Guest guest Posted March 16, 2006 Report Share Posted March 16, 2006 We are using Altapoint at 18 locations we have and have found it to be wonderful. It also has integrated appointment scheduling combined with a billing system. We are currently building PT-specific Electronic Medical Record templates to use as well. We've been VERY happy with it. Starting price for the billing/appointment scheduling is around $1500 for 5 users. Robin matacpt@... wrote: I had a demo at my office. I also felt that it was amazing, it met so many of our small detail needs. I decided not to use it because it is a relatively new program and the cost was high. I had decided to research it more, as I had a lot of questions in terms of implementation, long term support, their financial projections, etc. Ask a lot of questions, speak with other practices that have been using it, speak both with clinicians and administrative managers and get their feedback. I have used PTOS for billing since 1986 and combined it with Spectrasoft for scheduling a few years ago. The crossover of information from both programs leaves a lot to be desired, to the point that, after investing in Redoc for documentation, which supposedly, also transfers data with PTOS, I have not begun using it as of yet. I have not wanted to re-invest $$ in a new program that may do all billing, sch and documentation, but I am getting closer to cut my losses and start all over again. Leyda Mata Community Physical Therapists Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2006 Report Share Posted March 16, 2006 Leyda (and others) Just a quick note that there are a few companies right now that offer integrated software solutions. Two that I can name right off the top of my head are: Clinicient Raintree I also know that the APTA has been working on a solution with a vendor and someone on this list can probably speak about it. Both Clinicient and Raintree have been approaching the integrated solution from different angles. Clinicient was developed as a documentation tool by a Physical Therapist. As recently as 2003 they had some changes at the top of their organization and purchased a medical billing software program to integrate with their documentation program (which included scheduling). Raintree came from the opposite direction. They have a long standing medical billing software package and about 3 years ago started working with a couple of Physical Therapists to develop a documentation package. Both packages have been called " pricey " by therapists, but if you sit down and study what they can help you accomplish, they are very cheap (I think it is all in your perception). We purchased Raintree back in 2003 when the HIPAA transactions went into effect. The one difference that I can tell you about with the two packages is that Raintree offers a bit more flexibility when it comes to the documentation piece. Both companies offer the " BLACK MODEL T " version of documentation. Many therapists don't like that model. So Raintree offers alternatives like the following: 1. You can continue to hand write your notes and scan them in to the system for storage purposes. 2. You can transcribe a note using a microphone attached to your PC. This note is stored as a .WAV file and can be made a permanent part of the patient record (until you have it transcribed-in which case the .WAV file can be deleted and the transcribed note saved as the permanent record). 3. You can have your paper note copied in as a template and using a tablet PC, write your note and store that as a permanent record. I hope this helps you and others in the process of looking at products. I am sure others can relate their experiences with other products as well. If you need any contact information for either of these products, let me know and I will give you names of contacts at either of these companies. Jim Hall, CPA <///>< Rehab Management Services, LLC A Physical, Occupational and Speech Therapy Medical Billing Company Cedar Rapids, IA 319/892-0142 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2006 Report Share Posted March 16, 2006 I did allot of research on software and found that the PT Advantage Software was the best choice for our office. I looked at combining pakcages like PTOS with Redoc etc, but it just didn't make sense after looking at the Advantage Software. I have been happy with it, and the support is pretty good too. www.advantagesoftware.com Just my two cents. Feel free to e-mail me with any questions. ptinla1@... matacpt@... wrote: I had a demo at my office. I also felt that it was amazing, it met so many of our small detail needs. I decided not to use it because it is a relatively new program and the cost was high. I had decided to research it more, as I had a lot of questions in terms of implementation, long term support, their financial projections, etc. Ask a lot of questions, speak with other practices that have been using it, speak both with clinicians and administrative managers and get their feedback. I have used PTOS for billing since 1986 and combined it with Spectrasoft for scheduling a few years ago. The crossover of information from both programs leaves a lot to be desired, to the point that, after investing in Redoc for documentation, which supposedly, also transfers data with PTOS, I have not begun using it as of yet. I have not wanted to re-invest $$ in a new program that may do all billing, sch and documentation, but I am getting closer to cut my losses and start all over again. Leyda Mata Community Physical Therapists Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2006 Report Share Posted March 16, 2006 Dear PT Manager, Would anyone be kind enough to link me to the current RVBRS for PT? Joe Ruzich, PT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.