Guest guest Posted August 20, 2001 Report Share Posted August 20, 2001 NO SWEETIE HE DOES NOT HAVE COMPLETE CUSTODY!!!! IT'S CALLED SHARED CUSTODY!!!! NOW AS FAR AS DRUGS GO, I'M NOT SURE!!! Re: talked to Helen > KAREN > YES A BUMMER IN DEED > DID THE DAUGHTER GIVE CUSTODY > TO HIM? > IS HE ALSO A DRUG ABUSER? > > LOVE BETS > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2001 Report Share Posted August 20, 2001 WELL SAID CARO..STATE TROOPERS HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ALL THE STATE BUT KIDS ARE SO CLOSE TO ALL OF US. THEY SURE DON'T WANT ALL OF US ON HIM!!!!!!!!! HUGS SHARON Re: talked to Helen sounds like it to me jo. i'd have child welfare on his a__ so fast he wouldn't know what hit him. but then i'm an old social worker and i get a bit rabid where kids are concerned. caro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2001 Report Share Posted August 20, 2001 YOU GOT THAT RIGHT!!!!! IT JUST LEAVES ME SPEECHLESS!!AND THATS SAYING SOMETHING....I' NOT FROM NY FOR NOTHING ) hUGS SHARON Re: talked to Helen ok--to sort out my last post. ignore it. it is the children's dad that took them. so most of what's legally done will prob. have to be done by helen's daughter. EXCEPT turning him in for child endangerment for the med thing if he isn't giving them necessary meds. so, neither parent has sole custody? if not, then they will have to go thru legal channels to sort it out. if they can't sort it out themselves. how very very sad. caro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.