Guest guest Posted June 2, 2000 Report Share Posted June 2, 2000 I know this will be an old issue revisited, however I did a poor job of keeping up with all the info. from the time before. I am looking for the law/rule in regard to EMS personnel drawing blood at the law enforcement/JP's request. I would also be interested in other's policy for dealing with this matter. A second topic revisited! How does your department handle the situation where a injured person has been placed in custody and law enforcement refuses to allow medical treatment? The situation that has affected us is an intoxicated driver of a rollover with other occupants suffering major injury. Feel free to respond to my e-mail address: bwsgjr@... Director Seminole EMS Seminole, Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2000 Report Share Posted June 2, 2000 The exclusion of EMS personnel was included specifically to prevent law enforcement officers from delaying treatment and transport by demanding that they draw blood on the scene. It also was put there so that EMS people would not be spending the majority of their lives waiting to testify in court. It has nothing to do with " competence " to draw blood. Hope this helps clarify. Gene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2000 Report Share Posted June 2, 2000 This is a matter of education and needs to be addressed by the director of EMS with the chief law enforcement manager involved. The law enforcement people are subjecting themselves to personal liability and public liability if they refuse to allow treatment and damages result. You should, of course, document the bejabbers out of the situation and politely explain the situation to the cop, asking that he sign the refusal for his prisoner. That usually gets their attention. But don't get into a fight with them on scene. You can't win. They've got the gun, even if there are no brains to go with it. I would avoid personal confrontations with Troopers and cops over this. That will only make enemies. Your medical director probably ought to get involved. Amazing how much clout a physician has. His call to the County Attorney or City Attorney will probably cure the problem quickly. If not, then you'll have to decide how much you want to get personally involved. You can always file a personal complaint with the proper authority, but if you have to work with these people it's dangerous. Better to let the Chiefs battle it out. That's where the argument should be resolved. Gene Gandy, JD, LP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2000 Report Share Posted June 2, 2000 The following can be found in the Transportation Code regarding specimens taken after DWI or BWI or DUI by a minor: Sec. 724.017. Blood Specimen. (a) Only a physician, qualified technician, chemist, registered professional nurse, or licensed vocational nurse may take a blood specimen at the request or order of a peace officer under this chapter. The blood specimen must be taken in a sanitary place. ( The person who takes the blood specimen under this chapter, or the hospital where the blood specimen is taken, is not liable for damages arising from the request or order of the peace officer to take the blood specimen as provided by this chapter if the blood specimen was taken according to recognized medical procedures. This subsection does not relieve a person from liability for negligence in the taking of a blood specimen. © In this section, " qualified technician " does not include emergency medical services personnel. Randy Pitts FF/NREMT-P " C " Shift EMS Coordinator Fire Department Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2000 Report Share Posted June 2, 2000 Randy: Purely out of curiosity, on what do you base the conclusion that " qualified technician " does not include EMS personnel. Is there a set of definitions in another section that clarifies this or is there some case law or Attorney General's ruling that does? Dave Re: Law enforcement blood draw > The following can be found in the Transportation Code regarding specimens > taken after DWI or BWI or DUI by a minor: > > Sec. 724.017. Blood Specimen. > > (a) Only a physician, qualified technician, chemist, registered > professional nurse, or licensed vocational nurse may take a blood > specimen at the request or order of a peace officer under this > chapter. The blood specimen must be taken in a sanitary place. > > ( The person who takes the blood specimen under this chapter, > or the hospital where the blood specimen is taken, is not liable > for damages arising from the request or order of the peace > officer to take the blood specimen as provided by this chapter if > the blood specimen was taken according to recognized medical > procedures. This subsection does not relieve a person from > liability for negligence in the taking of a blood specimen. > > © In this section, " qualified technician " does not include > emergency medical services personnel. > > Randy Pitts FF/NREMT-P > " C " Shift EMS Coordinator > Fire Department > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Was the salesman clueless? Productopia has the answers. > http://click./1/4633/7/_/4981/_/959978945/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2000 Report Share Posted June 2, 2000 I don't think Randy expressed his personal opinion or conclusion. He was simply quoting what the code says. Maxine In a message dated 6/2/00 4:26:49 PM Central Daylight Time, d.jackson@... writes: << Purely out of curiosity, on what do you base the conclusion that " qualified technician " does not include EMS personnel. Is there a set of definitions in another section that clarifies this or is there some case law or Attorney General's ruling that does? >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2000 Report Share Posted June 2, 2000 Mr. , Wow, good questions. Hard ones to answer. All I can say is, cover yourself most carefully with your documentation if the officer is adamant (sp) about the patient not going to the hospital. I would be hesitant to try to take a person 'in custody' away from a man with a badge and a gun. I am fairly certain that is a crime of some sort. I would then go to the officers boss and have words to prevent the problem from happening again. As for drawing blood (I am assuming for legal blood alcohol) from a patient, if the patient agrees and you have a protocol: 1> Get the patient to SIGN a release allowing you to draw the blood, NOTE: If the patient refuses, get a copy of the WRITTEN court order for your records. 2> Draw three (3) grey top tubes (or whatever your receiving lab uses), Note: Use betadine to prep the site, not alcohol. 3> Label the blood tubes with patient name, SSN, DOB, your name, time and date drawn, and give them only to a> a police officer; b> the lab. DO NOT allow ANY other person to even touch the tubes. This a chain of evidence issue. The fewer people who touch the blood, the fewer that have to go to court. Note: be ready to go to court. 4> MAKE them recieving person give you a receipt for the blood, 5> doccument, Document, DOCUMENT. 6> Notify your medical director (or other appropriate superior) IMMEDIATELY after doing this. Webb, LP FLW EMS, MO ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2000 Report Share Posted June 3, 2000 I don't see Randy making conclusions, I only saw a point of law, of which c) made the EMS point. I think Mr. Gandy already explained this... Mike Re: Law enforcement blood draw Randy: Purely out of curiosity, on what do you base the conclusion that " qualified technician " does not include EMS personnel. Is there a set of definitions in another section that clarifies this or is there some case law or Attorney General's ruling that does? Dave Re: Law enforcement blood draw > The following can be found in the Transportation Code regarding specimens > taken after DWI or BWI or DUI by a minor: > > Sec. 724.017. Blood Specimen. > > (a) Only a physician, qualified technician, chemist, registered > professional nurse, or licensed vocational nurse may take a blood > specimen at the request or order of a peace officer under this > chapter. The blood specimen must be taken in a sanitary place. > > ( The person who takes the blood specimen under this chapter, > or the hospital where the blood specimen is taken, is not liable > for damages arising from the request or order of the peace > officer to take the blood specimen as provided by this chapter if > the blood specimen was taken according to recognized medical > procedures. This subsection does not relieve a person from > liability for negligence in the taking of a blood specimen. > > © In this section, " qualified technician " does not include > emergency medical services personnel. > > Randy Pitts FF/NREMT-P > " C " Shift EMS Coordinator > Fire Department > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Was the salesman clueless? Productopia has the answers. > http://click./1/4633/7/_/4981/_/959978945/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Law Enforcement Professionals: SAVE ON LONG DISTANCE TODAY!!! http://click./1/4170/7/_/4981/_/959981045/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2000 Report Share Posted June 3, 2000 Sorry yall- next time I'll make sure to state that I am merely quoting Law. OPINION FORTHCOMING: Consider thyself warned!! hehe If I interpret the Alcoholic Beverage Code, EMS personnel are specifically EXCLUDED as being able (not the same as qualified) to perform these blood draws. If you are asked by a trooper or JP, you might explain this and state this as a possible flaw in the case, which might cause them to lose the case! Generally, Troops are REAL interested in knowing what might hurt their cases. Randy Pitts FF/NREMT-P EMS Coordinator, C-Shift Fire Department Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2000 Report Share Posted June 3, 2000 Just my two cents. Texas does not allow for EMS personell to obtain a blood sample from anyone in regard to use as evidence in any alcohol related accident. This includes obtaining consent from the person. On the other hand in Sept. 1999 a new law allows for the Justice of the Peace ( just the JP ) to request fro a Paramedic to obtain blood samples from decesed victims of traffic accidents. Mike Shown FF/EMT-P Res. Deputy Sheriff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2000 Report Share Posted June 3, 2000 see hmm how do i say this nicely??? hypothetically speaking...when i was on scene and had a similar incident of drunk person who seemed ok but other patient was not, i got through the red tape by stating the " drunk " one was not a reliable source to say that he was ok....hospitals always did our draws... does this help or make it more cloudy?? amy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2000 Report Share Posted June 3, 2000 sorry it was in california...if this is in response to what i wrote... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2000 Report Share Posted June 3, 2000 Could you please provide the citation for that authority (for my records). Thanks! Re: Law enforcement blood draw Just my two cents. Texas does not allow for EMS personell to obtain a blood sample from anyone in regard to use as evidence in any alcohol related accident. This includes obtaining consent from the person. On the other hand in Sept. 1999 a new law allows for the Justice of the Peace ( just the JP ) to request fro a Paramedic to obtain blood samples from decesed victims of traffic accidents. Mike Shown FF/EMT-P Res. Deputy Sheriff ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Paying too much for Long Distance should be ILLEGAL! $60 in FREE Long Distance calls when you join beMANY! http://click./1/4169/7/_/4981/_/960087734/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2000 Report Share Posted June 4, 2000 The law on Paramedic obtaining a blood sample at the scene of a fatality traffic accident from a victim that may have died as a result of DWI is fairly new. It is located in the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) 49.10 (j). Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2000 Report Share Posted June 4, 2000 Ok so I work midnights, but doesnt this say that it is in regards to DWI's etc in reguards to a MINOR??? So what about adults??? Or am I loster than usual? ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2000 Report Share Posted June 4, 2000 I do not agree with what happened, but I take offense to the statement that cops have no brains. I am also a police dispatcher and my best friends are officers as well as my boyfriend. Its generalizations like that, that cause conflict between the two fields! And dont worry, I get on them when they stereotype medics and EMS too! ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2000 Report Share Posted June 5, 2000 Thanks Maxine. I didn't realize the part about EMS personnel being excluded was a quote. Gandy's explanation also helps put the whole thing into perspective. Dave Re: Law enforcement blood draw > I don't think Randy expressed his personal opinion or conclusion. He was > simply quoting what the code says. > > Maxine > > In a message dated 6/2/00 4:26:49 PM Central Daylight Time, > d.jackson@... writes: > > << Purely out of curiosity, on what do you base the conclusion that " qualified > technician " does not include EMS personnel. Is there a set of definitions in > another section that clarifies this or is there some case law or Attorney > General's ruling that does? >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here: > http://click./1/4054/7/_/4981/_/959999090/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2000 Report Share Posted June 5, 2000 Hey, I didn't mean to imply that ALL cops have no brains, just the one that wouldn't allow EMS to treat his prisoner. Gene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2000 Report Share Posted June 5, 2000 Ok sorry bout that...mistook your wording :-) guess you could say that I'm a little protective LOL ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2000 Report Share Posted June 6, 2000 Ah, you don't have to defend us, we are used to the insults, we can take it. Moseley Licensed Paramedic Police Officer Cleburne PD --- Midnight Medic wrote: > I do not agree with what happened, but I take > offense to the statement that > cops have no brains. I am also a police dispatcher > and my best friends are > officers as well as my boyfriend. Its > generalizations like that, that cause > conflict between the two fields! And dont worry, I > get on them when they > stereotype medics and EMS too! > ________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2000 Report Share Posted June 18, 2000 According to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure now allows a JP to request a paramedic to draw blood from a patient who is deceased at a vehicle accident when alcohol is involved. The statute can be found at http://capitol.tlc.state.us/statutes/codes/CPOOOO51.html. Also for you information at the web site of the Texas Ambulance Assocition a recommended form in available for you to down load for a JP to sign. All information and advisement is from legal counsel. > Randy: > > Purely out of curiosity, on what do you base the conclusion that " qualified > technician " does not include EMS personnel. Is there a set of definitions in > another section that clarifies this or is there some case law or Attorney > General's ruling that does? > > Dave > Re: Law enforcement blood draw > > > > The following can be found in the Transportation Code regarding specimens > > taken after DWI or BWI or DUI by a minor: > > > > Sec. 724.017. Blood Specimen. > > > > (a) Only a physician, qualified technician, chemist, registered > > professional nurse, or licensed vocational nurse may take a blood > > specimen at the request or order of a peace officer under this > > chapter. The blood specimen must be taken in a sanitary place. > > > > ( The person who takes the blood specimen under this chapter, > > or the hospital where the blood specimen is taken, is not liable > > for damages arising from the request or order of the peace > > officer to take the blood specimen as provided by this chapter if > > the blood specimen was taken according to recognized medical > > procedures. This subsection does not relieve a person from > > liability for negligence in the taking of a blood specimen. > > > > © In this section, " qualified technician " does not include > > emergency medical services personnel. > > > > Randy Pitts FF/NREMT-P > > " C " Shift EMS Coordinator > > Fire Department > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > > Was the salesman clueless? Productopia has the answers. > > http://click./1/4633/7/_/4981/_/959978945/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2000 Report Share Posted June 18, 2000 According to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure now allows a JP to request a paramedic to draw blood from a patient who is deceased at a vehicle accident when alcohol is involved. The statute can be found at http://capitol.tlc.state.us/statutes/codes/CPOOOO51.html. Also for you information at the web site of the Texas Ambulance Assocition a recommended form in available for you to down load for a JP to sign. All information and advisement is from legal counsel. > Randy: > > Purely out of curiosity, on what do you base the conclusion that " qualified > technician " does not include EMS personnel. Is there a set of definitions in > another section that clarifies this or is there some case law or Attorney > General's ruling that does? > > Dave > Re: Law enforcement blood draw > > > > The following can be found in the Transportation Code regarding specimens > > taken after DWI or BWI or DUI by a minor: > > > > Sec. 724.017. Blood Specimen. > > > > (a) Only a physician, qualified technician, chemist, registered > > professional nurse, or licensed vocational nurse may take a blood > > specimen at the request or order of a peace officer under this > > chapter. The blood specimen must be taken in a sanitary place. > > > > ( The person who takes the blood specimen under this chapter, > > or the hospital where the blood specimen is taken, is not liable > > for damages arising from the request or order of the peace > > officer to take the blood specimen as provided by this chapter if > > the blood specimen was taken according to recognized medical > > procedures. This subsection does not relieve a person from > > liability for negligence in the taking of a blood specimen. > > > > © In this section, " qualified technician " does not include > > emergency medical services personnel. > > > > Randy Pitts FF/NREMT-P > > " C " Shift EMS Coordinator > > Fire Department > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > > Was the salesman clueless? Productopia has the answers. > > http://click./1/4633/7/_/4981/_/959978945/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.