Guest guest Posted July 26, 2006 Report Posted July 26, 2006 Hi Vicki, I seem to recall running the company mentioned through a search engine when this was first posted. I seem to recall there were limited responses but one of them made me wonder if there was a heavy Anodyne type treatment focus. Dee Dee Daley, PT WorkWell Systems Southern Pines, NC Quote
Guest guest Posted July 26, 2006 Report Posted July 26, 2006 Good points Vicki. We once had a Focus Review Audit from our FI, Blue Cross of California where three people reviewing the files sat in front of us and one by one said, 1) This patient was not making progress after six visits and should have been discharged. 2) This patient was making good progress after six visits and should have been discharged. 3) This patient was in maintenance after six visits and should have been discharged. I asked the panel, " so we should never see anyone longer than six visits " ? They looked up from their piles of charts with a clueless look and asked, " where do you get that idea " . Our attorney sat in on the meeting and we won our appeal. From that point on, all chart notes were treated as a re-eval. All the best. Doug Doug Sparks Advanced Physical Therapy Concepts / APTC www.aptc.biz<http://www.aptc.biz/> doug@... Re: OIG Report Hi all What I find very troubling in the report is that none of the claims was substantiated. The largest portion of claims reportedly did not support being Medically reasonable and necessary. Maybe I'm an optimist, but I would hope that a portion of the claims would be found to be reasonable for coverage. I'm also concerned about the reviews being too black and white and that the human component of treatment is thrown into the garbage. The Medicare population is certainly not cut and dry and there are many times when their pace of recovery is slower than I believe Medicare likes to cover, or " significant recovery " is relative. I did not see a way of digging deeper into the claims reviewed to see what they were basing decisions on, but I would bet we would all see some of our past clients and circumstances mirrored there. I think we need to be very careful about condemning the therapists and figure out a way to find out a little more about the process and the reviewers. There are two sides to every story. I wish everyone a great day Vicki Vicki Tilley PT,GCS President ElderFit In Home Rehab, North Carolina (919) 644-6646 vicki@... www.elderfitpt.com<http://www.elderfitpt.com/> In a message dated 7/24/2006 9:36:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, DPT@... writes: Rick, I'd say a nearly $10million payback makes this a must read. Take note that the significant errors found resulting in recovery was for failure of documentation, including evidence the patient had visited their physician q30 days and the demonstration of medical necessity. , PT Therapeutics Quote
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2006 Report Posted August 25, 2006 OIG Report IG today posts three reports to the website. As always, selecting the link immediately following the report title will take you directly to the full document. Physical Therapy Billed by Physicians (OEI-09-02-00200) http://www.oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-09-02-00200.pdf OIG found that approximately 91 percent of physical therapy billed by physicians in the first 6 months of 2002 did not meet program requirements. These inappropriately paid services cost the program and its beneficiaries approximately $136 million. Because of inadequate documentation, reviewers had difficulty assessing the quality of the therapy services. In addition, we identified aberrances in physicians' billing patterns and unusually high volumes of claims that suggest physical therapy is vulnerable to abuse. Finally, physical therapy billed " incident to " physicians' professional services and rendered by unskilled and/or unlicensed personnel represent a vulnerability that could be placing beneficiaries at risk of receiving services that do not meet professionally recognized standards of care. To address these issues, we recommend CMS should consider revisions, clarifications, and further study of the " incident to " rule to ensure that Medicare beneficiaries are recei! ving skilled services from appropriately trained and licensed staff and that the services meet professionally recognized standards of care. Rick Gawenda, PT Director PM & R Detroit Receiving Hospital www.gawendaseminars.com HPA Government Affairs & Practice Committee __________________________________________________ Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.