Guest guest Posted April 13, 2006 Report Share Posted April 13, 2006 While we all need to practice restraint and tolerance on this list, we also need to keep our eye¹s on the goal of the spreading and acceptance and development of rife tech, we also need to practice forgiveness and understanding that we are all frail and very imperfect humans with egos [starting with me] . lee > Wow, today's digest of emails was really on a roll... I usually lurk but was > concerned about some of the attitudes showing up on the emails. So just > wanted to speak up for the silent majority that I know is out there. Talking > about people and other companies and saying they are not being truthful or > that they lie or insinuating that they are dishonest is certainly not the > purpose of this forum. Especially behind their back. > > Specifically talking about the Beam Ray and Lynn Kenny. Noticed his unit > was not on the " available list " . I just went to a meeting in Sacramento CA > where Lynn was giving a demostration etc. and they're still going strong! > It's still being sold and has been for over the past 20 years. He doesn't > profess to be FDA approved yet, but they have completed the 4 year hospital > clinical trials and will soon clear FDA requirements. > > I love getting educated and informed by this group, but it really turns me > off when people get side-tracked with criticism - takes away the credibility > of the speaker. > Thank you to all who do contribute and sincerely wish to advance Rife > technology and it's healing powers. > > Lana > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2006 Report Share Posted April 14, 2006 I have a friend who sells Beam Ray and just contacted her today to see if they are still on the market. She said yes and she presently has one to sell. Motherbear Judy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2007 Report Share Posted May 8, 2007 Having heard Lynn Kenny's well-done demonstration and discussion about Rife technology, I had mixed signals from him regarding the emission of RF from these devices. He made a statement as to the dangers of RF and being a ham radio operator, I can assure you that RF burns are very real and very painful. One learns how to avoid repeat episodes with a single exposure! The RF energy that is coupled to the gas tube is a different matter, however, and there should be no concern about receiving these burns from a well-constructed device. RF burns are contact burns and by sitting in front of any Rife machine, there is no danger from this seeming alarming hazard from which there is no risk what-so-ever. There have been arguments favoring RF type machines vs EMEM styles claiming that RF has better penetration etc, etc... But both technologies seem to work for some people with certain troubles and not for others. There are simply too many variables. I would tend to lean more towards an RF carrier and broadband noise which is RF and can be produced with the EMEM type machines by adding a series spark gap to the tube. I did this and it knocks out the TV and AM broadcast. Although this is not a true RF carrier, per se, but the signals resembeling the Lakhovsky effect do easily pass through the tissues of the body which would, no doubt, shake up some crystalized proteins. But resonance is resonance and the great efficiency of resonating bodies requires little power to set things in motion. Would more power be better? Perhaps. Perhaps not. Lynn said that the Beam Ray emits RF but I was skeptical. In the same speech he warned of the dangers yet stated that his device emitted RF as well. I wasn't sure that it did as I saw no coax cables from the generator to the lamp housing. Last week I visited an elderly woman who was very popular in the community as she lets people come over and use her Beam Ray. She is getting results for her problems and many of her new friends are pleased with it as well. The purpose of my visit, however, was to find out if the Beam Ray emits RF as Lynn said it did. I fired up my 500 Mhz spectrum analyzer and presto RF! Yep! It peaks around 2.5 Mhz. I didn't measure the power levels nor did I use a counter to determine the actual carrier frequency, but the device did, in fact, emit RF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2007 Report Share Posted May 8, 2007 Velly interesting. Lynn has told many people that his machine did not produce any RF. Friends who have had one told me there was a carrier somewhere around 75 Khz, and Lynn has told me that he uses several carrier frequencies. His story about RF seems to vary. Dave comdyne2002 wrote: ... snip .. The purpose of my visit, however, was to find out if the Beam Ray emits RF as Lynn said it did. I fired up my 500 Mhz spectrum analyzer and presto RF! Yep! It peaks around 2.5 Mhz. I didn't measure the power levels nor did I use a counter to determine the actual carrier frequency, but the device did, in fact, emit RF. >Having heard Lynn Kenny's well-done demonstration and discussion >about Rife technology, I had mixed signals from him regarding the >emission of RF from these devices. He made a statement as to the >dangers of RF and being a ham radio operator, I can assure you that >RF burns are very real and very painful. One learns how to avoid >repeat episodes with a single exposure! The RF energy that is coupled >to the gas tube is a different matter, however, and there should be >no concern about receiving these burns from a well-constructed >device. RF burns are contact burns and by sitting in front of any >Rife machine, there is no danger from this seeming alarming hazard >from which there is no risk what-so-ever. > >There have been arguments favoring RF type machines vs EMEM styles >claiming that RF has better penetration etc, etc... But both >technologies seem to work for some people with certain troubles and >not for others. There are simply too many variables. I would tend to >lean more towards an RF carrier and broadband noise which is RF and >can be produced with the EMEM type machines by adding a series spark >gap to the tube. I did this and it knocks out the TV and AM >broadcast. Although this is not a true RF carrier, per se, but the >signals resembeling the Lakhovsky effect do easily pass through the >tissues of the body which would, no doubt, shake up some crystalized >proteins. But resonance is resonance and the great efficiency of >resonating bodies requires little power to set things in motion. >Would more power be better? Perhaps. Perhaps not. > >Lynn said that the Beam Ray emits RF but I was skeptical. In the same >speech he warned of the dangers yet stated that his device emitted RF >as well. I wasn't sure that it did as I saw no coax cables from the >generator to the lamp housing. Last week I visited an elderly woman >who was very popular in the community as she lets people come over >and use her Beam Ray. She is getting results for her problems and >many of her new friends are pleased with it as well. The purpose of >my visit, however, was to find out if the Beam Ray emits RF as Lynn >said it did. I fired up my 500 Mhz spectrum analyzer and presto RF! >Yep! It peaks around 2.5 Mhz. I didn't measure the power levels nor >did I use a counter to determine the actual carrier frequency, but >the device did, in fact, emit RF. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2007 Report Share Posted May 9, 2007 -This is all so confusing for me , what does this all mean? I have a beam ray machine that I am using to try and heal from cancer. WHen I read all the false things that Lynn did I am very concerned that I am wasting my time. I dont have alot of time to try and get it right. Has anyone had any healing done by using the beam ray?-- In Rife , Dave wrote: > > Velly interesting. Lynn has told many people that his machine did not > produce any RF. Friends who have had one told me there was a carrier > somewhere around 75 Khz, and Lynn has told me that he uses several > carrier frequencies. His story about RF seems to vary. > Dave > > > comdyne2002 wrote: > > .. snip .. > > The purpose of > my visit, however, was to find out if the Beam Ray emits RF as Lynn > said it did. I fired up my 500 Mhz spectrum analyzer and presto RF! > Yep! It peaks around 2.5 Mhz. I didn't measure the power levels nor > did I use a counter to determine the actual carrier frequency, but > the device did, in fact, emit RF. > > > >Having heard Lynn Kenny's well-done demonstration and discussion > >about Rife technology, I had mixed signals from him regarding the > >emission of RF from these devices. He made a statement as to the > >dangers of RF and being a ham radio operator, I can assure you that > >RF burns are very real and very painful. One learns how to avoid > >repeat episodes with a single exposure! The RF energy that is coupled > >to the gas tube is a different matter, however, and there should be > >no concern about receiving these burns from a well-constructed > >device. RF burns are contact burns and by sitting in front of any > >Rife machine, there is no danger from this seeming alarming hazard > >from which there is no risk what-so-ever. > > > >There have been arguments favoring RF type machines vs EMEM styles > >claiming that RF has better penetration etc, etc... But both > >technologies seem to work for some people with certain troubles and > >not for others. There are simply too many variables. I would tend to > >lean more towards an RF carrier and broadband noise which is RF and > >can be produced with the EMEM type machines by adding a series spark > >gap to the tube. I did this and it knocks out the TV and AM > >broadcast. Although this is not a true RF carrier, per se, but the > >signals resembeling the Lakhovsky effect do easily pass through the > >tissues of the body which would, no doubt, shake up some crystalized > >proteins. But resonance is resonance and the great efficiency of > >resonating bodies requires little power to set things in motion. > >Would more power be better? Perhaps. Perhaps not. > > > >Lynn said that the Beam Ray emits RF but I was skeptical. In the same > >speech he warned of the dangers yet stated that his device emitted RF > >as well. I wasn't sure that it did as I saw no coax cables from the > >generator to the lamp housing. Last week I visited an elderly woman > >who was very popular in the community as she lets people come over > >and use her Beam Ray. She is getting results for her problems and > >many of her new friends are pleased with it as well. The purpose of > >my visit, however, was to find out if the Beam Ray emits RF as Lynn > >said it did. I fired up my 500 Mhz spectrum analyzer and presto RF! > >Yep! It peaks around 2.5 Mhz. I didn't measure the power levels nor > >did I use a counter to determine the actual carrier frequency, but > >the device did, in fact, emit RF. > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2007 Report Share Posted May 9, 2007 The " Beam Ray " (not to be confused with Rife's early equipment of the same name) is good equipment and many people report good results. It is different from EMEM equipment in that it uses a transformer to make high voltage that is different from ignition coils. And it does not have spark gaps to make an rf component. On a spectrum analyzer it makes peaks in the radio frequeny area due harmonics that come out of any frequency equipment including zappers. My main complaint with it is that it way overpriced. Loyd http://www.royalrife.com Re: Beam Ray > -This is all so confusing for me , what does this all mean? I have > a beam ray machine that I am using to try and heal from cancer. > WHen I read all the false things that Lynn did I am very concerned > that I am wasting my time. I dont have alot of time to try and get > it right. Has anyone had any healing done by using the beam ray?-- > > > > In Rife , Dave wrote: >> >> Velly interesting. Lynn has told many people that his machine did > not >> produce any RF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2007 Report Share Posted May 9, 2007 Dear ...? These machines do work, however they are not a " cure " for cancer. There are no " cures " - either here or from establishment medicine; only your body can cure itself. What these devices do, in my opinion, is to help slow down the disease and help the immune system step in and do its job. Your job is to support and build the immune system. Those who are successful in fighting off disease with the " Rife " devices, of whatever type and manufacture, ALSO work at helping the body - thru changes in diet, stopping the intake of toxins (smoking, alcohol, artificial foods like diet products, a great reduction of sugar and salt), increased use of the basic vitamins B, C, D, E and increased minerals, exercise. Thorough cleansings inside and out is also needed; getting rid of the parasites which most of us have accumulated over the years, and are dragging down our immune systems with their waste products - things like ESSIAC may help with that (stay near a bathroom!) Many folks also go to a nearly 100% vegetarian diet heavy in vegetables - fruit juices have too much sugar. Immune support products such as IP6, Del Immune 5, Transfer Factor 4 plus, various mushroom extracts, Beta Glucan products, exotic fruit juices (mangosteen, noni, probably others) all help when used carefully. The Gerson Clinic uses an all-vegetarian diet, weak organic coffee enemas, getting rid of any amalgam (mercury) fillings, etc. The Dr. Joanna Budwig diet seems to be very helpful for some - the flaxseedoil2 group on Yahoo is a support group for that protocol. I have had acquaintences who had initial decrease in their tumour sizes, but kept smoking and/or drinking, or went back to the same lifestyle they had before their cancers were found. They didn't make it, regardless what machines they used or what medical treatments they had. Others I've known who did a total transformation of their health, diet, activities, have pulled thru. Some of those used " Rife " devices. The beam ray is a good machine; I personally feel there are others which are stronger (much stronger in some cases!) but it's a decent device. You cannot depend on it or any other of these devices to bring about a " cure " , but used properly and consistently, many have indeed found that they " work " . Dave On 5/9/2007 4:47:16 AM, pamphetteplace (pamphetteplace@...) wrote: > -This is all so confusing for me , what does this all mean? I have > a beam ray machine that I am using to try and heal from cancer. > WHen I read all the false things that Lynn did I am very concerned > that I am wasting my time. I dont have alot of time to try and get > it right. Has anyone had any healing done by using the beam ray?-- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2007 Report Share Posted May 9, 2007 Dear ...? These machines do work, however they are not a " cure " for cancer. There are no " cures " - either here or from establishment medicine; only your body can cure itself. What these devices do, in my opinion, is to help slow down the disease and help the immune system step in and do its job. Your job is to support and build the immune system. Those who are successful in fighting off disease with the " Rife " devices, of whatever type and manufacture, ALSO work at helping the body - thru changes in diet, stopping the intake of toxins (smoking, alcohol, artificial foods like diet products, a great reduction of sugar and salt), increased use of the basic vitamins B, C, D, E and increased minerals, exercise. Thorough cleansings inside and out is also needed; getting rid of the parasites which most of us have accumulated over the years, and are dragging down our immune systems with their waste products - things like ESSIAC may help with that (stay near a bathroom!) Many folks also go to a nearly 100% vegetarian diet heavy in vegetables - fruit juices have too much sugar. Immune support products such as IP6, Del Immune 5, Transfer Factor 4 plus, various mushroom extracts, Beta Glucan products, exotic fruit juices (mangosteen, noni, probably others) all help when used carefully. The Gerson Clinic uses an all-vegetarian diet, weak organic coffee enemas, getting rid of any amalgam (mercury) fillings, etc. The Dr. Joanna Budwig diet seems to be very helpful for some - the flaxseedoil2 group on Yahoo is a support group for that protocol. I have had acquaintences who had initial decrease in their tumour sizes, but kept smoking and/or drinking, or went back to the same lifestyle they had before their cancers were found. They didn't make it, regardless what machines they used or what medical treatments they had. Others I've known who did a total transformation of their health, diet, activities, have pulled thru. Some of those used " Rife " devices. The beam ray is a good machine; I personally feel there are others which are stronger (much stronger in some cases!) but it's a decent device. You cannot depend on it or any other of these devices to bring about a " cure " , but used properly and consistently, many have indeed found that they " work " . Dave On 5/9/2007 4:47:16 AM, pamphetteplace (pamphetteplace@...) wrote: > -This is all so confusing for me , what does this all mean? I have > a beam ray machine that I am using to try and heal from cancer. > WHen I read all the false things that Lynn did I am very concerned > that I am wasting my time. I dont have alot of time to try and get > it right. Has anyone had any healing done by using the beam ray?-- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2007 Report Share Posted May 9, 2007 Very wisely put Dave. We must all appreciate that cancer is an invidious illness that off times takes years to manifest and which we need to hit with every weapon we have in our armoury - Rife treatments being just one, albeit very powerful ones. Once in remission, the source of the illness must then be found and eliminated to prevent further recurrence. Best Regards Tony Re: Re: Beam Ray Dear ...? These machines do work, however they are not a " cure " for cancer. There are no " cures " - either here or from establishment medicine; only your body can cure itself. What these devices do, in my opinion, is to help slow down the disease and help the immune system step in and do its job. Your job is to support and build the immune system. Those who are successful in fighting off disease with the " Rife " devices, of whatever type and manufacture, ALSO work at helping the body - thru changes in diet, stopping the intake of toxins (smoking, alcohol, artificial foods like diet products, a great reduction of sugar and salt), increased use of the basic vitamins B, C, D, E and increased minerals, exercise. Thorough cleansings inside and out is also needed; getting rid of the parasites which most of us have accumulated over the years, and are dragging down our immune systems with their waste products - things like ESSIAC may help with that (stay near a bathroom!) Many folks also go to a nearly 100% vegetarian diet heavy in vegetables - fruit juices have too much sugar. Immune support products such as IP6, Del Immune 5, Transfer Factor 4 plus, various mushroom extracts, Beta Glucan products, exotic fruit juices (mangosteen, noni, probably others) all help when used carefully. The Gerson Clinic uses an all-vegetarian diet, weak organic coffee enemas, getting rid of any amalgam (mercury) fillings, etc. The Dr. Joanna Budwig diet seems to be very helpful for some - the flaxseedoil2 group on Yahoo is a support group for that protocol. I have had acquaintences who had initial decrease in their tumour sizes, but kept smoking and/or drinking, or went back to the same lifestyle they had before their cancers were found. They didn't make it, regardless what machines they used or what medical treatments they had. Others I've known who did a total transformation of their health, diet, activities, have pulled thru. Some of those used " Rife " devices. The beam ray is a good machine; I personally feel there are others which are stronger (much stronger in some cases!) but it's a decent device. You cannot depend on it or any other of these devices to bring about a " cure " , but used properly and consistently, many have indeed found that they " work " . Dave On 5/9/2007 4:47:16 AM, pamphetteplace (pamphetteplace@...) wrote: > -This is all so confusing for me , what does this all mean? I have > a beam ray machine that I am using to try and heal from cancer. > WHen I read all the false things that Lynn did I am very concerned > that I am wasting my time. I dont have alot of time to try and get > it right. Has anyone had any healing done by using the beam ray?-- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 Cancer mutates and chemtrails, toxins, pollution, pesticides, and processed food complicate matters when trying to kill the cancer virus. I will go to my grave believing the wisdom of Ed Skillings research which indicated that herbs and frequencies provide the best results. Essiac from www.mountainroseherbs.com and Rife are a heck of a combination. See www.cancure.org and www.curezone.com searching both Rife and Essiac. Be Blessed in the battle for health freedom! --------- Re: Re: Beam Ray Dear ...? These machines do work, however they are not a " cure " for cancer. There are no " cures " - either here or from establishment medicine; only your body can cure itself. What these devices do, in my opinion, is to help slow down the disease and help the immune system step in and do its job. Your job is to support and build the immune system. Those who are successful in fighting off disease with the " Rife " devices, of whatever type and manufacture, ALSO work at helping the body - thru changes in diet, stopping the intake of toxins (smoking, alcohol, artificial foods like diet products, a great reduction of sugar and salt), increased use of the basic vitamins B, C, D, E and increased minerals, exercise. Thorough cleansings inside and out is also needed; getting rid of the parasites which most of us have accumulated over the years, and are dragging down our immune systems with their waste products - things like ESSIAC may help with that (stay near a bathroom!) Many folks also go to a nearly 100% vegetarian diet heavy in vegetables - fruit juices have too much sugar. Immune support products such as IP6, Del Immune 5, Transfer Factor 4 plus, various mushroom extracts, Beta Glucan products, exotic fruit juices (mangosteen, noni, probably others) all help when used carefully. The Gerson Clinic uses an all-vegetarian diet, weak organic coffee enemas, getting rid of any amalgam (mercury) fillings, etc. The Dr. Joanna Budwig diet seems to be very helpful for some - the flaxseedoil2 group on Yahoo is a support group for that protocol. I have had acquaintences who had initial decrease in their tumour sizes, but kept smoking and/or drinking, or went back to the same lifestyle they had before their cancers were found. They didn't make it, regardless what machines they used or what medical treatments they had. Others I've known who did a total transformation of their health, diet, activities, have pulled thru. Some of those used " Rife " devices. The beam ray is a good machine; I personally feel there are others which are stronger (much stronger in some cases!) but it's a decent device. You cannot depend on it or any other of these devices to bring about a " cure " , but used properly and consistently, many have indeed found that they " work " . Dave On 5/9/2007 4:47:16 AM, pamphetteplace (pamphetteplace@...) wrote: > -This is all so confusing for me , what does this all mean? I have > a beam ray machine that I am using to try and heal from cancer. > WHen I read all the false things that Lynn did I am very concerned > that I am wasting my time. I dont have alot of time to try and get > it right. Has anyone had any healing done by using the beam ray?-- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 Cancer mutates and chemtrails, toxins, pollution, pesticides, and processed food complicate matters when trying to kill the cancer virus. I will go to my grave believing the wisdom of Ed Skillings research which indicated that herbs and frequencies provide the best results. Essiac from www.mountainroseherbs.com and Rife are a heck of a combination. See www.cancure.org and www.curezone.com searching both Rife and Essiac. Be Blessed in the battle for health freedom! --------- Re: Re: Beam Ray Dear ...? These machines do work, however they are not a " cure " for cancer. There are no " cures " - either here or from establishment medicine; only your body can cure itself. What these devices do, in my opinion, is to help slow down the disease and help the immune system step in and do its job. Your job is to support and build the immune system. Those who are successful in fighting off disease with the " Rife " devices, of whatever type and manufacture, ALSO work at helping the body - thru changes in diet, stopping the intake of toxins (smoking, alcohol, artificial foods like diet products, a great reduction of sugar and salt), increased use of the basic vitamins B, C, D, E and increased minerals, exercise. Thorough cleansings inside and out is also needed; getting rid of the parasites which most of us have accumulated over the years, and are dragging down our immune systems with their waste products - things like ESSIAC may help with that (stay near a bathroom!) Many folks also go to a nearly 100% vegetarian diet heavy in vegetables - fruit juices have too much sugar. Immune support products such as IP6, Del Immune 5, Transfer Factor 4 plus, various mushroom extracts, Beta Glucan products, exotic fruit juices (mangosteen, noni, probably others) all help when used carefully. The Gerson Clinic uses an all-vegetarian diet, weak organic coffee enemas, getting rid of any amalgam (mercury) fillings, etc. The Dr. Joanna Budwig diet seems to be very helpful for some - the flaxseedoil2 group on Yahoo is a support group for that protocol. I have had acquaintences who had initial decrease in their tumour sizes, but kept smoking and/or drinking, or went back to the same lifestyle they had before their cancers were found. They didn't make it, regardless what machines they used or what medical treatments they had. Others I've known who did a total transformation of their health, diet, activities, have pulled thru. Some of those used " Rife " devices. The beam ray is a good machine; I personally feel there are others which are stronger (much stronger in some cases!) but it's a decent device. You cannot depend on it or any other of these devices to bring about a " cure " , but used properly and consistently, many have indeed found that they " work " . Dave On 5/9/2007 4:47:16 AM, pamphetteplace (pamphetteplace@...) wrote: > -This is all so confusing for me , what does this all mean? I have > a beam ray machine that I am using to try and heal from cancer. > WHen I read all the false things that Lynn did I am very concerned > that I am wasting my time. I dont have alot of time to try and get > it right. Has anyone had any healing done by using the beam ray?-- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 It is very confusing. None of the machines are exactly what Rife was using. Your Beam ray may be all you need but I would check this site out. If you cure yourself it will likely come back unless you change what is causing it. http://www.cancertutor.com/ http://www.cancertutor.com/Cancer02/BobBeck.html Some information on Rife's actual equiqment posted by a site that sells GB4000's. http://www.quantumbalancing.com/hdriw.htm Corey > > > > .. snip .. > > > > The purpose of > > my visit, however, was to find out if the Beam Ray emits RF as > Lynn > > said it did. I fired up my 500 Mhz spectrum analyzer and presto RF! > > Yep! It peaks around 2.5 Mhz. I didn't measure the power levels > nor > > did I use a counter to determine the actual carrier frequency, but > > the device did, in fact, emit RF. > > > > > > >Having heard Lynn Kenny's well-done demonstration and discussion > > >about Rife technology, I had mixed signals from him regarding the > > >emission of RF from these devices. He made a statement as to the > > >dangers of RF and being a ham radio operator, I can assure you > that > > >RF burns are very real and very painful. One learns how to avoid > > >repeat episodes with a single exposure! The RF energy that is > coupled > > >to the gas tube is a different matter, however, and there should > be > > >no concern about receiving these burns from a well-constructed > > >device. RF burns are contact burns and by sitting in front of any > > >Rife machine, there is no danger from this seeming alarming > hazard > > >from which there is no risk what-so-ever. > > > > > >There have been arguments favoring RF type machines vs EMEM > styles > > >claiming that RF has better penetration etc, etc... But both > > >technologies seem to work for some people with certain troubles > and > > >not for others. There are simply too many variables. I would tend > to > > >lean more towards an RF carrier and broadband noise which is RF > and > > >can be produced with the EMEM type machines by adding a series > spark > > >gap to the tube. I did this and it knocks out the TV and AM > > >broadcast. Although this is not a true RF carrier, per se, but > the > > >signals resembeling the Lakhovsky effect do easily pass through > the > > >tissues of the body which would, no doubt, shake up some > crystalized > > >proteins. But resonance is resonance and the great efficiency of > > >resonating bodies requires little power to set things in motion. > > >Would more power be better? Perhaps. Perhaps not. > > > > > >Lynn said that the Beam Ray emits RF but I was skeptical. In the > same > > >speech he warned of the dangers yet stated that his device > emitted RF > > >as well. I wasn't sure that it did as I saw no coax cables from > the > > >generator to the lamp housing. Last week I visited an elderly > woman > > >who was very popular in the community as she lets people come > over > > >and use her Beam Ray. She is getting results for her problems and > > >many of her new friends are pleased with it as well. The purpose > of > > >my visit, however, was to find out if the Beam Ray emits RF as > Lynn > > >said it did. I fired up my 500 Mhz spectrum analyzer and presto > RF! > > >Yep! It peaks around 2.5 Mhz. I didn't measure the power levels > nor > > >did I use a counter to determine the actual carrier frequency, > but > > >the device did, in fact, emit RF. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 It is very confusing. None of the machines are exactly what Rife was using. Your Beam ray may be all you need but I would check this site out. If you cure yourself it will likely come back unless you change what is causing it. http://www.cancertutor.com/ http://www.cancertutor.com/Cancer02/BobBeck.html Some information on Rife's actual equiqment posted by a site that sells GB4000's. http://www.quantumbalancing.com/hdriw.htm Corey > > > > .. snip .. > > > > The purpose of > > my visit, however, was to find out if the Beam Ray emits RF as > Lynn > > said it did. I fired up my 500 Mhz spectrum analyzer and presto RF! > > Yep! It peaks around 2.5 Mhz. I didn't measure the power levels > nor > > did I use a counter to determine the actual carrier frequency, but > > the device did, in fact, emit RF. > > > > > > >Having heard Lynn Kenny's well-done demonstration and discussion > > >about Rife technology, I had mixed signals from him regarding the > > >emission of RF from these devices. He made a statement as to the > > >dangers of RF and being a ham radio operator, I can assure you > that > > >RF burns are very real and very painful. One learns how to avoid > > >repeat episodes with a single exposure! The RF energy that is > coupled > > >to the gas tube is a different matter, however, and there should > be > > >no concern about receiving these burns from a well-constructed > > >device. RF burns are contact burns and by sitting in front of any > > >Rife machine, there is no danger from this seeming alarming > hazard > > >from which there is no risk what-so-ever. > > > > > >There have been arguments favoring RF type machines vs EMEM > styles > > >claiming that RF has better penetration etc, etc... But both > > >technologies seem to work for some people with certain troubles > and > > >not for others. There are simply too many variables. I would tend > to > > >lean more towards an RF carrier and broadband noise which is RF > and > > >can be produced with the EMEM type machines by adding a series > spark > > >gap to the tube. I did this and it knocks out the TV and AM > > >broadcast. Although this is not a true RF carrier, per se, but > the > > >signals resembeling the Lakhovsky effect do easily pass through > the > > >tissues of the body which would, no doubt, shake up some > crystalized > > >proteins. But resonance is resonance and the great efficiency of > > >resonating bodies requires little power to set things in motion. > > >Would more power be better? Perhaps. Perhaps not. > > > > > >Lynn said that the Beam Ray emits RF but I was skeptical. In the > same > > >speech he warned of the dangers yet stated that his device > emitted RF > > >as well. I wasn't sure that it did as I saw no coax cables from > the > > >generator to the lamp housing. Last week I visited an elderly > woman > > >who was very popular in the community as she lets people come > over > > >and use her Beam Ray. She is getting results for her problems and > > >many of her new friends are pleased with it as well. The purpose > of > > >my visit, however, was to find out if the Beam Ray emits RF as > Lynn > > >said it did. I fired up my 500 Mhz spectrum analyzer and presto > RF! > > >Yep! It peaks around 2.5 Mhz. I didn't measure the power levels > nor > > >did I use a counter to determine the actual carrier frequency, > but > > >the device did, in fact, emit RF. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 Hi, my two cents: The " Beam Ray " seems a well-constructed and high-quality unit. It's principles of operation seem sound and customer support for " original purchasers " is good. Cancer: This is a malady that is most probably viral in nature and cannot be " definitely " cured by use of any technology. Do not be confused because a machine is " not exactly like Rife's " as even Dr. Rife's research was not conclusive, and was not thoroughly documented, compiled, or analysed. Whether his success was any greater than that of EMEM type or " Beam Ray " machines is unknown. I am a firm beliver in this statement made in the previous post " ...If you cure yourself it will likely come back unless you change what is causing it. " You need to follow-up any malady elimination with sound diet and environmental conditions. As always, our prayers and intentions go out to those who suffer from Cancer and any other serious maladies. Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D. Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of the truth through relentless research and infinite patience. __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 The malady definately is realted to a virus or mycolplasma as Dr. Rife clearly stated this in his audio interviews. Payton Rous was awarded the Nobel Prize for discovering the viral forms (possibly mycoplasma) being associated with chicken cancer. I say 'associated' with but I do not state that the virus/mycoplama is the cause for it is not. The presence of these organisms is the result of chemical changes in the body fluids that cause Progfenator Cryptocides to morph into the scavengers that are seen in samples of this so-called disease that has been observed by only a handful of scientists due to the inability of microscope technology to see beyond its lousy limitations. The cause of cancer has been known for over 100 years, it is no secret. The medical machine at all levels as well as the media are controlled so the public's perception of cancer and all other diseases is totally erroneous. All disease including cancer is due to the toxicity of the body fluids due to inadequate metabolism and the lack of essential nutrients. Healthy cells becomes starved for oxygen (hypoxia) and will shift the production of ATP to a far less efficient form that burns glucose with very little oxygen. Otto Warburg was awarded the 1931 Nobel Prize for making this discovery. The cause of cancer was know even before him, he was the one to prove it scientifically. Warburg was awarded ONE Nobel Prize, not two... Cancer is curable and I agree that it cannot be cured with any technology. It can and was cured by cleansing the blood and by restoring correct nutrition. Tumors dissolve on their own as they are a natural part of the body's metabolism. A tumor is formed by the body using the identical mechanism it uses to conctruct a placenta. The same Hcg hormone is emitted. This was Dr. Beard's contribution from 1913. Chymotrypsin and trypsin are the key enzymes that break down tumors which are formed after injury or from entirely too much umetabolized waste products that are not eliminated because every cancer patient is chronically constipated. Injury or prolonged irritation is what produces cancer. The body attempts to wall off the trash to prevent the entire organism from konking out because the owner has no concept of personal hygiene. The 'profession' loves cancer so don't think for a milisecond that they ever intend to cure it. To quote Dr. Bell: 'Cancer is Nature's protest against disobedience and is the penalty she imposes upon those who, knowingly or unknowiongly, have ignored her teachings. Dr. MacCleod said: >Cancer: This is a malady that is most probably viral >in nature and cannot be " definitely " cured by use of >any technology. Do not be confused because a machine >is " not exactly like Rife's " as even Dr. Rife's... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.