Guest guest Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 Some Sucanat is merely organic brown sugar, where they refine it into cane sugar and molasses and mix it back together. If should just be very lightly refined cane syrup, that is still brown, not refined and remixed. My wife has a bad reaction to sucanat, while she can handle raw honey and grade B maple perfectly fine. After eating Wholesome sweeteners sucanat she gets phlegmy sick feelings the next day or two. - > > Ok, pg 537 of the revised second edition of NT says that sucanat is to be > avoided (Guide to natural sweeteners). But in the recent WAPF buyers guide > they have sucanat right next to rapadura in the " Best " section. Ummmm, I am > confused should I use it or avoided it??? It would sure be nice to be able > to use it as it is much cheaper than rapadura around here!!! > > -- > Mrs. () Siemens > > Blessed to be his helpmeet, 6 years and counting!!! > > Mommy to Zack (5) and Liddy (21 months) > > no fear, only faith; no guilt, only grace; no pride, only praise; no claim, > only Christ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 > > Ok, pg 537 of the revised second edition of NT says that sucanat is to be > avoided (Guide to natural sweeteners). But in the recent WAPF buyers guide > they have sucanat right next to rapadura in the " Best " section. Ummmm, I am > confused should I use it or avoided it??? It would sure be nice to be able > to use it as it is much cheaper than rapadura around here!!! > > -- Mrs. () Siemens, Sucanat is back to being good in WAPF literature. At some point the processing for Sucanat was changed to something less wholesome, so WAPF denounced it, but now they've reverted back to the original way. Something like that. B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 Hmm, a health food store I used to go to had some that looked identical to rapadura, that real powdery with some granular texture, I've not seen any around here that looked in any way similar to brown sugar. I guess you'd have to watch the brand. ::sigh:: and to think, there was a time when people had to pay through the nose to eat POORLY and eating good was CHEAP!!! On 12/23/05, gdawson6 <gdawson6@...> wrote: > > Some Sucanat is merely organic brown sugar, where they refine it into > cane sugar and molasses and mix it back together. If should just be > very lightly refined cane syrup, that is still brown, not refined and > remixed. -- Mrs. () Siemens Blessed to be his helpmeet, 6 years and counting!!! Mommy to Zack (5) and Liddy (21 months) no fear, only faith; no guilt, only grace; no pride, only praise; no claim, only Christ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 Well, I guess I buy a little and see how it goes. On 12/23/05, downwardog7 <illneverbecool@...> wrote: > > Sucanat is back to being good in WAPF literature. > > At some point the processing for Sucanat was changed to something less > wholesome, so WAPF denounced it, but now they've reverted back to the > original way. Something like that. > B. -- Mrs. () Siemens Blessed to be his helpmeet, 6 years and counting!!! Mommy to Zack (5) and Liddy (21 months) no fear, only faith; no guilt, only grace; no pride, only praise; no claim, only Christ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 This article used to appear on the WAPF site from Mother but seems to have been removed recently. Her original endorsement was " Ode to Sucanat " but later replaced by " Ode to Rapadura " http://www.westonaprice.org/motherlinda/odetorapadura.html What I learned from reading the article is that when it originated in its current form, Sucanat was a superior product (originating in Switzerland), being produced by a method of processing that retained the nutrients naturally occurring in sugarcane - it was considered " unrefined. " The rights were purchased to distribute in North America and over the years the distribution changed ownership a few times and the processes for extraction became increasingly more refined. Interesting politics actually. Rapadura which is the European version of original Sucanat, is now available in the US and is higher in vitamins and minerals than Sucanat (particularly magnesium, calcium, iron, silica and manganese.)Rapunzel is a German company who makes it and they they remain committed to sustainable agriculture and fair trading practices. I hope this helps - Lee Charlson www.holisticmoms.org > > Ok, pg 537 of the revised second edition of NT says that sucanat is to be > avoided (Guide to natural sweeteners). But in the recent WAPF buyers guide > they have sucanat right next to rapadura in the " Best " section. Ummmm, I am > confused should I use it or avoided it??? It would sure be nice to be able > to use it as it is much cheaper than rapadura around here!!! > > -- > Mrs. () Siemens > > Blessed to be his helpmeet, 6 years and counting!!! > > Mommy to Zack (5) and Liddy (21 months) > > no fear, only faith; no guilt, only grace; no pride, only praise; no claim, > only Christ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 It just made me wonder why it was listed by WAPF (the buyers guide I got this week) listed it as BEST along with rapadura, they must have started making it the old way again. On 12/23/05, KRISTEN <klee123@...> wrote: > > > > What I learned from reading the article is that when it originated in > its current form, Sucanat was a superior product (originating in > Switzerland), being produced by a method of processing that retained > the nutrients naturally occurring in sugarcane - it was considered > " unrefined. " The rights were purchased to distribute in North America > and over the years the distribution changed ownership a few times and > the processes for extraction became increasingly more refined. > Interesting politics actually. -- Mrs. () Siemens Blessed to be his helpmeet, 6 years and counting!!! Mommy to Zack (5) and Liddy (21 months) no fear, only faith; no guilt, only grace; no pride, only praise; no claim, only Christ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 FWIW - I think it is listed in the BEST category because it is still less processed and less refined because it is just dried cane juice and holds minerals etc, but I believe that Sucanat is still slightly more processed than Rapadura (from my research anyway.) Lee Charlson www.holisticmoms.org > > > > > > > > What I learned from reading the article is that when it originated in > > its current form, Sucanat was a superior product (originating in > > Switzerland), being produced by a method of processing that retained > > the nutrients naturally occurring in sugarcane - it was considered > > " unrefined. " The rights were purchased to distribute in North America > > and over the years the distribution changed ownership a few times and > > the processes for extraction became increasingly more refined. > > Interesting politics actually. > > > > > -- > Mrs. () Siemens > > Blessed to be his helpmeet, 6 years and counting!!! > > Mommy to Zack (5) and Liddy (21 months) > > no fear, only faith; no guilt, only grace; no pride, only praise; no claim, > only Christ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.