Guest guest Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 Dear FORUM, The patients on treatment before ART centers may have higher CD4's is first thing, the other thing is waiting for CD4 of such patients may result in treatment interuuptions. Not only this the guidelines regarding CD4 are for asymtomatic patients and not those who present with AIDS defining ailments. Why ARV centers forget the other parameter of viral load-if mRNA is more than 100000, then whatever id CD4 we have to offer ARV. These lacunas should be looked into fast. One of my patients reffered to ARV center of PGIMER almost lost his life as his CD4 under treatment was higher than cut off and was told that he does not require ARV at all. The other point I raised earlier remains " that involvement of PP's in whom patients have faith should be involved at the earliest both for ARV as well as ATT " Dr.Rakesh Bharti, Amritsar e-mail: <rakesh.bharti1@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 Dear Forum, I also agreed with Dr.Rakesh,that using only CD4 as a sole criteria to initate ARV, could be misleading,unreliable and risky for many people living with HIV. I knew personally many people whose CD4 as high as 700 but having multiple symptoms. Why can't we start ARV when a person's present clinical symptoms of AIDS defining illness, irrespective of CD4 count or in absence of viral load. We(NACO)must refer and adopt WHO guidline for initiating ARV, in practice. I also believe that if have to achieved Universal access by 2010, we have to involve reputed Private practioners and primary health centers to provide ARV and adherence counselling. regards, Loon Gangte Delhi Network of Positive people e-mail: loon_gangte@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 Dear Forum , I fully endrose the view point given by Dr Bharti regading the guide lines issued to ART centers regarding the initiation of ARV therapy by these centers. I have reffered some patients to these centers who were under my treatment since long and they have achieved signifant higher cd4 counts who were denied given ARV therapy. Again, I want, there should be direct contacts between these centers and few AIDS specialist like us who are having expierence of treating such cases since > than 12-15 years, so that at least patient sholud not suffer. DR RAVI SAINI AIDS AWRENESS GROUP ' AMRITSAR email: ravisaini@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2006 Report Share Posted October 12, 2006 Dear Forum, Very valid point is raised by Dr Bharti and others. We have to look for initiation of ART in certain patients with CD4 even > 200 as per standard guidelines of CDC and WHO. Dr Diwakar Tejaswi Medical Director Regional AIDS Training Center and Network in India (RATNEI) International Health Organization e-mail: diwakartejawi@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2006 Report Share Posted October 17, 2006 Dear FORUM, Re: Dr. Ravi Saini's posting on the Guidelines for CD4 testing by private providers The methodology suggested by Dr. Ravi Saini might bring in the following points for discussion. 1. Who all can be the " Recognised HIV specialists " and what should be the norm. 2. What if the mechanism is misused by People(who might not be HIV positive) and this is highly possible given the price of the ART. 3. On what basis you expect the ART medical officers to start ART for a person without knowing his/her status?. (Even Genaral Practitioners do not accept the X-Ray taken in a lab which they do not have any working relationship. They make the patient to take another X-Ray in their own prefered lab on the same day). 4. Accessing VCT is very vital as it might help taking the survilence data at a district level. 5. Also I feel at VCTC the attendees can get all basic information about HIV/AIDS and also condom demo which might not be feasible at private clinics. I am for public - private partnership but at the same time there should be uniform guidelines and standard operating procedures across the clinics designated to provide ART. I am witing these things only to think further on the point made by you and arrive at a solution. My intention is not to argue. Hope you take it in good sprits. regards, Swami. e-mail: <swamiiyer@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.