Guest guest Posted March 1, 2004 Report Share Posted March 1, 2004 Thank you for your answers.....here's another question for those of you that have kids in school...... What is the reading series that your kids are using?? like Open Court or Scholastic Literacy or the Program or son or McGraw Hill or Silver Burdett and Ginn, etc etc....Along with the company my district uses I and the other Kindergarten teacher supplement with PAF--preventing academic failure----i believe it was really meant for more of a spec ed or resource reading program though.....even if you have a child with no " challenges " , did you find one program more helpful or confusing than another..?? thanks again..........kathy nj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2004 Report Share Posted March 1, 2004 Hi Kathy! Yes still entertaining with company already here and more on the way -but we love it because we miss all our friends from NJ and NY too! (when you move to Florida you can nickname your home " Bed and Breakfast " ! ) and I myself take 2 or 3 ProEFAs on most days but as always on an " IEP " kind of day I take up to 5! And speaking of EFAs -we do have a number of MDs and PhDs at this point with serious interest in neuro research on our population. Thank you for all that offer support on the professionals level. I'm working on trying to have the research done without the parents of the children we are looking to support being put in a position that they feel they have to financially support this to make it happen. With therapy and in some cases medical and legal needs, many of you have enough stress on your family as it is. I believe we can get this done with only your support -not financial support -just support. About reading -I'll get your 's number if you want to call her being that she herself is a special ed teacher working on her masters...and...she grew up with apraxia. I'm sure she will have suggestions too. Here is an archive from her: And here is a post from Dolan who grew up with apraxia -and is > now going for her masters in Special Education at FAU. A bunch of > us from Florida were fortionate enough to meet and hear speak > at the and Noble in Jensen Beach Florida where I was > scheduled for a book signing for The Late Talker. And again if you > didn't know she had apraxia -you would not know (practice makes > perfect!) > > > From: meg6179@a... > Date: Sun Jul 13, 2003 11:43 am > Subject: Re: [ ] Re: stereotype that those that > speak early are " bri... > > > I enjoyed reading the poem you wrote, . > > I was a child with Oral apraxia and did not speak well until I was in > 5th > grade. I was called many of names growing up and it really hurts when > you are > old enough to realize what is actually going on. I can remember > having to read > a paragraph out loud in class one day (maybe 3rd grade). I can > remember how > stupid I felt because I could not pronounce a word (I think-- > SPECIFIC) and > everyone laughed because I could not say the word. I started crying > and it > really > has stuck with me. I am very careful about the words I use and when I > have > to read aloud I preview what is in print and then read slowly what is > there so > I don't make any mistakes. I am now 24 years old and I am very > successful but > that day in 3rd grade still sticks with me. > > I spoke to through email about my story and maybe one day I can > share > the story with all of you. > > Dolan Below are archives on the school program that works for Tanner as well as what we have done with him. We are happy with the SRA Open Court program. http://www.sraonline.com/index.php/home/curriculumsolutions/reading/ocr/622 Of course like Suzi we love Dr. Seuss books too. Tanner's favorite " first " books was Hop on Pop for the longest time -he loves many of them however - " Green Eggs and Ham " is another favorite of his that I believe is a great book for an apraxic child. Update again -Tanner is still straight As and is now fluent at reading many things. We still use many of the strategies below to help Tanner read his " chapter books " which he can now do with help!!! From: " kiddietalk " <kiddietalk@...> Date: Sun Nov 30, 2003 6:24 pm Subject: Re: , PLEASE Help Direct Me re. Hi everyone! I want to answer here about the amount of time it took Tanner to go from the Hug book to Danny and the Dinosaur (because my apologies but I try and can't keep up with private emails) Just like in NJ where Dakota attended kindergarten, here in Florida children in kindergarten are not expected to read or write. We've had many discussions on this and 'overall' I would highly recommend you check the archives and big time consider not starting kindergarten until your speech impaired child is 6 since there are many that do this with even " normal " kids -and it gives them that extra year of development. I also highly recommend starting them in the mainstream vs. starting them at 5 in a self contained LD kindergarten class. (and of course I don't recommend starting the child in the self contained LD kindergarten class unless everyone is 100% convinced that child can't make it in the mainstream) We kept Tanner schooled in out of district placement at the Summit Speech School for the hearing impaired up till he turned 6. (they only work on reading or writing readiness) Tanner was mainstreamed with pull out ST and OT and one of the top students in his public school kindergarten class of 26 students here in Florida. We (again) did not work on reading at all before or during Kindergarten. We only at home reinforced what he was being taught at school. Once Tanner completed kindergarten however we decided to look into a faster paced, well respected private school, and began to work on reading over the summer (when he first turned seven -and before he started first grade) I probably would have worked with Tanner on reading over the summer when he turned 7 years old -even if he stayed in the slower paced public school -he showed intrest in learning to read. We started with books like Hug for confidence -and Dr. Seuss for reading around either June when Tanner was still 6, or July of this past summer when Tanner turned 7. He was accepted into the private school by the skin of his teeth since he was only reading Dr. Seuss books and we were told most of the kindergarten class at his school is already reading and writing. Writing? We had only just had him transitioned out of OT for how he even held his pencil by the end of kindergarten -so no we had not worked on writing at all with Tanner - and he entered the school not writing. But regardless -Tanner's been maintaining all A's in reading and writing and spelling (and math and science etc.) since he started school, first grade in an accelerated academics private school in August of 2003. He went pretty quick from Hug to Dr. Seuss. Hug was just a jump start book for confidence he used for the first weeks. Dr. Seuss was his favorite for a month or so -but Tanner wanted to move onto " chapter books " which is what I told him Danny and the Dinosaur is getting closer to. Tanner is on level with his classmates on what is expected of them in class in all academic work. Even though Tanner is schooled with children like Suzi's who are reading Magic Tree House books in first grade, Tanner is not reading Magic Treehouse books yet on his own even though he reads books like that with me. I heard once that children's eyes are not yet like ours and need the type to be a bit larger for some reason -and since children with apraxia at times take a bit longer. I just searched and only found the work of Dr. Rosemary Sassoon http://www.clubtype.co.uk/sassoon.html and this website http://www.textmatters.com/kidstype/ Not sure if this is the theory I remember -I thought I heard it was on the age of eye development? So all together we've only been working on reading at home for around 4 months on a casual fun basis. Tanner started school in August and I'm very happy with his teacher and the school...and the reading program they use there. SRA Open Court Reading: " maintains strong instruction in the areas of decoding (learning how to read), comprehension (understanding what you read), inquiry and investigation (learning how to apply what you have read), and writing (how to communicate with others in print). There are also applications for teaching spelling, vocabulary, grammar, usage, and mechanics, penmanship, and listening, speaking, and viewing...Open Court Reading is a research-based curriculum grounded in systematic, explicit instruction of phonemic awareness, phonics and word knowledge, comprehension skills and strategies, inquiry skills and strategies, and writing and language arts skills and strategies. " http://www.sraonline.com/ or here is a good page about it: http://www.sraonline.com/index.php/home/curriculumsolutions/reading/ocr2002/ocr2\ \002longcopy/183 I think that covers all the questions! ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2004 Report Share Posted March 1, 2004 Kathy thought you would want to read this too about the program Tanner uses at school ~: ~~~~~~~~~ " Perhaps the most sobering message from our nation's recent interest in reading is how tightly children's achievement is reined by the educational practices and expectations of their classrooms. In some classrooms, nearly all of the children flourish. In others, they do not. Both are true in every state and every sort of community in our country, large or small, rich or poor. How can we help our schools be as good as they must be? Increasingly, we are told that good instruction must heed the lessons of research. This is a major message of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. It was also the major message of the National Reading Panel's report, Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction (2000); of the National Research Council's report, Preventing Reading Difficulties (1998); of the American Federation of Teachers' report, Building on the best, learning from what works (1998); of the Learning First Alliance's Every Child Reading: An Action Plan (1998); and indeed of many other recent reports from institutions, organizations, and every level of government. Significantly, it was equally the compelling message of the vast body of scientific research that I synthesized on behalf of the U.S. Congress more than a decade ago, Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print (1990). To be sure, the first requirement of effective schooling is good classroom management—the art of keeping all of one's students happily engaged. Yet engaging children in ways that promote learning depends on understanding what that must entail in both overview and moment-by moment activity. It depends on providing literacy instruction in a way that assures that for no child does any lesson depend on knowledge or abilities that have not been supported in the classroom and equally that for every child each lesson offers challenge and growth. It depends, in other words, on perspective and analysis that is beyond the reach of any single human being on her or his own. Therein lies the value of research. Research is the collective work of legions, all doing their best to test and retest and to extend the collective knowledge of the profession. Good research offers unrivaled guidance toward understanding what children must learn, how those facets interrelate, how to tell whether any is missing or misconstrued in our instructional models, and good ways to teach. In addition, research can provide objective distance from the individual student, teacher, or classroom and identify what works best in the hands of most teachers, for most children, and for the long term. Research can tell us what kinds of learning depend on instruction. And it can tell us what kinds of instruction work well and what kinds are shortsighted or even counterproductive. Research can also tell us how to assess students' progress and difficulties so that we can maximize the pace and impact of our curriculum while losing no key lesson and leaving no child behind. For 40 years, Open Court Reading has steadfastly structured its curriculum on the strongest lessons research could offer. For 40 years, as literacy research has grown in power and scope, Open Court Reading has been augmented and tuned or changed accordingly. For 40 years, Open Court Reading has demonstrated that instruction based on tested, research-based practices gets results. Over and over, the achievement of students who have been taught with Open Court Reading has been shown to be exceptional on state-mandated tests, national standardized tests, district tests, and a host of more specific measures. Whether we look to scientific journals and reports or success stories such as those presented here, the message is compelling. Through scientific research, we have learned with more clarity and detail than ever before what is involved in skillful reading—how the brain works, what kinds of knowledge it uses, and how it uses it. Most importantly, we have learned how to teach beginning reading far more effectively than is too often the case. Provided that we apply the lessons we have learned, there is no reason for any healthy child in any classroom in our country to be left behind in reading. For the future of our country and our children, there is no more urgent or important mission than turning this potential into reality. " Marilyn Jager Research Associate, Harvard University Graduate School of Education Phone (781) 395-2563 http://www.sraonline.com/download/ocr/adamsOCR2.doc ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 Some other books that are really good are Usborne Books. I used to sell them because I loved them so much - but now that I have almost all of them I don't really sell anymore. I like them because they start very easy, and graduate all the way to adult (encyclopedia like) books. The younger reading series is great because they have simple sentences on the top of pages that kids who are learning to read can accomplish - then more complex sentences at the bottom of the pages for the adult to read. You can also read straight across the top if the child wants to read the book all by themselves! You can look at all they have at http://www.usbornebooks.com . North Carolina [ ] reading series Thank you for your answers.....here's another question for those of you that have kids in school...... What is the reading series that your kids are using?? like Open Court or Scholastic Literacy or the Program or son or McGraw Hill or Silver Burdett and Ginn, etc etc....Along with the company my district uses I and the other Kindergarten teacher supplement with PAF--preventing academic failure----i believe it was really meant for more of a spec ed or resource reading program though.....even if you have a child with no " challenges " , did you find one program more helpful or confusing than another..?? thanks again..........kathy nj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.