Re: Chris's Warrior Menu

[Guest guest]

> >

> > > " I don't remember whether I said

> > > anything or not, but when people talk about their weight as if

it

> is

> > > important in this type of way, it really makes me lose respect

for

> > > their intelligence. Like, how can you consider *weight* as an

> > > isolated variable and important indicator of health?

>

> > >

> > Oh my goodness, Gene!! you really ARE judgemental!! LOLOLOL!!!

>

> so apparently i've got 4 strikes against me in your book: i'm a

> Christian, i'm fat, i'm stupid and i'm flakey!! LOLOL!!!! can i

throw

> old in there? maybe ugly? let's see what else...

>

> " Gene, my friend (or not)...is there an ounce of compassion in your

> body???

>

> laura "

> You might want to research your quotes before you blame me, ok?

OK, I'M SORRY. I WAS WRONG.

LAURA

[Guest guest]

> Well the quote was from me, as thought. I'm not sure where

> the confusion came, but Gene, there have been quite a few of your

> posts where the quoted text and new text was adjascent instead of

> separated by a space, which makes the email hard to read. I had

some

> similar trouble when I was using AOL's mail, which composes in html

by

> default. So if you *are* putting the spaces in and they aren't

coming

> out in the final post, you might want to see if you can switch to

> plain text if you're in html.

>

> , I'm not really that judgmental.

I BELIEVE YOU, CHRIS...I THINK YOU ARE A GENTLEMAN, INFORMATIVE IN A

HELPFUL WAY, AND KIND.

I usually make up excuses to

> brush off the stupidity so I don't have to look down on people.

YES...YOU ARE KIND!!! AND REALIZING THAT YOU DON'T WANT TO LOOK DOWN

ON PEOPLE...I LOVE HUMILITY. DON'T YOU? ADD HUMBLE TO THE LIST!!

Like

> the kid in the gym was young. Or the P.A. in the doctor's office

was

> just exposed to so many charts and so much literature with weight

as a

> stand-alone variable, and so many people day in day out that just

want

> to lose weight, that she couldn't help believing it all, or assuming

> it without much thought.

I'M REALLY SORRY CHRIS THAT I SAID THAT...I THOUGHT IT WAS GENE AND I

WAS HAIR TRIGGER AT THAT POINT.

>

>>

laura

[Guest guest]

-

>I BELIEVE YOU, CHRIS...I THINK YOU ARE A GENTLEMAN, INFORMATIVE IN A

>HELPFUL WAY, AND KIND.

I'm not even going to read the rest of your message, because writing all in

caps is hard on the eyes and is universally considered to be the internet

equivalent of SHOUTING AT PEOPLE. It's rude, and as the list-owner, I ask

that you stop.

-

[Guest guest]

On 7/21/05, laurainnewjersey <laurabusse@...> wrote:

> I'M REALLY SORRY CHRIS THAT I SAID THAT...I THOUGHT IT WAS GENE >AND I WAS

HAIR TRIGGER AT THAT POINT.

I'll forgive you if you stop writing in capital letters :-)

Chris

[Guest guest]

Chris-

>I know that it is constantly churning stuff around. I'm not sure what

>you're trying to say.

Just that I doubt it's that much of an issue for smaller meals to come in

contact with the sphincter, except maybe in the case of small snacks.

> > Second, and more importantly, if large meals empty faster, and because

> > large meals demand the production of more gastric juices, then large meals

> > will be more of a problem for people with digestive problems. I'd think

> > this would be obvious. No?

>

>It's certainly plausible but I wouldn't call it " obvious, " because I

>don't know what the beneficial effects of longer rest periods would

>be, and whether or not they would compensate or over-compensate for a

>larger meal size. I thought you've repeatedly said in the past that

>you thought larger and fewer meals were less stressful than frequent

>small meals?

Yeah, but I'm talking about people with digestive problems, not healthy

people. More food requires more gastic juice, and IF larger meals empty

faster, then people who have trouble generating enough gastric juice in the

first place will be even more challenged. This seems borne out by many

people's experience.

-