Guest guest Posted April 4, 2010 Report Share Posted April 4, 2010 There won't be SS when it's time for me to retire and I'm planning/saving as if their won't be. 2010 was the first year in which money paid out from SS was > than money taken in. This wasn't supposed to happen until 2016. > > > So does that mean you will opt out of medicare and social sec when the > time comes? > > > On Saturday, April 3, 2010, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattoly@...<tpiattoly%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > I came across this from an older gent I admire who has seen it all during > > his day. > > > > 1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every day. > > 2.. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute! > > 3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. 's Day (March > > 17th) than Target sells all year. > > 4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target + Sears + Costco > + > > K-Mart combined. > > 5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people and is the largest private > Employer, > > and most speak English. > > 6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World. > > 7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger & Safeway combined, and keep > in > > mind they did this in only 15 years. > > 8. During this same period, 31 supermarket chains sought bankruptcy. > > 9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world. > > 10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are Super > > Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had 5 Years ago. > > 11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will occur At > a > > Wal-Mart store. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 Billion.). > > 12. 90% of all Americans live within 15 miles of a Wal-Mart. > > You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the ground > work > > for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart to Fix > > the economy. T > > > > This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats, > Republicans, > > EVERYONE!! > > > > To: President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature, It > is > > now official you are ALL corrupt morons: > > * The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775. You have had 235 > years > > to get it right and it is broke. > > * Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 75 years to > get > > it right and it is broke. > > * Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 72 years to get it > > right and it is broke. > > * War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 46 years to get it > right; > > $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to " the > > poor " and they only want more. > > * Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 45 > years > > to get it right and they are broke. > > * Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 40 years to get it > > right and it is broke. > > * The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our > dependence > > on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 > > billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 33 years > to > > get it right and it is an abysmal failure. > > > > You have FAILED in every " government service " you have shoved down our > > throats while overspending our tax dollars AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO > > BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM?? > > Mr. Bill > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattoly@...<tpiattoly%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > >> Madlyn, > >> > >> I think it's great that your team can provide care to those who really > need > >> it and can't afford it. On the otherhand, I don't think putting our > country > >> in a financial crisis to pay for this as well as taxing us even more, is > the > >> most effective way to pay for this plan. > >> > >> If we can find other dollars to pay for this, I'd be more open. > >> > >> Another problem will be less reimbursement for hospitals and loss of > jobs > >> in the heathcare industry. Many non-profit hospitals already run at a > loss > >> and have begun to dig into their cash savings to continue operations and > >> fund capital campaigns. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Madalyn Friedberg < > mffrd10019@... <mffrd10019%40yahoo.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> Digna, > >>> > >>> Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. I was stating mine. > >>> > >>> I did not read the article as being relevant to the health care bill. > I > >>> read that some do not want to help the less fortunate and are resentful > >>> for having the government tell us what to do. We are doing that now. > Our tax > >>> dollars are used for many social programs. As for the mandatory health > >>> insurance that is bugging so many....we have mandatory car insurance, > Our > >>> tax dollars are used for the uninsured pool of drivers and I don't hear > >>> these same people balking about that. Medicare was condemned as a > >>> socialist plan - just try to take medicare away from any of the people > >>> complaining about the 'Obama Socialism " . The bill was passed and in our > form > >>> of government we now have to live with it. Learn how to 'tweak' it if > it > >>> does not work, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. > >>> > >>> I live with a social conscience.. I believe I have a moral and > >>> ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am. I know that > there > >>> are people who take advantage of the system but I believe that there > are > >>> many fewer than you might think and that the majority who need help > would > >>> much rather help themselves if possible. > >>> > >>> I work for a company that does not charge the residents. You read that > >>> correctly... no private insurance, no medicare, no medicaid, we don't > take > >>> their social security. We provide excellent care. We ask that they not > be > >>> able to pay for private care but we do not want them to leave their > families > >>> destitute. We do not do a financial search of the applicants. We have > had > >>> less than 2% of our residents not fit our criteria in the 38 years I > have > >>> worked for them. And some of those were family of staff members or > staff > >>> themselves. I believe that people are usually honest. We have a number > of > >>> homeless residents who would not get the care we provide elsewhere. > >>> We rely on donations, an endowment and private income. > >>> > >>> Happy Holidays > >>> > >>> Madalyn > >>> > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> > >>> From: Digna Cassens <dignacassens@...<dignacassens%40roadrunner.com> > <dignacassens%40roadrunner.com>> > >>> > >>> > >>> To: rd-usa <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> <rd-usa% > 40yahoogroups.com> > > >>> Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 1:05:01 AM > >>> > >>> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill > comments > >>> > >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this email - > I > >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? > >>> > >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and future. I > for > >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American > >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history lessons. > Let's > >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible > >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as Jan's > must > >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ev > > > -- Tavis Piattoly, MS, RD Assistant General Mgr, Elmwood Fitness Center Sports Nutritionist, New Orleans Saints & New Orleans Hornets Team Nutritionist, St. Amant High School www.elmwoodfitness.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2010 Report Share Posted April 4, 2010 There won't be SS when it's time for me to retire and I'm planning/saving as if their won't be. 2010 was the first year in which money paid out from SS was > than money taken in. This wasn't supposed to happen until 2016. > > > So does that mean you will opt out of medicare and social sec when the > time comes? > > > On Saturday, April 3, 2010, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattoly@...<tpiattoly%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > I came across this from an older gent I admire who has seen it all during > > his day. > > > > 1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every day. > > 2.. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute! > > 3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. 's Day (March > > 17th) than Target sells all year. > > 4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target + Sears + Costco > + > > K-Mart combined. > > 5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people and is the largest private > Employer, > > and most speak English. > > 6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World. > > 7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger & Safeway combined, and keep > in > > mind they did this in only 15 years. > > 8. During this same period, 31 supermarket chains sought bankruptcy. > > 9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world. > > 10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are Super > > Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had 5 Years ago. > > 11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will occur At > a > > Wal-Mart store. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 Billion.). > > 12. 90% of all Americans live within 15 miles of a Wal-Mart. > > You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the ground > work > > for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart to Fix > > the economy. T > > > > This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats, > Republicans, > > EVERYONE!! > > > > To: President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature, It > is > > now official you are ALL corrupt morons: > > * The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775. You have had 235 > years > > to get it right and it is broke. > > * Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 75 years to > get > > it right and it is broke. > > * Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 72 years to get it > > right and it is broke. > > * War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 46 years to get it > right; > > $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to " the > > poor " and they only want more. > > * Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 45 > years > > to get it right and they are broke. > > * Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 40 years to get it > > right and it is broke. > > * The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our > dependence > > on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 > > billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 33 years > to > > get it right and it is an abysmal failure. > > > > You have FAILED in every " government service " you have shoved down our > > throats while overspending our tax dollars AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO > > BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM?? > > Mr. Bill > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattoly@...<tpiattoly%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > >> Madlyn, > >> > >> I think it's great that your team can provide care to those who really > need > >> it and can't afford it. On the otherhand, I don't think putting our > country > >> in a financial crisis to pay for this as well as taxing us even more, is > the > >> most effective way to pay for this plan. > >> > >> If we can find other dollars to pay for this, I'd be more open. > >> > >> Another problem will be less reimbursement for hospitals and loss of > jobs > >> in the heathcare industry. Many non-profit hospitals already run at a > loss > >> and have begun to dig into their cash savings to continue operations and > >> fund capital campaigns. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Madalyn Friedberg < > mffrd10019@... <mffrd10019%40yahoo.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> Digna, > >>> > >>> Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. I was stating mine. > >>> > >>> I did not read the article as being relevant to the health care bill. > I > >>> read that some do not want to help the less fortunate and are resentful > >>> for having the government tell us what to do. We are doing that now. > Our tax > >>> dollars are used for many social programs. As for the mandatory health > >>> insurance that is bugging so many....we have mandatory car insurance, > Our > >>> tax dollars are used for the uninsured pool of drivers and I don't hear > >>> these same people balking about that. Medicare was condemned as a > >>> socialist plan - just try to take medicare away from any of the people > >>> complaining about the 'Obama Socialism " . The bill was passed and in our > form > >>> of government we now have to live with it. Learn how to 'tweak' it if > it > >>> does not work, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. > >>> > >>> I live with a social conscience.. I believe I have a moral and > >>> ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am. I know that > there > >>> are people who take advantage of the system but I believe that there > are > >>> many fewer than you might think and that the majority who need help > would > >>> much rather help themselves if possible. > >>> > >>> I work for a company that does not charge the residents. You read that > >>> correctly... no private insurance, no medicare, no medicaid, we don't > take > >>> their social security. We provide excellent care. We ask that they not > be > >>> able to pay for private care but we do not want them to leave their > families > >>> destitute. We do not do a financial search of the applicants. We have > had > >>> less than 2% of our residents not fit our criteria in the 38 years I > have > >>> worked for them. And some of those were family of staff members or > staff > >>> themselves. I believe that people are usually honest. We have a number > of > >>> homeless residents who would not get the care we provide elsewhere. > >>> We rely on donations, an endowment and private income. > >>> > >>> Happy Holidays > >>> > >>> Madalyn > >>> > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> > >>> From: Digna Cassens <dignacassens@...<dignacassens%40roadrunner.com> > <dignacassens%40roadrunner.com>> > >>> > >>> > >>> To: rd-usa <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> <rd-usa% > 40yahoogroups.com> > > >>> Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 1:05:01 AM > >>> > >>> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill > comments > >>> > >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this email - > I > >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? > >>> > >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and future. I > for > >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American > >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history lessons. > Let's > >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible > >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as Jan's > must > >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ev > > > -- Tavis Piattoly, MS, RD Assistant General Mgr, Elmwood Fitness Center Sports Nutritionist, New Orleans Saints & New Orleans Hornets Team Nutritionist, St. Amant High School www.elmwoodfitness.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2010 Report Share Posted April 4, 2010 I think anyone that has paid into a mandatory system would be a fool to opt out of it just because it's so poorly run. If I had a choice of not paying into these systems and taking my $$ to invest and use as I saw fit, then yes, I would opt out of both defective and inefficient (as proven by the fact they're bankrupt, riddled with fraud sysems) programs. But since they forcibly took my money, then I want at least some of it back. Interest free of course... I may as well have rolled it up and smoked it. Digna Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments >>> >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this email - I >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? >>> >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and future. I for >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history lessons. Let's >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as Jan's must >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ev Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2010 Report Share Posted April 4, 2010 When was I given a choice of not paying into medicare and social security? I must have missed that message when I came to the US and got my first job... It was so long that my memory fails me then. Digna Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments >>> >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this email - I >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? >>> >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and future. I for >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history lessons. Let's >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as Jan's must >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ev Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2010 Report Share Posted April 4, 2010 And while on that subject, I still have not me one person who can maintain a good quality of life just on SS income. I know we couldn't. Maybe it depends on what satisfies a person, but my SS and my husband's sure wouldn't satisfy us. And to boot, thanks to the economic downfall of the country our investments, carefully made and guarded for the last 50 years are worthless at a 60% reduction in value. Digna Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill >> comments >> >>> >> >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this >> >>> email - >> I >> >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? >> >>> >> >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and future. I >> for >> >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American >> >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history lessons. >> Let's >> >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible >> >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as Jan's >> must >> >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ev >> >> >> > > > > -- > Tavis Piattoly, MS, RD > Assistant General Mgr, Elmwood Fitness Center > Sports Nutritionist, New Orleans Saints & New Orleans Hornets > Team Nutritionist, St. Amant High School > www.elmwoodfitness.com > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 I agree wholeheartedly with this statement, “I believe I have a moral and ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am.†And, that is why I have no need for the government to take my money and give it to whomever they decide needs. I, as well as most Americans, perform those acts of charity on my own. If the government forces someone to give up what he earns and gives it to someone else who did not earn it, that is NOT charity. That is theft. The primary write of the Constitution said, " Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government. " -- Madison. I am also thankful to disagree that we are forced to have car insurance. I only have to have insurance for someone else that I injury, or their car that I damage, and ONLUY if I choose to drive. That is no comparison to this unconstitutional health insurance bill that requires everyone to purchase health insurance to cover themselves, whether they want to or not. I’m tired of that inaccurate comparison. W. Rowell, RD, LN Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care Certified LEAP Therapist From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of Madalyn Friedberg Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 10:00 PM To: rd-usa Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments Digna, Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. I was stating mine. I did not read the article as being relevant to the health care bill. I read that some do not want to help the less fortunate and are resentful for having the government tell us what to do. We are doing that now. Our tax dollars are used for many social programs. As for the mandatory health insurance that is bugging so many....we have mandatory car insurance, Our tax dollars are used for the uninsured pool of drivers and I don't hear these same people balking about that. Medicare was condemned as a socialist plan - just try to take medicare away from any of the people complaining about the 'Obama Socialism " . The bill was passed and in our form of government we now have to live with it. Learn how to 'tweak' it if it does not work, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. I live with a social conscience.. I believe I have a moral and ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am. I know that there are people who take advantage of the system but I believe that there are many fewer than you might think and that the majority who need help would much rather help themselves if possible. I work for a company that does not charge the residents. You read that correctly... no private insurance, no medicare, no medicaid, we don't take their social security. We provide excellent care. We ask that they not be able to pay for private care but we do not want them to leave their families destitute. We do not do a financial search of the applicants. We have had less than 2% of our residents not fit our criteria in the 38 years I have worked for them. And some of those were family of staff members or staff themselves. I believe that people are usually honest. We have a number of homeless residents who would not get the care we provide elsewhere. We rely on donations, an endowment and private income. Happy Holidays Madalyn ________________________________ From: Digna Cassens <dignacassens@...<mailto:dignacassens%40roadrunner.com>> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 1:05:01 AM Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this email - I wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and future. I for one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history lessons. Let's just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as Jan's must be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ever be squelched!). To further state my poin: 1.. this article is relevant to the healthcare bill and we're healthcare providers as well as healthcare consumers 2.. this article states a different point of view, proving America is still a democracy and freedom of speech can still be exercised w/o punishment 3.. this article is lcidly written and comprehensively stated as one person's opinion, and we're all entitled to our own opinions 4.. we're all concerned about " the economy " = mainly our own pockets; how we're keeping our income sources viable = whether it's our jobs or contracts or retirement pensions or SSI payments; and (therefore Jan) does have a point there. How can less be more? If you take a pie, let's say a 10 inch pie, and eat it, it's all yours, you get the whole pie. If you take the same pie and divide it among your family member, let's say 4 people, you each get a fourth of a pie, still pretty substantial, right? But.... If you take the same pie and divide it among 12 people, or better yet, let's be really generous and divide it among 50 or 60 or....... how about looking really really good and divide it among 100 people!!! what size piece of pie will we get? how many will it really feed and nourish? who can survive on a 1000th piece of pie? Same thing with healthcare funds. In this case it's not a party. The more isn't the merrier. It can't be. It's a matter of simple arithmetic. The more parts you divide something into the smaller the parts until suddenly, they're all gone. Nothing left. Nada nada nada... Digna Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments I found this interesting and personally related to the Health Care Bill. More comments below. Jan Patenaude This teacher is truly a genius! (photo removed - don't know if accurate, but sounds plausible). As the late said, " you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. " An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had never failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked, and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich --- a great equalizer. The professor then said, " OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan " . All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade, so no one would fail and no one would receive an A. After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset, and the students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less, and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too, so they studied little. The second test average was a D! No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F. The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings, and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed. I work hard to stay healthy. For MANY years I never carried insurance because I take care to protect my personal health. If I need health care, I pay out of pocket. When I needed 4 stitches in my upper lip (face plant when rock climbing - my husband did the 4 stitches in about 20 minutes. (The ER would have charged me nearly $1000 for the same service, and no, my hubby isn't a doctor - had field surgery training before he went to Vietnam - the scar is barely noticeable.) So, now, I'm supposed to pay for health care for all the people that don't give a crap about their health and run to the doctor for every cough, fever, lap band and for perfectly preventable things if they just took care of their health or addressed their personal addiction issues. Now, coverage for catestrophic stuff? Yes. Do people end up with health problems over which they have NO control? Yes. But, a new health care bill that includes components for nationalizing Student Loans? What does that have to do with health care. A bill written by lawyers that has NO tort reform so that docs still have to pay HUGE insurance premiums just to practice? Why wasn't that addresses? Of course, we ALL know why. It's pathetic. Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT Consultant, Writer, Speaker Director of Medical Nutrition Signet Diagnostic Corporation (Mountain Time) Fax: DineRight4aol (DOT) com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 I also completely agree that it is my decision to help those less fortunate but currently much of our tax paying dollars currently goes to those who don't feel like working. I do believe their are those who are truly trying to make a positive change by holding a job, attending school, raising a family, etc., but there's also a large % who are working the system. I worked in a low income Pediatric care center my first year as an RD and it was obvious the Medicaid system was being abused. Thanks > > > I agree wholeheartedly with this statement, “I believe I have a moral and > ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am.” And, that is why > I have no need for the government to take my money and give it to whomever > they decide needs. I, as well as most Americans, perform those acts of > charity on my own. If the government forces someone to give up what he earns > and gives it to someone else who did not earn it, that is NOT charity. That > is theft. The primary write of the Constitution said, " Charity is no part of > the legislative duty of the government. " -- Madison. > > I am also thankful to disagree that we are forced to have car insurance. I > only have to have insurance for someone else that I injury, or their car > that I damage, and ONLUY if I choose to drive. That is no comparison to this > unconstitutional health insurance bill that requires everyone to purchase > health insurance to cover themselves, whether they want to or not. I’m tired > of that inaccurate comparison. > > W. Rowell, RD, LN > Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT > Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care > Certified LEAP Therapist > > > > From: rd-usa <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto: > rd-usa <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Madalyn > Friedberg > Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 10:00 PM > To: rd-usa <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments > > > > Digna, > > Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. I was stating mine. > > I did not read the article as being relevant to the health care bill. I > read that some do not want to help the less fortunate and are resentful for > having the government tell us what to do. We are doing that now. Our tax > dollars are used for many social programs. As for the mandatory health > insurance that is bugging so many....we have mandatory car insurance, Our > tax dollars are used for the uninsured pool of drivers and I don't hear > these same people balking about that. Medicare was condemned as a socialist > plan - just try to take medicare away from any of the people complaining > about the 'Obama Socialism " . The bill was passed and in our form of > government we now have to live with it. Learn how to 'tweak' it if it does > not work, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. > > I live with a social conscience.. I believe I have a moral and ethical > obligation to help those less fortunate than I am. I know that there are > people who take advantage of the system but I believe that there are many > fewer than you might think and that the majority who need help would much > rather help themselves if possible. > > I work for a company that does not charge the residents. You read that > correctly... no private insurance, no medicare, no medicaid, we don't take > their social security. We provide excellent care. We ask that they not be > able to pay for private care but we do not want them to leave their families > destitute. We do not do a financial search of the applicants. We have had > less than 2% of our residents not fit our criteria in the 38 years I have > worked for them. And some of those were family of staff members or staff > themselves. I believe that people are usually honest. We have a number of > homeless residents who would not get the care we provide elsewhere. > We rely on donations, an endowment and private income. > > Happy Holidays > > Madalyn > > > ________________________________ > > From: Digna Cassens <dignacassens@...<dignacassens%40roadrunner.com> > <mailto:dignacassens%40roadrunner.com <dignacassens%2540roadrunner.com>>> > To: rd-usa <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com><mailto: > rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com <rd-usa%2540yahoogroups.com>> > Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 1:05:01 AM > Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments > > Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this email - I > wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? > > I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and future. I for > one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American > Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history lessons. Let's > just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible > tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as Jan's must > be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ever be > squelched!). > > To further state my poin: > 1.. this article is relevant to the healthcare bill and we're healthcare > providers as well as healthcare consumers > 2.. this article states a different point of view, proving America is still > a democracy and freedom of speech can still be exercised w/o punishment > 3.. this article is lcidly written and comprehensively stated as one > person's opinion, and we're all entitled to our own opinions > 4.. we're all concerned about " the economy " = mainly our own pockets; how > we're keeping our income sources viable = whether it's our jobs or contracts > or retirement pensions or SSI payments; and (therefore Jan) does have > a point there. How can less be more? > If you take a pie, let's say a 10 inch pie, and eat it, it's all yours, you > get the whole pie. > If you take the same pie and divide it among your family member, let's say > 4 people, you each get a fourth of a pie, still pretty substantial, right? > But.... > If you take the same pie and divide it among 12 people, or better yet, > let's be really generous and divide it among 50 or 60 or....... how about > looking really really good and divide it among 100 people!!! what size piece > of pie will we get? how many will it really feed and nourish? who can > survive on a 1000th piece of pie? > > Same thing with healthcare funds. In this case it's not a party. The more > isn't the merrier. It can't be. It's a matter of simple arithmetic. The more > parts you divide something into the smaller the parts until suddenly, > they're all gone. Nothing left. Nada nada nada... > > Digna > > Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments > > I found this interesting and personally related to the Health Care Bill. > More comments below. > Jan Patenaude > > This teacher is truly a genius! (photo removed - don't know if accurate, > but sounds plausible). > > As the late said, " you cannot multiply wealth by dividing > it. " > > An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had > never > failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. > That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked, and that no one > would > be poor and no one would be rich --- a great equalizer. The professor then > said, > " OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan " . All grades > would > be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade, so no one would > fail > and no one would receive an A. After the first test, the grades were > averaged > and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset, and the > students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, > the > students who studied little had studied even less, and the ones who > studied hard > decided they wanted a free ride too, so they studied little. The second > test average > was a D! No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around, the average > was an F. > The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all > resulted in hard > feelings, and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. All > failed, to their > great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also > ultimately fail > because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when > government > takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed. > > I work hard to stay healthy. For MANY years I never carried insurance > because I take care to protect my personal health. If I need health care, I > pay > out of pocket. When I needed 4 stitches in my upper lip (face plant when > rock climbing - my husband did the 4 stitches in about 20 minutes. (The ER > would have charged me nearly $1000 for the same service, and no, my hubby > isn't a doctor - had field surgery training before he went to Vietnam - the > > scar is barely noticeable.) > > So, now, I'm supposed to pay for health care for all the people that don't > give a crap about their health and run to the doctor for every cough, > fever, lap band and for perfectly preventable things if they just took care > of > their health or addressed their personal addiction issues. > > Now, coverage for catestrophic stuff? Yes. Do people end up with health > problems over which they have NO control? Yes. > > But, a new health care bill that includes components for nationalizing > Student Loans? What does that have to do with health care. > > A bill written by lawyers that has NO tort reform so that docs still have > to pay HUGE insurance premiums just to practice? Why wasn't that addresses? > > Of course, we ALL know why. > > It's pathetic. > > Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT > Consultant, Writer, Speaker > Director of Medical Nutrition > Signet Diagnostic Corporation > (Mountain Time) > Fax: > DineRight4aol (DOT) com > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 I also completely agree that it is my decision to help those less fortunate but currently much of our tax paying dollars currently goes to those who don't feel like working. I do believe their are those who are truly trying to make a positive change by holding a job, attending school, raising a family, etc., but there's also a large % who are working the system. I worked in a low income Pediatric care center my first year as an RD and it was obvious the Medicaid system was being abused. Thanks > > > I agree wholeheartedly with this statement, “I believe I have a moral and > ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am.” And, that is why > I have no need for the government to take my money and give it to whomever > they decide needs. I, as well as most Americans, perform those acts of > charity on my own. If the government forces someone to give up what he earns > and gives it to someone else who did not earn it, that is NOT charity. That > is theft. The primary write of the Constitution said, " Charity is no part of > the legislative duty of the government. " -- Madison. > > I am also thankful to disagree that we are forced to have car insurance. I > only have to have insurance for someone else that I injury, or their car > that I damage, and ONLUY if I choose to drive. That is no comparison to this > unconstitutional health insurance bill that requires everyone to purchase > health insurance to cover themselves, whether they want to or not. I’m tired > of that inaccurate comparison. > > W. Rowell, RD, LN > Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT > Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care > Certified LEAP Therapist > > > > From: rd-usa <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto: > rd-usa <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Madalyn > Friedberg > Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 10:00 PM > To: rd-usa <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments > > > > Digna, > > Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. I was stating mine. > > I did not read the article as being relevant to the health care bill. I > read that some do not want to help the less fortunate and are resentful for > having the government tell us what to do. We are doing that now. Our tax > dollars are used for many social programs. As for the mandatory health > insurance that is bugging so many....we have mandatory car insurance, Our > tax dollars are used for the uninsured pool of drivers and I don't hear > these same people balking about that. Medicare was condemned as a socialist > plan - just try to take medicare away from any of the people complaining > about the 'Obama Socialism " . The bill was passed and in our form of > government we now have to live with it. Learn how to 'tweak' it if it does > not work, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. > > I live with a social conscience.. I believe I have a moral and ethical > obligation to help those less fortunate than I am. I know that there are > people who take advantage of the system but I believe that there are many > fewer than you might think and that the majority who need help would much > rather help themselves if possible. > > I work for a company that does not charge the residents. You read that > correctly... no private insurance, no medicare, no medicaid, we don't take > their social security. We provide excellent care. We ask that they not be > able to pay for private care but we do not want them to leave their families > destitute. We do not do a financial search of the applicants. We have had > less than 2% of our residents not fit our criteria in the 38 years I have > worked for them. And some of those were family of staff members or staff > themselves. I believe that people are usually honest. We have a number of > homeless residents who would not get the care we provide elsewhere. > We rely on donations, an endowment and private income. > > Happy Holidays > > Madalyn > > > ________________________________ > > From: Digna Cassens <dignacassens@...<dignacassens%40roadrunner.com> > <mailto:dignacassens%40roadrunner.com <dignacassens%2540roadrunner.com>>> > To: rd-usa <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com><mailto: > rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com <rd-usa%2540yahoogroups.com>> > Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 1:05:01 AM > Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments > > Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this email - I > wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? > > I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and future. I for > one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American > Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history lessons. Let's > just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible > tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as Jan's must > be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ever be > squelched!). > > To further state my poin: > 1.. this article is relevant to the healthcare bill and we're healthcare > providers as well as healthcare consumers > 2.. this article states a different point of view, proving America is still > a democracy and freedom of speech can still be exercised w/o punishment > 3.. this article is lcidly written and comprehensively stated as one > person's opinion, and we're all entitled to our own opinions > 4.. we're all concerned about " the economy " = mainly our own pockets; how > we're keeping our income sources viable = whether it's our jobs or contracts > or retirement pensions or SSI payments; and (therefore Jan) does have > a point there. How can less be more? > If you take a pie, let's say a 10 inch pie, and eat it, it's all yours, you > get the whole pie. > If you take the same pie and divide it among your family member, let's say > 4 people, you each get a fourth of a pie, still pretty substantial, right? > But.... > If you take the same pie and divide it among 12 people, or better yet, > let's be really generous and divide it among 50 or 60 or....... how about > looking really really good and divide it among 100 people!!! what size piece > of pie will we get? how many will it really feed and nourish? who can > survive on a 1000th piece of pie? > > Same thing with healthcare funds. In this case it's not a party. The more > isn't the merrier. It can't be. It's a matter of simple arithmetic. The more > parts you divide something into the smaller the parts until suddenly, > they're all gone. Nothing left. Nada nada nada... > > Digna > > Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments > > I found this interesting and personally related to the Health Care Bill. > More comments below. > Jan Patenaude > > This teacher is truly a genius! (photo removed - don't know if accurate, > but sounds plausible). > > As the late said, " you cannot multiply wealth by dividing > it. " > > An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had > never > failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. > That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked, and that no one > would > be poor and no one would be rich --- a great equalizer. The professor then > said, > " OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan " . All grades > would > be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade, so no one would > fail > and no one would receive an A. After the first test, the grades were > averaged > and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset, and the > students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, > the > students who studied little had studied even less, and the ones who > studied hard > decided they wanted a free ride too, so they studied little. The second > test average > was a D! No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around, the average > was an F. > The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all > resulted in hard > feelings, and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. All > failed, to their > great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also > ultimately fail > because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when > government > takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed. > > I work hard to stay healthy. For MANY years I never carried insurance > because I take care to protect my personal health. If I need health care, I > pay > out of pocket. When I needed 4 stitches in my upper lip (face plant when > rock climbing - my husband did the 4 stitches in about 20 minutes. (The ER > would have charged me nearly $1000 for the same service, and no, my hubby > isn't a doctor - had field surgery training before he went to Vietnam - the > > scar is barely noticeable.) > > So, now, I'm supposed to pay for health care for all the people that don't > give a crap about their health and run to the doctor for every cough, > fever, lap band and for perfectly preventable things if they just took care > of > their health or addressed their personal addiction issues. > > Now, coverage for catestrophic stuff? Yes. Do people end up with health > problems over which they have NO control? Yes. > > But, a new health care bill that includes components for nationalizing > Student Loans? What does that have to do with health care. > > A bill written by lawyers that has NO tort reform so that docs still have > to pay HUGE insurance premiums just to practice? Why wasn't that addresses? > > Of course, we ALL know why. > > It's pathetic. > > Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT > Consultant, Writer, Speaker > Director of Medical Nutrition > Signet Diagnostic Corporation > (Mountain Time) > Fax: > DineRight4aol (DOT) com > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 The answer is " yes " for me. If I actually had the choice! You bet! Whatever is right for my country, not whatever is best for me at someone else's expense! I just don't think that way and this nation was not founded and made great on that way of thinking. W. Rowell, RD, LN Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care Certified LEAP Therapist From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of Jen Zingaro Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 4:21 PM To: rd-usa Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments So does that mean you will opt out of medicare and social sec when the time comes? On Saturday, April 3, 2010, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattoly@...<mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com>> wrote: > I came across this from an older gent I admire who has seen it all during > his day. > > 1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every day. > 2.. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute! > 3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. 's Day (March > 17th) than Target sells all year. > 4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target + Sears + Costco + > K-Mart combined. > 5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people and is the largest private Employer, > and most speak English. > 6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World. > 7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger & Safeway combined, and keep in > mind they did this in only 15 years. > 8. During this same period, 31 supermarket chains sought bankruptcy. > 9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world. > 10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are Super > Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had 5 Years ago. > 11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will occur At a > Wal-Mart store. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 Billion.). > 12. 90% of all Americans live within 15 miles of a Wal-Mart. > You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the ground work > for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart to Fix > the economy. T > > This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats, Republicans, > EVERYONE!! > > To: President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature, It is > now official you are ALL corrupt morons: > * The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775. You have had 235 years > to get it right and it is broke. > * Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 75 years to get > it right and it is broke. > * Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 72 years to get it > right and it is broke. > * War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 46 years to get it right; > $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to " the > poor " and they only want more. > * Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 45 years > to get it right and they are broke. > * Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 40 years to get it > right and it is broke. > * The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence > on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 > billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 33 years to > get it right and it is an abysmal failure. > > You have FAILED in every " government service " you have shoved down our > throats while overspending our tax dollars AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO > BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM?? > Mr. Bill > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattoly@...<mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com>> wrote: > >> Madlyn, >> >> I think it's great that your team can provide care to those who really need >> it and can't afford it. On the otherhand, I don't think putting our country >> in a financial crisis to pay for this as well as taxing us even more, is the >> most effective way to pay for this plan. >> >> If we can find other dollars to pay for this, I'd be more open. >> >> Another problem will be less reimbursement for hospitals and loss of jobs >> in the heathcare industry. Many non-profit hospitals already run at a loss >> and have begun to dig into their cash savings to continue operations and >> fund capital campaigns. >> >> Thanks >> >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Madalyn Friedberg <mffrd10019@...<mailto:mffrd10019%40yahoo.com> >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Digna, >>> >>> Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. I was stating mine. >>> >>> I did not read the article as being relevant to the health care bill. I >>> read that some do not want to help the less fortunate and are resentful >>> for having the government tell us what to do. We are doing that now. Our tax >>> dollars are used for many social programs. As for the mandatory health >>> insurance that is bugging so many....we have mandatory car insurance, Our >>> tax dollars are used for the uninsured pool of drivers and I don't hear >>> these same people balking about that. Medicare was condemned as a >>> socialist plan - just try to take medicare away from any of the people >>> complaining about the 'Obama Socialism " . The bill was passed and in our form >>> of government we now have to live with it. Learn how to 'tweak' it if it >>> does not work, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. >>> >>> I live with a social conscience.. I believe I have a moral and >>> ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am. I know that there >>> are people who take advantage of the system but I believe that there are >>> many fewer than you might think and that the majority who need help would >>> much rather help themselves if possible. >>> >>> I work for a company that does not charge the residents. You read that >>> correctly... no private insurance, no medicare, no medicaid, we don't take >>> their social security. We provide excellent care. We ask that they not be >>> able to pay for private care but we do not want them to leave their families >>> destitute. We do not do a financial search of the applicants. We have had >>> less than 2% of our residents not fit our criteria in the 38 years I have >>> worked for them. And some of those were family of staff members or staff >>> themselves. I believe that people are usually honest. We have a number of >>> homeless residents who would not get the care we provide elsewhere. >>> We rely on donations, an endowment and private income. >>> >>> Happy Holidays >>> >>> Madalyn >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: Digna Cassens <dignacassens@...<mailto:dignacassens%40roadrunner.com><dignacassens%\ 40roadrunner.com>> >>> >>> >>> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> >>> Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 1:05:01 AM >>> >>> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments >>> >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this email - I >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? >>> >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and future. I for >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history lessons. Let's >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as Jan's must >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ev Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 The answer is " yes " for me. If I actually had the choice! You bet! Whatever is right for my country, not whatever is best for me at someone else's expense! I just don't think that way and this nation was not founded and made great on that way of thinking. W. Rowell, RD, LN Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care Certified LEAP Therapist From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of Jen Zingaro Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 4:21 PM To: rd-usa Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments So does that mean you will opt out of medicare and social sec when the time comes? On Saturday, April 3, 2010, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattoly@...<mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com>> wrote: > I came across this from an older gent I admire who has seen it all during > his day. > > 1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every day. > 2.. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute! > 3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. 's Day (March > 17th) than Target sells all year. > 4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target + Sears + Costco + > K-Mart combined. > 5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people and is the largest private Employer, > and most speak English. > 6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World. > 7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger & Safeway combined, and keep in > mind they did this in only 15 years. > 8. During this same period, 31 supermarket chains sought bankruptcy. > 9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world. > 10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are Super > Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had 5 Years ago. > 11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will occur At a > Wal-Mart store. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 Billion.). > 12. 90% of all Americans live within 15 miles of a Wal-Mart. > You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the ground work > for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart to Fix > the economy. T > > This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats, Republicans, > EVERYONE!! > > To: President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature, It is > now official you are ALL corrupt morons: > * The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775. You have had 235 years > to get it right and it is broke. > * Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 75 years to get > it right and it is broke. > * Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 72 years to get it > right and it is broke. > * War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 46 years to get it right; > $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to " the > poor " and they only want more. > * Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 45 years > to get it right and they are broke. > * Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 40 years to get it > right and it is broke. > * The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence > on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 > billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 33 years to > get it right and it is an abysmal failure. > > You have FAILED in every " government service " you have shoved down our > throats while overspending our tax dollars AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO > BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM?? > Mr. Bill > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattoly@...<mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com>> wrote: > >> Madlyn, >> >> I think it's great that your team can provide care to those who really need >> it and can't afford it. On the otherhand, I don't think putting our country >> in a financial crisis to pay for this as well as taxing us even more, is the >> most effective way to pay for this plan. >> >> If we can find other dollars to pay for this, I'd be more open. >> >> Another problem will be less reimbursement for hospitals and loss of jobs >> in the heathcare industry. Many non-profit hospitals already run at a loss >> and have begun to dig into their cash savings to continue operations and >> fund capital campaigns. >> >> Thanks >> >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Madalyn Friedberg <mffrd10019@...<mailto:mffrd10019%40yahoo.com> >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Digna, >>> >>> Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. I was stating mine. >>> >>> I did not read the article as being relevant to the health care bill. I >>> read that some do not want to help the less fortunate and are resentful >>> for having the government tell us what to do. We are doing that now. Our tax >>> dollars are used for many social programs. As for the mandatory health >>> insurance that is bugging so many....we have mandatory car insurance, Our >>> tax dollars are used for the uninsured pool of drivers and I don't hear >>> these same people balking about that. Medicare was condemned as a >>> socialist plan - just try to take medicare away from any of the people >>> complaining about the 'Obama Socialism " . The bill was passed and in our form >>> of government we now have to live with it. Learn how to 'tweak' it if it >>> does not work, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. >>> >>> I live with a social conscience.. I believe I have a moral and >>> ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am. I know that there >>> are people who take advantage of the system but I believe that there are >>> many fewer than you might think and that the majority who need help would >>> much rather help themselves if possible. >>> >>> I work for a company that does not charge the residents. You read that >>> correctly... no private insurance, no medicare, no medicaid, we don't take >>> their social security. We provide excellent care. We ask that they not be >>> able to pay for private care but we do not want them to leave their families >>> destitute. We do not do a financial search of the applicants. We have had >>> less than 2% of our residents not fit our criteria in the 38 years I have >>> worked for them. And some of those were family of staff members or staff >>> themselves. I believe that people are usually honest. We have a number of >>> homeless residents who would not get the care we provide elsewhere. >>> We rely on donations, an endowment and private income. >>> >>> Happy Holidays >>> >>> Madalyn >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: Digna Cassens <dignacassens@...<mailto:dignacassens%40roadrunner.com><dignacassens%\ 40roadrunner.com>> >>> >>> >>> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> <rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> >>> Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 1:05:01 AM >>> >>> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments >>> >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this email - I >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? >>> >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and future. I for >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history lessons. Let's >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as Jan's must >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ev Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Well stated. I agree. I will take care of myself and my own family, thank you! That includes our healthcare expenses. I am teaching my young men to do the same with their future families. W. Rowell, RD, LN Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care Certified LEAP Therapist From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of ne Holden Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 5:12 PM To: rd-usa Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments Jen Zingaro wrote: > So does that mean you will opt out of medicare and social sec when the > time comes? If I could repeal them, yes, I personally would give them up, for the sake of generations to come. - ne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 I encourage everyone to read " The Healing of America " by T.R. Reid. This book gives a great overview of other countries health care systems both the pros and cons and also how some of the systems are already used in our country. Conger, MS, RD, CD, CDE Outpatient Clinical Dietitian Pager number: karenc4@... Email Confidentiality Footer: The above email may contain patient identifiable or confidential information. Because email is not secure, please be aware of associated risks of email transmission. If you are a patient, communicating to a UW Medicine Provider via email implies your agreement to email communication; see http://www.uwmedicine.org/Global/Compliance/EmailRisk.htm The information is intended for the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender by reply email, and then destroy all copies of the message and any attachments. See our Notice of Privacy Practices at www.uwmedicine.org. > Diane, > > Many in Congress (including the President) do not understand it because they > haven't read it. This plan is not in any way going to make America > healthier. If anyone thinks so, please explain how. It will put more $$ in > the pockets of drug companies. > > Here's my .02 on the issue. > > How often or how many physicians have the time to talk about Nutrition and > Exercise during their consultation? I'd say less than 1%. For those who do, > they're not effective in changing habits because they're educated on the > topic nor have enough time to discuss what really needs to be done. In > addition, there's a huge liability on the MD if they don't prescribe > medicine. If you have an overweight/obese patient who has dyslipidemia and > HTN, it's much safer to give them Lipitor and Attenolol as opposed to > recommending they see an RD and join a gym. If they don't and the patient > drops dead of a Heart Attack or Stroke, malpractice suits are issued. > > One of our major initiatives for our Fitness Center is to increase medical > referrals. We have 4 fitness centers and we are owned by one of the largest > Health Care institutions in the South. We have over 700 physicians and I've > spoken to hundreds of them on various topics. They all indicate they are > pushed to see as many patients as possible and rarely have time to discuss > fitness or refer for nutrition. It's only those Physician Champions who care > that refer. > > This new Healthcare plan is not going to fix the Obesity issue. As much as > I'm opposed to the Government telling us what we should put in our body, I'm > all for taxing junk food, fast food, and sodas. If you want to live an > unhealthier life, you should pay more to do so. If you want to smoke, drink, > eat junk food on a daily basis, you have the right to do so but you should > pay more for Health Insurance. > > Let's take the Welfare system as an example. Here are people who have > everything provided by the Govt for them if needed (housing, food stamps, > medicade). Why should they go to work if everything is given to them > (similar to the school analogy). Why can't we stop using the govt. money on > the food stamp program to purhcase junk food. Just doing this will make a > significant change in overall health. > > Just something to think about. > > Thanks > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Diane Preves M.S., R.D. < > newlife4health@...> wrote: > >> >> >> Jan, >> >> I appreciate your message (and the math professor's example). As for >> Madalyn's comment about this forum--we are all affected, and we all have a >> voice. As healthcare professionals we also have to navigate the reforms on >> another level too. We are all big girls (and boys) here, and I trust >> professionally we are able to cut through opinion to the meat of the matter. >> Of course we all have opinions about it too and I am not offended when I >> hear either side's opinion expressed. I find that the more input I receive >> the better--I am able to formulate my own understanding but with reform this >> massive the more input the better. I heard today that many in Congress still >> do not understand it all. >> >> Respectfully, >> Diane Preves, M.S., R.D. >> N.E.W. LIFE (Nutrition, Exercise, Wellness for LIFE) >> www.newlifeforhealth.com >> e-mail: newlife4health@... <newlife4health%40aol.com>, >> newlife@... <newlife%40newlifeforhealth.com> >> >> >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/newlifedianepreves >> http://www.facebook.com/people/Diane-Preves/1357243185 >> http://twitter.com/DianePreves >> >> >> Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments >> >> I found this interesting and personally related to the Health Care Bill. >> More comments below. >> Jan Patenaude >> >> This teacher is truly a genius! (photo removed - don't know if accurate, >> but sounds plausible). >> >> As the late said, " you cannot multiply wealth by dividing >> it. " >> >> An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had >> never >> failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. >> That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked, and that no one >> would >> be poor and no one would be rich --- a great equalizer. The professor then >> said, >> " OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan " . All grades >> would >> be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade, so no one would >> fail >> and no one would receive an A. After the first test, the grades were >> averaged >> and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset, and the >> students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, >> the >> students who studied little had studied even less, and the ones who >> studied hard >> decided they wanted a free ride too, so they studied little. The second >> test average >> was a D! No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around, the average >> was an F. >> The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all >> resulted in hard >> feelings, and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. All >> failed, to their >> great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also >> ultimately fail >> because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when >> government >> takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed. >> >> I work hard to stay healthy. For MANY years I never carried insurance >> because I take care to protect my personal health. If I need health care, I >> pay >> out of pocket. When I needed 4 stitches in my upper lip (face plant when >> rock climbing - my husband did the 4 stitches in about 20 minutes. (The ER >> would have charged me nearly $1000 for the same service, and no, my hubby >> isn't a doctor - had field surgery training before he went to Vietnam - the >> >> scar is barely noticeable.) >> >> So, now, I'm supposed to pay for health care for all the people that don't >> give a crap about their health and run to the doctor for every cough, >> fever, lap band and for perfectly preventable things if they just took care >> of >> their health or addressed their personal addiction issues. >> >> Now, coverage for catestrophic stuff? Yes. Do people end up with health >> problems over which they have NO control? Yes. >> >> But, a new health care bill that includes components for nationalizing >> Student Loans? What does that have to do with health care. >> >> A bill written by lawyers that has NO tort reform so that docs still have >> to pay HUGE insurance premiums just to practice? Why wasn't that addresses? >> >> Of course, we ALL know why. >> >> It's pathetic. >> >> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT >> Consultant, Writer, Speaker >> Director of Medical Nutrition >> Signet Diagnostic Corporation >> (Mountain Time) >> Fax: >> DineRight4aol (DOT) com >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Under current regulation Medicare is already optional. Beginning when eligible one can choose not to be in the Medicare system. Pat Bollinger Rowell, wrote: > > > The answer is " yes " for me. If I actually had the choice! You bet! > Whatever is right for my country, not whatever is best for me at > someone else's expense! I just don't think that way and this nation > was not founded and made great on that way of thinking. > > W. Rowell, RD, LN > Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT > Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care > Certified LEAP Therapist > > From: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>] On > Behalf Of Jen Zingaro > Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 4:21 PM > To: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments > > So does that mean you will opt out of medicare and social sec when the > time comes? > > On Saturday, April 3, 2010, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattolygmail (DOT) com > <mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com><mailto:tpiattoly% 40gmail.com> > wrote: > > I came across this from an older gent I admire who has seen it all > during > > his day. > > > > 1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every day. > > 2.. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute! > > 3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. 's Day (March > > 17th) than Target sells all year. > > 4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target + Sears + > Costco + > > K-Mart combined. > > 5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people and is the largest private > Employer, > > and most speak English. > > 6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World. > > 7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger & Safeway combined, and > keep in > > mind they did this in only 15 years. > > 8. During this same period, 31 supermarket chains sought bankruptcy. > > 9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world. > > 10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are Super > > Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had 5 Years ago. > > 11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will > occur At a > > Wal-Mart store. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 Billion.). > > 12. 90% of all Americans live within 15 miles of a Wal-Mart. > > You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the > ground work > > for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart > to Fix > > the economy. T > > > > This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats, > Republicans, > > EVERYONE!! > > > > To: President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature, It is > > now official you are ALL corrupt morons: > > * The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775. You have had 235 years > > to get it right and it is broke. > > * Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 75 years to get > > it right and it is broke. > > * Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 72 years to get it > > right and it is broke. > > * War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 46 years to get it right; > > $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to > " the > > poor " and they only want more. > > * Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 45 years > > to get it right and they are broke. > > * Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 40 years to get it > > right and it is broke. > > * The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence > > on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget > of $24 > > billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 33 > years to > > get it right and it is an abysmal failure. > > > > You have FAILED in every " government service " you have shoved down our > > throats while overspending our tax dollars AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO > > BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM?? > > Mr. Bill > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattolygmail (DOT) com > <mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com><mailto:tpiattoly% 40gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Madlyn, > >> > >> I think it's great that your team can provide care to those who > really need > >> it and can't afford it. On the otherhand, I don't think putting our > country > >> in a financial crisis to pay for this as well as taxing us even > more, is the > >> most effective way to pay for this plan. > >> > >> If we can find other dollars to pay for this, I'd be more open. > >> > >> Another problem will be less reimbursement for hospitals and loss > of jobs > >> in the heathcare industry. Many non-profit hospitals already run at > a loss > >> and have begun to dig into their cash savings to continue > operations and > >> fund capital campaigns. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Madalyn Friedberg > <mffrd10019yahoo (DOT) com > <mailto:mffrd10019%40yahoo.com><mailto:mffrd10019% 40yahoo.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> Digna, > >>> > >>> Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. I was stating mine. > >>> > >>> I did not read the article as being relevant to the health care > bill. I > >>> read that some do not want to help the less fortunate and are > resentful > >>> for having the government tell us what to do. We are doing that > now. Our tax > >>> dollars are used for many social programs. As for the mandatory health > >>> insurance that is bugging so many....we have mandatory car > insurance, Our > >>> tax dollars are used for the uninsured pool of drivers and I don't > hear > >>> these same people balking about that. Medicare was condemned as a > >>> socialist plan - just try to take medicare away from any of the people > >>> complaining about the 'Obama Socialism " . The bill was passed and > in our form > >>> of government we now have to live with it. Learn how to 'tweak' it > if it > >>> does not work, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. > >>> > >>> I live with a social conscience.. I believe I have a moral and > >>> ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am. I know > that there > >>> are people who take advantage of the system but I believe that > there are > >>> many fewer than you might think and that the majority who need > help would > >>> much rather help themselves if possible. > >>> > >>> I work for a company that does not charge the residents. You read that > >>> correctly... no private insurance, no medicare, no medicaid, we > don't take > >>> their social security. We provide excellent care. We ask that they > not be > >>> able to pay for private care but we do not want them to leave > their families > >>> destitute. We do not do a financial search of the applicants. We > have had > >>> less than 2% of our residents not fit our criteria in the 38 years > I have > >>> worked for them. And some of those were family of staff members or > staff > >>> themselves. I believe that people are usually honest. We have a > number of > >>> homeless residents who would not get the care we provide elsewhere. > >>> We rely on donations, an endowment and private income. > >>> > >>> Happy Holidays > >>> > >>> Madalyn > >>> > >>> > >>> ____________ _________ _________ __ > >>> > >>> From: Digna Cassens <dignacassens@ roadrunner. com > <mailto:dignacassens%40roadrunner.com><mailto:dignacassen > s%40roadrunner. com><dignacassen s%40roadrunner. com>> > >>> > >>> > >>> To: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com > <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:rd-usa% 40yahoogroups. com> > <rd-usa%40yahoogrou ps.com> > >>> Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 1:05:01 AM > >>> > >>> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill > comments > >>> > >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this > email - I > >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? > >>> > >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and > future. I for > >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American > >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history > lessons. Let's > >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible > >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as > Jan's must > >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ev > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Thanks, Pat. Is it optional for me to have to pay into it right straight from my paycheck? Dave From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of Pat Bollinger Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:31 AM To: rd-usa Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments Under current regulation Medicare is already optional. Beginning when eligible one can choose not to be in the Medicare system. Pat Bollinger Rowell, wrote: > > > The answer is " yes " for me. If I actually had the choice! You bet! > Whatever is right for my country, not whatever is best for me at > someone else's expense! I just don't think that way and this nation > was not founded and made great on that way of thinking. > > W. Rowell, RD, LN > Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT > Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care > Certified LEAP Therapist > > From: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>] On > Behalf Of Jen Zingaro > Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 4:21 PM > To: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments > > So does that mean you will opt out of medicare and social sec when the > time comes? > > On Saturday, April 3, 2010, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattolygmail (DOT) com > <mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com><mailto:tpiattoly% 40gmail.com> > wrote: > > I came across this from an older gent I admire who has seen it all > during > > his day. > > > > 1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every day. > > 2.. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute! > > 3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. 's Day (March > > 17th) than Target sells all year. > > 4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target + Sears + > Costco + > > K-Mart combined. > > 5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people and is the largest private > Employer, > > and most speak English. > > 6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World. > > 7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger & Safeway combined, and > keep in > > mind they did this in only 15 years. > > 8. During this same period, 31 supermarket chains sought bankruptcy. > > 9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world. > > 10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are Super > > Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had 5 Years ago. > > 11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will > occur At a > > Wal-Mart store. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 Billion.). > > 12. 90% of all Americans live within 15 miles of a Wal-Mart. > > You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the > ground work > > for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart > to Fix > > the economy. T > > > > This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats, > Republicans, > > EVERYONE!! > > > > To: President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature, It is > > now official you are ALL corrupt morons: > > * The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775. You have had 235 years > > to get it right and it is broke. > > * Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 75 years to get > > it right and it is broke. > > * Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 72 years to get it > > right and it is broke. > > * War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 46 years to get it right; > > $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to > " the > > poor " and they only want more. > > * Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 45 years > > to get it right and they are broke. > > * Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 40 years to get it > > right and it is broke. > > * The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence > > on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget > of $24 > > billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 33 > years to > > get it right and it is an abysmal failure. > > > > You have FAILED in every " government service " you have shoved down our > > throats while overspending our tax dollars AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO > > BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM?? > > Mr. Bill > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattolygmail (DOT) com > <mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com><mailto:tpiattoly% 40gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Madlyn, > >> > >> I think it's great that your team can provide care to those who > really need > >> it and can't afford it. On the otherhand, I don't think putting our > country > >> in a financial crisis to pay for this as well as taxing us even > more, is the > >> most effective way to pay for this plan. > >> > >> If we can find other dollars to pay for this, I'd be more open. > >> > >> Another problem will be less reimbursement for hospitals and loss > of jobs > >> in the heathcare industry. Many non-profit hospitals already run at > a loss > >> and have begun to dig into their cash savings to continue > operations and > >> fund capital campaigns. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Madalyn Friedberg > <mffrd10019yahoo (DOT) com > <mailto:mffrd10019%40yahoo.com><mailto:mffrd10019% 40yahoo.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> Digna, > >>> > >>> Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. I was stating mine. > >>> > >>> I did not read the article as being relevant to the health care > bill. I > >>> read that some do not want to help the less fortunate and are > resentful > >>> for having the government tell us what to do. We are doing that > now. Our tax > >>> dollars are used for many social programs. As for the mandatory health > >>> insurance that is bugging so many....we have mandatory car > insurance, Our > >>> tax dollars are used for the uninsured pool of drivers and I don't > hear > >>> these same people balking about that. Medicare was condemned as a > >>> socialist plan - just try to take medicare away from any of the people > >>> complaining about the 'Obama Socialism " . The bill was passed and > in our form > >>> of government we now have to live with it. Learn how to 'tweak' it > if it > >>> does not work, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. > >>> > >>> I live with a social conscience.. I believe I have a moral and > >>> ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am. I know > that there > >>> are people who take advantage of the system but I believe that > there are > >>> many fewer than you might think and that the majority who need > help would > >>> much rather help themselves if possible. > >>> > >>> I work for a company that does not charge the residents. You read that > >>> correctly... no private insurance, no medicare, no medicaid, we > don't take > >>> their social security. We provide excellent care. We ask that they > not be > >>> able to pay for private care but we do not want them to leave > their families > >>> destitute. We do not do a financial search of the applicants. We > have had > >>> less than 2% of our residents not fit our criteria in the 38 years > I have > >>> worked for them. And some of those were family of staff members or > staff > >>> themselves. I believe that people are usually honest. We have a > number of > >>> homeless residents who would not get the care we provide elsewhere. > >>> We rely on donations, an endowment and private income. > >>> > >>> Happy Holidays > >>> > >>> Madalyn > >>> > >>> > >>> ____________ _________ _________ __ > >>> > >>> From: Digna Cassens <dignacassens@ roadrunner. com > <mailto:dignacassens%40roadrunner.com><mailto:dignacassen > s%40roadrunner. com><dignacassen s%40roadrunner. com>> > >>> > >>> > >>> To: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com > <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:rd-usa% 40yahoogroups. com> > <rd-usa%40yahoogrou ps.com> > >>> Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 1:05:01 AM > >>> > >>> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill > comments > >>> > >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this > email - I > >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? > >>> > >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and > future. I for > >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the American > >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history > lessons. Let's > >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the terrible > >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as > Jan's must > >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could ev > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 , If I remember correctly, you are employed by the state. I see you have a .gov email address. I find it a bit self-serving (as in " I got mine, too bad for you " ) that you claim to dislike state programs so much yet you are eligible for many perks that those of us who don't work for the government aren't as fortunate to have. To be honest, I am incredibly disappointed in the thoughts shared by members of this list. You hate reform. We know that. So, what is a better option? To keep the system we have is not that option. To repeal government offered health care is not an option; so don't accept Medicare.... what about the military? Our troops get (gasp) government sponsored healthcare. As a former soldier in the US Army, I can say it was also outstanding care. To be honest, it was more efficient, cost me nothing, and quicker than in the public sector. If you are complaining because you perceive that your current freedom of choice will be taken away (no, the President, senate, and/or congress personally will not be involved in your medical care), remember that your freedom of choice now is only an illusion. Your health care decisions are not made by you and your doctor. They're made by dudes in suits over at insurance headquarters and are based not on your health but on the bottom line. The same guys who decided that viagra was medically necessary but hearing aids for children with hearing loss were not. The CEO of my current health plan just got a $3 million dollar bonus. And rates were increased. However, I'm lucky in that I have access to health are. Chew on this, those of you who would go without insurance if you could (how many of you have done that?)..... that's fine as long as you stay healthy. Get cancer? We're talking hundreds of thousands of dollars for your surgery, chemo and radiation. Get diabetes? Let me see, it costs about $300/ month, every month, just for your insulin. test strips are about $1 each. You'll need to be seen by your endocrinologist every 3-4 months. Heart disease? Ever costed out cardiac surgery? How many bake sales and donations do you think your friends and neighbors are going to have? Multiply that by the number of chronic illnesses they'll have as well. And, if you're all lucky to stay healthy, remember you could walk out the door and get hit by a bus. Trauma care ain't cheap. Hospitals are only obligated to make sure patients are stable enough for transfer, so don't think that your lack of insurance will carry much weight. As soon as you got a pulse and a blood pressure, there'll be folks trying to get you out the door. You can forget about rehab, nor will you be able to afford the durable medical equipment you need, unless you have access to a lot more in your account than most of us have. Remember, you won't be able to work, so no employer sponsored insurance. If you don't want reform, are you happy with our standing in terms of health outcomes? We have the most expensive health care system in the world, and we are not even close to the top 10 in most outcomes. You can twist those statistics all you want; I know folks on this list have been quick to blame it all on various scapegoats, but the World Health Organization, no slouches when it comes to analyzing data, and not " owned " by liberals or anyone else, has done the crunching. We cost a lot and don't come close to the health care offered by countries that provide care from a more ethical perspective. Remember that if you have health insurance through your employer you are one paycheck from not having it. There's a saying that those who are against reform are those who have good insurance now. I'm not loving the current bill either. I'm incredibly disappointed that it does not include a public option. That's right. I think that we as a moral and ethical nation should be responsible to make sure that every single person in this great nation has access to health care. However, I'm not going to dig in my heels and stomp my feet or whatnot with no thoughts for improving it. Rather, I'm working to make sure that we build on this beginning and make it better. For all of us. I've got mine and I'd love to stop having this argument because we all have ours. Warmest regards, pam Pam Charney pcharney@... > Thanks, Pat. Is it optional for me to have to pay into it right > straight from my paycheck? > > Dave > > From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On > Behalf Of Pat Bollinger > Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:31 AM > To: rd-usa > Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill > comments > > Under current regulation Medicare is already optional. Beginning when > eligible one can choose not to be in the Medicare system. > > Pat Bollinger > > Rowell, wrote: > > > > > > The answer is " yes " for me. If I actually had the choice! You bet! > > Whatever is right for my country, not whatever is best for me at > > someone else's expense! I just don't think that way and this nation > > was not founded and made great on that way of thinking. > > > > W. Rowell, RD, LN > > Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT > > Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care > > Certified LEAP Therapist > > > > From: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> > > [mailto:rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>] > On > > Behalf Of Jen Zingaro > > Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 4:21 PM > > To: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill > comments > > > > So does that mean you will opt out of medicare and social sec when > the > > time comes? > > > > On Saturday, April 3, 2010, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattolygmail (DOT) com > > <mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com><mailto:tpiattoly% 40gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > I came across this from an older gent I admire who has seen it all > > during > > > his day. > > > > > > 1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every > day. > > > 2.. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute! > > > 3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. 's Day > (March > > > 17th) than Target sells all year. > > > 4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target + Sears + > > Costco + > > > K-Mart combined. > > > 5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people and is the largest private > > Employer, > > > and most speak English. > > > 6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World. > > > 7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger & Safeway combined, > and > > keep in > > > mind they did this in only 15 years. > > > 8. During this same period, 31 supermarket chains sought > bankruptcy. > > > 9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world. > > > 10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 > are Super > > > Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had 5 Years ago. > > > 11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will > > occur At a > > > Wal-Mart store. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 > Billion.). > > > 12. 90% of all Americans live within 15 miles of a Wal-Mart. > > > You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the > > ground work > > > for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart > > to Fix > > > the economy. T > > > > > > This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats, > > Republicans, > > > EVERYONE!! > > > > > > To: President Obama and all 535 voting members of the > Legislature, It is > > > now official you are ALL corrupt morons: > > > * The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775. You have had > 235 years > > > to get it right and it is broke. > > > * Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 75 years > to get > > > it right and it is broke. > > > * Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 72 years to > get it > > > right and it is broke. > > > * War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 46 years to get > it right; > > > $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and > transferred to > > " the > > > poor " and they only want more. > > > * Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had > 45 years > > > to get it right and they are broke. > > > * Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 40 years to > get it > > > right and it is broke. > > > * The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our > dependence > > > on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget > > of $24 > > > billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 33 > > years to > > > get it right and it is an abysmal failure. > > > > > > You have FAILED in every " government service " you have shoved > down our > > > throats while overspending our tax dollars AND YOU WANT > AMERICANS TO > > > BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE > SYSTEM?? > > > Mr. Bill > > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattolygmail (DOT) > com > > <mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com><mailto:tpiattoly% 40gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Madlyn, > > >> > > >> I think it's great that your team can provide care to those who > > really need > > >> it and can't afford it. On the otherhand, I don't think putting > our > > country > > >> in a financial crisis to pay for this as well as taxing us even > > more, is the > > >> most effective way to pay for this plan. > > >> > > >> If we can find other dollars to pay for this, I'd be more open. > > >> > > >> Another problem will be less reimbursement for hospitals and loss > > of jobs > > >> in the heathcare industry. Many non-profit hospitals already > run at > > a loss > > >> and have begun to dig into their cash savings to continue > > operations and > > >> fund capital campaigns. > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> > > >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Madalyn Friedberg > > <mffrd10019yahoo (DOT) com > > <mailto:mffrd10019%40yahoo.com><mailto:mffrd10019% 40yahoo.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Digna, > > >>> > > >>> Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. I was > stating mine. > > >>> > > >>> I did not read the article as being relevant to the health care > > bill. I > > >>> read that some do not want to help the less fortunate and are > > resentful > > >>> for having the government tell us what to do. We are doing that > > now. Our tax > > >>> dollars are used for many social programs. As for the > mandatory health > > >>> insurance that is bugging so many....we have mandatory car > > insurance, Our > > >>> tax dollars are used for the uninsured pool of drivers and I > don't > > hear > > >>> these same people balking about that. Medicare was condemned > as a > > >>> socialist plan - just try to take medicare away from any of > the people > > >>> complaining about the 'Obama Socialism " . The bill was passed and > > in our form > > >>> of government we now have to live with it. Learn how to > 'tweak' it > > if it > > >>> does not work, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. > > >>> > > >>> I live with a social conscience.. I believe I have a moral and > > >>> ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am. I > know > > that there > > >>> are people who take advantage of the system but I believe that > > there are > > >>> many fewer than you might think and that the majority who need > > help would > > >>> much rather help themselves if possible. > > >>> > > >>> I work for a company that does not charge the residents. You > read that > > >>> correctly... no private insurance, no medicare, no medicaid, we > > don't take > > >>> their social security. We provide excellent care. We ask that > they > > not be > > >>> able to pay for private care but we do not want them to leave > > their families > > >>> destitute. We do not do a financial search of the applicants. We > > have had > > >>> less than 2% of our residents not fit our criteria in the 38 > years > > I have > > >>> worked for them. And some of those were family of staff > members or > > staff > > >>> themselves. I believe that people are usually honest. We have a > > number of > > >>> homeless residents who would not get the care we provide > elsewhere. > > >>> We rely on donations, an endowment and private income. > > >>> > > >>> Happy Holidays > > >>> > > >>> Madalyn > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ____________ _________ _________ __ > > >>> > > >>> From: Digna Cassens <dignacassens@ roadrunner. com > > <mailto:dignacassens%40roadrunner.com><mailto:dignacassen > > s%40roadrunner. com><dignacassen s%40roadrunner. com>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> To: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com > > <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:rd-usa% 40yahoogroups. com> > > <rd-usa%40yahoogrou ps.com> > > >>> Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 1:05:01 AM > > >>> > > >>> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill > > comments > > >>> > > >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this > > email - I > > >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? > > >>> > > >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and > > future. I for > > >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the > American > > >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history > > lessons. Let's > > >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the > terrible > > >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as > > Jan's must > > >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could > ev > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Well said pam. Also, for those of you thatare upset b/c your congressman didn't vote based on your letters, maybe they voted based on the ones that are pro-reform like mine. > , > If I remember correctly, you are employed by the state. I see you have > a .gov email address. I find it a bit self-serving (as in " I got mine, > too bad for you " ) that you claim to dislike state programs so much yet > you are eligible for many perks that those of us who don't work for > the government aren't as fortunate to have. > > To be honest, I am incredibly disappointed in the thoughts shared by > members of this list. You hate reform. We know that. So, what is a > better option? To keep the system we have is not that option. To > repeal government offered health care is not an option; so don't > accept Medicare.... what about the military? Our troops get (gasp) > government sponsored healthcare. As a former soldier in the US Army, I > can say it was also outstanding care. To be honest, it was more > efficient, cost me nothing, and quicker than in the public sector. > > If you are complaining because you perceive that your current freedom > of choice will be taken away (no, the President, senate, and/or > congress personally will not be involved in your medical care), > remember that your freedom of choice now is only an illusion. Your > health care decisions are not made by you and your doctor. They're > made by dudes in suits over at insurance headquarters and are based > not on your health but on the bottom line. The same guys who decided > that viagra was medically necessary but hearing aids for children with > hearing loss were not. The CEO of my current health plan just got a $3 > million dollar bonus. And rates were increased. However, I'm lucky in > that I have access to health are. > > Chew on this, those of you who would go without insurance if you could > (how many of you have done that?)..... that's fine as long as you stay > healthy. Get cancer? We're talking hundreds of thousands of dollars > for your surgery, chemo and radiation. Get diabetes? Let me see, it > costs about $300/ month, every month, just for your insulin. test > strips are about $1 each. You'll need to be seen by your > endocrinologist every 3-4 months. Heart disease? Ever costed out > cardiac surgery? How many bake sales and donations do you think your > friends and neighbors are going to have? Multiply that by the number > of chronic illnesses they'll have as well. And, if you're all lucky to > stay healthy, remember you could walk out the door and get hit by a > bus. Trauma care ain't cheap. Hospitals are only obligated to make > sure patients are stable enough for transfer, so don't think that your > lack of insurance will carry much weight. As soon as you got a pulse > and a blood pressure, there'll be folks trying to get you out the > door. You can forget about rehab, nor will you be able to afford the > durable medical equipment you need, unless you have access to a lot > more in your account than most of us have. Remember, you won't be able > to work, so no employer sponsored insurance. > > If you don't want reform, are you happy with our standing in terms of > health outcomes? We have the most expensive health care system in the > world, and we are not even close to the top 10 in most outcomes. You > can twist those statistics all you want; I know folks on this list > have been quick to blame it all on various scapegoats, but the World > Health Organization, no slouches when it comes to analyzing data, and > not " owned " by liberals or anyone else, has done the crunching. We > cost a lot and don't come close to the health care offered by > countries that provide care from a more ethical perspective. > > Remember that if you have health insurance through your employer you > are one paycheck from not having it. There's a saying that those who > are against reform are those who have good insurance now. I'm not > loving the current bill either. I'm incredibly disappointed that it > does not include a public option. That's right. I think that we as a > moral and ethical nation should be responsible to make sure that every > single person in this great nation has access to health care. However, > I'm not going to dig in my heels and stomp my feet or whatnot with no > thoughts for improving it. Rather, I'm working to make sure that we > build on this beginning and make it better. For all of us. I've got > mine and I'd love to stop having this argument because we all have ours. > > Warmest regards, > pam > > Pam Charney > pcharney@... > > > > > >> Thanks, Pat. Is it optional for me to have to pay into it right >> straight from my paycheck? >> >> Dave >> >> From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On >> Behalf Of Pat Bollinger >> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:31 AM >> To: rd-usa >> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill >> comments >> >> Under current regulation Medicare is already optional. Beginning when >> eligible one can choose not to be in the Medicare system. >> >> Pat Bollinger >> >> Rowell, wrote: >> > >> > >> > The answer is " yes " for me. If I actually had the choice! You bet! >> > Whatever is right for my country, not whatever is best for me at >> > someone else's expense! I just don't think that way and this nation >> > was not founded and made great on that way of thinking. >> > >> > W. Rowell, RD, LN >> > Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT >> > Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care >> > Certified LEAP Therapist >> > >> > From: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> >> > [mailto:rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>] >> On >> > Behalf Of Jen Zingaro >> > Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 4:21 PM >> > To: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> >> > Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill >> comments >> > >> > So does that mean you will opt out of medicare and social sec when >> the >> > time comes? >> > >> > On Saturday, April 3, 2010, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattolygmail (DOT) com >> > <mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com><mailto:tpiattoly% 40gmail.com> > >> wrote: >> > > I came across this from an older gent I admire who has seen it all >> > during >> > > his day. >> > > >> > > 1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every >> day. >> > > 2.. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute! >> > > 3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. 's Day >> (March >> > > 17th) than Target sells all year. >> > > 4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target + Sears + >> > Costco + >> > > K-Mart combined. >> > > 5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people and is the largest private >> > Employer, >> > > and most speak English. >> > > 6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World. >> > > 7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger & Safeway combined, >> and >> > keep in >> > > mind they did this in only 15 years. >> > > 8. During this same period, 31 supermarket chains sought >> bankruptcy. >> > > 9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world. >> > > 10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 >> are Super >> > > Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had 5 Years ago. >> > > 11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will >> > occur At a >> > > Wal-Mart store. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 >> Billion.). >> > > 12. 90% of all Americans live within 15 miles of a Wal-Mart. >> > > You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the >> > ground work >> > > for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart >> > to Fix >> > > the economy. T >> > > >> > > This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats, >> > Republicans, >> > > EVERYONE!! >> > > >> ------------------------------------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 I think I may be one of the few who isn't against it...not 100% for ALL of it, but something sure needs to happen! Collier, RD/LD Clinical Nutrition Manager Patient Services Manager Midland Memorial Hospital 2200 West Illinois Midland, TX 79701 leslie.collier@... (fax) (pager) " Dance like no one is watching, eat like someone is! " From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of Jen Zingaro Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:14 AM To: rd-usa Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments Well said pam. Also, for those of you thatare upset b/c your congressman didn't vote based on your letters, maybe they voted based on the ones that are pro-reform like mine. On Monday, April 5, 2010, Pam Charney <pcharney@... <mailto:pcharney%40mac.com> > wrote: > , > If I remember correctly, you are employed by the state. I see you have > a .gov email address. I find it a bit self-serving (as in " I got mine, > too bad for you " ) that you claim to dislike state programs so much yet > you are eligible for many perks that those of us who don't work for > the government aren't as fortunate to have. > > To be honest, I am incredibly disappointed in the thoughts shared by > members of this list. You hate reform. We know that. So, what is a > better option? To keep the system we have is not that option. To > repeal government offered health care is not an option; so don't > accept Medicare.... what about the military? Our troops get (gasp) > government sponsored healthcare. As a former soldier in the US Army, I > can say it was also outstanding care. To be honest, it was more > efficient, cost me nothing, and quicker than in the public sector. > > If you are complaining because you perceive that your current freedom > of choice will be taken away (no, the President, senate, and/or > congress personally will not be involved in your medical care), > remember that your freedom of choice now is only an illusion. Your > health care decisions are not made by you and your doctor. They're > made by dudes in suits over at insurance headquarters and are based > not on your health but on the bottom line. The same guys who decided > that viagra was medically necessary but hearing aids for children with > hearing loss were not. The CEO of my current health plan just got a $3 > million dollar bonus. And rates were increased. However, I'm lucky in > that I have access to health are. > > Chew on this, those of you who would go without insurance if you could > (how many of you have done that?)..... that's fine as long as you stay > healthy. Get cancer? We're talking hundreds of thousands of dollars > for your surgery, chemo and radiation. Get diabetes? Let me see, it > costs about $300/ month, every month, just for your insulin. test > strips are about $1 each. You'll need to be seen by your > endocrinologist every 3-4 months. Heart disease? Ever costed out > cardiac surgery? How many bake sales and donations do you think your > friends and neighbors are going to have? Multiply that by the number > of chronic illnesses they'll have as well. And, if you're all lucky to > stay healthy, remember you could walk out the door and get hit by a > bus. Trauma care ain't cheap. Hospitals are only obligated to make > sure patients are stable enough for transfer, so don't think that your > lack of insurance will carry much weight. As soon as you got a pulse > and a blood pressure, there'll be folks trying to get you out the > door. You can forget about rehab, nor will you be able to afford the > durable medical equipment you need, unless you have access to a lot > more in your account than most of us have. Remember, you won't be able > to work, so no employer sponsored insurance. > > If you don't want reform, are you happy with our standing in terms of > health outcomes? We have the most expensive health care system in the > world, and we are not even close to the top 10 in most outcomes. You > can twist those statistics all you want; I know folks on this list > have been quick to blame it all on various scapegoats, but the World > Health Organization, no slouches when it comes to analyzing data, and > not " owned " by liberals or anyone else, has done the crunching. We > cost a lot and don't come close to the health care offered by > countries that provide care from a more ethical perspective. > > Remember that if you have health insurance through your employer you > are one paycheck from not having it. There's a saying that those who > are against reform are those who have good insurance now. I'm not > loving the current bill either. I'm incredibly disappointed that it > does not include a public option. That's right. I think that we as a > moral and ethical nation should be responsible to make sure that every > single person in this great nation has access to health care. However, > I'm not going to dig in my heels and stomp my feet or whatnot with no > thoughts for improving it. Rather, I'm working to make sure that we > build on this beginning and make it better. For all of us. I've got > mine and I'd love to stop having this argument because we all have ours. > > Warmest regards, > pam > > Pam Charney > pcharney@... <mailto:pcharney%40mac.com> > > > > > >> Thanks, Pat. Is it optional for me to have to pay into it right >> straight from my paycheck? >> >> Dave >> >> From: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> ] On >> Behalf Of Pat Bollinger >> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:31 AM >> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> >> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill >> comments >> >> Under current regulation Medicare is already optional. Beginning when >> eligible one can choose not to be in the Medicare system. >> >> Pat Bollinger >> >> Rowell, wrote: >> > >> > >> > The answer is " yes " for me. If I actually had the choice! You bet! >> > Whatever is right for my country, not whatever is best for me at >> > someone else's expense! I just don't think that way and this nation >> > was not founded and made great on that way of thinking. >> > >> > W. Rowell, RD, LN >> > Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT >> > Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care >> > Certified LEAP Therapist >> > >> > From: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> >> > [mailto:rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>] >> On >> > Behalf Of Jen Zingaro >> > Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 4:21 PM >> > To: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> >> > Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill >> comments >> > >> > So does that mean you will opt out of medicare and social sec when >> the >> > time comes? >> > >> > On Saturday, April 3, 2010, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattolygmail (DOT) com >> > <mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com><mailto:tpiattoly% 40gmail.com> > >> wrote: >> > > I came across this from an older gent I admire who has seen it all >> > during >> > > his day. >> > > >> > > 1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every >> day. >> > > 2.. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute! >> > > 3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. 's Day >> (March >> > > 17th) than Target sells all year. >> > > 4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target + Sears + >> > Costco + >> > > K-Mart combined. >> > > 5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people and is the largest private >> > Employer, >> > > and most speak English. >> > > 6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World. >> > > 7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger & Safeway combined, >> and >> > keep in >> > > mind they did this in only 15 years. >> > > 8. During this same period, 31 supermarket chains sought >> bankruptcy. >> > > 9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world. >> > > 10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 >> are Super >> > > Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had 5 Years ago. >> > > 11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will >> > occur At a >> > > Wal-Mart store. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 >> Billion.). >> > > 12. 90% of all Americans live within 15 miles of a Wal-Mart. >> > > You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the >> > ground work >> > > for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart >> > to Fix >> > > the economy. T >> > > >> > > This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats, >> > Republicans, >> > > EVERYONE!! >> > > >> ------------------------------------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Thanks for sharing! I think I will read it! Collier, RD/LD Clinical Nutrition Manager Patient Services Manager Midland Memorial Hospital 2200 West Illinois Midland, TX 79701 leslie.collier@... (fax) (pager) " Dance like no one is watching, eat like someone is! " From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of KAREN CONGER Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 10:25 AM To: RD Listserv Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments I encourage everyone to read " The Healing of America " by T.R. Reid. This book gives a great overview of other countries health care systems both the pros and cons and also how some of the systems are already used in our country. Conger, MS, RD, CD, CDE Outpatient Clinical Dietitian Pager number: karenc4@... <mailto:karenc4%40u.washington.edu> Email Confidentiality Footer: The above email may contain patient identifiable or confidential information. Because email is not secure, please be aware of associated risks of email transmission. If you are a patient, communicating to a UW Medicine Provider via email implies your agreement to email communication; see http://www.uwmedicine.org/Global/Compliance/EmailRisk.htm The information is intended for the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender by reply email, and then destroy all copies of the message and any attachments. See our Notice of Privacy Practices at www.uwmedicine.org. > Diane, > > Many in Congress (including the President) do not understand it because they > haven't read it. This plan is not in any way going to make America > healthier. If anyone thinks so, please explain how. It will put more $$ in > the pockets of drug companies. > > Here's my .02 on the issue. > > How often or how many physicians have the time to talk about Nutrition and > Exercise during their consultation? I'd say less than 1%. For those who do, > they're not effective in changing habits because they're educated on the > topic nor have enough time to discuss what really needs to be done. In > addition, there's a huge liability on the MD if they don't prescribe > medicine. If you have an overweight/obese patient who has dyslipidemia and > HTN, it's much safer to give them Lipitor and Attenolol as opposed to > recommending they see an RD and join a gym. If they don't and the patient > drops dead of a Heart Attack or Stroke, malpractice suits are issued. > > One of our major initiatives for our Fitness Center is to increase medical > referrals. We have 4 fitness centers and we are owned by one of the largest > Health Care institutions in the South. We have over 700 physicians and I've > spoken to hundreds of them on various topics. They all indicate they are > pushed to see as many patients as possible and rarely have time to discuss > fitness or refer for nutrition. It's only those Physician Champions who care > that refer. > > This new Healthcare plan is not going to fix the Obesity issue. As much as > I'm opposed to the Government telling us what we should put in our body, I'm > all for taxing junk food, fast food, and sodas. If you want to live an > unhealthier life, you should pay more to do so. If you want to smoke, drink, > eat junk food on a daily basis, you have the right to do so but you should > pay more for Health Insurance. > > Let's take the Welfare system as an example. Here are people who have > everything provided by the Govt for them if needed (housing, food stamps, > medicade). Why should they go to work if everything is given to them > (similar to the school analogy). Why can't we stop using the govt. money on > the food stamp program to purhcase junk food. Just doing this will make a > significant change in overall health. > > Just something to think about. > > Thanks > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Diane Preves M.S., R.D. < > newlife4health@... <mailto:newlife4health%40aol.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> Jan, >> >> I appreciate your message (and the math professor's example). As for >> Madalyn's comment about this forum--we are all affected, and we all have a >> voice. As healthcare professionals we also have to navigate the reforms on >> another level too. We are all big girls (and boys) here, and I trust >> professionally we are able to cut through opinion to the meat of the matter. >> Of course we all have opinions about it too and I am not offended when I >> hear either side's opinion expressed. I find that the more input I receive >> the better--I am able to formulate my own understanding but with reform this >> massive the more input the better. I heard today that many in Congress still >> do not understand it all. >> >> Respectfully, >> Diane Preves, M.S., R.D. >> N.E.W. LIFE (Nutrition, Exercise, Wellness for LIFE) >> www.newlifeforhealth.com >> e-mail: newlife4health@... <mailto:newlife4health%40aol.com> <newlife4health%40aol.com>, >> newlife@... <mailto:newlife%40newlifeforhealth.com> <newlife%40newlifeforhealth.com> >> >> >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/newlifedianepreves >> http://www.facebook.com/people/Diane-Preves/1357243185 >> http://twitter.com/DianePreves >> >> >> Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments >> >> I found this interesting and personally related to the Health Care Bill. >> More comments below. >> Jan Patenaude >> >> This teacher is truly a genius! (photo removed - don't know if accurate, >> but sounds plausible). >> >> As the late said, " you cannot multiply wealth by dividing >> it. " >> >> An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had >> never >> failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. >> That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked, and that no one >> would >> be poor and no one would be rich --- a great equalizer. The professor then >> said, >> " OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan " . All grades >> would >> be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade, so no one would >> fail >> and no one would receive an A. After the first test, the grades were >> averaged >> and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset, and the >> students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, >> the >> students who studied little had studied even less, and the ones who >> studied hard >> decided they wanted a free ride too, so they studied little. The second >> test average >> was a D! No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around, the average >> was an F. >> The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all >> resulted in hard >> feelings, and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. All >> failed, to their >> great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also >> ultimately fail >> because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when >> government >> takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed. >> >> I work hard to stay healthy. For MANY years I never carried insurance >> because I take care to protect my personal health. If I need health care, I >> pay >> out of pocket. When I needed 4 stitches in my upper lip (face plant when >> rock climbing - my husband did the 4 stitches in about 20 minutes. (The ER >> would have charged me nearly $1000 for the same service, and no, my hubby >> isn't a doctor - had field surgery training before he went to Vietnam - the >> >> scar is barely noticeable.) >> >> So, now, I'm supposed to pay for health care for all the people that don't >> give a crap about their health and run to the doctor for every cough, >> fever, lap band and for perfectly preventable things if they just took care >> of >> their health or addressed their personal addiction issues. >> >> Now, coverage for catestrophic stuff? Yes. Do people end up with health >> problems over which they have NO control? Yes. >> >> But, a new health care bill that includes components for nationalizing >> Student Loans? What does that have to do with health care. >> >> A bill written by lawyers that has NO tort reform so that docs still have >> to pay HUGE insurance premiums just to practice? Why wasn't that addresses? >> >> Of course, we ALL know why. >> >> It's pathetic. >> >> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT >> Consultant, Writer, Speaker >> Director of Medical Nutrition >> Signet Diagnostic Corporation >> (Mountain Time) >> Fax: >> DineRight4aol (DOT) com >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Thanks for sharing! I think I will read it! Collier, RD/LD Clinical Nutrition Manager Patient Services Manager Midland Memorial Hospital 2200 West Illinois Midland, TX 79701 leslie.collier@... (fax) (pager) " Dance like no one is watching, eat like someone is! " From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of KAREN CONGER Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 10:25 AM To: RD Listserv Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments I encourage everyone to read " The Healing of America " by T.R. Reid. This book gives a great overview of other countries health care systems both the pros and cons and also how some of the systems are already used in our country. Conger, MS, RD, CD, CDE Outpatient Clinical Dietitian Pager number: karenc4@... <mailto:karenc4%40u.washington.edu> Email Confidentiality Footer: The above email may contain patient identifiable or confidential information. Because email is not secure, please be aware of associated risks of email transmission. If you are a patient, communicating to a UW Medicine Provider via email implies your agreement to email communication; see http://www.uwmedicine.org/Global/Compliance/EmailRisk.htm The information is intended for the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender by reply email, and then destroy all copies of the message and any attachments. See our Notice of Privacy Practices at www.uwmedicine.org. > Diane, > > Many in Congress (including the President) do not understand it because they > haven't read it. This plan is not in any way going to make America > healthier. If anyone thinks so, please explain how. It will put more $$ in > the pockets of drug companies. > > Here's my .02 on the issue. > > How often or how many physicians have the time to talk about Nutrition and > Exercise during their consultation? I'd say less than 1%. For those who do, > they're not effective in changing habits because they're educated on the > topic nor have enough time to discuss what really needs to be done. In > addition, there's a huge liability on the MD if they don't prescribe > medicine. If you have an overweight/obese patient who has dyslipidemia and > HTN, it's much safer to give them Lipitor and Attenolol as opposed to > recommending they see an RD and join a gym. If they don't and the patient > drops dead of a Heart Attack or Stroke, malpractice suits are issued. > > One of our major initiatives for our Fitness Center is to increase medical > referrals. We have 4 fitness centers and we are owned by one of the largest > Health Care institutions in the South. We have over 700 physicians and I've > spoken to hundreds of them on various topics. They all indicate they are > pushed to see as many patients as possible and rarely have time to discuss > fitness or refer for nutrition. It's only those Physician Champions who care > that refer. > > This new Healthcare plan is not going to fix the Obesity issue. As much as > I'm opposed to the Government telling us what we should put in our body, I'm > all for taxing junk food, fast food, and sodas. If you want to live an > unhealthier life, you should pay more to do so. If you want to smoke, drink, > eat junk food on a daily basis, you have the right to do so but you should > pay more for Health Insurance. > > Let's take the Welfare system as an example. Here are people who have > everything provided by the Govt for them if needed (housing, food stamps, > medicade). Why should they go to work if everything is given to them > (similar to the school analogy). Why can't we stop using the govt. money on > the food stamp program to purhcase junk food. Just doing this will make a > significant change in overall health. > > Just something to think about. > > Thanks > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Diane Preves M.S., R.D. < > newlife4health@... <mailto:newlife4health%40aol.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> Jan, >> >> I appreciate your message (and the math professor's example). As for >> Madalyn's comment about this forum--we are all affected, and we all have a >> voice. As healthcare professionals we also have to navigate the reforms on >> another level too. We are all big girls (and boys) here, and I trust >> professionally we are able to cut through opinion to the meat of the matter. >> Of course we all have opinions about it too and I am not offended when I >> hear either side's opinion expressed. I find that the more input I receive >> the better--I am able to formulate my own understanding but with reform this >> massive the more input the better. I heard today that many in Congress still >> do not understand it all. >> >> Respectfully, >> Diane Preves, M.S., R.D. >> N.E.W. LIFE (Nutrition, Exercise, Wellness for LIFE) >> www.newlifeforhealth.com >> e-mail: newlife4health@... <mailto:newlife4health%40aol.com> <newlife4health%40aol.com>, >> newlife@... <mailto:newlife%40newlifeforhealth.com> <newlife%40newlifeforhealth.com> >> >> >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/newlifedianepreves >> http://www.facebook.com/people/Diane-Preves/1357243185 >> http://twitter.com/DianePreves >> >> >> Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments >> >> I found this interesting and personally related to the Health Care Bill. >> More comments below. >> Jan Patenaude >> >> This teacher is truly a genius! (photo removed - don't know if accurate, >> but sounds plausible). >> >> As the late said, " you cannot multiply wealth by dividing >> it. " >> >> An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had >> never >> failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. >> That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked, and that no one >> would >> be poor and no one would be rich --- a great equalizer. The professor then >> said, >> " OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan " . All grades >> would >> be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade, so no one would >> fail >> and no one would receive an A. After the first test, the grades were >> averaged >> and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset, and the >> students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, >> the >> students who studied little had studied even less, and the ones who >> studied hard >> decided they wanted a free ride too, so they studied little. The second >> test average >> was a D! No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around, the average >> was an F. >> The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all >> resulted in hard >> feelings, and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. All >> failed, to their >> great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also >> ultimately fail >> because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when >> government >> takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed. >> >> I work hard to stay healthy. For MANY years I never carried insurance >> because I take care to protect my personal health. If I need health care, I >> pay >> out of pocket. When I needed 4 stitches in my upper lip (face plant when >> rock climbing - my husband did the 4 stitches in about 20 minutes. (The ER >> would have charged me nearly $1000 for the same service, and no, my hubby >> isn't a doctor - had field surgery training before he went to Vietnam - the >> >> scar is barely noticeable.) >> >> So, now, I'm supposed to pay for health care for all the people that don't >> give a crap about their health and run to the doctor for every cough, >> fever, lap band and for perfectly preventable things if they just took care >> of >> their health or addressed their personal addiction issues. >> >> Now, coverage for catestrophic stuff? Yes. Do people end up with health >> problems over which they have NO control? Yes. >> >> But, a new health care bill that includes components for nationalizing >> Student Loans? What does that have to do with health care. >> >> A bill written by lawyers that has NO tort reform so that docs still have >> to pay HUGE insurance premiums just to practice? Why wasn't that addresses? >> >> Of course, we ALL know why. >> >> It's pathetic. >> >> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT >> Consultant, Writer, Speaker >> Director of Medical Nutrition >> Signet Diagnostic Corporation >> (Mountain Time) >> Fax: >> DineRight4aol (DOT) com >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Thanks for sharing! I think I will read it! Collier, RD/LD Clinical Nutrition Manager Patient Services Manager Midland Memorial Hospital 2200 West Illinois Midland, TX 79701 leslie.collier@... (fax) (pager) " Dance like no one is watching, eat like someone is! " From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of KAREN CONGER Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 10:25 AM To: RD Listserv Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments I encourage everyone to read " The Healing of America " by T.R. Reid. This book gives a great overview of other countries health care systems both the pros and cons and also how some of the systems are already used in our country. Conger, MS, RD, CD, CDE Outpatient Clinical Dietitian Pager number: karenc4@... <mailto:karenc4%40u.washington.edu> Email Confidentiality Footer: The above email may contain patient identifiable or confidential information. Because email is not secure, please be aware of associated risks of email transmission. If you are a patient, communicating to a UW Medicine Provider via email implies your agreement to email communication; see http://www.uwmedicine.org/Global/Compliance/EmailRisk.htm The information is intended for the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender by reply email, and then destroy all copies of the message and any attachments. See our Notice of Privacy Practices at www.uwmedicine.org. > Diane, > > Many in Congress (including the President) do not understand it because they > haven't read it. This plan is not in any way going to make America > healthier. If anyone thinks so, please explain how. It will put more $$ in > the pockets of drug companies. > > Here's my .02 on the issue. > > How often or how many physicians have the time to talk about Nutrition and > Exercise during their consultation? I'd say less than 1%. For those who do, > they're not effective in changing habits because they're educated on the > topic nor have enough time to discuss what really needs to be done. In > addition, there's a huge liability on the MD if they don't prescribe > medicine. If you have an overweight/obese patient who has dyslipidemia and > HTN, it's much safer to give them Lipitor and Attenolol as opposed to > recommending they see an RD and join a gym. If they don't and the patient > drops dead of a Heart Attack or Stroke, malpractice suits are issued. > > One of our major initiatives for our Fitness Center is to increase medical > referrals. We have 4 fitness centers and we are owned by one of the largest > Health Care institutions in the South. We have over 700 physicians and I've > spoken to hundreds of them on various topics. They all indicate they are > pushed to see as many patients as possible and rarely have time to discuss > fitness or refer for nutrition. It's only those Physician Champions who care > that refer. > > This new Healthcare plan is not going to fix the Obesity issue. As much as > I'm opposed to the Government telling us what we should put in our body, I'm > all for taxing junk food, fast food, and sodas. If you want to live an > unhealthier life, you should pay more to do so. If you want to smoke, drink, > eat junk food on a daily basis, you have the right to do so but you should > pay more for Health Insurance. > > Let's take the Welfare system as an example. Here are people who have > everything provided by the Govt for them if needed (housing, food stamps, > medicade). Why should they go to work if everything is given to them > (similar to the school analogy). Why can't we stop using the govt. money on > the food stamp program to purhcase junk food. Just doing this will make a > significant change in overall health. > > Just something to think about. > > Thanks > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Diane Preves M.S., R.D. < > newlife4health@... <mailto:newlife4health%40aol.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> Jan, >> >> I appreciate your message (and the math professor's example). As for >> Madalyn's comment about this forum--we are all affected, and we all have a >> voice. As healthcare professionals we also have to navigate the reforms on >> another level too. We are all big girls (and boys) here, and I trust >> professionally we are able to cut through opinion to the meat of the matter. >> Of course we all have opinions about it too and I am not offended when I >> hear either side's opinion expressed. I find that the more input I receive >> the better--I am able to formulate my own understanding but with reform this >> massive the more input the better. I heard today that many in Congress still >> do not understand it all. >> >> Respectfully, >> Diane Preves, M.S., R.D. >> N.E.W. LIFE (Nutrition, Exercise, Wellness for LIFE) >> www.newlifeforhealth.com >> e-mail: newlife4health@... <mailto:newlife4health%40aol.com> <newlife4health%40aol.com>, >> newlife@... <mailto:newlife%40newlifeforhealth.com> <newlife%40newlifeforhealth.com> >> >> >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/newlifedianepreves >> http://www.facebook.com/people/Diane-Preves/1357243185 >> http://twitter.com/DianePreves >> >> >> Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments >> >> I found this interesting and personally related to the Health Care Bill. >> More comments below. >> Jan Patenaude >> >> This teacher is truly a genius! (photo removed - don't know if accurate, >> but sounds plausible). >> >> As the late said, " you cannot multiply wealth by dividing >> it. " >> >> An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had >> never >> failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. >> That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked, and that no one >> would >> be poor and no one would be rich --- a great equalizer. The professor then >> said, >> " OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan " . All grades >> would >> be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade, so no one would >> fail >> and no one would receive an A. After the first test, the grades were >> averaged >> and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset, and the >> students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, >> the >> students who studied little had studied even less, and the ones who >> studied hard >> decided they wanted a free ride too, so they studied little. The second >> test average >> was a D! No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around, the average >> was an F. >> The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all >> resulted in hard >> feelings, and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. All >> failed, to their >> great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also >> ultimately fail >> because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when >> government >> takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed. >> >> I work hard to stay healthy. For MANY years I never carried insurance >> because I take care to protect my personal health. If I need health care, I >> pay >> out of pocket. When I needed 4 stitches in my upper lip (face plant when >> rock climbing - my husband did the 4 stitches in about 20 minutes. (The ER >> would have charged me nearly $1000 for the same service, and no, my hubby >> isn't a doctor - had field surgery training before he went to Vietnam - the >> >> scar is barely noticeable.) >> >> So, now, I'm supposed to pay for health care for all the people that don't >> give a crap about their health and run to the doctor for every cough, >> fever, lap band and for perfectly preventable things if they just took care >> of >> their health or addressed their personal addiction issues. >> >> Now, coverage for catestrophic stuff? Yes. Do people end up with health >> problems over which they have NO control? Yes. >> >> But, a new health care bill that includes components for nationalizing >> Student Loans? What does that have to do with health care. >> >> A bill written by lawyers that has NO tort reform so that docs still have >> to pay HUGE insurance premiums just to practice? Why wasn't that addresses? >> >> Of course, we ALL know why. >> >> It's pathetic. >> >> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT >> Consultant, Writer, Speaker >> Director of Medical Nutrition >> Signet Diagnostic Corporation >> (Mountain Time) >> Fax: >> DineRight4aol (DOT) com >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 You jump to many conclusions, including that I do not approve of taking care of the veterans. I know there are MANY in the military who disagree that their government run healthcare is so great. I deal with vets all the time in long term care. I would prefer to let them have something much better than the government can run. I would also prefer to purchase my own catastrophic health insurance and save for the high deductable in a HSA account, rather than the State providing me with an employer sponsored health insurance policy that I have. If they gave me the money, instead of spending it for me, I would do exactly that. Quote Worthy: " If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands, which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen! " - Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill > > comments > > >>> > > >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this > > email - I > > >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? > > >>> > > >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and > > future. I for > > >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the > American > > >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history > > lessons. Let's > > >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the > terrible > > >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as > > Jan's must > > >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could > ev > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Pam, Thanks for sharing your views! My sister died of colon cancer 3 years ago. She and her husband owned their own business. After 2 years she had capped out of her insurance and had to buy another policy. Oh yes, she had terminal cancer so you can only imagine the costs. Some of the chemo treatments cost over 10K per month. When she died, they were close to bankrupt with a duaghter about to start college. Reform is needed, and yes we need better coverage and programs for prevention. The current system does not work. Judy Simon MS,RD,CD,CHES Mind Body Nutrition, PLLC > , > If I remember correctly, you are employed by the state. I see you have > a .gov email address. I find it a bit self-serving (as in " I got mine, > too bad for you " ) that you claim to dislike state programs so much yet > you are eligible for many perks that those of us who don't work for > the government aren't as fortunate to have. > > To be honest, I am incredibly disappointed in the thoughts shared by > members of this list. You hate reform. We know that. So, what is a > better option? To keep the system we have is not that option. To > repeal government offered health care is not an option; so don't > accept Medicare.... what about the military? Our troops get (gasp) > government sponsored healthcare. As a former soldier in the US Army, I > can say it was also outstanding care. To be honest, it was more > efficient, cost me nothing, and quicker than in the public sector. > > If you are complaining because you perceive that your current freedom > of choice will be taken away (no, the President, senate, and/or > congress personally will not be involved in your medical care), > remember that your freedom of choice now is only an illusion. Your > health care decisions are not made by you and your doctor. They're > made by dudes in suits over at insurance headquarters and are based > not on your health but on the bottom line. The same guys who decided > that viagra was medically necessary but hearing aids for children with > hearing loss were not. The CEO of my current health plan just got a $3 > million dollar bonus. And rates were increased. However, I'm lucky in > that I have access to health are. > > Chew on this, those of you who would go without insurance if you could > (how many of you have done that?)..... that's fine as long as you stay > healthy. Get cancer? We're talking hundreds of thousands of dollars > for your surgery, chemo and radiation. Get diabetes? Let me see, it > costs about $300/ month, every month, just for your insulin. test > strips are about $1 each. You'll need to be seen by your > endocrinologist every 3-4 months. Heart disease? Ever costed out > cardiac surgery? How many bake sales and donations do you think your > friends and neighbors are going to have? Multiply that by the number > of chronic illnesses they'll have as well. And, if you're all lucky to > stay healthy, remember you could walk out the door and get hit by a > bus. Trauma care ain't cheap. Hospitals are only obligated to make > sure patients are stable enough for transfer, so don't think that your > lack of insurance will carry much weight. As soon as you got a pulse > and a blood pressure, there'll be folks trying to get you out the > door. You can forget about rehab, nor will you be able to afford the > durable medical equipment you need, unless you have access to a lot > more in your account than most of us have. Remember, you won't be able > to work, so no employer sponsored insurance. > > If you don't want reform, are you happy with our standing in terms of > health outcomes? We have the most expensive health care system in the > world, and we are not even close to the top 10 in most outcomes. You > can twist those statistics all you want; I know folks on this list > have been quick to blame it all on various scapegoats, but the World > Health Organization, no slouches when it comes to analyzing data, and > not " owned " by liberals or anyone else, has done the crunching. We > cost a lot and don't come close to the health care offered by > countries that provide care from a more ethical perspective. > > Remember that if you have health insurance through your employer you > are one paycheck from not having it. There's a saying that those who > are against reform are those who have good insurance now. I'm not > loving the current bill either. I'm incredibly disappointed that it > does not include a public option. That's right. I think that we as a > moral and ethical nation should be responsible to make sure that every > single person in this great nation has access to health care. However, > I'm not going to dig in my heels and stomp my feet or whatnot with no > thoughts for improving it. Rather, I'm working to make sure that we > build on this beginning and make it better. For all of us. I've got > mine and I'd love to stop having this argument because we all have ours. > > Warmest regards, > pam > > Pam Charney > pcharney@... > > > > > >> Thanks, Pat. Is it optional for me to have to pay into it right >> straight from my paycheck? >> >> Dave >> >> From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On >> Behalf Of Pat Bollinger >> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:31 AM >> To: rd-usa >> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill >> comments >> >> Under current regulation Medicare is already optional. Beginning when >> eligible one can choose not to be in the Medicare system. >> >> Pat Bollinger >> >> Rowell, wrote: >>> >>> >>> The answer is " yes " for me. If I actually had the choice! You bet! >>> Whatever is right for my country, not whatever is best for me at >>> someone else's expense! I just don't think that way and this nation >>> was not founded and made great on that way of thinking. >>> >>> W. Rowell, RD, LN >>> Montana State Hospital, Warm Spring, MT >>> Consultant Dietitian, Long Term Care >>> Certified LEAP Therapist >>> >>> From: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> >>> [mailto:rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>] >> On >>> Behalf Of Jen Zingaro >>> Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 4:21 PM >>> To: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com> >>> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill >> comments >>> >>> So does that mean you will opt out of medicare and social sec when >> the >>> time comes? >>> >>> On Saturday, April 3, 2010, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattolygmail (DOT) com >>> <mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com><mailto:tpiattoly% 40gmail.com> > >> wrote: >>>> I came across this from an older gent I admire who has seen it all >>> during >>>> his day. >>>> >>>> 1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every >> day. >>>> 2.. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute! >>>> 3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. 's Day >> (March >>>> 17th) than Target sells all year. >>>> 4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target + Sears + >>> Costco + >>>> K-Mart combined. >>>> 5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people and is the largest private >>> Employer, >>>> and most speak English. >>>> 6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World. >>>> 7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger & Safeway combined, >> and >>> keep in >>>> mind they did this in only 15 years. >>>> 8. During this same period, 31 supermarket chains sought >> bankruptcy. >>>> 9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world. >>>> 10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 >> are Super >>>> Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had 5 Years ago. >>>> 11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will >>> occur At a >>>> Wal-Mart store. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 >> Billion.). >>>> 12. 90% of all Americans live within 15 miles of a Wal-Mart. >>>> You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the >>> ground work >>>> for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart >>> to Fix >>>> the economy. T >>>> >>>> This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats, >>> Republicans, >>>> EVERYONE!! >>>> >>>> To: President Obama and all 535 voting members of the >> Legislature, It is >>>> now official you are ALL corrupt morons: >>>> * The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775. You have had >> 235 years >>>> to get it right and it is broke. >>>> * Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 75 years >> to get >>>> it right and it is broke. >>>> * Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 72 years to >> get it >>>> right and it is broke. >>>> * War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 46 years to get >> it right; >>>> $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and >> transferred to >>> " the >>>> poor " and they only want more. >>>> * Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had >> 45 years >>>> to get it right and they are broke. >>>> * Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 40 years to >> get it >>>> right and it is broke. >>>> * The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our >> dependence >>>> on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget >>> of $24 >>>> billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 33 >>> years to >>>> get it right and it is an abysmal failure. >>>> >>>> You have FAILED in every " government service " you have shoved >> down our >>>> throats while overspending our tax dollars AND YOU WANT >> AMERICANS TO >>>> BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE >> SYSTEM?? >>>> Mr. Bill >>>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Tavis Piattoly <tpiattolygmail (DOT) >> com >>> <mailto:tpiattoly%40gmail.com><mailto:tpiattoly% 40gmail.com> > >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Madlyn, >>>>> >>>>> I think it's great that your team can provide care to those who >>> really need >>>>> it and can't afford it. On the otherhand, I don't think putting >> our >>> country >>>>> in a financial crisis to pay for this as well as taxing us even >>> more, is the >>>>> most effective way to pay for this plan. >>>>> >>>>> If we can find other dollars to pay for this, I'd be more open. >>>>> >>>>> Another problem will be less reimbursement for hospitals and loss >>> of jobs >>>>> in the heathcare industry. Many non-profit hospitals already >> run at >>> a loss >>>>> and have begun to dig into their cash savings to continue >>> operations and >>>>> fund capital campaigns. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Madalyn Friedberg >>> <mffrd10019yahoo (DOT) com >>> <mailto:mffrd10019%40yahoo.com><mailto:mffrd10019% 40yahoo.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Digna, >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. I was >> stating mine. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did not read the article as being relevant to the health care >>> bill. I >>>>>> read that some do not want to help the less fortunate and are >>> resentful >>>>>> for having the government tell us what to do. We are doing that >>> now. Our tax >>>>>> dollars are used for many social programs. As for the >> mandatory health >>>>>> insurance that is bugging so many....we have mandatory car >>> insurance, Our >>>>>> tax dollars are used for the uninsured pool of drivers and I >> don't >>> hear >>>>>> these same people balking about that. Medicare was condemned >> as a >>>>>> socialist plan - just try to take medicare away from any of >> the people >>>>>> complaining about the 'Obama Socialism " . The bill was passed and >>> in our form >>>>>> of government we now have to live with it. Learn how to >> 'tweak' it >>> if it >>>>>> does not work, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. >>>>>> >>>>>> I live with a social conscience.. I believe I have a moral and >>>>>> ethical obligation to help those less fortunate than I am. I >> know >>> that there >>>>>> are people who take advantage of the system but I believe that >>> there are >>>>>> many fewer than you might think and that the majority who need >>> help would >>>>>> much rather help themselves if possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> I work for a company that does not charge the residents. You >> read that >>>>>> correctly... no private insurance, no medicare, no medicaid, we >>> don't take >>>>>> their social security. We provide excellent care. We ask that >> they >>> not be >>>>>> able to pay for private care but we do not want them to leave >>> their families >>>>>> destitute. We do not do a financial search of the applicants. We >>> have had >>>>>> less than 2% of our residents not fit our criteria in the 38 >> years >>> I have >>>>>> worked for them. And some of those were family of staff >> members or >>> staff >>>>>> themselves. I believe that people are usually honest. We have a >>> number of >>>>>> homeless residents who would not get the care we provide >> elsewhere. >>>>>> We rely on donations, an endowment and private income. >>>>>> >>>>>> Happy Holidays >>>>>> >>>>>> Madalyn >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ____________ _________ _________ __ >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Digna Cassens <dignacassens@ roadrunner. com >>> <mailto:dignacassens%40roadrunner.com><mailto:dignacassen >>> s%40roadrunner. com><dignacassen s%40roadrunner. com>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> To: rd-usayahoogroups (DOT) com >>> <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:rd-usa% 40yahoogroups. com> >>> <rd-usa%40yahoogrou ps.com> >>>>>> Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 1:05:01 AM >>>>>> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill >>> comments >>>>>> >>>>>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this >>> email - I >>>>>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? >>>>>> >>>>>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and >>> future. I for >>>>>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the >> American >>>>>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history >>> lessons. Let's >>>>>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the >> terrible >>>>>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as >>> Jan's must >>>>>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could >> ev >>> >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 I agree --well said. This next statement is no judgement on anyone participating in this discussion--most especially not you Madalyn since you are of a different generation than I will refer to and have dedicated yourself to a giving profession in an organization that is foundationally very giving--but perhaps a paradigm shift in our culture influences much of the different perspectives on this issue. While American citizens are still the most generous people on the planet as a whole to other countries in need, there is also a predominant narcisissm and perhaps stunted maturity all around us. When my children were small (immature, self-focused) it was the time to teach them about generosity by positively (persuasively) enforcing them them to recognize where they could " pitch in " or " be responsible " for their age and then expect them to give of themselves to family, and then growing into being generous to others outside the family. Unfortunately, human nature being what it is, sometimes the suggestion to pitch in and help others needed to be gently enforced at first! They were children, and with consistency of example they matured. It would be rather dysfunctional for me to tell my 19-year-old now what he should and shouldn't give now (but it's not a problem because he has an antennae for giving a helping hand and he has been on numerous missions trips, paying his own way from his own sweat-work to help those less fortunate). Our government seems to be treating us as though we did not mature (meaning grown up from childish self-centeredness to a focus outside of ourselves, which may be increasingly true) and are still in need of enforcing our generosity. Perhaps the pervasive narcissism and self-centeredness, and yes, lack of maturity running all around us today, indicates to the government a " need " to be the " parent " in our social and economic lives. Or perhaps it's more sinister than that, or both. All that to say that the differing perspectives seem to be rooted in different perceptions about what is morally and economically right and wrong (and necessary) at this time, with different understanding mixed in there about human behavior in a time when human behavior has been changing. Admittedly, we are both a generous and increasingly self-centered people. I do not believe, however, that government will be able to force the people to mature, especially if the solution is to keep us dependent on a continual flow of handouts. I have noticed that healthcare is not the only handout being dished out daily--increased housing mortgage helps, increased student loan forgiveness, bailouts galore. It feels kind of like the parent who gives treats and sweets to keep the kids content for just another hour. The kids learn bad behavior and grow up unhealthy. While the government seems to believe that it is a healthy i.v. instead, an infusion for the health of the country, I'm not so sure it's not quick candy. And it may be with perfectly justifiable good intent of the government while a bigger problem may depend on how the infusion of money is used by the receiving parties. Again, Madalyn, this is not about your comments. You seem to be of a generation when the culture was different, that gets it about the value of functioning in a truly generous manner as you seem to be. We are all looking for a solution here. This is a truly difficult situation and these are desperate times for many in need--the current administration is in a difficult place of decision. But when the powers-that-be had to manipulate to get the healthcare reform passed with " legitimate " lawyer tactics with an " end justifies the means " attitude, it seemed good people from both sides of the argument are no longer included in the solution. I am mostly concerned with the truth that a house divided will not stand. Respectfully, Diane Preves, M.S., R.D. N.E.W. LIFE (Nutrition, Exercise, Wellness for LIFE) www.newlifeforhealth.com e-mail: newlife4health@..., newlife@... http://www.linkedin.com/in/newlifedianepreves http://www.facebook.com/people/Diane-Preves/1357243185 http://twitter.com/DianePreves Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments I found this interesting and personally related to the Health Care Bill. More comments below. Jan Patenaude This teacher is truly a genius! (photo removed - don't know if accurate, but sounds plausible). As the late said, " you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. " An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had never failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked, and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich --- a great equalizer. The professor then said, " OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan " . All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade, so no one would fail and no one would receive an A. After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset, and the students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less, and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too, so they studied little. The second test average was a D! No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F. The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings, and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed. I work hard to stay healthy. For MANY years I never carried insurance because I take care to protect my personal health. If I need health care, I pay out of pocket. When I needed 4 stitches in my upper lip (face plant when rock climbing - my husband did the 4 stitches in about 20 minutes. (The ER would have charged me nearly $1000 for the same service, and no, my hubby isn't a doctor - had field surgery training before he went to Vietnam - the scar is barely noticeable.) So, now, I'm supposed to pay for health care for all the people that don't give a crap about their health and run to the doctor for every cough, fever, lap band and for perfectly preventable things if they just took care of their health or addressed their personal addiction issues. Now, coverage for catestrophic stuff? Yes. Do people end up with health problems over which they have NO control? Yes. But, a new health care bill that includes components for nationalizing Student Loans? What does that have to do with health care. A bill written by lawyers that has NO tort reform so that docs still have to pay HUGE insurance premiums just to practice? Why wasn't that addresses? Of course, we ALL know why. It's pathetic. Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT Consultant, Writer, Speaker Director of Medical Nutrition Signet Diagnostic Corporation (Mountain Time) Fax: DineRight4aol (DOT) com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 I agree --well said. This next statement is no judgement on anyone participating in this discussion--most especially not you Madalyn since you are of a different generation than I will refer to and have dedicated yourself to a giving profession in an organization that is foundationally very giving--but perhaps a paradigm shift in our culture influences much of the different perspectives on this issue. While American citizens are still the most generous people on the planet as a whole to other countries in need, there is also a predominant narcisissm and perhaps stunted maturity all around us. When my children were small (immature, self-focused) it was the time to teach them about generosity by positively (persuasively) enforcing them them to recognize where they could " pitch in " or " be responsible " for their age and then expect them to give of themselves to family, and then growing into being generous to others outside the family. Unfortunately, human nature being what it is, sometimes the suggestion to pitch in and help others needed to be gently enforced at first! They were children, and with consistency of example they matured. It would be rather dysfunctional for me to tell my 19-year-old now what he should and shouldn't give now (but it's not a problem because he has an antennae for giving a helping hand and he has been on numerous missions trips, paying his own way from his own sweat-work to help those less fortunate). Our government seems to be treating us as though we did not mature (meaning grown up from childish self-centeredness to a focus outside of ourselves, which may be increasingly true) and are still in need of enforcing our generosity. Perhaps the pervasive narcissism and self-centeredness, and yes, lack of maturity running all around us today, indicates to the government a " need " to be the " parent " in our social and economic lives. Or perhaps it's more sinister than that, or both. All that to say that the differing perspectives seem to be rooted in different perceptions about what is morally and economically right and wrong (and necessary) at this time, with different understanding mixed in there about human behavior in a time when human behavior has been changing. Admittedly, we are both a generous and increasingly self-centered people. I do not believe, however, that government will be able to force the people to mature, especially if the solution is to keep us dependent on a continual flow of handouts. I have noticed that healthcare is not the only handout being dished out daily--increased housing mortgage helps, increased student loan forgiveness, bailouts galore. It feels kind of like the parent who gives treats and sweets to keep the kids content for just another hour. The kids learn bad behavior and grow up unhealthy. While the government seems to believe that it is a healthy i.v. instead, an infusion for the health of the country, I'm not so sure it's not quick candy. And it may be with perfectly justifiable good intent of the government while a bigger problem may depend on how the infusion of money is used by the receiving parties. Again, Madalyn, this is not about your comments. You seem to be of a generation when the culture was different, that gets it about the value of functioning in a truly generous manner as you seem to be. We are all looking for a solution here. This is a truly difficult situation and these are desperate times for many in need--the current administration is in a difficult place of decision. But when the powers-that-be had to manipulate to get the healthcare reform passed with " legitimate " lawyer tactics with an " end justifies the means " attitude, it seemed good people from both sides of the argument are no longer included in the solution. I am mostly concerned with the truth that a house divided will not stand. Respectfully, Diane Preves, M.S., R.D. N.E.W. LIFE (Nutrition, Exercise, Wellness for LIFE) www.newlifeforhealth.com e-mail: newlife4health@..., newlife@... http://www.linkedin.com/in/newlifedianepreves http://www.facebook.com/people/Diane-Preves/1357243185 http://twitter.com/DianePreves Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill comments I found this interesting and personally related to the Health Care Bill. More comments below. Jan Patenaude This teacher is truly a genius! (photo removed - don't know if accurate, but sounds plausible). As the late said, " you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. " An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had never failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked, and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich --- a great equalizer. The professor then said, " OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan " . All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade, so no one would fail and no one would receive an A. After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset, and the students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less, and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too, so they studied little. The second test average was a D! No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F. The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings, and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed. I work hard to stay healthy. For MANY years I never carried insurance because I take care to protect my personal health. If I need health care, I pay out of pocket. When I needed 4 stitches in my upper lip (face plant when rock climbing - my husband did the 4 stitches in about 20 minutes. (The ER would have charged me nearly $1000 for the same service, and no, my hubby isn't a doctor - had field surgery training before he went to Vietnam - the scar is barely noticeable.) So, now, I'm supposed to pay for health care for all the people that don't give a crap about their health and run to the doctor for every cough, fever, lap band and for perfectly preventable things if they just took care of their health or addressed their personal addiction issues. Now, coverage for catestrophic stuff? Yes. Do people end up with health problems over which they have NO control? Yes. But, a new health care bill that includes components for nationalizing Student Loans? What does that have to do with health care. A bill written by lawyers that has NO tort reform so that docs still have to pay HUGE insurance premiums just to practice? Why wasn't that addresses? Of course, we ALL know why. It's pathetic. Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT Consultant, Writer, Speaker Director of Medical Nutrition Signet Diagnostic Corporation (Mountain Time) Fax: DineRight4aol (DOT) com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Pam, One problem is that there seems to be little or no distinction between the irresponsibly ill and the unintended catastrophic situations to be covered. But it is what it is and the powers-that-be may continue the battle over it's adoption and implementation, but since we have been dealt this deck of cards I say we respectibly accept our differences on this list and in our profession and optimize where our services can now continue to be useful in the context of this new framework that has been forced on us. In that we will be stronger as a profession if we work together. Diane Re: Why socialism won't work -Healthcare bill >> > comments >> > >>> >> > >>> Madalyn, About your opinon, that this is not the forum for this >> > email - I >> > >>> wonder why? can you explain so I can understand? >> > >>> >> > >>> I find that it is very relevant to all our predicaments and >> > future. I for >> > >>> one am convinced it's the beginning of the end of what the >> American >> > >>> Constitution stands for as I understand it from my history >> > lessons. Let's >> > >>> just say some are to the left, others to the right, and the >> terrible >> > >>> tug-of-war will put us all face down in the mud. voices such as >> > Jan's must >> > >>> be heard and paid attention to, not squelched (as if Jan could >> ev >> > >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.