Using GB4000 as signal source for the 8CE EM+ , 6C EM+ ; Other options: Avoiding 'frequency scatter'

[Guest guest]

A list member wrote:

> If I was buying a EMEM device I sure would consider Bruce Stenulsons

> SYSTEM 8CE EM+. It looks like one of the most versitile devices out

> there. This will be the next one I purchase. Just my opinion. I just

> wonder if my GB-4000 can be used with it as a signal generator?

>

>

> D B

D B,

Yes, the GB4000 can easily be used as an external signal source for the 8CE; the

multi-stage signal processing circuitry in the 6C & 8CE EM+ was designed to

accept input from a wide variety of frequency sources, from computer sound

systems running various software (Including FREX 15) to the GENY-2 generator

cards while they were available, the Semoia Hammerhead, F100 series frequency

generators, etc... So it can use the GB-4000 audio output mode, with the output

amplitude of the GB4000 turned down.

All of the actual signal processing is done within the 8CE to allow optimization

of the plasma resonance dynamics independently of the characteristics of

external signal source; all you need is a reasonably accurate frequency- an

output matching what you think you have programmed in. Although I have not

tested one personally, I would expect that The GB4000 should be very capable in

this respect.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The F100 series devices from Robin (F125 & F165 models currently

available) are excellent devices which can be used to drive the 6C / 8CE, as far

as frequency accuracy and the versatility of the software which controls them.

Their ability to be programmed to generate the 'Scalar Harmonic' background

frequencies which Jeff Sutherland developed may be unique at this time.

The scalar harmonics are derived and synthesized 'on the fly' based upon each

primary frequency being run, and change instantaneously as the primary frequency

changes, so the scalar harmonic background frequency will always be a supportive

harmonic of the primary frequency. Jeff Sutherland prefers and recommends the

use of the F165 ($995), which is capable of generating two scalar harmonics

simultaneously at two precise harmonic relationships to the primary frequencies

being sequenced. For those of us who are continually financially challenged, the

F125 ($495), which can produce one scalar harmonic background frequency, may

well be very suitable.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Computer Sound Systems running software such as FREX, NCH Toner, etc.

When using software running on Computers with the output coming from their sound

systems to drive any resonant frequency induction device, many researchers

report very good results; (see Luigi's report of recovery from 'terminal' kidney

cancer on the RIFE list for one recent example of using FREX 15 with a 6C EM+.)

But since computer sound systems were designed to produce 'pleasing sounds',

their strength lies in producing clean sine waves; so the sine wave outputs of

quality sound cards are observed in testing to be stable and very usable.

When asked / commanded to produce square waves- especially at higher frequencies

approaching 10,000 Hz, they fail miserably [ as observed in my testing of a

Soundblaster Live! MP3 card, as well as a couple of other systems.) Specificly,

they fail miserably in relation to the 'pulse repetition intervals'. This can be

observed on a good oscilloscope, as the waveforms are observed to vary as much

as plus or minus 20% to 30%! The successive waveform leading edges literally

'jump all over the place' on the oscilloscope screen- [not what we need!-],

varying in " pulse interval " by a large percentage...

This effectively results in an unstable 'shotgun' pattern so wide that the

primary frequency is hardly there- essentially a 40% scatter. Oh, yes, if you

set it for 10,000 Hz / (10,000 pulses per second), a simple frequency counter

may say that there are 10,000 pulses being generated between the beginning and

the end of each second, but the interval between those pulses is unacceptably

irregular.

What do you do? Simply DO NOT try to use square waves generated by a computer

sound system at higher frequencies! Use sine wave output instead- you will

actually be producing the pulses at the consistent intervals which are needed.

If you are running a very basic machine which has to have a square wave signal

from the computer in order to run, you can do a couple of things:

1: Use only much lower harmonics of all frequencies; the irregularities are far

less noticeable on frequencies below 1000 Hz, and may still be fairly usable up

to about 2000 Hz on some sound cards / systems. But understand that some

'scatter' may always be present when trying to use a square wave output from a

computer sound system... it's simply not tightly on the frequency you think you

have asked it to run. Why is this significant? 'Frequency scatter' has been

reported by some researchers to result in more 'collateral adverse reactions'.

They tested this by starting with precise DNA derived frequencies, and testing

with both wide and narrow 'converges' programmed into an F100 device. Their

findings indicate that when the 'converge' was set beyond a very narrow band,

that the observed 'adverse collateral reactions' increased substantially. When

very tight converges close around very specific target frequencies were used,

the observed 'adverse collateral reactions' were very minimal or non-existent.

('Frequency scatter' form a square wave generated on a computer sound system is

similar to a *very wide* uncontrolled 'converge', within the context of this

report.)

2: Get a 'wave shaper' device to convert the cleaner sine waves into the clean

square waves you need, external to the computer, and use it's output to drive

your device. (I believe Dave Felt offers such a wave shaper.)

Since the multi-stage signal processing circuitry I designed for the 6C /8CE EM+

many years ago was designed to process sine waves, such a 'wave shaper' is not

needed, and should not be used with these systems.

More later as time allows. I wish each of you the very best of insights and

results in your ongoing research!

Be Well!!

Bruce