Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Reason why pigs pigs aren't the healthiest meat to eat.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Don't let facts stand in your way. You don't know enough to know that

correlation does not equal causation. No doubt it is all the dog eating that's

been holding them back. (!) Not to belabor the point, but China is doing much

better in the global economy than we are--they are the rising power, we are the

declining power; we buy their crap, they don't buy our crap; we owe them money,

they don't owe us money.

A simple internet search will bring up evidence of Aztec innovations in

agriculture, as must be true of any classic " civilization " (might want to google

that, too). Who exactly were they way behind?

Bill

>

> I know enough to say it appears that countries that are currently behind also

happen to be eating dogs.� Aztecs may have had some advanced skills, but as a

whole culture and even the way the government was ran was primitive.�

Especially in their agriculture they were way behind.

>

> Now I don't know much about China when it had a benevolent soveriegn.� I

don't buy alot of this yin yang crap.� There is some truth to it but a lot of

it sounds like a lot of pseudo science.� I won't argue with Taoism or

acupuncture, but what I've read of the yin and yang to food I don't buy.�

Modern China is given way too much credit.� If there citizens have better

health than ours it's because they're too poor to afford cake and their into

traditional cooking which tends to be much healthier than our fast food

society.� Their healthcare system is probably a joke so they have to be more

conscious of taking care of themselves.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but this is going to be my last comment in dealing with your

lack of research. All of us are constantly beating against it and you

refuse to actually check facts before saying something stupid.

http://www.aztec-history.com/aztec-farming.html

Aztec's had an awesome farming system. No they didn't have tractors and

monoculture but WOW floating islands built out of reeds to farm in the

marshy areas with complex dams, aquaducts, and gates... Sounds awfully

advanced to me. The Chinese, by the way, farm land that we in the US

wouldn't even consider for grazing.

I can't say that I agree with yin and yang as well but having healed

myself after being on the road to death with Lupus by use of a lot of

their pseudo science, I sure have to give them a bit of credit on the

medical side. Then their current poor farmers look a lot healthier than

a lot of people. And then cake.. oh, so you think they don't know how to

make something sweet.. I think your definition of " poor " is twisted

based on... once again Western Culture. In the US we are utterly spoiled

and if something bad happens most people wouldn't have a clue how to

take care of themselves and would starve. All those " rich " people who

live in the modern houses don't have a clue how to even grow vegetables

let alone prepare food from real things and not out of a box.

But now I wait for your response that is based on your opinion and

limited knowledge of cultures.. however, don't expect me to respond

again unless you actually research it this time.

Holt wrote:

>

>

> I know enough to say it appears that countries that are currently

> behind also happen to be eating dogs. Aztecs may have had some

> advanced skills, but as a whole culture and even the way the

> government was ran was primitive. Especially in their agriculture

> they were way behind.

>

> Now I don't know much about China when it had a benevolent soveriegn.

> I don't buy alot of this yin yang crap. There is some truth to it but

> a lot of it sounds like a lot of pseudo science. I won't argue with

> Taoism or acupuncture, but what I've read of the yin and yang to food

> I don't buy. Modern China is given way too much credit. If there

> citizens have better health than ours it's because they're too poor to

> afford cake and their into traditional cooking which tends to be much

> healthier than our fast food society. Their healthcare system is

> probably a joke so they have to be more conscious of taking care of

> themselves.

>

>

>

> > I wonder what age of the Chinese you are talking about.� In recent

> times they are one of the biggest examples of what can go wrong with a

> country.� Huge population of poor, over populated, oppressive

> government, polution, waste, far worse in that category than America

> or any other country.� Behind in every way.� Perhaps they did have

> one of the most advanced Governments centuries if not millenia ago,

> but not in recent times.� Not knowing my history too well I'll guess

> either it's the poor that eat dogs or it is the modern inferior

> government officials that eat it.

>

> >

>

> > Aztecs may have had interesting particularly advanced skills, but as

> a whole culture they were very primitive.� Unlike some Native Indian

> cultures I can't say there is any personal attributes of an aztec

> individual I would admire in particular.� In my opinion they are a

> terrible example of a culture at that, where there are the people at

> top who get all the meat while most of the population lived

> meagerly.� I would not want to be an aztec living in those days.

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So based on her super-secret research, we should avoid it, but it is too

impolitic to bring up. Scientific research is not alchemy--if it exists, you can

find it. She is basically reporting hearsay, complete with vague,

pseudoscientific references to unpublished studies and blood chemistry. You

can't get to truth by agglomerating random bits of information.

Bill

>

> Apparently she doesn't want to go into further detail with the research

because it will open up too much debate with the people that farm pigs in the

WAPF community.� It's wise that she does recommend to avoid it if you are sick

or healing.� Pigs are an essential part to the American diet and they do

contain good health benefits like being easier to digest than other meats and

the fat behind high in vitamin D in pastured pig.� People love bacon, pork

chops, and sausage.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually I just researched that one myself (because I knew they had done

amazing things I just didn't realize how amazing), it's staggering what

some cultures achieve! Especially in farming places modern farmers

wouldn't even consider. It's really mind boggling!

Bill wrote:

>

>

> Don't let facts stand in your way. You don't know enough to know that

> correlation does not equal causation. No doubt it is all the dog

> eating that's been holding them back. (!) Not to belabor the point,

> but China is doing much better in the global economy than we are--they

> are the rising power, we are the declining power; we buy their crap,

> they don't buy our crap; we owe them money, they don't owe us money.

>

> A simple internet search will bring up evidence of Aztec innovations

> in agriculture, as must be true of any classic " civilization " (might

> want to google that, too). Who exactly were they way behind?

>

> Bill

>

>

> >

> > I know enough to say it appears that countries that are currently

> behind also happen to be eating dogs.� Aztecs may have had some

> advanced skills, but as a whole culture and even the way the

> government was ran was primitive.� Especially in their agriculture

> they were way behind.

> >

> > Now I don't know much about China when it had a benevolent

> soveriegn.� I don't buy alot of this yin yang crap.� There is some

> truth to it but a lot of it sounds like a lot of pseudo science.� I

> won't argue with Taoism or acupuncture, but what I've read of the yin

> and yang to food I don't buy.� Modern China is given way too much

> credit.� If there citizens have better health than ours it's because

> they're too poor to afford cake and their into traditional cooking

> which tends to be much healthier than our fast food society.� Their

> healthcare system is probably a joke so they have to be more conscious

> of taking care of themselves.

> >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's something I found right away on the aztecs

http://books.google.com/books?id=qZNdwX8O9DUC & pg=PA65 & lpg=PA65 & dq=Aztecs+had+poo\

r+agriculture & source=bl & ots=ZWPy0-0nvw & sig=5fs8rPd9rLFHwiIBJfGhP3Bp7Kk & hl=en & ei=\

Mx7CSrzJK4PWtgPwmu3JAg & sa=X & oi=book_result & ct=result & resnum=1#v=onepage & q=Aztecs\

%20had%20poor%20agriculture & f=false

China sells low quality products and undercuts us.  They're rising by force in a

very negative way.  You can do that but you sap your people and countries around

you in the long run.

From: Bill <lynchwt@...>

Subject: Re: Reason why pigs pigs aren't the healthiest meat to eat.

Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 7:16 AM

 

Don't let facts stand in your way. You don't know enough to

know that correlation does not equal causation. No doubt it is all the dog

eating that's been holding them back. (!) Not to belabor the point, but China is

doing much better in the global economy than we are--they are the rising power,

we are the declining power; we buy their crap, they don't buy our crap; we owe

them money, they don't owe us money.

A simple internet search will bring up evidence of Aztec innovations in

agriculture, as must be true of any classic " civilization " (might want to google

that, too). Who exactly were they way behind?

Bill

--- In , Holt <danthemanholt@ ...>

wrote:

>

> I know enough to say it appears that countries that are currently behind also

happen to be eating dogs.� Aztecs may have had some advanced skills, but as a

whole culture and even the way the government was ran was primitive.�

Especially in their agriculture they were way behind.

>

> Now I don't know much about China when it had a benevolent soveriegn.� I

don't buy alot of this yin yang crap.� There is some truth to it but a lot of

it sounds like a lot of pseudo science.� I won't argue with Taoism or

acupuncture, but what I've read of the yin and yang to food I don't buy.�

Modern China is given way too much credit.� If there citizens have better

health than ours it's because they're too poor to afford cake and their into

traditional cooking which tends to be much healthier than our fast food

society.� Their healthcare system is probably a joke so they have to be more

conscious of taking care of themselves.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a good article:

http://nohorsesarehorriblepeople.blogspot.com/2008/03/collapse-of-great-civilisa\

tion.html

Their advanced techniques probably came from their ancestors of Atlantis, but

that is debatable.

China in 2007

http://walmartwatch.com/img/blog/imported_food_safety.pdf

Here's a positive article about them:

http://english.cri.cn/6909/2009/08/26/1321s511320.htm

>

> > I wonder what age of the Chinese you are talking about.� In recent

> times they are one of the biggest examples of what can go wrong with a

> country.� Huge population of poor, over populated, oppressive

> government, polution, waste, far worse in that category than America

> or any other country.� Behind in every way.� Perhaps they did have

> one of the most advanced Governments centuries if not millenia ago,

> but not in recent times.� Not knowing my history too well I'll guess

> either it's the poor that eat dogs or it is the modern inferior

> government officials that eat it.

>

> >

>

> > Aztecs may have had interesting particularly advanced skills, but as

> a whole culture they were very primitive.� Unlike some Native Indian

> cultures I can't say there is any personal attributes of an aztec

> individual I would admire in particular.� In my opinion they are a

> terrible example of a culture at that, where there are the people at

> top who get all the meat while most of the population lived

> meagerly.� I would not want to be an aztec living in those days.

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you actually read it? Or take it out of context. I read it. Sounds

like they experience exactly what we are experiencing here; you're only

reading about the end of their civilization at this point in the book.

The only difference being we import food from other countries when we're

short. They didn't have that option when their population exceeded their

production. Mmmm... read read read.... at least you gave something this

time. And on your next email, again, only looking at the end of their

civilization.

Yes, on China, however, they are very powerful. They just have to tell

us no and our own economy will crash. Do not underestimate them.

Holt wrote:

>

>

> Here's something I found right away on the aztecs

>

>

http://books.google.com/books?id=qZNdwX8O9DUC & pg=PA65 & lpg=PA65 & dq=Aztecs+had+poo\

r+agriculture & source=bl & ots=ZWPy0-0nvw & sig=5fs8rPd9rLFHwiIBJfGhP3Bp7Kk & hl=en & ei=\

Mx7CSrzJK4PWtgPwmu3JAg & sa=X & oi=book_result & ct=result & resnum=1#v=onepage & q=Aztecs\

%20had%20poor%20agriculture & f=false

>

<http://books.google.com/books?id=qZNdwX8O9DUC & pg=PA65 & lpg=PA65 & dq=Aztecs+had+po\

or+agriculture & source=bl & ots=ZWPy0-0nvw & sig=5fs8rPd9rLFHwiIBJfGhP3Bp7Kk & hl=en & ei\

=Mx7CSrzJK4PWtgPwmu3JAg & sa=X & oi=book_result & ct=result & resnum=1#v=onepage & q=Aztec\

s%20had%20poor%20agriculture & f=false>

>

> China sells low quality products and undercuts us. They're rising by

> force in a very negative way. You can do that but you sap your people

> and countries around you in the long run.

>

>

>

> From: Bill <lynchwt@... <mailto:lynchwt%40gmail.com>>

> Subject: Re: Reason why pigs pigs aren't the healthiest meat to eat.

>

> <mailto: %40>

> Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 7:16 AM

>

>

>

> Don't let facts stand in your way. You don't know enough to know that

> correlation does not equal causation. No doubt it is all the dog

> eating that's been holding them back. (!) Not to belabor the point,

> but China is doing much better in the global economy than we are--they

> are the rising power, we are the declining power; we buy their crap,

> they don't buy our crap; we owe them money, they don't owe us money.

>

> A simple internet search will bring up evidence of Aztec innovations

> in agriculture, as must be true of any classic " civilization " (might

> want to google that, too). Who exactly were they way behind?

>

> Bill

>

>

>

> >

>

> > I know enough to say it appears that countries that are currently

> behind also happen to be eating dogs.� Aztecs may have had some

> advanced skills, but as a whole culture and even the way the

> government was ran was primitive.� Especially in their agriculture

> they were way behind.

>

> >

>

> > Now I don't know much about China when it had a benevolent

> soveriegn.� I don't buy alot of this yin yang crap.� There is some

> truth to it but a lot of it sounds like a lot of pseudo science.� I

> won't argue with Taoism or acupuncture, but what I've read of the yin

> and yang to food I don't buy.� Modern China is given way too much

> credit.� If there citizens have better health than ours it's because

> they're too poor to afford cake and their into traditional cooking

> which tends to be much healthier than our fast food society.� Their

> healthcare system is probably a joke so they have to be more conscious

> of taking care of themselves.

>

> >

>

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. I have no idea what " serious changes " is supposed to mean. I

thought the ambiguity of this passage was clear so didn't comment on

it. ;-) This reminds me of " evidence " against dietary fat put forth

by Pritikin in one of his books 20 years ago that higher levels

of fat in the blood right after eating meat showed how dangerous it

was to eat meat. I thought, isn't the bloodstream the way for

transporting nutrients around the body? That's like saying that

(temporary) increased waist circumference right after eating is proof

that eating makes you fat.

I am also grateful to Sally for all her scholarship and this may just

be one detail in the massive work of NT that she didn't follow through

on sufficiently. I'm satisfied that pork has been eaten safely by a

number of healthy traditional societies, and if pork fat is safe and

healthful, it stands to reason pork meat is, too. After all, we're

told that fat is where " toxins " would be stored and concentrated, not

in muscle tissue.

Jeanmarie

On Sep 29, 2009, at 6:39 AM, Bill wrote:

> I'm very grateful for Sally Fallon's work in bringing together

> information about the value of traditional diets. Her comments on

> pork do not make a lot of sense here. " Serious changes " in blood

> chemistry?--what does that even mean? Can you just look at blood

> under a microscope and see " serious changes " and know that they are

> bad? Are cancer researchers putting pork into their petri dishes to

> grow cancer cells? For real? I wish there was a lot less of this

> kind of bizarre, unsubstantiated rumor-mongering and posting of

> random internet conspiracy theories in the traditional foods

> community.

> Bill

>

>

> >

> > Sally doesn't say that much about pork in NT, and I could find no

> pork

> > recipes in the index. However, she sings the praises of lard. On

> pork,

> > from page 32 of the introduction, she says:

> >

> > <snip>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Sep 29, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Holt wrote:

> Apparently she doesn't want to go into further detail with the

> research because it will open up too much debate with the people

> that farm pigs in the WAPF community.

>

That's a real logical leap. What makes you sure you know why she

didn't go into further detail? Maybe she didn't have further

definitive information at the time.

> It's wise that she does recommend to avoid it if you are sick or

> healing.

>

> .

>

When did she say to avoid pork if one is sick or healing?

Jeanmarie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha! Yes, we know you can google. You turned this up by googling " Aztecs had poor

agriculture " --it says it right there on your link. Talk about confirmation bias!

Of course, your source doesn't support your idea--it just mentions poor harvests

during the civilization's final century.

CAPITALISM sells low quality goods and peripheral areas set up production that

undercuts core areas. That is the nature of capitalism, not a moral flaw of the

Chinese. They are selling it to us--we want it, we don't want expensive, quality

goods. The market speaks. The sheer arrogance of blaming one modernizing country

for the ills of the world is stunning. The Chinese, like us, are part of a

global system. To understand a system, you don't take apart its parts,

especially not with lazy cultural stereotypes.

Bill

>

> Here's something I found right away on the aztecs

>

>

http://books.google.com/books?id=qZNdwX8O9DUC & pg=PA65 & lpg=PA65 & dq=Aztecs+had+poo\

r+agriculture & source=bl & ots=ZWPy0-0nvw & sig=5fs8rPd9rLFHwiIBJfGhP3Bp7Kk & hl=en & ei=\

Mx7CSrzJK4PWtgPwmu3JAg & sa=X & oi=book_result & ct=result & resnum=1#v=onepage & q=Aztecs\

%20had%20poor%20agriculture & f=false

>

> China sells low quality products and undercuts us.� They're rising by force

in a very negative way.� You can do that but you sap your people and countries

around you in the long run.

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atlantis? Are you messing with us now? Is this a put on? No one is recommending

eating food from China--the country is an environmental disaster area. But this

is not because of some moral deficiency or backwardness on the part of the

Chinese, but because the most advanced companies of the West have located

production there.

Bill

>

> Here's a good article:

>

>

http://nohorsesarehorriblepeople.blogspot.com/2008/03/collapse-of-great-civilisa\

tion.html

>

> Their advanced techniques probably came from their ancestors of Atlantis, but

that is debatable.

>

> China in 2007

>

> http://walmartwatch.com/img/blog/imported_food_safety.pdf

>

> Here's a positive article about them:

>

> http://english.cri.cn/6909/2009/08/26/1321s511320.htm

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" CAPITALISM sells low quality goods and peripheral areas set up production that

undercuts core areas. That is the nature of capitalism, . . "

I just couldn't let this pass.  " Capitalism sells low quality goods. . " ? 

Capitalism sets the stage for the production of both low quality and high

quality goods and lets the buyer decide.  Some cannot afford the higher quality

goods so there is an alternative for them.  There have been societies where low

quality goods were/are the norm.  Can anyone remember the former Soviet Union? 

There was little incentive to produce high quality goods.  Why do you think

people fled in droves with the demise of the Soviet Union and the felling of the

Berlin Wall?

You would rather have socialism?  I just watched Farenheit 451 the other night

and there was a sentence which really stood out.  The premise of the story is

that reading is bad as it makes some people sad, other dissatisfied, etc.  So .

.. . just do away with  books so that everyone can be equal as anything else is

just not fair.  This is a 1966 movie but sort of eerily predicts our present day

- everyone the same and kept that way by meaningless entertainment (lg flat

screen TV's which they had in the movie) and drugs (to keep you from being

unhappy). 

Sorry, I got carried away.

Lynda

Messages in this topic (60) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

Messages | Database | Polls | Members

Change settings via the Web ( ID required)

Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to

Traditional

Visit Your Group | Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

Recent Activity

 11

New MembersVisit Your Group

Give Back

for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> > The pig or swine is a very popular food item with most Christians. Yet

Christians

> > are unaware that the God they profess to believe in had condemned the

eating

First of all, the laws that applied to the Jews were not followed by the

christians who were the early founders. “let no man judge you in eating and

drinking or in respect of a feast day or of an observance of the new moon or of

a sabbath, for those things are a shadow of the things to come, but the reality

belongs to the Christ "

Also " And no one puts new wine into old wineskins; otherwise the new wine will

burst the skins and will be spilled, and the skins will be destroyed. But new

wine must be put into fresh wineskins. And no one after drinking old wine

desires new wine, but says, “The old is good.â€

I know many, many jewish people, my jewish friends call me a jew b/c I am very

interested in religions and have learned a lot about jewish practices and have

been to sabbath dinners and passover seders, bar mitzvahs, you name it. If you

ask a religious jewish person about any of the things they abstain from,

tattoos, pork, etc. they don't come up with a biological reason, they

specifically steer away from that. They do the things they do b/c God set them

aside as chosen, they don't try to figure it out and are totally uninterested in

a conversation as to the why.

> > A pig is a real garbage gut. It will eat anything including urine,

excrement,

> > dirt, decaying animal flesh, maggots, or decaying vegetables. They will

even

> > eat the cancerous growths off other pigs or animals.

When any animal is hungry, they will eat anything.Pets, who are at the residence

of someone elderly who is their caretaker who then dies, are known to be fed off

by their pets until the body is discovered. Chickens also will eat just about

anything. I have seen them eat paper towels.

> > The meat and fat of a pig absorbs toxins like a sponge. Their meat can

be

> > 30 times more toxic than beef or venison.

Thirty times more toxic than beef or venison? This first makes the implication

that these animals are toxic at all. What types of animals are they comparing?

stockyard cows to stockyard pigs or naturally farm raised cows and pigs?

> > Unlike other mammals, a pig does not sweat or perspire. Perspiration is

a

> > means by which toxins are removed from the body. Since a pig does not

sweat,

> > the toxins remain within its body and in the meat.

Obviously there is toxin coping mechanism in pigs, actually their's is probably

better than any other animal's if they can handle all the toxins and diseases

people condemn them for, and still run round without being extinct as a species.

But it seems all farm animals are susceptible to many diseases.

> > Farmers will often pen up pigs within a rattlesnake nest because the

pigs

> > will eat the snakes, and if bitten they will not be harmed by the venom.

This practice is in no way an argument against consuming pork.

> > Pig meat has twice as much fat as beef. A 3 oz T bone steak contains 8.5

grams

> > of fat; a 3 oz pork chop contains 18 grams of fat. A 3 oz beef rib has

11.1

> > grams of fat; a 3 oz pork spare rib has 23.2 grams of fat.

Okay a pig has a lot of fat, since when do weston pricers condemn an animal for

having fat? Isn't it's high sat. fat content that makes it stable under high

heat?

> > The swine carries about 30 diseases which can be easily passed to

humans.

> > This is why God commanded that we are not even to touch their carcase

(Leviticus

> > 11:8).

When this was written, a menstruating woman was considered unclean.

> > The pig is so poisonous and filthy, that nature had to prepare him a

sewer

> > line or canal running down each leg with an outlet in the bottom of the

foot.

> > Out of this hole oozes pus and filth his body cannot pass into its

system

> > fast enough. Some of this pus gets into the meat of the pig.

How, how does the pus get into the meat of the pig? How is the pus in the meat

measured? What's the name of any institutions or veterinarians that measured and

documented this pus?

My father who is a veterinarian never heard of this canal where pus runs out and

actually used the words " that's bullsh%$ "

> > There are

> > other reasons grounded in biological facts that could be listed to show

why

> > pigs and swine should not be eaten. But a true Christian should only need

one

> > reason why not to eat this type of food because God prohibited it.

> > " And

> > the swine, because it divides the hoof, yet does not chew the cud, it is

unclean

> > unto you: you shall not eat of their flesh, nor touch their dead carcase. "

I want scientific reasons and observable realities for why not chewing the cud

makes an animal unfit for human consumption.

> > - Leviticus 11:7,8; Deuteronomy 14:8

> > Those who

> > say Christ abolished the law condemning pork are motivated by their

stomach

> > not Scripture. The problems with pork are biological, and Christ never

changed

> > the laws of biology.

If I am not mistaken it was 's vision that lifted the pork ban, I don't

think Christ addressed the issue. If anything he let the demons go into a pig

herd which then destroyed themselves. Which is why it's not reasonable to take a

book that includes the practice of two different religions and try to delve

suggestions of how we should eat from it. It's almost 2010, I want to know hard

scientific evidence of why pastured, natural pigs are inherently bad for humans,

like, say, eating too much puffer fish gonads b/c they contains tetrodotoxins.

Or if the animals are going to be condemned b/c they are stockyard, then make

that distinction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No, I'm serious.  Aztecs cultured may be linked to Atlantis.  Atlantis was

real.  I'm not sure how accurate the historical Atlantis is to what stories may

have been told about it.  At it's time it was the most advanced culture.

I foregot the guys name but there is a book written about it.

<<<Atlantis? Are you messing with us now?>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<<<So faced with this conflicting information, I have listed

pork as a food that is fine for people that are healthy, but those dealing with

serious illness may want to avoid it.  Sally>>>>

> Apparently she doesn't want to go into further detail with the

> research because it will open up too much debate with the people

> that farm pigs in the WAPF community.

>

That's a real logical leap. What makes you sure you know why she

didn't go into further detail? Maybe she didn't have further

definitive information at the time.

> It's wise that she does recommend to avoid it if you are sick or

> healing.

>

> .

>

When did she say to avoid pork if one is sick or healing?

Jeanmarie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh. there was a book written about it! We should then accept this as fact

without further evidence.

Re: Re: Reason why pigs pigs aren't the healthiest meat to eat.

 

 

No, I'm serious.  Aztecs cultured may be linked to Atlantis.  Atlantis was

real.  I'm not sure how accurate the historical Atlantis is to what stories may

have been told about it.  At it's time it was the most advanced culture.

I foregot the guys name but there is a book written about it.

<<<Atlantis? Are you messing with us now?>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks & field-keywords=F\

rank+ph & x=13 & y=21

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantis

From: Ancient Eyeball Recipe <implode7@...>

Subject: Re: Re: Reason why pigs pigs aren't the healthiest meat to eat.

Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 10:07 AM

 

Oh. there was a book written about it! We should then accept

this as fact without further evidence.

Re: Re: Reason why pigs pigs aren't the healthiest meat to eat.

 

 

No, I'm serious.  Aztecs cultured may be linked to Atlantis.  Atlantis was

real.  I'm not sure how accurate the historical Atlantis is to what stories may

have been told about it.  At it's time it was the most advanced culture.

I foregot the guys name but there is a book written about it.

<<<Atlantis? Are you messing with us now?>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh. Now you've convinced me.

Re: Re: Reason why pigs pigs aren't the healthiest meat to eat.

 

 

No, I'm serious.  Aztecs cultured may be linked to Atlantis.  Atlantis was

real.  I'm not sure how accurate the historical Atlantis is to what stories may

have been told about it.  At it's time it was the most advanced culture.

I foregot the guys name but there is a book written about it.

<<<Atlantis? Are you messing with us now?>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, and those Atlantins didn't like the pig either.

From: Ancient Eyeball Recipe < implode7comcast (DOT) net >

Subject: Re: Re: Reason why pigs pigs aren't the healthiest meat to eat.

Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 10:07 AM

 

Oh. there was a book written about it! We should then accept this as fact

without further evidence.

Re: Re: Reason why pigs pigs aren't the healthiest meat to eat.

 

 

No, I'm serious.  Aztecs cultured may be linked to Atlantis.  Atlantis was

real.  I'm not sure how accurate the historical Atlantis is to what stories may

have been told about it.  At it's time it was the most advanced culture.

I foregot the guys name but there is a book written about it.

<<<Atlantis? Are you messing with us now?>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This does not go toward ~eating~ pork, but recently they've discovered that, of

all the germs that kids can get exposed to that seem to help ensure they ~don't~

get asthma (and other autoimmune problems, I wonder?), is a germ that by far is

most prevalent on pigs and their feces. And sure enough, children who grew up

with pigs get asthma much, much, much less than those who don't.

Tim

Berkeley

PS - chili peppers, tomatoes, chocolate, avocadoes -- if I'm not mistaken these

are all domesticated products given to us by the Aztecs and their predecessors.

I call that pretty advanced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, whatever credibility you may have had before, you've

demolished by now. Enough, already. A lot of nice people have taken

your ludicrous post on pigs seriously enough to debunk your claims

thoroughly, yet you just keep dishing up more myths, legends and

prejudices that you try to disguise as science. If your personal

religious belief forbids you from eating the meat of pigs, so be it,

but most of us are interested in real science and real evidence for

our decisions on what to eat. At least that's how I interpret the

majority of posts from the majority of people on this list. I'm just

gonna use my delete button without bothering to respond from now on.

Jeanmarie

On Sep 29, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Holt wrote:

>

>

>

> No, I'm serious. Aztecs cultured may be linked to Atlantis.

> Atlantis was real. I'm not sure how accurate the historical

> Atlantis is to what stories may have been told about it. At it's

> time it was the most advanced culture.

>

> I foregot the guys name but there is a book written about it.

>

> <<<Atlantis? Are you messing with us now?>>>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and what Atlantis ~really~ was:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0618610189/ref=s9_simz_gw_s0_p14_t1?pf_\

rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER & pf_rd_s=center-2 & pf_rd_r=04DSNYD0AY0Z0F87FJDC & pf_rd_t\

=101 & pf_rd_p=470938631 & pf_rd_i=507846

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0618610189/ref=s9_simz_gw_s0_p14_t1?pf\

_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER & pf_rd_s=center-2 & pf_rd_r=04DSNYD0AY0Z0F87FJDC & pf_rd_\

t=101 & pf_rd_p=470938631 & pf_rd_i=507846>

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0618610189/ref=s9_simz_gw_s0_p14_t1?pf\

_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER & pf_rd_s=center-2 & pf_rd_r=04DSNYD0AY0Z0F87FJDC & pf_rd_\

t=101 & pf_rd_p=470938631 & pf_rd_i=507846>

Tim, Berkeley

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0618610189/ref=s9_simz_gw_s0_p14_t1?pf\

_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER & pf_rd_s=center-2 & pf_rd_r=04DSNYD0AY0Z0F87FJDC & pf_rd_\

t=101 & pf_rd_p=470938631 & pf_rd_i=507846>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill,

I am also curious about how many people were tested and found to have these

serious changes? And what kind of changes are they? For someone with

health problems like mine perhaps the changes would help me heal? What

ethnic group did these people comprise? Were they from cultures that didn't

eat much pork? What about all the cultures that hunted wild boar?

And as someone mentioned what kind of pork was studied? Organic doesn't

mean much. If someone did it on truly pastured pork that would be a step in

the right direction.

Dawn

From:

[mailto: ] On Behalf Of Bill

Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:40 AM

Subject: Re: Reason why pigs pigs aren't the healthiest meat to eat.

I'm very grateful for Sally Fallon's work in bringing together information

about the value of traditional diets. Her comments on pork do not make a lot

of sense here. " Serious changes " in blood chemistry?--what does that even

mean? Can you just look at blood under a microscope and see " serious

changes " and know that they are bad? Are cancer researchers putting pork

into their petri dishes to grow cancer cells? For real? I wish there was a

lot less of this kind of bizarre, unsubstantiated rumor-mongering and

posting of random internet conspiracy theories in the traditional foods

community.

Bill

>

> > I think Sally also writes in Nourishing Traditions that one

> > shouldn't eat pork. However, the reasons she gives are the same that

> > I've read on vegan websites and they didn't convince me. Pigs

> > certainly have been a part of healthy peoples' traditional diets,

> > for example in Okinawa they've been a staple food as far as I know.

> > ___

> >

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pork is ok to eat according to Sally's later book Eat Fat Lose Fat. she said

once that the reason she left pork recipes out of NT was because of her

co-author Enig, who is Jewish. apparently, she convinced her that is was ok

to include them in EFLF.

>

> > Apparently she doesn't want to go into further detail with the

> > research because it will open up too much debate with the people

> > that farm pigs in the WAPF community.

> >

>

>

>

> That's a real logical leap. What makes you sure you know why she

> didn't go into further detail? Maybe she didn't have further

> definitive information at the time.

>

> > It's wise that she does recommend to avoid it if you are sick or

> > healing.

> >

>

> > .

> >

>

> When did she say to avoid pork if one is sick or healing?

> Jeanmarie

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here's where she says to avoid if sick

http://onibasu.com/archives/cl/24871.html

>

> > Apparently she doesn't want to go into further detail with the

> > research because it will open up too much debate with the people

> > that farm pigs in the WAPF community.

> >

>

>

>

> That's a real logical leap. What makes you sure you know why she

> didn't go into further detail? Maybe she didn't have further

> definitive information at the time.

>

> > It's wise that she does recommend to avoid it if you are sick or

> > healing.

> >

>

> > .

> >

>

> When did she say to avoid pork if one is sick or healing?

> Jeanmarie

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...