Guest guest Posted January 7, 2004 Report Share Posted January 7, 2004 In a message dated 1/7/2004 9:51:43 AM Central Standard Time, nhuey@... writes: > I have been notified that our department will not > be included in a proposal for a citywide public safety salary increase > because Communications/9-1-1 is not considered part of public safety. > > > > > makes me wonder what kind of people are running your city, if they are > confused on who is all included in DPS (department of public safety).....that is just asinine!! jamie in iowa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2004 Report Share Posted January 7, 2004 In a message dated 1/7/2004 9:51:43 AM Central Standard Time, nhuey@... writes: > documentation that shows 9-1-1 included as public safety. COMMON SENSE IS ALL YOU NEED!! jamie in iowa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2004 Report Share Posted January 7, 2004 In a message dated 1/7/2004 12:12:27 PM Central Standard Time, ekarsten@... writes: > COMMON SENSE IS ALL YOU NEED!! > > > >jamie in iowa > > > I meant all they need is common sense. sorry jamie in iowa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2004 Report Share Posted January 9, 2004 The best argument I can think of is in the form of definitions found in Federal and State homeland security legislation. The fed's give a definition that you could help with this argument. The following is pulled straight from the Homeland Security Act and is a part of United States Code: PUBLIC LAW 107-296, section 2. (6) The term ''emergency response providers'' includes Federal, State, and local emergency public safety, law enforcement, emergency response, emergency medical (including hospital emergency facilities), and RELATED PERSONNEL, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES. The idea is that dispatch and 9-1-1 are considered related personnel. Our state also outlines some definitions in various pieces of homeland security legislation. You also might check to see of your state has done the same. Some other thoughts: Argue that 9-1-1 and Dispatch personnel are a REQUIRED component of your cities emergency response. They are the critical component to maintaining field unit safety. They are the nexus for information: be it from citizens, the government, or other departments/units in the field. Dispatchers/call takers provide the means for control and coordinated response by operations personnel in the field and relay emergency information to all responders. Play them a tape of where a dispatcher has relayed critical information that saved the life of a field unit, particularly when units are covering one another on a radio channel. They provide the MEANS for organizing and alerting response components to an emergency. Dispatchers/Communications helps maintain a picture of the strategic situation. You have a number of units that get sucked out to a big call. Who make sure that available units are moved to maintain jurisdictional coverage? Can city emergency services continue to provide an adequate level of service without the dispatcher or 9-1-1 operations My last idea is to look for similarities between your comm. in SOP's and public safety response SOP's as it pertains to report to work requirements. They are considered essential employees (i.e.. They have to report to work regardless). Ken N Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.