Guest guest Posted January 30, 2004 Report Share Posted January 30, 2004 Yes, it does appear that way. But it's still a fallacy to treat solely by the TSH. My husband had a TSH of 2.2. According to ANY guideline, he's not hypo, right?? WRONG. His free T3 was towards the bottom of the range!! THAT is indicative of hypo. Janie > I just read it and maybe I misinterpreted it but I thought it almost > sounded like they were moving towards considering any sustained TSH > above 2.5 as being suspicious of hypothyroidism..? What do you all > think? > > http://www.aace.com/pub/tam2003/explanation.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2004 Report Share Posted January 30, 2004 Yes but it still says that it should nto be treated. You have to be alot sick to warrant treatment. A little sick and you get nothing. in AZ Mom to Kayla(10), Jenna(8), (8), (6), (6), (5), Junie(3), and (2yo twins), Jillian (13 mo) and Mahlina(9.5mo) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Arizona_Thyroid_Groups/ www.teambettendorf.com > > I just read it and maybe I misinterpreted it but I thought it almost > sounded like they were moving towards considering any sustained TSH > above 2.5 as being suspicious of hypothyroidism..? What do you all > think? > > http://www.aace.com/pub/tam2003/explanation.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2004 Report Share Posted January 30, 2004 Yes but it still says that it should nto be treated. You have to be alot sick to warrant treatment. A little sick and you get nothing. in AZ Mom to Kayla(10), Jenna(8), (8), (6), (6), (5), Junie(3), and (2yo twins), Jillian (13 mo) and Mahlina(9.5mo) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Arizona_Thyroid_Groups/ www.teambettendorf.com > > I just read it and maybe I misinterpreted it but I thought it almost > sounded like they were moving towards considering any sustained TSH > above 2.5 as being suspicious of hypothyroidism..? What do you all > think? > > http://www.aace.com/pub/tam2003/explanation.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2004 Report Share Posted January 30, 2004 Hi, Gentle, Considering the wording in the AACE statement, one could be led to believe that they are genuinely concerned about Thyroid problems. However, one has to keep in mind that they have an incentive here that is fostered for the most part by the producers of synthetic thyroid hormones. The synthetics cost almost nothing to make, so i behooves them to keep the marketing volume as high as possible to continue to reap those profits. Sorry... I wish that most of them were really concerned about such " everyday " problems as Hypo and Hyperthyroidism. The truth is, however, that they are in this for the $$ and the strokes to their egos. Just my " not so humble " opinion, Dianne At 03:57 PM 1/30/04 +0000, you wrote: >Was wondering if everybody read this " TSH explanation " snippet from >AACE. > >I just read it and maybe I misinterpreted it but I thought it almost >sounded like they were moving towards considering any sustained TSH >above 2.5 as being suspicious of hypothyroidism..? What do you all >think? > >http://www.aace.com/pub/tam2003/explanation.php > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.