Guest guest Posted July 28, 2004 Report Share Posted July 28, 2004 As far as the accuracy of a scan goes, when Hannah was digitized, they talked about the resolution of the cameras being very important. The higher the resolution the better the quaility. Especially if you look at Hannah's face in her digitzer pic (in her folder) you can really see that her facial features are definitely not as defined as they would be w/an actual cast (not that they cast the face, lol, but for the sake of an example!). If you've ever done a plaster mold of your baby's hand or foot from one of those kits it's amazing--you can even see the wrinkles in baby's skin! I'm sure a computer could never generate something so exact. CT is working on making their digitzers that they will actually use in clinics with much higher resolution cameras than was used on Hannah to help capture these smaller detais, like suture ridges in heads and parts of the ears. You could defnitely see where Hannah's ears are in the scan we had done, but you don't have that level of fine detail. Another thing they do to help improve the accuracy is overlaying a few scans to be sure the scan doesn't miss any small areas, like the tip of the nose or something. There would be a magin of error in both methods really, but as long as the cast is done correctly (allowed to dry long enough, etc)I should think it would certainly the most accurate possible. However, I do think scanning will be the wave of the future for sure b/c it allows you to look at the facial features as well. , mom to Hannah, DOCgrad tomorrow! Cape Cod, Ma > > > > >> Hi Florida Parents! > > >> > > >> I just wanted to let you know that there are 2 Starscanners in > the > > > State of Florida. There is > > >> one in Miami and one in Orlando. I go to the Orthotist in > Orlando, > > > Steve . He says he > > >> will scan babies heads in the Starband for $75.00 a visit. It > is a > > > GREAT way to see the > > >> before and after results of the helmet therapy. > > >> > > >> My son, goes to an Orthotist in Tampa. In the beginning of > > > 's treatment, we > > >> went to Steve in Orlando for the scan of 's head. We just > went > > > to Orlando yesterday > > >> for a 3 month scan check of 's head. I cannot believe the > > > difference in the human > > >> measurement vs. the Starscanner measurement! The scanner > results > > > show in detail the > > >> amount of growth has had in the helmet! It was amazing to > > > see the comparison > > >> photos of the before and now of 's head. The scanner is 2 > > > seconds and the child > > >> doesn't have ANY stress! It is a piece of cake. > > >> > > >> I just wanted to share this information to the Florda parents > who > > > would like to do this > > >> Starscanner. The Starscanner results is wonderful to have for > your > > > own records, it gives > > >> piece of mind that the helmet is literally working, and the > $75.00 > > > is reasonable because > > >> you get the exact measurements! (I don't know if insurance > would > > > be billed or not) > > >> > > >> Just wanted to share! > > >> > > >> P.S. If anyone needs Steve 's information- just email me! I > > > also have photos of the > > >> Starscanner in ph's photo album, if you would like to > > > check it out! > > >> > > >> Krissy > > >> ph's mom > > >> Starband 4/28/04 > > >> Palm Harbor, FL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For more plagio info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.