Guest guest Posted November 28, 2008 Report Posted November 28, 2008 In the consolidated list there are often several frequencies given for one micro-organism. Are the higher or lower rates generally more effective or does it just completely vary with the individual " bug " involved? Generally only one frequency per genetic variant of the organism and multiple and varied infections common? Also, a relatively new one on the human infection radar, Borna Virus, may well be causative in up to over 75% of cases of bi-polar and depression. [On Borna virus <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borna_virus> From the linked article: In the early 90's researchers in America and Japan conducted a 1000-subject investigation in which patients with psychiatric disorders were tested for BDV antibodies.[citation needed] According to the study, 768 patients suffering from bipolar disorder and schizophrenia tested positive for the antibodies, while 300 control subjects tested negative.[citation needed] Further studies were planned in Germany, at the Koch Institute, Berlin and Hanover Medical School and potentially in Belgium as well.] Many thanks in advance, Geoffrey Levens, L.Ac. Quote
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2008 Report Posted November 29, 2008 --- levingo wrote: > In the consolidated list there are often several frequencies > given for > one micro-organism. Are the higher or lower rates > generally more > effective or does it just completely vary with the > individual " bug " > involved? Generally only one frequency per genetic variant > of the > organism and multiple and varied infections common? <snip> The frequencies in the CAFL have not been demonstrated to devitalize " bugs " . It's more of an assumption because the particular condition often clears up when these frequencies are used. Regards, Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.