Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 Scout, I don't think it very important that we know exactly what happened when we were very young. What counts is what we thought happened. We are not in a court of law, trying to determine guilt. We are trying to put ourselves back together again. Our perceptions and beliefs are what tore us apart, whether or not they are objectively correct. I reacted differently than my brother and my sister. I was never able to protect myself by lying. I believed that if my mother would ever catch me in a lie she would kill me. My brother and sister did protect themselves by lying, and she didn't kill them. Maybe I was just too afraid to try lying. Maybe my mother had a very different standard for me than for them. It doesn't matter now. - Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 I feel like for years I spent my life reacting to others and tuned into others because of the craziness of my foo. Each of us kids responded differently and maybe that was personality type but we each had a purpose: to fill a need for my mother and of course that changed with her changing moods, etc. I have realized that my essence was buried underneath all of that, my true self was/is intact but buried. I wasn't a caretaker, that was the role I was forced to play in my foo to survive, but that wasn't the real me, just a reaction to chaois. The real me is quite different than the me growing up. Today I am learning to build a relationship with that part of myself. I don't know if this helps but I get the feeling that you feel you should have stood up to her because she wasn't physically hurting you and that you were just weak or something and I can assure you that is false. My mother didn't hit us either but her anger was terrifying. We have to remember how small and fragile we were. We couldn't have stood up to that kind of force, no way. I am sure others can address this more thoroughly but that is my two cents. > I've posted some about my therapy and lately I have been wondering > more about what exactly is the cause of my problems... Because the > problems with my mom were ongoing and stressful, I had somewhat > assumed a lot of my issues were related to her, the family > dysfunction, etc. But I have a bit of a theory that I'm hoping > others who were unlucky enough to experience other traumas in early > childhood could reflect on. > > Do you think that it's possible that an early trauma (pre-6 years > old) could be the root of the problems, them exacerbated by the > unstable parenting and emotional abuse from my mother? I ask this > because I have really come to question some of my responses to my > mother, not to blame myself but to try and figure things out. My > brothers didn't take her crap, they stood up for themselves, and she > (obviously) didn't torture or kill them. Looking at the family > dynamics, I know their responses didn't define whether they > were " good/bad " in my mom's eyes. She often would go from witch to > waif whenever they didn't take her abuse. It was that easy, really. > And I knew that, yet I would always just freeze or cry, and comply > with everything. There were maybe one or two times when I responded > differently, and she didn't torture or kill me or do anything, she > turned waif, just like I knew she would. I didn't appreciate my role > in the family or need to 'care' for her. It was just like an > automatic response. And I don't remember it really starting until I > was 6 or 7. Before that she still had my dad to manipulate. > > Anyway, I have some sketchy memories of a couple of difficult > experiences around 4-5 years of age, one which has been verified by > my mom awhile back (she was threatened by my uncle, an alcoholic, > with a large knife which he put to her throat while I was there- I > have very little recollection of this which surprised my mom when she > brought it up years later), and then something else that was also > traumatic. What I'm considering is that these experiences might have > caused a PTSD-like response from me, which might explain my reactions > to my mom. It's not like I'm trying to take responsibility off of > her, but in terms of therapy, I think the cause of some of these > problems should be addressed. I have many PTSD-like symptoms (though > I don't believe enough to warrant a full diagnosis) which can't be > explained by my mom. She was obviously all over the place when I was > growing up but I don't really consider my experiences with her as > traumatic-- she broke things, knocked things over, etc, but I was > NEVER scared that she would hurt me. I don't really know what I was > afraid of. > > So I was wondering if anyone here had any feedback in regards to > pinpointing specific issues in therapy. It's very easy for me to go > on and on about my mom in therapy, which I'm sure is fine, but I'm > NOT sure is at the root of everything. I'm also wondering if the > term " secondary victimization " would apply here, as my mom has had > PTSD all my life and often discussed her childhood abuse with me. I > know, things I should discuss in therapy, but I've come not to trust > any of my past beliefs about me, my family, and this situation. > > Thanks for listening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 > I don't think it very important that we know exactly what happened > when we were very young. What counts is what we thought happened. > We are not in a court of law, trying to determine guilt. We are > trying to put ourselves back together again. Our perceptions and > beliefs are what tore us apart, whether or not they are objectively > correct. > I do understand that, quite a bit. It's what I've been telling myself forever. That everyone who ever did anything to me did not 'intend' to cause harm, that I am justified in my responses and in who I am as a result, that I don't need to know what happened to understand it's impact, etc. Unfortunately though, I worry about the effectiveness of treating symptoms as opposed to the underlying cause. I am beginning to believe my reactions were not just due to a difference in personality between myself and my brothers. I remember a time when I would have reacted the same as they did, and then things happened, and everything changed. I always thought I was doing pretty well, that I did what I needed to do, and I guess I probably did what I was capable of. In discussing the situation with a social worker who first recognized that I wasn't doing as great as I wanted to think (and who was right, though I usually am in better control of myself and better able to give a perception of 'fine'), I do agree that it's important to isolate certain experiences that had a significant life impact, to discuss the feelings and thoughts associated, and how that has contributed to behaviors now. So just knowing that life was bad, doesn't seem to be enough. And for me I don't think it is. I have so many fleas, BPD and PTSD fleas, and I don't know how to separate me from that, and in order to do that I think I need to separate my experiences with my mom and those experiences. If that makes any sense. It would be so easy to say she was the cause of everything. She certainly didn't help, and probably made things worse, obviously for me, than if I had a supportive caregiver. But the things I can't talk about, are the ones that I think are the root of it all, though I just don't know yet. Is it best to just layer by layer peel away until you get to the middle, or start from the middle and work your way out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 > > > Unfortunately though, I worry about the effectiveness of treating > symptoms as opposed to the underlying cause. I am beginning to > believe my reactions were not just due to a difference in personality > between myself and my brothers. I remember a time when I would have > reacted the same as they did, and then things happened, and > everything changed. I always thought I was doing pretty well, that I > did what I needed to do, and I guess I probably did what I was > capable of. > > In discussing the situation with a social worker who first recognized > that I wasn't doing as great as I wanted to think (and who was right, > though I usually am in better control of myself and better able to > give a perception of 'fine'), I do agree that it's important to > isolate certain experiences that had a significant life impact, to > discuss the feelings and thoughts associated, and how that has > contributed to behaviors now. So just knowing that life was bad, > doesn't seem to be enough. And for me I don't think it is. I have > so many fleas, BPD and PTSD fleas, and I don't know how to separate > me from that, and in order to do that I think I need to separate my > experiences with my mom and those experiences. If that makes any > sense. > > It would be so easy to say she was the cause of everything. She > certainly didn't help, and probably made things worse, obviously for > me, than if I had a supportive caregiver. But the things I can't > talk about, are the ones that I think are the root of it all, though > I just don't know yet. > > Is it best to just layer by layer peel away until you get to the > middle, or start from the middle and work your way out?>>>>>>> I had a similar conversation with my therapist a few months ago. I was trying to figure out if I really did correctly interpret what happened. Therapist said it didn't matter. What mattered were the feelings. However, I still maintain that if I knew I misinterpreted something, that my feelings would change. After all, isn't that why we explain things to each other...to avoid negative consequences of misinterpretation? I don't know if the things you can't talk about are the root of it all...but it is an interesting comment....something to explore. About peeling the layers, I could never get to the middle without going through each layer. I am still not to the core (boo hoo!) Be gentle & kind to yourself. Sylvia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 > Unfortunately though, I worry about the effectiveness of treating > symptoms as opposed to the underlying cause. Scout, I think that the way we perceived things when we were little is the underlying cause, much more than what actually happened (as seen by an unbiased observer - who doesn't exist anyway). > Is it best to just layer by layer peel away until you get to the > middle, or start from the middle and work your way out? I am starting from the middle and from the outside and working towards the in-between layers. I often wonder if the in-between layers are completely rotted out, because I can't get through them at all. - Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.