Re: t: What is considered a short cervix? PG ment

[Guest guest]

Hi t,

You said:

" I think that any measurement that was not done

transvaginally is in question. "

Do you know that if they get your measurement via an abdominal

sonogram it tends to read longer than the cervix is or shorter if it

is not as accurate. I had a sonogram at 10 weeks to get a baseline

(my next sonogram isn't for EIGHT weeks now) and they said it is

3.7cm.

Thanks,

[Guest guest]

Hi t,

You said:

" I think that any measurement that was not done

transvaginally is in question. "

Do you know that if they get your measurement via an abdominal

sonogram it tends to read longer than the cervix is or shorter if it

is not as accurate. I had a sonogram at 10 weeks to get a baseline

(my next sonogram isn't for EIGHT weeks now) and they said it is

3.7cm.

Thanks,

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

I was talking about a vaginal sonogram. I am also not sure what you

are trying to tell me. Not trying to be obtuse, but could you

please spell it out for me?

t

>

> Hi t,

>

> You said:

>

> " I think that any measurement that was not done

> transvaginally is in question. "

>

>

> Do you know that if they get your measurement via an abdominal

> sonogram it tends to read longer than the cervix is or shorter if

it

> is not as accurate. I had a sonogram at 10 weeks to get a baseline

> (my next sonogram isn't for EIGHT weeks now) and they said it is

> 3.7cm.

>

> Thanks,

>