wrote this article strictly to make people look bad and that was in no way Mr. Eades position. It was just one of many of his concerns. " E. Tate " wrote: This is just another example of an unreasonable demand by impersonal administrators. So now when I'm sick, I have to take your no-paying insurance to the expensive as heck doctor for a note saying I was running a fever and can't work. I'll submit that note along with a reimbursement voucher? Tater james davis wrote:i worked somewhere once where to take sick time they " required " that you bring a receipt from the doctors' office with a dx code on it. we called the union. they said no. a small amount of hell was raised and they changed their minds. jim --- " E. Tate " wrote: > > I think MedStar is being a bit unreasonable here. I > agree that employee absenteeism can become a > problem. Instead of creating (again another classic > American knee-jerk reaction) a blanket policy that > creates more work and oversight, why not determine > the reason for the (alleged) excessive absence? If > absenteeism is a problem there is an underlying > cause. > > > > According the article the employees must be at work > 97% of their scheduled time. Given a 24 / 48 shift > (I have no clue what MedStar works) that's 22.32 > hours they can miss in a 3 month period. If the > shift is a rotating 12 that's 16.38 hours off. So, > either way it's 1 shift +/- in a 3 month period. > Since their policy is 4 shifts per year, this seems > somewhat reasonable. If " The worst of it is a few " , > they need to concentrate on the few. > > > > Personally, I don't believe in calling in sick > unless necessary. However, I do believe it's my > right to call in sick if I need a " mental health " > day. If I am not 100% mentally prepared for work, > do you want me doing the things we do? I don't > expect anyone to call in sick, and then be seen out > gallivanting around town. If you're too sick to > work, keep your sick @$$ at home and rest. > > > > I'm a firm believer that " benefit time " is just > that, a benefit of the job. I also believe an > employee should be allowed to use that time as they > see fit for both their physical and mental health. > > > > Personally, this all sounds like an excuse for some > other failure in the system. You can't convince me > that they are shutting down trucks because of > absenteeism. If they aren't shutting down trucks, > why are they falling below standards? Must be that > computer system they are replacing and the SSM > software they're using. Maybe once they get the new > one up and running it'll be better at predicting the > next call and their call times will decrease. (I'm > only kidding about SSM helping.......) > > > > > > Tater > > > > Will M wrote: > Posted on Wed, Sep. 28, 2005 > > > > MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time > > By BILL TEETER > Star-Telegram Staff Writer > > FORT WORTH -- MedStar isn't meeting response-time > goals because too many employees are taking > unnecessary sick time, MedStar Executive Director > Jack > Eades said Wednesday. > From Sept. 1 through Sept. 22, ambulances made it on > time to scenes on " priority 1 " calls 86 percent of > the > time, Eades told the agency's board of directors at > their regular monthly meeting. > > MedStar, also known as the Area Metropolitan > Ambulance > Authority, requires its ambulances to make priority > 1 > calls in nine minutes or less on at least 90 percent > of their calls. > > In April, Rural/Metro, a private ambulance firm, > withdrew from its contract with MedStar because of > poor response times. Since then, MedStar has been > operating as the ambulance provider for the region. > > Although MedStar is at nearly full staff after an > aggressive hiring campaign in the wake of > Rural/Metro's departure, some ambulance workers are > taking sick time when they may not really need it, > which creates staff shortages, Eades said. > > Employees are allowed four sick days a year but can > accrue up to 13 weeks of unused sick time, Eades > said. > There is a misconception among some employees that > they are entitled to take sick days when they are > not > really ill, he said. > > " We are going to have to adopt a new attendance > policy, " Eades said. " It's going to have to be a lot > tougher than the one used by the contractor. " > > To fix the situation, Eades said MedStar is adopting > a > policy in which ambulance crew members must be at > work > at least 97 percent of their scheduled time. The > time-off percentage will be measured from the most > recent three months of their employment when an > employee calls in sick or takes off other than for > approved vacation or certain other leaves, such as > those covered by the federal Family Medical Leave > Act, > Eades said. > > The policy is tough but needed, said board President > McMahan. > > " They're not unreasonable, " he said. > > City Councilwoman Becky Haskin, who sits on the > board, > asked Eades how widespread the problem is. > > " The worst of it is a few, " Eades said. > > MedStar serves Fort Worth and 13 other cities. From > May through July, response times for the system had > met their mark, although some locations continued to > have problems. > > The agency's August performance report showed > MedStar > made more than 90 percent of its calls on time > except > for its less-serious priority 3 calls, which were at > an on-time rate of 89.9 percent. > > The board also approved a budget for the next fiscal > year beginning Oct. 1 allowing $18,274,626 in > expenditures, an increase of about $896,000 from the > previous year. > > The budget includes $1.5 million in capital outlays > for vehicles and new computer systems that should > help > response times in the future, he said. > > ONLINE: www.medstar911.com. > > Bill Teeter. > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > Yahoo! for Good > Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. > http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/ > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 > I kinda like the idea of a specific point as a definition of excessive > absenteeism...(don't know if 97% is the mark or not) too often > " excessive " is defined by a supervisor secondary to other factors [...] Hmm... seems to me that excessive sick time would be using anything beyond what I've earned. Otherwise, I'm with - it's a benefit to be used as needed. Wasn't there a fifth circuit case a few years ago that essentially said the same thing - that employers can't require doctor's notes to " prove up " an illness - because sick time is an accrued benefit for use at the will of the employee? Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 I love a good argument as much as the next person. But, I really see this topic turning more towards the new policy and away from the actual issue. That Exec. Mgt has little to no faith in it's field employees. MedStar is a private EMS service. We don't benifit from government funding, pensions plans, or good insurance for that matter. Even when only 1-2 shifts are put down on our night shifts; we still have (at times) only 6-7 trucks TOTAL for a 450sq mile service area. I don't need to tell you that this sucks. Everyone knows SSM is a bad way to run a system because you honestly have no idea when and where a call will drop. If there were more trucks available to begin with you wouldn't have to worry as much about call off's. You can deal with the " worse is a few " in a non-public manner. Don't sit there and promise your employees something and then accuse them of being selfish by taking sick days when they " don't need it " . Now the uneducated public feels as if they can't depend on MedStar to deliver pt care in a timely manner. Nick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 I agree that there has to be some line in the sand on absenteeism. I am not sure where that line is either, but I feel 97% may be a little harsh. A large company here in Tyler has taken a different approach on absenteeism. They give bonuses based on attendance. They do not count scheduled vacation, jury duty, or cases where short term or long term disability are applied. Employees are paid a bonus of $100 for the 1st quarter, $200 the 2nd, $300 the 3rd and $400 the 4th. This adds up to a $1000 bonus throughout the year. If an employee misses a day ever, they are ineligible for the remainder of the calendar year. There is some talk of changing the policy to allow employees that are perfect in other quarters to receive the bonus. My understanding of the proposal is: If an employee received the bonus in the 1st quarter and had a sick day in the 2nd (therefore did not get the bonus) and was perfect in the 3rd they receive $100 and $200 for the 4th. So, basically they start over at the 1st bonus level following an absence. I am a firm believer in creating and maintaining happy employees. I am also a firm believer in making sure the feeling of the employees about management is not antagonistic. Happy employees are healthier, healthier employees are more productive; more productive employees mean an increase in the bottom line. Instead of finding ways to punish employees we should be finding ways to encourage them and reward them for hard, efficient work. Tater THEDUDMAN@... wrote:Gene, I too need to add one comment: >>>Something here does not compute. The whole story has not been told. This is a forum for discussion of important issues in EMS, and it would be very nice if the managers of MedStar would use this forum to explain their positions, and the employees would use this forum to voice their concerns. Unfortunately, managers don't often post on here, although they monitor this list, I am sure. If MedStar management would like to talk about the problems they face, this would be a great place to do it. MedStar is a public entity. There is no reason for secrecy and political posturing. Let's hear from Mr. Eades, and let's hear from the troops. Maybe we'll all learn something.>>>> Instead of using this " forum " to get blasted for whatever ideas they may have outside of the box...they would probably be much better served to spend their time and energy on restoring and improving communication between the administrative and field staff. Honestly, what is going on inside of MedStar is none of our issue unless we work there or pay taxes that support the MedStar system. I kinda like the idea of a specific point as a definition of excessive absenteeism...(don't know if 97% is the mark or not) too often " excessive " is defined by a supervisor secondary to other factors such as difficulty in filling the hole, personal feelings towards the employee, and recent history with the employee....specific definitions with appropriate outs for long-term issues (FMLA stuff) could go a long way to alleviating this perceived injustice of " discipline for excessive absenteeism " . Dudley Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time Oh, my. I have to jump in here and make a few comments. Please read down. Gene G. > The gentleman that wrote that article, to my understanding, was in > attendance of one of our " meetings " . Unfortunately he left out all the good and made > the entire article about the absenteeism. Yes, absenteeism is a habitual > problem with some, but not all employees. There are also a lot of other > issues, that were left out. > What did you expect from a reporter? Reporters look for issues that make good headlines. BTW, what issues were left out? It would be nice to know what they are. > In Jack Eades defense, he at no time blamed the compliance issue on the > crews solely. Yes, there are days where we have been down a few shifts, and at > times that would contribute, but there are other factors as well. > What other factors? If you want to defend Jack, why not post those issues. Right now, the prevailing impression is that Jack Eades is some sort of monster who wants to penalize folks for being sick and make them work when they ought to be home. If you really respect your management, tell the whole story. Few things are black and white. Let's hear all sides, and that includes an invitation to Mr. Eades to set forth his positions here. > Thanks to a gentleman that came in from another busy system (which shall > remain nameless), we have a new posting plan as well. This posting plan has > at times helped, but in the most part, has not helped so much. However, we > have been hiring more medics, which will allow us to add more units to the > schedule and more units to this posting plan. Once the new units and hours are > added, this plan may work in this growing system. > > Lemme see here. You've got folks who are at the top of their game managing the system, and they bring in an anonymous person to formulate a new posting plan, but it hasn't helped? What the hell is going on? What are you saying about the deployment plan? That's a very big issue, and it deserves some discussion. The public has an interest in deployment plans, though most members of the public wouldn't know a deployment plan from a dog catching plan. Everybody knows that MedStar has major problems with its operations, so if you have opinions or insights about what's causing the problems, why not tell us? Are you afraid to talk about system problems for fear of retaliation from management? If so, that's very, very sad. > From a crew stand point, this new absentee policy that is being put into > place is not rubbing us well. > Well, yes. I can't imagine it rubbing anybody well no matter where they worked. > First of all, most of us only hear dof this policy through reading that > article. > An excellent example of superb management in action. Don't talk to your employees, just make some comments to a news reporter and blast your employees for being lazy and malingering. A perfect way to instill confidence in management. Seems like a major gaffe. I'm sorry. > We work a minimum of 48 hours a week. Four days on, three days off, 12 > hour shifts. With those hours in mind, according to this new plan, we would be > able to take one day off a month without being excessive. 97% attendance is > about 12 days off a year. Granted there are those that just take days off > to take days off in our system, you find them anywhere, but it really wasn't > fair to group us as a whole. > Then why did Mr. Eades formulate this policy? He's a total doofus? He didn't articulate his plan well? He doesn't really know why folks are taking sick days? He's trying to cover his ass and the service's poor responses by blaming the troops? What? Has anybody looked into the reasons that employees take sick days? Ohhhhhh, that would be entirely too difficult. Something here does not compute. The whole story has not been told. This is a forum for discussion of important issues in EMS, and it would be very nice if the managers of MedStar would use this forum to explain their positions, and the employees would use this forum to voice their concerns. Unfortunately, managers don't often post on here, although they monitor this list, I am sure. If MedStar management would like to talk about the problems they face, this would be a great place to do it. MedStar is a public entity. There is no reason for secrecy and political posturing. Let's hear from Mr. Eades, and let's hear from the troops. Maybe we'll all learn something. Gene G. > There were good points that were brought up as well. Crews that are going > over and beyond, employees that are not excessive. Employees that are making > times. The paper does not note the good points, and instead made a full page > article about something bad, as though attempting to create controversy. > There is no news value in reporting that " Today Aunt Martha Made a Really Wonderful Cheesecake. " News outlets look for bad things to say about people. The management fell into the trap by allowing the reporter to focus on a negative factor, and he left the impression that he is an uncaring, inflexible Scrooge, which he is not. Lesson. If you're in management, get yourself a public information officer who knows the territory and never give an interview without that person being present and setting the rules. I learned this the hard way. The press is unforgiving. You can't win with them unless you understand them completely and know how to play them. Most managers haven't a clue about that. > We all work long hours, get held over our shifts for late calls, and bust > our rumps to make compliance in this system, unfortunately there are issues > that remain that keep us from doing this and it is not because of habitual > persons that call off sick. That is a group of maybe 10-15 employees. I believe > this guy wrote this article strictly to make people look bad and that was in > no way Mr. Eades position. It was just one of many of his concerns. > Which proves my point. The press took something that was a minor consideration, turned it around and made it a cause celebe` and made the administrator look like Simon Legree. > " E. Tate " wrote: > > This is just another example of an unreasonable demand by impersonal > administrators. So now when I'm sick, I have to take your no-paying insurance to > the expensive as heck doctor for a note saying I was running a fever and can't > work. I'll submit that note along with a reimbursement voucher? > > > > > > Tater > > > james davis wrote:i worked somewhere once where > to take sick time they > " required " that you bring a receipt from the doctors' > office with a dx code on it. we called the union. they > said no. a small amount of hell was raised and they > changed their minds. > > jim > > > --- " E. Tate " wrote: > > > > > I think MedStar is being a bit unreasonable here. I > > agree that employee absenteeism can become a > > problem. Instead of creating (again another classic > > American knee-jerk reaction) a blanket policy that > > creates more work and oversight, why not determine > > the reason for the (alleged) excessive absence? If > > absenteeism is a problem there is an underlying > > cause. > > > > > > > > According the article the employees must be at work > > 97% of their scheduled time. Given a 24 / 48 shift > > (I have no clue what MedStar works) that's 22.32 > > hours they can miss in a 3 month period. If the > > shift is a rotating 12 that's 16.38 hours off. So, > > either way it's 1 shift +/- in a 3 month period. > > Since their policy is 4 shifts per year, this seems > > somewhat reasonable. If " The worst of it is a few " , > > they need to concentrate on the few. > > > > > > > > Personally, I don't believe in calling in sick > > unless necessary. However, I do believe it's my > > right to call in sick if I need a " mental health " > > day. If I am not 100% mentally prepared for work, > > do you want me doing the things we do? I don't > > expect anyone to call in sick, and then be seen out > > gallivanting around town. If you're too sick to > > work, keep your sick @$$ at home and rest. > > > > > > > > I'm a firm believer that " benefit time " is just > > that, a benefit of the job. I also believe an > > employee should be allowed to use that time as they > > see fit for both their physical and mental health. > > > > > > > > Personally, this all sounds like an excuse for some > > other failure in the system. You can't convince me > > that they are shutting down trucks because of > > absenteeism. If they aren't shutting down trucks, > > why are they falling below standards? Must be that > > computer system they are replacing and the SSM > > software they're using. Maybe once they get the new > > one up and running it'll be better at predicting the > > next call and their call times will decrease. (I'm > > only kidding about SSM helping.......) > > > > > > > > > > > > Tater > > > > > > > > Will M wrote: > > Posted on Wed, Sep. 28, 2005 > > > > > > > > MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time > > > > By BILL TEETER > > Star-Telegram Staff Writer > > > > FORT WORTH -- MedStar isn't meeting response-time > > goals because too many employees are taking > > unnecessary sick time, MedStar Executive Director > > Jack > > Eades said Wednesday. > > From Sept. 1 through Sept. 22, ambulances made it on > > time to scenes on " priority 1 " calls 86 percent of > > the > > time, Eades told the agency's board of directors at > > their regular monthly meeting. > > > > MedStar, also known as the Area Metropolitan > > Ambulance > > Authority, requires its ambulances to make priority > > 1 > > calls in nine minutes or less on at least 90 percent > > of their calls. > > > > In April, Rural/Metro, a private ambulance firm, > > withdrew from its contract with MedStar because of > > poor response times. Since then, MedStar has been > > operating as the ambulance provider for the region. > > > > Although MedStar is at nearly full staff after an > > aggressive hiring campaign in the wake of > > Rural/Metro's departure, some ambulance workers are > > taking sick time when they may not really need it, > > which creates staff shortages, Eades said. > > > > Employees are allowed four sick days a year but can > > accrue up to 13 weeks of unused sick time, Eades > > said. > > There is a misconception among some employees that > > they are entitled to take sick days when they are > > not > > really ill, he said. > > > > " We are going to have to adopt a new attendance > > policy, " Eades said. " It's going to have to be a lot > > tougher than the one used by the contractor. " > > > > To fix the situation, Eades said MedStar is adopting > > a > > policy in which ambulance crew members must be at > > work > > at least 97 percent of their scheduled time. The > > time-off percentage will be measured from the most > > recent three months of their employment when an > > employee calls in sick or takes off other than for > > approved vacation or certain other leaves, such as > > those covered by the federal Family Medical Leave > > Act, > > Eades said. > > > > The policy is tough but needed, said board President > > McMahan. > > > > " They're not unreasonable, " he said. > > > > City Councilwoman Becky Haskin, who sits on the > > board, > > asked Eades how widespread the problem is. > > > > " The worst of it is a few, " Eades said. > > > > MedStar serves Fort Worth and 13 other cities. From > > May through July, response times for the system had > > met their mark, although some locations continued to > > have problems. > > > > The agency's August performance report showed > > MedStar > > made more than 90 percent of its calls on time > > except > > for its less-serious priority 3 calls, which were at > > an on-time rate of 89.9 percent. > > > > The board also approved a budget for the next fiscal > > year beginning Oct. 1 allowing $18,274,626 in > > expenditures, an increase of about $896,000 from the > > previous year. > > > > The budget includes $1.5 million in capital outlays > > for vehicles and new computer systems that should > > help > > response times in the future, he said. > > > > ONLINE: www.medstar911.com. > > > > Bill Teeter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > > Yahoo! for Good > > Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. > > http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/ > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 Mike, Most organizations (non-EMS as well as EMS) do not provide Sick Time as an accrued benefit. It is not like vacation. When you leave you cannot take it with you. It is merely insurance that says when you are sick, you will at least receive your regular expected amount of money for that day, week, pay period. Therefore, it is not intended to be used as fast as you accrue it and most organizations you would not last if you took up sick every time you earned a day. I really don't think we want to start providing incentives to government organizations and private companies that Sick Time is an accrued benefit that belongs to the employee...or else we will see a drastic decrease in the amount of time given as Sick Days. BTW, this was one of the selling points of Paid Time Off (PTO) where you just got X amount of days per year to use as you the employee saw fit....they all belonged to you and in most plans you can use them all, keep some, and many times even sell some back for money. Kept employees from having to lie to get a day off....and helped keep this unaccrued liability of " Sick Time " from growing so large it was unmanageable. Again...what is excessive absenteeism? Dudley Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time > I kinda like the idea of a specific point as a definition of excessive > absenteeism...(don't know if 97% is the mark or not) too often > " excessive " is defined by a supervisor secondary to other factors [...] Hmm... seems to me that excessive sick time would be using anything beyond what I've earned. Otherwise, I'm with - it's a benefit to be used as needed. Wasn't there a fifth circuit case a few years ago that essentially said the same thing - that employers can't require doctor's notes to " prove up " an illness - because sick time is an accrued benefit for use at the will of the employee? Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 Dudley you strike on a very important distinction. BENEFIT, is at the will of the employer. It's above and beyond compensation and not a right. Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time > I kinda like the idea of a specific point as a definition of excessive > absenteeism...(don't know if 97% is the mark or not) too often > " excessive " is defined by a supervisor secondary to other factors [...] Hmm... seems to me that excessive sick time would be using anything beyond what I've earned. Otherwise, I'm with - it's a benefit to be used as needed. Wasn't there a fifth circuit case a few years ago that essentially said the same thing - that employers can't require doctor's notes to " prove up " an illness - because sick time is an accrued benefit for use at the will of the employee? Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 Here here....great info and I like that bonus plan too...but it has come up in similar situations (the airlines used to give new cars to flight attendants and pilots that had perfect attendance every year because of the money they saved) of are you then encouraging people to come to work sick? My frustration is how do you balance the real sickness (which you don't want in the workplace) with the need for a day off every now and then, with the need to control people who take advantage of the system? The bonus system works but is weak in #1, the % basis works (at the right %) but is bad on #2, and doing nothing is bad on #3. What other ideas are out there? This seems like a serious EMS issue...although it won't allow us to bash a specific EMS agency we may be harboring ill will against...what other ideas have you seen in or out of EMS? Dudley Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time Oh, my. I have to jump in here and make a few comments. Please read down. Gene G. > The gentleman that wrote that article, to my understanding, was in > attendance of one of our " meetings " . Unfortunately he left out all the good and made > the entire article about the absenteeism. Yes, absenteeism is a habitual > problem with some, but not all employees. There are also a lot of other > issues, that were left out. > What did you expect from a reporter? Reporters look for issues that make good headlines. BTW, what issues were left out? It would be nice to know what they are. > In Jack Eades defense, he at no time blamed the compliance issue on the > crews solely. Yes, there are days where we have been down a few shifts, and at > times that would contribute, but there are other factors as well. > What other factors? If you want to defend Jack, why not post those issues. Right now, the prevailing impression is that Jack Eades is some sort of monster who wants to penalize folks for being sick and make them work when they ought to be home. If you really respect your management, tell the whole story. Few things are black and white. Let's hear all sides, and that includes an invitation to Mr. Eades to set forth his positions here. > Thanks to a gentleman that came in from another busy system (which shall > remain nameless), we have a new posting plan as well. This posting plan has > at times helped, but in the most part, has not helped so much. However, we > have been hiring more medics, which will allow us to add more units to the > schedule and more units to this posting plan. Once the new units and hours are > added, this plan may work in this growing system. > > Lemme see here. You've got folks who are at the top of their game managing the system, and they bring in an anonymous person to formulate a new posting plan, but it hasn't helped? What the hell is going on? What are you saying about the deployment plan? That's a very big issue, and it deserves some discussion. The public has an interest in deployment plans, though most members of the public wouldn't know a deployment plan from a dog catching plan. Everybody knows that MedStar has major problems with its operations, so if you have opinions or insights about what's causing the problems, why not tell us? Are you afraid to talk about system problems for fear of retaliation from management? If so, that's very, very sad. > From a crew stand point, this new absentee policy that is being put into > place is not rubbing us well. > Well, yes. I can't imagine it rubbing anybody well no matter where they worked. > First of all, most of us only hear dof this policy through reading that > article. > An excellent example of superb management in action. Don't talk to your employees, just make some comments to a news reporter and blast your employees for being lazy and malingering. A perfect way to instill confidence in management. Seems like a major gaffe. I'm sorry. > We work a minimum of 48 hours a week. Four days on, three days off, 12 > hour shifts. With those hours in mind, according to this new plan, we would be > able to take one day off a month without being excessive. 97% attendance is > about 12 days off a year. Granted there are those that just take days off > to take days off in our system, you find them anywhere, but it really wasn't > fair to group us as a whole. > Then why did Mr. Eades formulate this policy? He's a total doofus? He didn't articulate his plan well? He doesn't really know why folks are taking sick days? He's trying to cover his ass and the service's poor responses by blaming the troops? What? Has anybody looked into the reasons that employees take sick days? Ohhhhhh, that would be entirely too difficult. Something here does not compute. The whole story has not been told. This is a forum for discussion of important issues in EMS, and it would be very nice if the managers of MedStar would use this forum to explain their positions, and the employees would use this forum to voice their concerns. Unfortunately, managers don't often post on here, although they monitor this list, I am sure. If MedStar management would like to talk about the problems they face, this would be a great place to do it. MedStar is a public entity. There is no reason for secrecy and political posturing. Let's hear from Mr. Eades, and let's hear from the troops. Maybe we'll all learn something. Gene G. > There were good points that were brought up as well. Crews that are going > over and beyond, employees that are not excessive. Employees that are making > times. The paper does not note the good points, and instead made a full page > article about something bad, as though attempting to create controversy. > There is no news value in reporting that " Today Aunt Martha Made a Really Wonderful Cheesecake. " News outlets look for bad things to say about people. The management fell into the trap by allowing the reporter to focus on a negative factor, and he left the impression that he is an uncaring, inflexible Scrooge, which he is not. Lesson. If you're in management, get yourself a public information officer who knows the territory and never give an interview without that person being present and setting the rules. I learned this the hard way. The press is unforgiving. You can't win with them unless you understand them completely and know how to play them. Most managers haven't a clue about that. > We all work long hours, get held over our shifts for late calls, and bust > our rumps to make compliance in this system, unfortunately there are issues > that remain that keep us from doing this and it is not because of habitual > persons that call off sick. That is a group of maybe 10-15 employees. I believe > this guy wrote this article strictly to make people look bad and that was in > no way Mr. Eades position. It was just one of many of his concerns. > Which proves my point. The press took something that was a minor consideration, turned it around and made it a cause celebe` and made the administrator look like Simon Legree. > " E. Tate " wrote: > > This is just another example of an unreasonable demand by impersonal > administrators. So now when I'm sick, I have to take your no-paying insurance to > the expensive as heck doctor for a note saying I was running a fever and can't > work. I'll submit that note along with a reimbursement voucher? > > > > > > Tater > > > james davis wrote:i worked somewhere once where > to take sick time they > " required " that you bring a receipt from the doctors' > office with a dx code on it. we called the union. they > said no. a small amount of hell was raised and they > changed their minds. > > jim > > > --- " E. Tate " wrote: > > > > > I think MedStar is being a bit unreasonable here. I > > agree that employee absenteeism can become a > > problem. Instead of creating (again another classic > > American knee-jerk reaction) a blanket policy that > > creates more work and oversight, why not determine > > the reason for the (alleged) excessive absence? If > > absenteeism is a problem there is an underlying > > cause. > > > > > > > > According the article the employees must be at work > > 97% of their scheduled time. Given a 24 / 48 shift > > (I have no clue what MedStar works) that's 22.32 > > hours they can miss in a 3 month period. If the > > shift is a rotating 12 that's 16.38 hours off. So, > > either way it's 1 shift +/- in a 3 month period. > > Since their policy is 4 shifts per year, this seems > > somewhat reasonable. If " The worst of it is a few " , > > they need to concentrate on the few. > > > > > > > > Personally, I don't believe in calling in sick > > unless necessary. However, I do believe it's my > > right to call in sick if I need a " mental health " > > day. If I am not 100% mentally prepared for work, > > do you want me doing the things we do? I don't > > expect anyone to call in sick, and then be seen out > > gallivanting around town. If you're too sick to > > work, keep your sick @$$ at home and rest. > > > > > > > > I'm a firm believer that " benefit time " is just > > that, a benefit of the job. I also believe an > > employee should be allowed to use that time as they > > see fit for both their physical and mental health. > > > > > > > > Personally, this all sounds like an excuse for some > > other failure in the system. You can't convince me > > that they are shutting down trucks because of > > absenteeism. If they aren't shutting down trucks, > > why are they falling below standards? Must be that > > computer system they are replacing and the SSM > > software they're using. Maybe once they get the new > > one up and running it'll be better at predicting the > > next call and their call times will decrease. (I'm > > only kidding about SSM helping.......) > > > > > > > > > > > > Tater > > > > > > > > Will M wrote: > > Posted on Wed, Sep. 28, 2005 > > > > > > > > MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time > > > > By BILL TEETER > > Star-Telegram Staff Writer > > > > FORT WORTH -- MedStar isn't meeting response-time > > goals because too many employees are taking > > unnecessary sick time, MedStar Executive Director > > Jack > > Eades said Wednesday. > > From Sept. 1 through Sept. 22, ambulances made it on > > time to scenes on " priority 1 " calls 86 percent of > > the > > time, Eades told the agency's board of directors at > > their regular monthly meeting. > > > > MedStar, also known as the Area Metropolitan > > Ambulance > > Authority, requires its ambulances to make priority > > 1 > > calls in nine minutes or less on at least 90 percent > > of their calls. > > > > In April, Rural/Metro, a private ambulance firm, > > withdrew from its contract with MedStar because of > > poor response times. Since then, MedStar has been > > operating as the ambulance provider for the region. > > > > Although MedStar is at nearly full staff after an > > aggressive hiring campaign in the wake of > > Rural/Metro's departure, some ambulance workers are > > taking sick time when they may not really need it, > > which creates staff shortages, Eades said. > > > > Employees are allowed four sick days a year but can > > accrue up to 13 weeks of unused sick time, Eades > > said. > > There is a misconception among some employees that > > they are entitled to take sick days when they are > > not > > really ill, he said. > > > > " We are going to have to adopt a new attendance > > policy, " Eades said. " It's going to have to be a lot > > tougher than the one used by the contractor. " > > > > To fix the situation, Eades said MedStar is adopting > > a > > policy in which ambulance crew members must be at > > work > > at least 97 percent of their scheduled time. The > > time-off percentage will be measured from the most > > recent three months of their employment when an > > employee calls in sick or takes off other than for > > approved vacation or certain other leaves, such as > > those covered by the federal Family Medical Leave > > Act, > > Eades said. > > > > The policy is tough but needed, said board President > > McMahan. > > > > " They're not unreasonable, " he said. > > > > City Councilwoman Becky Haskin, who sits on the > > board, > > asked Eades how widespread the problem is. > > > > " The worst of it is a few, " Eades said. > > > > MedStar serves Fort Worth and 13 other cities. From > > May through July, response times for the system had > > met their mark, although some locations continued to > > have problems. > > > > The agency's August performance report showed > > MedStar > > made more than 90 percent of its calls on time > > except > > for its less-serious priority 3 calls, which were at > > an on-time rate of 89.9 percent. > > > > The board also approved a budget for the next fiscal > > year beginning Oct. 1 allowing $18,274,626 in > > expenditures, an increase of about $896,000 from the > > previous year. > > > > The budget includes $1.5 million in capital outlays > > for vehicles and new computer systems that should > > help > > response times in the future, he said. > > > > ONLINE: www.medstar911.com. > > > > Bill Teeter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > > Yahoo! for Good > > Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. > > http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/ > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 Kenny, you and the dudman are about 4 standard deviations from the mean--each on opposite sides, But, that is what makes the world an interesting place. BEB _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Kenny Navarro Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 12:41 PM To: Subject: Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time Dudley, I just wanted to let you know that I am constantly impressed by your ability to think outside the box. There are many on this list who react without facts or condemn an entire system based on the musings of a single individual. Those same people also seem very rigid in their ideas and are not willing to consider alternative and innovative options. It is this kind of forward thinking that will move the industry into the 21st century (of course, it will go kicking and screaming, but you can't stop progress.) Keep up the good work ...(until you disagree with something I consider dogma, then be quiet! - kidding) Kenny Navarro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 I am a employee at Medstar. What frustrates me is the fact that he is more concerned with the bottom line than with patient care! The employees at Medstar are overworked, underpaid, under appreciated, simply put they are exhausted. And then for all of us to be publicly humiliated by our own Exec. Director. To me having an ambulance where the crew is mentally, emotionally, and phsycally exhausted and is more inclined to make mistakes regarding pt care and poor bedside mannor, is it better to be down one truck or have that truck in service. This is where pt care comes in to play. Another thing that gets me, these people here bust their butts because of their love for the job (HELPING PEOPLE) not for the money (BELIEVE ME NOT FOR THE MONEY)! If there was a problem, which agreed you will have problem children in every company, it should have been dealt with professionally and internally, at the very least we deserve that. For this person to think that PUBLICLY DEGRADING your employees will make them work any harder is asinine! I for one do not take sick time unless I am in fact sick, I work hard and deserve to take that time off! Which most if not all of my fellow employees would agree. Simply put this is nothing more than a slap in the face for people who work hard for their company and invest their time to take care of people in need! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 MedStar is subsidized by each of the " member cities " and thus receives " government funding " . A significant part of reimbursement is Medicare and Medicaid--both government programs--and thus " government funding " . _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Nick Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 3:18 PM To: Subject: Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time I love a good argument as much as the next person. But, I really see this topic turning more towards the new policy and away from the actual issue. That Exec. Mgt has little to no faith in it's field employees. MedStar is a private EMS service. We don't benifit from government funding, pensions plans, or good insurance for that matter. Even when only 1-2 shifts are put down on our night shifts; we still have (at times) only 6-7 trucks TOTAL for a 450sq mile service area. I don't need to tell you that this sucks. Everyone knows SSM is a bad way to run a system because you honestly have no idea when and where a call will drop. If there were more trucks available to begin with you wouldn't have to worry as much about call off's. You can deal with the " worse is a few " in a non-public manner. Don't sit there and promise your employees something and then accuse them of being selfish by taking sick days when they " don't need it " . Now the uneducated public feels as if they can't depend on MedStar to deliver pt care in a timely manner. Nick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 You must also point the finger at the Emergency Physicians Advisory Board (EPAB) which has the power (politically) to demand better patient care yet does not. My elderly parents live in Fort Worth so it does matter to me. Bledsoe, DO, FACEP Professor, EM GWUMC _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Christy Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 9:45 PM To: Subject: Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time I am a employee at Medstar. What frustrates me is the fact that he is more concerned with the bottom line than with patient care! The employees at Medstar are overworked, underpaid, under appreciated, simply put they are exhausted. And then for all of us to be publicly humiliated by our own Exec. Director. To me having an ambulance where the crew is mentally, emotionally, and phsycally exhausted and is more inclined to make mistakes regarding pt care and poor bedside mannor, is it better to be down one truck or have that truck in service. This is where pt care comes in to play. Another thing that gets me, these people here bust their butts because of their love for the job (HELPING PEOPLE) not for the money (BELIEVE ME NOT FOR THE MONEY)! If there was a problem, which agreed you will have problem children in every company, it should have been dealt with professionally and internally, at the very least we deserve that. For this person to think that PUBLICLY DEGRADING your employees will make them work any harder is asinine! I for one do not take sick time unless I am in fact sick, I work hard and deserve to take that time off! Which most if not all of my fellow employees would agree. Simply put this is nothing more than a slap in the face for people who work hard for their company and invest their time to take care of people in need! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 I am a employee at Medstar. What frustrates me is the fact that he is more concerned with the bottom line than with patient care! The employees at Medstar are overworked, underpaid, under appreciated, simply put they are exhausted. And then for all of us to be publicly humiliated by our own Exec. Director. To me having an ambulance where the crew is mentally, emotionally, and phsycally exhausted and is more inclined to make mistakes regarding pt care and poor bedside mannor, is it better to be down one truck or have that truck in service. This is where pt care comes in to play. Another thing that gets me, these people here bust their butts because of their love for the job (HELPING PEOPLE) not for the money (BELIEVE ME NOT FOR THE MONEY)! If there was a problem, which agreed you will have problem children in every company, it should have been dealt with professionally and internally, at the very least we deserve that. For this person to think that PUBLICLY DEGRADING your employees will make them work any harder is asinine! I for one do not take sick time unless I am in fact sick, I work hard and deserve to take that time off! Which most if not all of my fellow employees would agree. Simply put this is nothing more than a slap in the face for people who work hard for their company and invest their time to take care of people in need! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 I am a employee at Medstar. What frustrates me is the fact that he is more concerned with the bottom line than with patient care! The employees at Medstar are overworked, underpaid, under appreciated, simply put they are exhausted. And then for all of us to be publicly humiliated by our own Exec. Director. To me having an ambulance where the crew is mentally, emotionally, and phsycally exhausted and is more inclined to make mistakes regarding pt care and poor bedside mannor, is it better to be down one truck or have that truck in service. This is where pt care comes in to play. Another thing that gets me, these people here bust their butts because of their love for the job (HELPING PEOPLE) not for the money (BELIEVE ME NOT FOR THE MONEY)! If there was a problem, which agreed you will have problem children in every company, it should have been dealt with professionally and internally, at the very least we deserve that. For this person to think that PUBLICLY DEGRADING your employees will make them work any harder is asinine! I for one do not take sick time unless I am in fact sick, I work hard and deserve to take that time off! Which most if not all of my fellow employees would agree. Simply put this is nothing more than a slap in the face for people who work hard for their company and invest their time to take care of people in need! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 I am a employee at Medstar. What frustrates me is the fact that he is more concerned with the bottom line than with patient care! The employees at Medstar are overworked, underpaid, under appreciated, simply put they are exhausted. And then for all of us to be publicly humiliated by our own Exec. Director. To me having an ambulance where the crew is mentally, emotionally, and phsycally exhausted and is more inclined to make mistakes regarding pt care and poor bedside mannor, is it better to be down one truck or have that truck in service. This is where pt care comes in to play. Another thing that gets me, these people here bust their butts because of their love for the job (HELPING PEOPLE) not for the money (BELIEVE ME NOT FOR THE MONEY)! If there was a problem, which agreed you will have problem children in every company, it should have been dealt with professionally and internally, at the very least we deserve that. For this person to think that PUBLICLY DEGRADING your employees will make them work any harder is asinine! I for one do not take sick time unless I am in fact sick, I work hard and deserve to take that time off! Which most if not all of my fellow employees would agree. Simply put this is nothing more than a slap in the face for people who work hard for their company and invest their time to take care of people in need! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Thought I might just pop on with some incite I got several years back in one of my other incarnations. I've held management positions in many different companies that I've worked for. On company was a large corporation with divisions in several states. Some of the sections were having lots of absentee problems, and others very few. I was tasked at one point to visit the various divisions and find out what the differences were. In every instance of excessive absenteeism, I was able to trace it back to a managerial problem. Moral in those divisions was rock bottom. The managemers there had very poor people skills and tried to manage bu threats and intimidation. Employee stress levels were high and their company loyalty was zero. These managers were all the tyranical " my way or the hiway " . types. On the other end, the divisions with the least absenteeism had managers that were felt by the employees to actually care for them. These people actually enjoyed coming to work. We had one manager that was so good, according to his employees, that if he were any better he would have been able to walk on water. His door was always open, he had time to answer questions, he was willing to help his employees that were having problems with a task, and he took time to explain any chages in the whys and wherefors of policy and proceedure polocies. His employees felt like they were part of the company and the processes that made it work. Having rambled through all this, we come to the problem with Medstar. From what we've seen and what's been said by Medstar employees, I'd say their moral is getting close to the bottom. Since they had to read about the problem and solution in the paper, I'd venture that comminication is about zero. The employees feel used and abused, and definitely do not feel they are part of equation except as warm bodies. If Medstar really wants to cure their absentee problems, they should fix their managerial problems. The absentee problem would cure itself then. Any time you have to fall to intimidation and threats to try to fix a problem, you have failed miserablly as a manager. Dang, maybe I should get a job with one of them consultation outfits. Just my 2 cents on the subject. Thanks for listening again y'all. JoeT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Thought I might just pop on with some incite I got several years back in one of my other incarnations. I've held management positions in many different companies that I've worked for. On company was a large corporation with divisions in several states. Some of the sections were having lots of absentee problems, and others very few. I was tasked at one point to visit the various divisions and find out what the differences were. In every instance of excessive absenteeism, I was able to trace it back to a managerial problem. Moral in those divisions was rock bottom. The managemers there had very poor people skills and tried to manage bu threats and intimidation. Employee stress levels were high and their company loyalty was zero. These managers were all the tyranical " my way or the hiway " . types. On the other end, the divisions with the least absenteeism had managers that were felt by the employees to actually care for them. These people actually enjoyed coming to work. We had one manager that was so good, according to his employees, that if he were any better he would have been able to walk on water. His door was always open, he had time to answer questions, he was willing to help his employees that were having problems with a task, and he took time to explain any chages in the whys and wherefors of policy and proceedure polocies. His employees felt like they were part of the company and the processes that made it work. Having rambled through all this, we come to the problem with Medstar. From what we've seen and what's been said by Medstar employees, I'd say their moral is getting close to the bottom. Since they had to read about the problem and solution in the paper, I'd venture that comminication is about zero. The employees feel used and abused, and definitely do not feel they are part of equation except as warm bodies. If Medstar really wants to cure their absentee problems, they should fix their managerial problems. The absentee problem would cure itself then. Any time you have to fall to intimidation and threats to try to fix a problem, you have failed miserablly as a manager. Dang, maybe I should get a job with one of them consultation outfits. Just my 2 cents on the subject. Thanks for listening again y'all. JoeT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Thought I might just pop on with some incite I got several years back in one of my other incarnations. I've held management positions in many different companies that I've worked for. On company was a large corporation with divisions in several states. Some of the sections were having lots of absentee problems, and others very few. I was tasked at one point to visit the various divisions and find out what the differences were. In every instance of excessive absenteeism, I was able to trace it back to a managerial problem. Moral in those divisions was rock bottom. The managemers there had very poor people skills and tried to manage bu threats and intimidation. Employee stress levels were high and their company loyalty was zero. These managers were all the tyranical " my way or the hiway " . types. On the other end, the divisions with the least absenteeism had managers that were felt by the employees to actually care for them. These people actually enjoyed coming to work. We had one manager that was so good, according to his employees, that if he were any better he would have been able to walk on water. His door was always open, he had time to answer questions, he was willing to help his employees that were having problems with a task, and he took time to explain any chages in the whys and wherefors of policy and proceedure polocies. His employees felt like they were part of the company and the processes that made it work. Having rambled through all this, we come to the problem with Medstar. From what we've seen and what's been said by Medstar employees, I'd say their moral is getting close to the bottom. Since they had to read about the problem and solution in the paper, I'd venture that comminication is about zero. The employees feel used and abused, and definitely do not feel they are part of equation except as warm bodies. If Medstar really wants to cure their absentee problems, they should fix their managerial problems. The absentee problem would cure itself then. Any time you have to fall to intimidation and threats to try to fix a problem, you have failed miserablly as a manager. Dang, maybe I should get a job with one of them consultation outfits. Just my 2 cents on the subject. Thanks for listening again y'all. JoeT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Brilliant Joe, truely Brilliant. Kudos. Mike Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time Thought I might just pop on with some incite I got several years back in one of my other incarnations. I've held management positions in many different companies that I've worked for. On company was a large corporation with divisions in several states. Some of the sections were having lots of absentee problems, and others very few. I was tasked at one point to visit the various divisions and find out what the differences were. In every instance of excessive absenteeism, I was able to trace it back to a managerial problem. Moral in those divisions was rock bottom. The managemers there had very poor people skills and tried to manage bu threats and intimidation. Employee stress levels were high and their company loyalty was zero. These managers were all the tyranical " my way or the hiway " . types. On the other end, the divisions with the least absenteeism had managers that were felt by the employees to actually care for them. These people actually enjoyed coming to work. We had one manager that was so good, according to his employees, that if he were any better he would have been able to walk on water. His door was always open, he had time to answer questions, he was willing to help his employees that were having problems with a task, and he took time to explain any chages in the whys and wherefors of policy and proceedure polocies. His employees felt like they were part of the company and the processes that made it work. Having rambled through all this, we come to the problem with Medstar. From what we've seen and what's been said by Medstar employees, I'd say their moral is getting close to the bottom. Since they had to read about the problem and solution in the paper, I'd venture that comminication is about zero. The employees feel used and abused, and definitely do not feel they are part of equation except as warm bodies. If Medstar really wants to cure their absentee problems, they should fix their managerial problems. The absentee problem would cure itself then. Any time you have to fall to intimidation and threats to try to fix a problem, you have failed miserablly as a manager. Dang, maybe I should get a job with one of them consultation outfits. Just my 2 cents on the subject. Thanks for listening again y'all. JoeT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Brilliant Joe, truely Brilliant. Kudos. Mike Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time Thought I might just pop on with some incite I got several years back in one of my other incarnations. I've held management positions in many different companies that I've worked for. On company was a large corporation with divisions in several states. Some of the sections were having lots of absentee problems, and others very few. I was tasked at one point to visit the various divisions and find out what the differences were. In every instance of excessive absenteeism, I was able to trace it back to a managerial problem. Moral in those divisions was rock bottom. The managemers there had very poor people skills and tried to manage bu threats and intimidation. Employee stress levels were high and their company loyalty was zero. These managers were all the tyranical " my way or the hiway " . types. On the other end, the divisions with the least absenteeism had managers that were felt by the employees to actually care for them. These people actually enjoyed coming to work. We had one manager that was so good, according to his employees, that if he were any better he would have been able to walk on water. His door was always open, he had time to answer questions, he was willing to help his employees that were having problems with a task, and he took time to explain any chages in the whys and wherefors of policy and proceedure polocies. His employees felt like they were part of the company and the processes that made it work. Having rambled through all this, we come to the problem with Medstar. From what we've seen and what's been said by Medstar employees, I'd say their moral is getting close to the bottom. Since they had to read about the problem and solution in the paper, I'd venture that comminication is about zero. The employees feel used and abused, and definitely do not feel they are part of equation except as warm bodies. If Medstar really wants to cure their absentee problems, they should fix their managerial problems. The absentee problem would cure itself then. Any time you have to fall to intimidation and threats to try to fix a problem, you have failed miserablly as a manager. Dang, maybe I should get a job with one of them consultation outfits. Just my 2 cents on the subject. Thanks for listening again y'all. JoeT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Brilliant Joe, truely Brilliant. Kudos. Mike Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time Thought I might just pop on with some incite I got several years back in one of my other incarnations. I've held management positions in many different companies that I've worked for. On company was a large corporation with divisions in several states. Some of the sections were having lots of absentee problems, and others very few. I was tasked at one point to visit the various divisions and find out what the differences were. In every instance of excessive absenteeism, I was able to trace it back to a managerial problem. Moral in those divisions was rock bottom. The managemers there had very poor people skills and tried to manage bu threats and intimidation. Employee stress levels were high and their company loyalty was zero. These managers were all the tyranical " my way or the hiway " . types. On the other end, the divisions with the least absenteeism had managers that were felt by the employees to actually care for them. These people actually enjoyed coming to work. We had one manager that was so good, according to his employees, that if he were any better he would have been able to walk on water. His door was always open, he had time to answer questions, he was willing to help his employees that were having problems with a task, and he took time to explain any chages in the whys and wherefors of policy and proceedure polocies. His employees felt like they were part of the company and the processes that made it work. Having rambled through all this, we come to the problem with Medstar. From what we've seen and what's been said by Medstar employees, I'd say their moral is getting close to the bottom. Since they had to read about the problem and solution in the paper, I'd venture that comminication is about zero. The employees feel used and abused, and definitely do not feel they are part of equation except as warm bodies. If Medstar really wants to cure their absentee problems, they should fix their managerial problems. The absentee problem would cure itself then. Any time you have to fall to intimidation and threats to try to fix a problem, you have failed miserablly as a manager. Dang, maybe I should get a job with one of them consultation outfits. Just my 2 cents on the subject. Thanks for listening again y'all. JoeT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 You truly hit the nail on the head Joe! All of our mgt. (with the exclusion of our GM and MOST supervisors) are exactly as you described in the divisions with poor moral. kudos to you, and I hope things turn around before they get any worse! Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time Thought I might just pop on with some incite I got several years back in one of my other incarnations. I've held management positions in many different companies that I've worked for. On company was a large corporation with divisions in several states. Some of the sections were having lots of absentee problems, and others very few. I was tasked at one point to visit the various divisions and find out what the differences were. In every instance of excessive absenteeism, I was able to trace it back to a managerial problem. Moral in those divisions was rock bottom. The managemers there had very poor people skills and tried to manage bu threats and intimidation. Employee stress levels were high and their company loyalty was zero. These managers were all the tyranical " my way or the hiway " . types. On the other end, the divisions with the least absenteeism had managers that were felt by the employees to actually care for them. These people actually enjoyed coming to work. We had one manager that was so good, according to his employees, that if he were any better he would have been able to walk on water. His door was always open, he had time to answer questions, he was willing to help his employees that were having problems with a task, and he took time to explain any chages in the whys and wherefors of policy and proceedure polocies. His employees felt like they were part of the company and the processes that made it work. Having rambled through all this, we come to the problem with Medstar. From what we've seen and what's been said by Medstar employees, I'd say their moral is getting close to the bottom. Since they had to read about the problem and solution in the paper, I'd venture that comminication is about zero. The employees feel used and abused, and definitely do not feel they are part of equation except as warm bodies. If Medstar really wants to cure their absentee problems, they should fix their managerial problems. The absentee problem would cure itself then. Any time you have to fall to intimidation and threats to try to fix a problem, you have failed miserablly as a manager. Dang, maybe I should get a job with one of them consultation outfits. Just my 2 cents on the subject. Thanks for listening again y'all. JoeT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 You truly hit the nail on the head Joe! All of our mgt. (with the exclusion of our GM and MOST supervisors) are exactly as you described in the divisions with poor moral. kudos to you, and I hope things turn around before they get any worse! Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time Thought I might just pop on with some incite I got several years back in one of my other incarnations. I've held management positions in many different companies that I've worked for. On company was a large corporation with divisions in several states. Some of the sections were having lots of absentee problems, and others very few. I was tasked at one point to visit the various divisions and find out what the differences were. In every instance of excessive absenteeism, I was able to trace it back to a managerial problem. Moral in those divisions was rock bottom. The managemers there had very poor people skills and tried to manage bu threats and intimidation. Employee stress levels were high and their company loyalty was zero. These managers were all the tyranical " my way or the hiway " . types. On the other end, the divisions with the least absenteeism had managers that were felt by the employees to actually care for them. These people actually enjoyed coming to work. We had one manager that was so good, according to his employees, that if he were any better he would have been able to walk on water. His door was always open, he had time to answer questions, he was willing to help his employees that were having problems with a task, and he took time to explain any chages in the whys and wherefors of policy and proceedure polocies. His employees felt like they were part of the company and the processes that made it work. Having rambled through all this, we come to the problem with Medstar. From what we've seen and what's been said by Medstar employees, I'd say their moral is getting close to the bottom. Since they had to read about the problem and solution in the paper, I'd venture that comminication is about zero. The employees feel used and abused, and definitely do not feel they are part of equation except as warm bodies. If Medstar really wants to cure their absentee problems, they should fix their managerial problems. The absentee problem would cure itself then. Any time you have to fall to intimidation and threats to try to fix a problem, you have failed miserablly as a manager. Dang, maybe I should get a job with one of them consultation outfits. Just my 2 cents on the subject. Thanks for listening again y'all. JoeT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 You truly hit the nail on the head Joe! All of our mgt. (with the exclusion of our GM and MOST supervisors) are exactly as you described in the divisions with poor moral. kudos to you, and I hope things turn around before they get any worse! Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time Thought I might just pop on with some incite I got several years back in one of my other incarnations. I've held management positions in many different companies that I've worked for. On company was a large corporation with divisions in several states. Some of the sections were having lots of absentee problems, and others very few. I was tasked at one point to visit the various divisions and find out what the differences were. In every instance of excessive absenteeism, I was able to trace it back to a managerial problem. Moral in those divisions was rock bottom. The managemers there had very poor people skills and tried to manage bu threats and intimidation. Employee stress levels were high and their company loyalty was zero. These managers were all the tyranical " my way or the hiway " . types. On the other end, the divisions with the least absenteeism had managers that were felt by the employees to actually care for them. These people actually enjoyed coming to work. We had one manager that was so good, according to his employees, that if he were any better he would have been able to walk on water. His door was always open, he had time to answer questions, he was willing to help his employees that were having problems with a task, and he took time to explain any chages in the whys and wherefors of policy and proceedure polocies. His employees felt like they were part of the company and the processes that made it work. Having rambled through all this, we come to the problem with Medstar. From what we've seen and what's been said by Medstar employees, I'd say their moral is getting close to the bottom. Since they had to read about the problem and solution in the paper, I'd venture that comminication is about zero. The employees feel used and abused, and definitely do not feel they are part of equation except as warm bodies. If Medstar really wants to cure their absentee problems, they should fix their managerial problems. The absentee problem would cure itself then. Any time you have to fall to intimidation and threats to try to fix a problem, you have failed miserablly as a manager. Dang, maybe I should get a job with one of them consultation outfits. Just my 2 cents on the subject. Thanks for listening again y'all. JoeT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 I think what needs to be done at the Star is an association of the employee's. We need to get together and discuss options vital to us. We cannot let this happen again for the sake of any and all who come in contact with Med Star. Not only do the people in our service area think twice about a crew that comes to thier aide because they might have been playing sick when that families grandmother died, but for the very saftey of that crew and patient, being in top notch form and condition. Overall, we need to come together and nip this in the butt because I will be dammed if my name is drug through the mud again. Let me know something. Darren Bledsoe wrote: You must also point the finger at the Emergency Physicians Advisory Board (EPAB) which has the power (politically) to demand better patient care yet does not. My elderly parents live in Fort Worth so it does matter to me. Bledsoe, DO, FACEP Professor, EM GWUMC _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Christy Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 9:45 PM To: Subject: Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time I am a employee at Medstar. What frustrates me is the fact that he is more concerned with the bottom line than with patient care! The employees at Medstar are overworked, underpaid, under appreciated, simply put they are exhausted. And then for all of us to be publicly humiliated by our own Exec. Director. To me having an ambulance where the crew is mentally, emotionally, and phsycally exhausted and is more inclined to make mistakes regarding pt care and poor bedside mannor, is it better to be down one truck or have that truck in service. This is where pt care comes in to play. Another thing that gets me, these people here bust their butts because of their love for the job (HELPING PEOPLE) not for the money (BELIEVE ME NOT FOR THE MONEY)! If there was a problem, which agreed you will have problem children in every company, it should have been dealt with professionally and internally, at the very least we deserve that. For this person to think that PUBLICLY DEGRADING your employees will make them work any harder is asinine! I for one do not take sick time unless I am in fact sick, I work hard and deserve to take that time off! Which most if not all of my fellow employees would agree. Simply put this is nothing more than a slap in the face for people who work hard for their company and invest their time to take care of people in need! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 I think what needs to be done at the Star is an association of the employee's. We need to get together and discuss options vital to us. We cannot let this happen again for the sake of any and all who come in contact with Med Star. Not only do the people in our service area think twice about a crew that comes to thier aide because they might have been playing sick when that families grandmother died, but for the very saftey of that crew and patient, being in top notch form and condition. Overall, we need to come together and nip this in the butt because I will be dammed if my name is drug through the mud again. Let me know something. Darren Bledsoe wrote: You must also point the finger at the Emergency Physicians Advisory Board (EPAB) which has the power (politically) to demand better patient care yet does not. My elderly parents live in Fort Worth so it does matter to me. Bledsoe, DO, FACEP Professor, EM GWUMC _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Christy Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 9:45 PM To: Subject: Re: MedStar answer times suffer due to sick time I am a employee at Medstar. What frustrates me is the fact that he is more concerned with the bottom line than with patient care! The employees at Medstar are overworked, underpaid, under appreciated, simply put they are exhausted. And then for all of us to be publicly humiliated by our own Exec. Director. To me having an ambulance where the crew is mentally, emotionally, and phsycally exhausted and is more inclined to make mistakes regarding pt care and poor bedside mannor, is it better to be down one truck or have that truck in service. This is where pt care comes in to play. Another thing that gets me, these people here bust their butts because of their love for the job (HELPING PEOPLE) not for the money (BELIEVE ME NOT FOR THE MONEY)! If there was a problem, which agreed you will have problem children in every company, it should have been dealt with professionally and internally, at the very least we deserve that. For this person to think that PUBLICLY DEGRADING your employees will make them work any harder is asinine! I for one do not take sick time unless I am in fact sick, I work hard and deserve to take that time off! Which most if not all of my fellow employees would agree. Simply put this is nothing more than a slap in the face for people who work hard for their company and invest their time to take care of people in need! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.