Guest guest Posted October 14, 2008 Report Share Posted October 14, 2008 The RAC program is coming to a state year you . . . of particular concern to me personally is North Carolina (proposed start January 1st 2009 and retro-dated to October 2007). Working in an outpatient setting, of particular concern is (as I read it) the fact that the report found that some of the highest overpayments of the nearly 700million identified, were related to insufficient documentation for therex and manual therapy (read as EEEEK!). Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place, but I am not seeing or hearing much from the state association or the APTA on the subject beyond " be prepared, " and hear a lot of very different approaches from a variety of therapists at different clinics regard what they are (or are not) doing to prepare. I don't mean to be alarmist (but among those PT's aware, fear is in the air), but this has the potential to impact the profession in a more dramatic way than managed care, the balanced budget amendment, or therapy caps. Specifically, I'd like to know how those PT's that have or are about to be impact by RACs, have obtained their information. What seminars/webinars would you recommend? Are therapists simply trusting the information they're getting from their employer? Is (and I'd hope not) this the first that most rank-and-file clinicians are hearing about the program? Also, what are we as a profession doing with respect to " beyond functional " goal writing, and " why were YOU as a skilled professional " needed for execution of the therapy session (as opposed to a trainer or HEP) explanations in the objective section of every note (e.g. using the buzzwords " facilitate " " inhibit " " verbal cue required " and " tactile cue required)? Given the potential impact that this may have on the profession, this seems to me to be something of an under-response. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated, Dr. M. Ball, PT, DPT, PhD, MBA Charlotte, NC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2008 Report Share Posted October 15, 2008 Dear Dr. Bell, Thank you for opening dialogue on this very alarming and critical matter. I am also not hearing much or reading much regarding the Recovery Audit Contract (RAC) Program from the state association or the APTA on this subject matter either (we are in Louisiana). However, you can hear a great deal more about this and other Medicare and Medicaid audit programs (Comprehensive Error Rate Testing-CERT-Program) by attending a Healthcare Financial Management Association Conference. Most states have a local chapter of the HFMA you can join. You can also read about this and similar programs by visiting their website at _http://www.hmfa.org_ (http://www.hmfa.org) . Additionally, this information can be found by visiting the CMS website at _http://cms.gov_ (http://cms.gov) . In short, both the RAC Program and CERT Program have been enormously successful. As a result of the tens of millions of dollars of fraudulent/abusive billing uncovered by MACs (Medicare Administrative Contractors) over the past two years alone, CMS and HHS now have the resources they need to ramp up their efforts. Prior to this time, CMS, HHS and OIG was limited to focusing their efforts on the " big " or " high dollar " offenders, e.g., hospitals, DME Suppliers, home health agencies, large group practices, etc. That time has come and gone. Now CMS and HHS have the resources to focus on all healthcare providers and suppliers, big and small. In the past, it took CMS, HHS, OIG months and months to gather all the data it required to investigate and prosecute cases of fraud and abuse. Those days are gone. CMS, HHS and OIG have partnered with the CIA. Highly sophisticated software programs developed by the CIA to track terrorist activity are now being used by CMS and HHS to track specific billing and upcoding patterns or " spikes " in real time. This software also allows CMS and HHS to combine Medicare and Medicaid claims data--a problem CMS, HHS and OIG considered when implementing these new programs. Prior to this time, Medicare claim data and Medicaid claim data were not stored on the same database. According, Dr. Joe Schmoe could be billing Medicare for 40 visits per day, and billing Medicaid for 40 visits a day during the same 8 hour workday without ever raising a " red flag. " Combining Medicare and Medicaid claim data will now allow CMS and HHS to more effectively track fraudulent and abusive billing practices before they get out of hand. I too, do not want to come across as an alarmist. However, when CMS and HHS is reduced to using software developed by the CIA to track terrorist activity in order to track and curtail rampant Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse, we should all be alarmed. If your practice does not have a Corporate Compliance Plan in place, hire an attorney or consultant to create one for your practice and ensure that you have appointed a Compliance Officer to oversee and implement these policies and procedures. If your practice therapists and billing staff members have not recently attended a Medicare and/or Medicaid sponsored coding, billing and documentation workshop that specifically addresses previous and upcoming changes being implemented by CMS and HHS, find one and send them. And finally, document, document, document! Documentation to support medical necessity, as well as level of service charge is the area that CMS will focus their attention on in 2009, as this has been proven to be a problematic area for outpatient therapy and rehab. As always, wishing you all the best of luck and prosperity in the future. Vickie D. Cavitt, President Medical Legal Alliance, L.L.C. 600 Guilbeau Road, Suite A Lafayette, LA 70506 In a message dated 10/14/2008 6:08:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time, DrDrewpt@... writes: The RAC program is coming to a state year you . . . of particular concern to me personally is North Carolina (proposed start January 1st 2009 and retro-dated to October 2007). Working in an outpatient setting, of particular concern is (as I read it) the fact that the report found that some of the highest overpayments of the nearly 700million identified, were related to insufficient documentation for therex and manual therapy (read as EEEEK!). Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place, but I am not seeing or hearing much from the state association or the APTA on the subject beyond " be prepared, " and hear a lot of very different approaches from a variety of therapists at different clinics regard what they are (or are not) doing to prepare. I don't mean to be alarmist (but among those PT's aware, fear is in the air), but this has the potential to impact the profession in a more dramatic way than managed care, the balanced budget amendment, or therapy caps. Specifically, I'd like to know how those PT's that have or are about to be impact by RACs, have obtained their information. What seminars/webinars would you recommend? Are therapists simply trusting the information they're getting from their employer? Is (and I'd hope not) this the first that most rank-and-file clinicians are hearing about the program? Also, what are we as a profession doing with respect to " beyond functional " goal writing, and " why were YOU as a skilled professional " needed for execution of the therapy session (as opposed to a trainer or HEP) explanations in the objective section of every note (e.g. using the buzzwords " facilitate " " inhibit " " verbal cue required " and " tactile cue required)? Given the potential impact that this may have on the profession, this seems to me to be something of an under-response. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated, Dr. M. Ball, PT, DPT, PhD, MBA Charlotte, NC [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] **************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination. Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out (http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000002) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2008 Report Share Posted October 15, 2008 APTA has been involved in commenting on the RAC demonstration project and has many resources on their website for members and non-members. I have pasted the link below for members of this list serv to access. You may need to copy and paste the link in your web browser. http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Denials_Audits_Appeals2 & Template=/Ta\ ggedPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm & TPLID=169 & ContentID=30163 Keep in mind 85% of all overpayments collected were from hospital inpatient services, which is separate from IRF which was 6.07%. Here is a link to the June 2008 RAC Report. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC/Downloads/RAC%20Evaluation%20Report.pdf Rick Gawenda, PT President Section on Health Policy & Administration APTA > > > I am also not hearing much or reading much regarding > the Recovery Audit > Contract (RAC) Program from the state association or > the APTA on this subject > matter either (we are in Louisiana). However, you > can hear a great deal more > about this and other Medicare and Medicaid audit > programs (Comprehensive Error > Rate Testing-CERT-Program) by attending a Healthcare > Financial Management > Association Conference. Most states have a local > chapter of the HFMA you can > join. You can also read about this and similar > programs by visiting their > website at _http://www.hmfa.org_ > (http://www.hmfa.org) . Additionally, this > information can be found by visiting the CMS website > at _http://cms.gov_ > (http://cms.gov) . > > In short, both the RAC Program and CERT Program have > been enormously > successful. As a result of the tens of millions of > dollars of fraudulent/abusive > billing uncovered by MACs (Medicare Administrative > Contractors) over the past > two years alone, CMS and HHS now have the resources > they need to ramp up their > efforts. Prior to this time, CMS, HHS and OIG was > limited to focusing > their efforts on the " big " or " high dollar " > offenders, e.g., hospitals, DME > Suppliers, home health agencies, large group > practices, etc. That time has come > and gone. Now CMS and HHS have the resources to > focus on all healthcare > providers and suppliers, big and small. > > In the past, it took CMS, HHS, OIG months and months > to gather all the data > it required to investigate and prosecute cases of > fraud and abuse. Those > days are gone. CMS, HHS and OIG have partnered with > the CIA. Highly > sophisticated software programs developed by the CIA > to track terrorist activity are > now being used by CMS and HHS to track specific > billing and upcoding patterns > or " spikes " in real time. This software also > allows CMS and HHS to combine > Medicare and Medicaid claims data--a problem CMS, > HHS and OIG considered when > implementing these new programs. > > Prior to this time, Medicare claim data and Medicaid > claim data were not > stored on the same database. According, Dr. Joe > Schmoe could be billing > Medicare for 40 visits per day, and billing Medicaid > for 40 visits a day during the > same 8 hour workday without ever raising a " red > flag. " Combining Medicare > and Medicaid claim data will now allow CMS and HHS > to more effectively track > fraudulent and abusive billing practices before they > get out of hand. > > I too, do not want to come across as an alarmist. > However, when CMS and HHS > is reduced to using software developed by the CIA to > track terrorist > activity in order to track and curtail rampant > Medicare and Medicaid fraud and > abuse, we should all be alarmed. > > If your practice does not have a Corporate > Compliance Plan in place, hire an > attorney or consultant to create one for your > practice and ensure that you > have appointed a Compliance Officer to oversee and > implement these policies > and procedures. > > If your practice therapists and billing staff > members have not recently > attended a Medicare and/or Medicaid sponsored > coding, billing and documentation > workshop that specifically addresses previous and > upcoming changes being > implemented by CMS and HHS, find one and send them. > > And finally, document, document, document! > Documentation to support medical > necessity, as well as level of service charge is the > area that CMS will > focus their attention on in 2009, as this has been > proven to be a problematic > area for outpatient therapy and rehab. > > As always, wishing you all the best of luck and > prosperity in the future. > > Vickie > > D. Cavitt, President > Medical Legal Alliance, L.L.C. > 600 Guilbeau Road, Suite A > Lafayette, LA 70506 > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 10/14/2008 6:08:06 P.M. Central > Daylight Time, > DrDrewpt@... writes: > > > > > The RAC program is coming to a state year you . . . > of particular concern to > me personally is North Carolina (proposed start > January 1st 2009 and > retro-dated to October 2007). Working in an > outpatient setting, of > particular concern is (as I read it) the fact that > the report found that > some of the highest overpayments of the nearly > 700million identified, were > related to insufficient documentation for therex and > manual therapy (read as > EEEEK!). Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place, but I > am not seeing or > hearing much from the state association or the APTA > on the subject beyond > " be prepared, " and hear a lot of very different > approaches from a variety of > therapists at different clinics regard what they are > (or are not) doing to > prepare. I don't mean to be alarmist (but among > those PT's aware, fear is > in the air), but this has the potential to impact > the profession in a more > dramatic way than managed care, the balanced budget > amendment, or therapy > caps. Specifically, I'd like to know how those PT's > that have or are about > to be impact by RACs, have obtained their > information. What > seminars/webinars would you recommend? Are > therapists simply trusting the > information they're getting from their employer? Is > (and I'd hope not) this > the first that most rank-and-file clinicians are > hearing about the program? > Also, what are we as a profession doing with > respect to " beyond functional " > goal writing, and " why were YOU as a skilled > professional " needed for > execution of the therapy session (as opposed to a > trainer or HEP) > explanations in the objective section of every note > (e.g. using the > buzzwords " facilitate " " inhibit " " verbal cue > required " and " tactile cue > required)? Given the potential impact that this may > have on the profession, > this seems to me to be something of an > under-response. > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated, > > Dr. M. Ball, PT, DPT, PhD, MBA > > Charlotte, NC > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > **************New MapQuest Local shows what's > happening at your destination. > Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out > (http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000002) > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > === message truncated === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2008 Report Share Posted October 15, 2008 Dear Dr. Ball, This may help you sleep better... The RAC program is coming to your state and physical therapy insufficient documentation is a serious issue but of the $992.7 million in overpayments collected from 2005 through March 2008 only $19.9 million came from 'Physician' provider types. Physical therapists are lumped in with physicians. Most of the RAC overpayments came from inpatient hospitals. Unfortunately, of the RAC overpayments appealed by providers, only 34.9% were decided in the providers' favor. Of the Medicare Claims Processing Contractors denied claims appealed by providers from 2005 to 2007, 59% were decided in the providers favor. The RAC program is a 'win' for Medicare (not a win-win, just a win). Total costs are $0.20 per dollar collected. Expect the permanent RAC program to go after the 'big' money - RAC contractors are paid based on collections - no collection, no pay. Also, overpayments overturned at any level of appeal will result in a forfeiture of the contingency fee by the RAC. Finally, RACs can only 'look back' three years, not four. My four year experience with the Florida RAC (HealthDataInsights) was a bit underwhelming. I paid back about $40 which was too small to appeal. My recommendation to every physical therapist would be to appeal - if you think you have a leg to stand on. Of course, your basis for an appeal would be your physical therapy notes and charts. Get the full RAC report here... http://www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC/Downloads/RAC_Demonstration_Evaluation_Report.pdf The updated report is here (net of appeals)... http://www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC/Downloads/Appealupdatethrough63008ofRACEvalRept.pdf Tim , PT timrichpt@... www.PhysicalTherapyDiagnosis.com > > The RAC program is coming to a state year you . . . of particular concern to > me personally is North Carolina (proposed start January 1st 2009 and > retro-dated to October 2007). Working in an outpatient setting, of > particular concern is (as I read it) the fact that the report found that > some of the highest overpayments of the nearly 700million identified, were > related to insufficient documentation for therex and manual therapy (read as > EEEEK!). Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place, but I am not seeing or > hearing much from the state association or the APTA on the subject beyond > " be prepared, " and hear a lot of very different approaches from a variety of > therapists at different clinics regard what they are (or are not) doing to > prepare. I don't mean to be alarmist (but among those PT's aware, fear is > in the air), but this has the potential to impact the profession in a more > dramatic way than managed care, the balanced budget amendment, or therapy > caps. Specifically, I'd like to know how those PT's that have or are about > to be impact by RACs, have obtained their information. What > seminars/webinars would you recommend? Are therapists simply trusting the > information they're getting from their employer? Is (and I'd hope not) this > the first that most rank-and-file clinicians are hearing about the program? > Also, what are we as a profession doing with respect to " beyond functional " > goal writing, and " why were YOU as a skilled professional " needed for > execution of the therapy session (as opposed to a trainer or HEP) > explanations in the objective section of every note (e.g. using the > buzzwords " facilitate " " inhibit " " verbal cue required " and " tactile cue > required)? Given the potential impact that this may have on the profession, > this seems to me to be something of an under-response. > > > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated, > > Dr. M. Ball, PT, DPT, PhD, MBA > > Charlotte, NC > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.