Guest guest Posted October 13, 2006 Report Share Posted October 13, 2006 Dear Forum, In a recent contribution to AIDS-India, Bernard asks for more information on injection practices from IPEN’s recent Assessment of Injection Practices in India (executive summary available at: http://www.ipen.org.in/). The study looked at all injection providers, including formal and informal, rural and urban. Injections from all classes of providers were unreliably safe, with some differences (page ix): “risk of unsafe injection when administered at non-allopathic health facilities (ISM [indian System of Medicine] and informally trained prescribers) was almost one and a half times…more as compared to that with allopathic prescribers….” The Bottom line: If you’re going for an injection, you cannot assure that you will be safe by avoiding informal providers. More than 30% of all injections were a risk to transmit bloodborne viruses. However, unsafe injections are only the tip of the iceberg. To ensure safe health care, it is important to consider blood exposures other than injections. The common and continuing focus on injection safety comes from donors pushing vaccinations. For years, donors observed that vacccinators often reused syringes and/or needles without sterilization – despite training, supervision, and equipment supply. Finally, from 1999, donors got together through Safe Injection Global Network (SIGN) to promote auto-disable syringes – which break after one use. Auto-disable syringes are a useful innovation. They make vaccinations safer (but not safe; multidose vials can be contaminated from a previous injection, and are not as safe as single-dose vials). But, take another look at this: What does the shift to auto-disable syringes mean? Health program managers focusing on vaccinations have in effect given up on sterilization! Failure to sterilize instruments continues. When sex workers or clients go for injections to treat STDs – are they safe? When you go for a blood test, are you safe? When women go for tubal ligations, are instruments reused without sterilization? Are dental drills sterilized between patients? Too often, the answer is “No.” Furthermore, there are dangerous blood exposures outside health care. Cosmetic procedures such as tattooing, manicures, pedicures, etc, expose clients to HIV and other bloodborne viruses if instruments are reused without sterilization (note: Dettol and other disinfectants are not effective against viruses). Last year, I sat in a meeting where sex workers from Karnataka reported standing in line for tattoos during festivals to honor the Goddess Yellama. (Sex workers are besieged with information about HIV from sex – why did no one tell them about HIV from blood exposures, such as tattooing? Considering this oversight, and considering the findings of the IPEN study noted above, are all those NGO and government programs that treat sex workers’ STDs providing safe care?) Gisselquist Email: <david_gisselquist@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.