Guest guest Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Masterjohn <chrismasterjohn@...> wrote: Raw honey is loaded with enzymes and it lasts years, as far as I know. ----------- I was looking back at some old posts. Thought you would be interested in reading this and possibly comment. This is from a scientific researcher in response to a line from We Want to Live - Aajonus. Excerpt: In the body, 80-90% of unheated honey turns into enzymes for digestion, assimilation and utilization. Comment: This is impossible. honey is 100% sugar. Enzymes are 100% protein. How can sugar (with no nitrogen), turn into protein? It is absurd statements like the above that makes good scientists reject and laugh at this and then throw out the bad, along with the good. Problem is, how does an uninformed public know the difference??? They don't and tend to believe what they read. Sad situation. jafa I --------------------------------- Sneak preview the all-new .com. It's not radically different. Just radically better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 On 7/2/06, jafa <jafasum@...> wrote: > Comment: This is impossible. honey is 100% sugar. Enzymes are 100% protein. How can sugar (with no nitrogen), turn into protein? > It is absurd statements like the above that makes good scientists reject and laugh at this and then throw out the bad, along with the good. Problem is, how does an uninformed public know the difference??? > They don't and tend to believe what they read. Sad situation. Not that I would believe anything that Aajounus says by virtue of him saying that, but are you SURE that this person is a scientific researcher? What is her or his specialty? Rocks? Of course sugar doesn't turn into protein without a source of nitrogen. But why on earth this person thinks honey is " 100% sugar " is well beyond me. Chris -- The Truth About Cholesterol Find Out What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Here is a brief excerpt from one page on honey composition. I would note that there are actually other antibacterial components in some honeys besdies the hydrogen peroxide. In any case, if this person had bothered to look for a single article anywhere on honey composition, she or he would be quickly disabused of the notion that honey is " 100% sugar. " That said, I find it hard to believe that Aajounus's statement that 80-90% of honey winds up as active enzymes could possibly be true. Maybe he means that 80-90% of the enzyme content consumed becomes biologically active in the human, which sounds more plausible. In any case, excerpt below. Chris ==================== http://maarec.cas.psu.edu/bkCD/Products_Hive/honey_com.html One of the characteristics that sets honey apart from all other sweetening agents is the presence of enzymes. These conceivably arise from the bee, pollen, nectar, or even yeasts or microorganisms in the honey. Those most prominent are added by the bee during the conversion of nectar to honey. Enzymes are complex protein materials that under mild conditions bring about chemical changes, which may be very difficult to accomplish in a chemical laboratory without their aid. The changes that enzymes bring about throughout nature are essential to life. Some of the most important honey enzymes are invertase, diastase, and glucose oxidase. Invertase, also known as sucrase or saccharase, splits sucrose into its constituent simple sugars, dextrose, and levulose. Other more complex sugars have been found recently to form in small amounts during this action and in part explain the complexity of the minor sugars of honey. Although the work of invertase is completed when honey is ripened, the enzyme remains in the honey and retains its activity for some time. Even so, the sucrose content of honey never reaches zero. Since the enzyme also synthesizes sucrose, perhaps the final low value for the sucrose content of honey represents an equilibrium between splitting and forming sucrose. Diastase (amylase) digests starch to simpler compounds but no starch is found in nectar. What its function is in honey is not clear. Diastase appears to be present in varying amounts in nearly all honey and it can be measured. It has probably had the greatest attention in the past, because it has been used as a measure of honey quality in several European countries. Glucose oxidase converts dextrose to a related material, a gulconolactone, which in turn forms gluconic acid, the principal acid in honey. Since this enzyme previously was shown to be in the pharyngeal gland of the honey bee, this is probably the source. Here, as with other enzymes, the amount varies in different honeys. In addition to gluconolactone, glucose oxidase forms hydrogen peroxide during its action on dextrose, which has been shown to be the basis of the heat-sensitive antibacterial activity of honey. Other enzymes are reported to be present in honey, including catalase and an acid phosphatase. All the honey enzymes can be destroyed or weakened by heat. -- The Truth About Cholesterol Find Out What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 On Jul 2, 2006, at 11:52 AM, jafa wrote: > Comment: This is impossible. honey is 100% sugar. .... Since bees produce and reproduce indefinitely on honey and have for thousands of years, to say that honey is 100% sugar (ie, not differentiating honey from man-made sugar) strikes me as a misleadingly broad statement, and one from which no conclusions can be drawn, since I do not expect that bees could thrive indefinitely on refined white sugar. Therefore, obviously something in honey must differ from white sugar. Question is, what? Scientists and laypeople alike might well ask this and be open to a spectrum of answers (whic could lead to a spectrum of conclusions, depending on the biases and slant of the concluder) I'd also ask where this information came from to begin with. > Problem is, how does an uninformed public know the difference??? > They don't and tend to believe what they read. Sad situation. I believe that each individual is responsible for divining what is right and best for them from what they read and apprehend. You live with the results of your choices. If you choose to make your mind up without doing research... you (or your animals and children) live with the results. I expect we are all here because we DO feel responsible for educating ourselves from diverse sources and making a personal decision based on more than one source of information. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2006 Report Share Posted July 3, 2006 Hold on, genius. Bees reproduce on royal jelly, not honey. > > Since bees produce and reproduce indefinitely on honey and have for > thousands of years, to say that honey is 100% sugar (ie, not > differentiating honey from man-made sugar) strikes me as a misleadingly > broad statement, and one from which no conclusions can be drawn, since > I do not expect that bees could thrive indefinitely on refined white > sugar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 , You are correct: only the Queen reproduces, and she eats royal jelly, not honey. The young larvae begin on royal jelly and switch to honey later. Thank you for correcting me. I appreciate these facts but my original assertion is the same: The statement " Raw honey is 100% sugar " is misleading. Raw honey obviously has properties which white sugar does not. (I consider refined honey a separate question) Question is: what properties? Raw honey contains pollen and propolis, among other things, so what's in pollen would need to be part of the answer. This site sells honey and is not an impartial source, but it gives some intriguing leads. I'd like to look into the science which investigates the antimicrobial and antibacterial effects of propolis, examines enzymes in raw honey, as well as nutritional essays on pollen. http://www.draperbee.com/ BEE POLLEN: Main Ingredients: Protein 21.2 %, Carbohydrates 48.5 %, Fatty acids 9.9 %, Ash 3.5 %, Fiber 14.2 % Thiamine (vitamin B1) - Indicated for the treatment of the toxic effects of alcohol and certain medicine, the curing the edemas, the treatment of shingles, and heart conditions myocarditis and tachycardia, and in regimen for diabetes. Riboflavin (vitamin B2) - In opthomology, necessary to cure conjunctivitis, disorders of retinal adaption, some skin diseases and alleviate migraines. Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) - Required for the formation of hemoglobin and used to combat nervousness, fatigue, muscular weakness, brain tumors, anemia, Parkinson's disease, arteriosclerosis of the brain, and radiation sickness. Nicotinic Acid (Nicotinamide) - Acts on the formation of blood, is used in the treatment of toxic overload, diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal problems, asthma, neuralgia, fights migraine and tinnitus, and lower cholesterol. Pantothenic Acid (Part of B-complex) - Effectively speeds the cure of wounds, gangrene, various ulcers, herpes, bedsores, inflammatory infections of the mouth, colds, bronchitis, infectious hepatitis and minor skin problems. Ascorbic Acid (vitamin C) - Stimulating antitoxic effects. Beneficial against colds, respiratory distress, and is useful in metabolizing calcium. Retinol (vitamin A) - Effective against infections, dry eyes, and nightblindness. Tocopherol (vitamin E) - Assists oxygenation of the cellular level and fights sterility. Has anticoagulant properties and improves blood circulation. On Jul 3, 2006, at 1:24 PM, michael grogan wrote: > Hold on, genius. Bees reproduce on royal jelly, not honey. > > > > Since bees produce and reproduce indefinitely on honey and have for > > thousands of years, to say that honey is 100% sugar (ie, not > > differentiating honey from man-made sugar) strikes me as a > misleadingly > > broad statement, and one from which no conclusions can be drawn, > since > > I do not expect that bees could thrive indefinitely on refined white > > sugar. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.