Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Posted September 28, 2006 > > Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A > very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years > later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on > her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. > I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would > greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God > Bless You. > > Sylvia > My wife had b one cancer and the doctor said it was Myeloma (multiple) and I used an Global Wellness Rife machine and now she is back to normal. Quote
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Posted September 28, 2006 Dear Sylvia, To begin with, cancers are defined by their primary or point of origin. Does she have bone cancer or does she have breast cancer with mets? There is a HUGE distinction between the two as to how to deal with them. You need to have the EXACT/SPECIFIC diagnosis, staging, etc... before you go any further. Then there can be a discussion on what can possibly be done. Regards, Bruce Guilmette, Ph.D. Survive Cancer Foundation, Inc. http://survivecancerfoundation.org Bone Cancer Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God Bless You. Sylvia Quote
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2006 Report Posted September 29, 2006 Here we see the problems that arise when you treat the symptom but not the cause. If it were me, I would use the Dr. Schulze " Incurables " program. Go to www.herbdoc.com for information. She needs to get the lymph moving, cleanse the bowel/ liver/ gallbladder/ kidneys, and take in immune building nutrition. Kathy -- donald eheman wrote: Sylvia Go to : http://www.cancertutor.com Don Sylvia wrote: Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God Bless You. Sylvia Quote
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2006 Report Posted September 29, 2006 All cancer is the same. It matters not what it is called or if it metastacised from some other location. It has two fundamental conditions which, when present together, will trigger progenator cryptocides to morph into the micoplasmas responsible for the production of the MMPs (Matrix Metaloproteases) that are the enzymes that temporarily dissolve fibrin thus allowing the infection to spread throughout the body. The two conditionas are: First - Chronic constipation - Inadequate elimination of the waste products of metabolism that cause autointoxication of the body fluids, altering the terrain and driving it to a more acid state. Second - An injury or constant irritation: Hypoxia (lack of cellular oxygen assimilation) causes tissue necrosis. The body will use the stem cell Diploid Totipotent to form a Trophoblast that will wall up the dead tissue in an attempt to prevent the spread of the condition before it triggers an inflammatory response the mechanism is what formks tumors which are not the locus of the infection, but rather the result of it as cancer is a systemic, not a localized condition. Because the fibrin coating of the tumor is recognized by the body as being normal tissue, the disease spreads by using its MMP digestive enzymes to transport the original locus of inferstation to other parts of the body. Cancers' origin can easily be determined as the original tissue maintains its unique identity when it matastacizes to other locations in the body and sets up shop. Pigmented skin cells of the melanoma form are a typical example they can easily be determined by their obvious colorations. Most breast cancers originate in the uterus, etc. Regardless of what caused the cancer, it can be driven out of the body as long as conventional therapies are not introduced. Surgery exacerbates the condition and should never be performed unless a tumor is blocking or otherwise interfering with some vital body function. You can live a full life with cancer as many have. There is not one single case of breast cancer that requires amputation but the salacious vivisection of the mammary glands generates tremendous revenues. The X-rays used to detect the cancers, in fact, induces them. Everything you think you know about cancer is wrong. EVERYTHING! Western treatment methods are a total scam. No one needs to die from cancer. It is totally curable! Its a digestive disorder! The lack of pancreatic digestive enzymes is a major factor in the development of the disease. Dr. Kelley cured himself of the always fatal cancer of the pancreas. He wrote a book about it and well over 10, 000 people used his protocol to beat cancer. Your oncologist is a fraud and if you take his allopathic treatments, it will probable cost you your life. The key to beating the disorder is to remove the toxins and install the essential nutrients, mainly minerals, that will produce healthy cells. Dr. Otto Warburg, Nobel Prize winner in Physiology (Medicine) was awarded the 1931 prize for explaining the mechanism that produces cancer. In his 1966 speech to the Noble Laureates, he explained how to turn the disease into a harmless state using cleansing and nutritional supplementation. Rife energy is very beneficial as resonant energy that can couple with the crystalline proteins that make up the cytoplasmic membranes of diseased cells can be set them into motion causing heat to build up and thus produce a subsequent rupture of the cell wall exposing it to ambient oxygen which will burn it up. -- Re: Bone Cancer Here we see the problems that arise when you treat the symptom but not the cause. If it were me, I would use the Dr. Schulze " Incurables " program. Go to www.herbdoc.com for information. She needs to get the lymph moving, cleanse the bowel/ liver/ gallbladder/ kidneys, and take in immune building nutrition. Kathy -- donald eheman wrote: Sylvia Go to : http://www.cancertutor.com Don Sylvia wrote: Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God Bless You. Sylvia Quote
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2006 Report Posted September 29, 2006 Excellent article where can I find more information along these lines, I agree with the allopathic treatment, my wife was pretty healthy and showed no signs of cancer, she was progressing well with Meyer's cocktails, till after the chemo it was all down hill after that, then she needed radiation to combat what the chemo had caused, it followed shortly by her death, I am convinced that if I could have convinced her otherwise she would still be alive today, I believe with my whole being that chemo and radiation are not the answer Terry _____ From: Rife [mailto:Rife ] On Behalf Of comdyne@... Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:54 PM To: Rife Subject: Re: Bone Cancer All cancer is the same. It matters not what it is called or if it metastacised from some other location. It has two fundamental conditions which, when present together, will trigger progenator cryptocides to morph into the micoplasmas responsible for the production of the MMPs (Matrix Metaloproteases) that are the enzymes that temporarily dissolve fibrin thus allowing the infection to spread throughout the body. The two conditionas are: First - Chronic constipation - Inadequate elimination of the waste products of metabolism that cause autointoxication of the body fluids, altering the terrain and driving it to a more acid state. Second - An injury or constant irritation: Hypoxia (lack of cellular oxygen assimilation) causes tissue necrosis. The body will use the stem cell Diploid Totipotent to form a Trophoblast that will wall up the dead tissue in an attempt to prevent the spread of the condition before it triggers an inflammatory response the mechanism is what formks tumors which are not the locus of the infection, but rather the result of it as cancer is a systemic, not a localized condition. Because the fibrin coating of the tumor is recognized by the body as being normal tissue, the disease spreads by using its MMP digestive enzymes to transport the original locus of inferstation to other parts of the body. Cancers' origin can easily be determined as the original tissue maintains its unique identity when it matastacizes to other locations in the body and sets up shop. Pigmented skin cells of the melanoma form are a typical example they can easily be determined by their obvious colorations. Most breast cancers originate in the uterus, etc. Regardless of what caused the cancer, it can be driven out of the body as long as conventional therapies are not introduced. Surgery exacerbates the condition and should never be performed unless a tumor is blocking or otherwise interfering with some vital body function. You can live a full life with cancer as many have. There is not one single case of breast cancer that requires amputation but the salacious vivisection of the mammary glands generates tremendous revenues. The X-rays used to detect the cancers, in fact, induces them. Everything you think you know about cancer is wrong. EVERYTHING! Western treatment methods are a total scam. No one needs to die from cancer. It is totally curable! Its a digestive disorder! The lack of pancreatic digestive enzymes is a major factor in the development of the disease. Dr. Kelley cured himself of the always fatal cancer of the pancreas. He wrote a book about it and well over 10, 000 people used his protocol to beat cancer. Your oncologist is a fraud and if you take his allopathic treatments, it will probable cost you your life. The key to beating the disorder is to remove the toxins and install the essential nutrients, mainly minerals, that will produce healthy cells. Dr. Otto Warburg, Nobel Prize winner in Physiology (Medicine) was awarded the 1931 prize for explaining the mechanism that produces cancer. In his 1966 speech to the Noble Laureates, he explained how to turn the disease into a harmless state using cleansing and nutritional supplementation. Rife energy is very beneficial as resonant energy that can couple with the crystalline proteins that make up the cytoplasmic membranes of diseased cells can be set them into motion causing heat to build up and thus produce a subsequent rupture of the cell wall exposing it to ambient oxygen which will burn it up. -- Re: Bone Cancer Here we see the problems that arise when you treat the symptom but not the cause. If it were me, I would use the Dr. Schulze " Incurables " program. Go to www.herbdoc.com for information. She needs to get the lymph moving, cleanse the bowel/ liver/ gallbladder/ kidneys, and take in immune building nutrition. Kathy -- donald eheman <dehemanyahoo (DOT) <mailto:deheman%40yahoo.com> com> wrote: Sylvia Go to : http://www.cancertu <http://www.cancertutor.com> tor.com Don Sylvia <forrestgal2000@ <mailto:forrestgal2000%40hotmail.com> hotmail.com> wrote: Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God Bless You. Sylvia Quote
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2006 Report Posted September 30, 2006 I re-published a book by an English oncologist who, in the first quarter of the last century, was curing the vast majority of his cancer patients using natural methods. He refused to operate on tumors unless absolutely necessary I added definitions to the medical terms he used and in a very few areas I added commentary as much more is known today about cancer than was understood during his time period. Dr. Bell's writing skills were remarkable as he drove home the concept of what causes cancer and how it can be eliminated. The book is spectacular and transcribing it was a labor of love. I added my own 33 page treatise which is titled 'The Truth About Cancer' which is the last section of the book. Most of your questions about this dreaded disease are answered in this work. http://www.lulu com/items/volume_10/225000/225756/2/preview/cancer_preview_B_rtf.rtf -- Re: Bone Cancer Here we see the problems that arise when you treat the symptom but not the cause. If it were me, I would use the Dr. Schulze " Incurables " program. Go to www.herbdoc.com for information. She needs to get the lymph moving, cleanse the bowel/ liver/ gallbladder/ kidneys, and take in immune building nutrition. Kathy -- donald eheman <dehemanyahoo (DOT) <mailto:deheman%40yahoo.com> com> wrote: Sylvia Go to : http://www.cancertu <http://www.cancertutor.com> tor.com Don Sylvia <forrestgal2000@ <mailto:forrestgal2000%40hotmail.com> hotmail.com> wrote: Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God Bless You. Sylvia Quote
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2006 Report Posted September 30, 2006 Hi Comdyne, Interesting excerpts have whetted my appetite. What are you charging to purchase the book? Best Regards Tony Pagdin " comdyne@... " wrote: I re-published a book by an English oncologist who, in the first quarter of the last century, was curing the vast majority of his cancer patients using natural methods. He refused to operate on tumors unless absolutely necessary I added definitions to the medical terms he used and in a very few areas I added commentary as much more is known today about cancer than was understood during his time period. Dr. Bell's writing skills were remarkable as he drove home the concept of what causes cancer and how it can be eliminated. The book is spectacular and transcribing it was a labor of love. I added my own 33 page treatise which is titled 'The Truth About Cancer' which is the last section of the book. Most of your questions about this dreaded disease are answered in this work. http://www.lulu com/items/volume_10/225000/225756/2/preview/cancer_preview_B_rtf.rtf -- Re: Bone Cancer Here we see the problems that arise when you treat the symptom but not the cause. If it were me, I would use the Dr. Schulze " Incurables " program. Go to www.herbdoc.com for information. She needs to get the lymph moving, cleanse the bowel/ liver/ gallbladder/ kidneys, and take in immune building nutrition. Kathy -- donald eheman com> wrote: Sylvia Go to : http://www.cancertu tor.com Don Sylvia hotmail.com> wrote: Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God Bless You. Sylvia Quote
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2006 Report Posted October 1, 2006 The book is a POD (Print On Demand) at the publisher Lulu.com. Its $24.95 go to www.lulu.com/comdyne Be sure to click on the book and then select the preview which will give you a the first few pages to read. Dr. Bell worked in London from about 1880 to about 1927. He authored several books which I am still looking for. Words cannot describe the intensity of his powers of logical reasoning. What he says about cancer is so profound and so sensible. I'm sure that he and our hero Dr. Rife would have had a lot to share with each other. What is so remarkable is the fact that the methods he used would probably work quite well today but people probably a would need to add considerably to the protocol because our foods are so depleted and our environment is far more toxic. Nonetheless, I have little doubt that is methods would still work far better than what the allopathic community has to offer. Here is a few quotes from the rear cover: : “Cancer Is Nature's protest against disobedience, and is the penalty she imposes upon those who, though, perhaps knowingly or unknowingly, have ignored her teachings.” “As to the treatment of cancer in whatever form it presents itself...surgery ...has not been encouraging, and it has been years ago since I made up my mind that I would never operate again for this disease.” -- Re: Bone Cancer Here we see the problems that arise when you treat the symptom but not the cause. If it were me, I would use the Dr. Schulze " Incurables " program. Go to www.herbdoc.com for information. She needs to get the lymph moving, cleanse the bowel/ liver/ gallbladder/ kidneys, and take in immune building nutrition. Kathy -- donald eheman com> wrote: Sylvia Go to : http://www.cancertu tor.com Don Sylvia hotmail.com> wrote: Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God Bless You. Sylvia Quote
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2006 Report Posted October 1, 2006 All cancer is MOST ASSUREDLY NOT THE SAME! All cancers have commonalities, but they are far different animals when compared one to another. There are major differences in propagation, effected structures in the body as well as what specifically drives them. All 117 types of cancer can be dealt with successfully, but not all respond to the same type of treatments. I have hundreds of files of people I work with who do not necessarily respond the same way to the same form of treatment. Not everything works for everyone all the time. If you think you can do one thing that stops all cancers, you are deluding yourself as well as others. Regards, Bruce Guilmette, PhD Survive Cancer Foundation, Inc. http://survivecancerfoundation.org <http://survivecancerfoundation.org/> Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own. Matt 6:34 (NIV) _____ From: Rife [mailto:Rife ] On Behalf Of Terry McClelland Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 4:33 PM To: Rife Subject: RE: Bone Cancer Excellent article where can I find more information along these lines, I agree with the allopathic treatment, my wife was pretty healthy and showed no signs of cancer, she was progressing well with Meyer's cocktails, till after the chemo it was all down hill after that, then she needed radiation to combat what the chemo had caused, it followed shortly by her death, I am convinced that if I could have convinced her otherwise she would still be alive today, I believe with my whole being that chemo and radiation are not the answer Terry _____ From: Rifeyahoogroups (DOT) <mailto:Rife%40yahoogroups.com> com [mailto:Rifeyahoogroups (DOT) <mailto:Rife%40yahoogroups.com> com] On Behalf Of comdyneiac (DOT) <mailto:comdyne%40iac.net> net Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:54 PM To: Rifeyahoogroups (DOT) <mailto:Rife%40yahoogroups.com> com Subject: Re: Bone Cancer All cancer is the same. It matters not what it is called or if it metastacised from some other location. It has two fundamental conditions which, when present together, will trigger progenator cryptocides to morph into the micoplasmas responsible for the production of the MMPs (Matrix Metaloproteases) that are the enzymes that temporarily dissolve fibrin thus allowing the infection to spread throughout the body. The two conditionas are: First - Chronic constipation - Inadequate elimination of the waste products of metabolism that cause autointoxication of the body fluids, altering the terrain and driving it to a more acid state. Second - An injury or constant irritation: Hypoxia (lack of cellular oxygen assimilation) causes tissue necrosis. The body will use the stem cell Diploid Totipotent to form a Trophoblast that will wall up the dead tissue in an attempt to prevent the spread of the condition before it triggers an inflammatory response the mechanism is what formks tumors which are not the locus of the infection, but rather the result of it as cancer is a systemic, not a localized condition. Because the fibrin coating of the tumor is recognized by the body as being normal tissue, the disease spreads by using its MMP digestive enzymes to transport the original locus of inferstation to other parts of the body. Cancers' origin can easily be determined as the original tissue maintains its unique identity when it matastacizes to other locations in the body and sets up shop. Pigmented skin cells of the melanoma form are a typical example they can easily be determined by their obvious colorations. Most breast cancers originate in the uterus, etc. Regardless of what caused the cancer, it can be driven out of the body as long as conventional therapies are not introduced. Surgery exacerbates the condition and should never be performed unless a tumor is blocking or otherwise interfering with some vital body function. You can live a full life with cancer as many have. There is not one single case of breast cancer that requires amputation but the salacious vivisection of the mammary glands generates tremendous revenues. The X-rays used to detect the cancers, in fact, induces them. Everything you think you know about cancer is wrong. EVERYTHING! Western treatment methods are a total scam. No one needs to die from cancer. It is totally curable! Its a digestive disorder! The lack of pancreatic digestive enzymes is a major factor in the development of the disease. Dr. Kelley cured himself of the always fatal cancer of the pancreas. He wrote a book about it and well over 10, 000 people used his protocol to beat cancer. Your oncologist is a fraud and if you take his allopathic treatments, it will probable cost you your life. The key to beating the disorder is to remove the toxins and install the essential nutrients, mainly minerals, that will produce healthy cells. Dr. Otto Warburg, Nobel Prize winner in Physiology (Medicine) was awarded the 1931 prize for explaining the mechanism that produces cancer. In his 1966 speech to the Noble Laureates, he explained how to turn the disease into a harmless state using cleansing and nutritional supplementation. Rife energy is very beneficial as resonant energy that can couple with the crystalline proteins that make up the cytoplasmic membranes of diseased cells can be set them into motion causing heat to build up and thus produce a subsequent rupture of the cell wall exposing it to ambient oxygen which will burn it up. -- Re: Bone Cancer Here we see the problems that arise when you treat the symptom but not the cause. If it were me, I would use the Dr. Schulze " Incurables " program. Go to www.herbdoc.com for information. She needs to get the lymph moving, cleanse the bowel/ liver/ gallbladder/ kidneys, and take in immune building nutrition. Kathy -- donald eheman <dehemanyahoo (DOT) <mailto:deheman%40yahoo.com> com> wrote: Sylvia Go to : http://www.cancertu <http://www.cancertu <http://www.cancertutor.com> tor.com> tor.com Don Sylvia <forrestgal2000@ <mailto:forrestgal2000%40hotmail.com> hotmail.com> wrote: Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God Bless You. Sylvia Quote
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2006 Report Posted October 1, 2006 The bulk of cancers are carcinoma (c.90%) and they are all epitheilial in their make-up. Of course there are differences between them but the basic function of all of them is the same, and yes, if adequately addressed, they can be resolved, all of them! The biological terrain being polluted with numerous toxins which come from either chemical ingestion or autointoxication, cause the condition of hypoxia. Dr. Warburg was awarded the 1931 Nobel prize for explaining the mechanism of the shift in ATP production from aerobic to anaerobic states as a defense mechanism for survival of the cell. Transmembrane potentials fall and the cell begins to feed primarily on sugars. Regardless of the type of cancer cell one is dealing with, if the pollution is removed and the normal constituents of the fluids be restored through nutrition; i.e.. Adding missing minerals and vitamins, the cell will return to stasis or die off as the environment has become hostile to Progenator Cryptocides. Dr. Rife observed this and he stated in the Stafford/Crane audio tapes that he could change the form of the disease by altering the nutrient media. He started with b-coli and changed the disease to several forms including two forms of cancer which, although he didn't say it, could be assumed to be sarcoma and carcinoma. Regardless of what form the cancer comes in, if it is treated via the life enhancement rather than by destructive means, the disease can be reversed. Poisoning tumors only makes the survivors stronger and the destruction of healthy cells in the process makes the immune system weaker and thus less able to defend itself from future occurrences. Conventional cancer treatments are the wrong way to address the disease. Tumors are not the cancer, but are the result of it. The body, having been unable to eliminate waste products, will form the tumor as a protection mechanism to prevent the spread of the blight. It sets up the city dump, so-to-speak, as a common collection gathering point which is in areas that contain the poorest circulation of fluids and subsequently lower levels of ambient oxygen. In men its often the prostate and in women, the breasts. By extripating the tumor, one exacerbates the condition as, now that the main dump has been closed, and the neighbors will throw their trash in the nearest vacant field. Both Drs. Bell and Eli G. considered surgery for cancer to be a criminal assault upon the patient. Cancer always returns at the incision point and when it does, its really ticked-off! This is a simple disease. The problem lies in the fact that the money mongers have built a mountain out of a mole hill. Unless cancer is interfering with body functions, it is best left alone. Correcting the digestive conditions that triggered it by restoring pancreatic function and the production of trypsin and chymotrypsin, tumors dissolve and thus, the disease can be beaten. Many have done so. I totally do not agree that each form of cancer requires individualized specialized treatment. Removing the source of irritation and restoring nutrient balance to levels that are required for correct cellular replication, the disease of cancer requires nothing else to resolve itself. Read Otto Warburg's 1966 speech to the Nobel Laureates. He said it all in a nut shell. Add to the mix a lot of oxygen and pulsed electrical fields and the recovery will be accelerated exponentially. There is one thing one can do to stop all cancers. Stop doing what it was that gave you the cancer in the first place! Stop taking X-rays in any form, stop drinking water saturated with the known carcinogens of chlorine and fluoride, stop eating Trans-fats, start using mineral supplementation, get some exercise to move the lymph fluids, etc. All of this activity combined will drive this nasty out of the body. -- Re: Bone Cancer Here we see the problems that arise when you treat the symptom but not the cause. If it were me, I would use the Dr. Schulze " Incurables " program. Go to www.herbdoc.com for information. She needs to get the lymph moving, cleanse the bowel/ liver/ gallbladder/ kidneys, and take in immune building nutrition. Kathy -- donald eheman <dehemanyahoo (DOT) <mailto:deheman%40yahoo.com> com> wrote: Sylvia Go to : http://www.cancertu <http://www.cancertu <http://www.cancertutor.com> tor.com> tor.com Don Sylvia <forrestgal2000@ <mailto:forrestgal2000%40hotmail.com> hotmail.com> wrote: Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God Bless You. Sylvia Quote
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2006 Report Posted October 1, 2006 ....this sure addresses a bunch of my questions that i posted 4 min after this was posted. i'd still like to read more from others. i regret the instant hatred i took to biology as a kid. well, not really, i'm not well suited for it at all & that's what i hate, that & finding myself in a world where one can't trust those who one should be able to look to with openness & confidence. > RE: Bone Cancer > > > The bulk of cancers are carcinoma (c.90%) and they are all epitheilial in > their make-up. Of course there are differences between them but the basic > function of all of them is the same, and yes, if adequately > addressed, they > can be resolved, all of them! The biological terrain being polluted with > numerous toxins which come from either chemical ingestion or > autointoxication, cause the condition of hypoxia. Dr. Warburg was awarded > the 1931 Nobel prize for explaining the mechanism of the shift in ATP > production from aerobic to anaerobic states as a defense mechanism for > survival of the cell. Transmembrane potentials fall and the cell begins to > feed primarily on sugars. Regardless of the type of cancer cell one is > dealing with, if the pollution is removed and the normal > constituents of the > fluids be restored through nutrition; i.e.. Adding missing minerals and > vitamins, the cell will return to stasis or die off as the environment has > become hostile to Progenator Cryptocides. Dr. Rife observed this and he > stated in the Stafford/Crane audio tapes that he could change the form of > the disease by altering the nutrient media. He started with b-coli and > changed the disease to several forms including two forms of cancer which, > although he didn't say it, could be assumed to be sarcoma and carcinoma. > Regardless of what form the cancer comes in, if it is treated via the life > enhancement rather than by destructive means, the disease can be reversed. > Poisoning tumors only makes the survivors stronger and the destruction of > healthy cells in the process makes the immune system weaker and thus less > able to defend itself from future occurrences. Conventional cancer > treatments are the wrong way to address the disease. > > Tumors are not the cancer, but are the result of it. The body, having been > unable to eliminate waste products, will form the tumor as a protection > mechanism to prevent the spread of the blight. It sets up the city dump, > so-to-speak, as a common collection gathering point which is in areas that > contain the poorest circulation of fluids and subsequently lower levels of > ambient oxygen. In men its often the prostate and in women, the > breasts. By > extripating the tumor, one exacerbates the condition as, now that the main > dump has been closed, and the neighbors will throw their trash in the > nearest vacant field. Both Drs. Bell and Eli G. considered > surgery for > cancer to be a criminal assault upon the patient. Cancer always returns at > the incision point and when it does, its really ticked-off! > > This is a simple disease. The problem lies in the fact that the money > mongers have built a mountain out of a mole hill. Unless cancer is > interfering with body functions, it is best left alone. Correcting the > digestive conditions that triggered it by restoring pancreatic > function and > the production of trypsin and chymotrypsin, tumors dissolve and thus, the > disease can be beaten. Many have done so. > > I totally do not agree that each form of cancer requires individualized > specialized treatment. Removing the source of irritation and restoring > nutrient balance to levels that are required for correct cellular > replication, the disease of cancer requires nothing else to > resolve itself. > Read Otto Warburg's 1966 speech to the Nobel Laureates. He said > it all in a > nut shell. Add to the mix a lot of oxygen and pulsed electrical fields and > the recovery will be accelerated exponentially. There is one thing one can > do to stop all cancers. Stop doing what it was that gave you the cancer in > the first place! Stop taking X-rays in any form, stop drinking water > saturated with the known carcinogens of chlorine and fluoride, stop eating > Trans-fats, start using mineral supplementation, get some exercise to move > the lymph fluids, etc. All of this activity combined will drive this nasty > out of the body. > Quote
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2006 Report Posted October 2, 2006 Nice preventive measures, but not the whole story. I have read Warburg's materials along with hundreds of other works. I work with terminal people every single day. Most have been the medical route and failed, but not all. Some are health freaks to the extreme and still get cancer and still die no matter what they try. Sometimes nutrition works, sometimes not. I firmly recommend dietary changes, but that does not necessarily bring resolution. I like and use RIFE, but that in conjunction with dietary change does not necessarily work either. Every single person is different and every single person has unique physiology, mental makeup and other complex characteristics that will dictate how to deal with what they have to successful resolution. You cannot lump everyone into a single bag and meet with success. Cancer can be a rather simplistic thing, but by the time the mutations reach stages 3 and 4, the mutations have gone to the point that many simple fixes are no longer viable. Just about anything will stop stage one and two cancers. Modern medicine, witchdoctors, simple diet changes are all about equally effective. Stage 3 and 4 are whole other animals and the complexities that they bring because of the specific mutations do not lend themselves to simplistic solutions. I know, I've been there and done that. (Diagnosed with stage 4 RCC and given 4 - 6 months to live and beat the odds, but it was a whole lot more complex than what you make it out to be.) Quite frankly if it was so simple to fix, there would be no problem. I am not building mountains out of mole hills. I am not trying to complicate the issue. I am stating fact that there is much more to the problem then you appear to think there is. Most of what Warburg and Rife and others have done has been done for more than 80 years and yet we have cancer around and among us every single day. You cannot lay the blame solely on the medical establishment, as much as I would like to. If there was something that would stop it as simply as you seem to believe, somewhere on the face of the earth, someone would have a 95%+ success rate and the world would be lined up at his door. I laud you if you can stop cancer as easily as you say. Set yourself up a clinic and have at it. I guarantee you wealth and fame beyond your wildest imagination if it does work as easily as you say. I would like nothing better than to never have to work with a person who has no life or hope left or a grieving family because all the " simple fixes " just didn't work out. I would love to tell everyone just to head to your doorstep and the fix is a done deal. Believe me, there is nothing I would like better. Bruce Guilmette, PhD Survive Cancer Foundation, Inc. http://survivecancerfoundation.org <http://survivecancerfoundation.org/> Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own. Matt 6:34 (NIV) _____ From: Rife [mailto:Rife ] On Behalf Of comdyne@... Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 4:05 PM To: Rife Subject: RE: Bone Cancer The bulk of cancers are carcinoma (c.90%) and they are all epitheilial in their make-up. Of course there are differences between them but the basic function of all of them is the same, and yes, if adequately addressed, they can be resolved, all of them! The biological terrain being polluted with numerous toxins which come from either chemical ingestion or autointoxication, cause the condition of hypoxia. Dr. Warburg was awarded the 1931 Nobel prize for explaining the mechanism of the shift in ATP production from aerobic to anaerobic states as a defense mechanism for survival of the cell. Transmembrane potentials fall and the cell begins to feed primarily on sugars. Regardless of the type of cancer cell one is dealing with, if the pollution is removed and the normal constituents of the fluids be restored through nutrition; i.e.. Adding missing minerals and vitamins, the cell will return to stasis or die off as the environment has become hostile to Progenator Cryptocides. Dr. Rife observed this and he stated in the Stafford/Crane audio tapes that he could change the form of the disease by altering the nutrient media. He started with b-coli and changed the disease to several forms including two forms of cancer which, although he didn't say it, could be assumed to be sarcoma and carcinoma. Regardless of what form the cancer comes in, if it is treated via the life enhancement rather than by destructive means, the disease can be reversed. Poisoning tumors only makes the survivors stronger and the destruction of healthy cells in the process makes the immune system weaker and thus less able to defend itself from future occurrences. Conventional cancer treatments are the wrong way to address the disease. Tumors are not the cancer, but are the result of it. The body, having been unable to eliminate waste products, will form the tumor as a protection mechanism to prevent the spread of the blight. It sets up the city dump, so-to-speak, as a common collection gathering point which is in areas that contain the poorest circulation of fluids and subsequently lower levels of ambient oxygen. In men its often the prostate and in women, the breasts. By extripating the tumor, one exacerbates the condition as, now that the main dump has been closed, and the neighbors will throw their trash in the nearest vacant field. Both Drs. Bell and Eli G. considered surgery for cancer to be a criminal assault upon the patient. Cancer always returns at the incision point and when it does, its really ticked-off! This is a simple disease. The problem lies in the fact that the money mongers have built a mountain out of a mole hill. Unless cancer is interfering with body functions, it is best left alone. Correcting the digestive conditions that triggered it by restoring pancreatic function and the production of trypsin and chymotrypsin, tumors dissolve and thus, the disease can be beaten. Many have done so. I totally do not agree that each form of cancer requires individualized specialized treatment. Removing the source of irritation and restoring nutrient balance to levels that are required for correct cellular replication, the disease of cancer requires nothing else to resolve itself. Read Otto Warburg's 1966 speech to the Nobel Laureates. He said it all in a nut shell. Add to the mix a lot of oxygen and pulsed electrical fields and the recovery will be accelerated exponentially. There is one thing one can do to stop all cancers. Stop doing what it was that gave you the cancer in the first place! Stop taking X-rays in any form, stop drinking water saturated with the known carcinogens of chlorine and fluoride, stop eating Trans-fats, start using mineral supplementation, get some exercise to move the lymph fluids, etc. All of this activity combined will drive this nasty out of the body. -- Re: Bone Cancer Here we see the problems that arise when you treat the symptom but not the cause. If it were me, I would use the Dr. Schulze " Incurables " program. Go to www.herbdoc.com for information. She needs to get the lymph moving, cleanse the bowel/ liver/ gallbladder/ kidneys, and take in immune building nutrition. Kathy -- donald eheman <dehemanyahoo (DOT) <mailto:deheman%40yahoo.com> com> wrote: Sylvia Go to : http://www.cancertu <http://www.cancertu <http://www.cancertu <http://www.cancertutor.com> tor.com> tor.com> tor.com Don Sylvia <forrestgal2000@ <mailto:forrestgal2000%40hotmail.com> hotmail.com> wrote: Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God Bless You. Sylvia Quote
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2006 Report Posted October 2, 2006 Then how did you survive stage 3 and 4 cancer? Josh skype: jkenn337 email: jkenn337@... aol: kutztownstudent msn messenger: kenn6498ku@... RE: Bone Cancer > Nice preventive measures, but not the whole story. I have read Warburg's > materials along with hundreds of other works. I work with terminal people > every single day. Most have been the medical route and failed, but not > all. > Some are health freaks to the extreme and still get cancer and still die > no > matter what they try. > > Sometimes nutrition works, sometimes not. I firmly recommend dietary > changes, but that does not necessarily bring resolution. I like and use > RIFE, but that in conjunction with dietary change does not necessarily > work > either. Every single person is different and every single person has > unique > physiology, mental makeup and other complex characteristics that will > dictate how to deal with what they have to successful resolution. You > cannot lump everyone into a single bag and meet with success. > > Cancer can be a rather simplistic thing, but by the time the mutations > reach > stages 3 and 4, the mutations have gone to the point that many simple > fixes > are no longer viable. Just about anything will stop stage one and two > cancers. Modern medicine, witchdoctors, simple diet changes are all about > equally effective. Stage 3 and 4 are whole other animals and the > complexities that they bring because of the specific mutations do not lend > themselves to simplistic solutions. I know, I've been there and done > that. > (Diagnosed with stage 4 RCC and given 4 - 6 months to live and beat the > odds, but it was a whole lot more complex than what you make it out to > be.) > > Quite frankly if it was so simple to fix, there would be no problem. I am > not building mountains out of mole hills. I am not trying to complicate > the > issue. I am stating fact that there is much more to the problem then you > appear to think there is. Most of what Warburg and Rife and others have > done has been done for more than 80 years and yet we have cancer around > and > among us every single day. You cannot lay the blame solely on the medical > establishment, as much as I would like to. If there was something that > would stop it as simply as you seem to believe, somewhere on the face of > the > earth, someone would have a 95%+ success rate and the world would be lined > up at his door. > > I laud you if you can stop cancer as easily as you say. Set yourself up a > clinic and have at it. I guarantee you wealth and fame beyond your > wildest > imagination if it does work as easily as you say. I would like nothing > better than to never have to work with a person who has no life or hope > left > or a grieving family because all the " simple fixes " just didn't work out. > I > would love to tell everyone just to head to your doorstep and the fix is a > done deal. Believe me, there is nothing I would like better. > > > Bruce Guilmette, PhD > Survive Cancer Foundation, Inc. > http://survivecancerfoundation.org <http://survivecancerfoundation.org/> > > Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each > day > has enough trouble of its own. Matt 6:34 (NIV) > Quote
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2006 Report Posted October 2, 2006 Surviving any cancer is determined work on the part of someone with it. My first recommendation is to change the diet to one of 90% vegetable, 10% protein. (See our website under NUTRITION for a more detailed breakdown of food and eating changes needed.) Juice lots of green stuff, bright vegetables, and occassionally a small amount of fruit (need to keep sugars down). All cancers have at least 6 points of commonality that need to be addressed in order to have a reasonable chance at success. On our website under SUPPLEMENTS is a section devoted to my personal theory on what it takes to beat cancer and why. I must stress this is my view, but it is based upon scientific research into what cancers do in order to propogate themselves. If you attack each one of these points and keep in mind that not everyting works for everyone all the time, you will have a chance at survival. Because you cannot easily distinguish what will work and what will not, you do multiple supplements that attack each of the pathaways. One may not work, but if you pick 5 or 6 different things for each characteristic, the odds are highly significant that you will be successful. From a statistical analysis point of view, I raised my odds of survival from the 2% given by the doctors with surgery, chemo, and radiation to a better than 90% probability. It is still not foolproof, but my chances of survival are much greater by doing multiple things with a redundancy factor than relying upon one thing to do the job. Each of the supplements I chose had numerous studies done on it. I chose things I could find at least 30 medical studies done in the last 10 years. Each of those things needed an 80% positive effect rating (24 out of the 30 had to have positive test results) and then targeted the supplements to attack one or more of each of the 6 points I identified. There were no random guesses involved. I went further and chose thiings that are antioxidants as well as enzymes to break down cancer cells and tumor walls. I chose things that work on restoring normal cellular function and then set up a strict regimen to follow. There are easier ways to accomplish what I did, but I figured that I would have only one chance to live and wanted to take the best shot that I could. The Budwig diet works on a different theory and does not use antixodants. The approach is sound and well worth looking at. Johanna Budwig was a nobel laurate who researched her process very well. Thousands of people have been successful doing that. A man named Rudolph Breuss (Austrian) developed a juice fast in the early 1950's which is well documented and highly successful. Had I found this first, this is what I would have done for myself initially. He had documented over 40,000 cures in a 50 year period. It comprises a daily mixture of 10 oz beet juice, 2 oz carrot, 2 oz celery, 2 oz potato, and 1 oz of radish juice for a period of 6 weeks. It starves cancer of proteins and carbohydrates needed to feed it while keeping the body nurished. There is a book on it called THE BREUSS CANCER CURE on amazon.com for roughly $10. There are no end of things you can do, but it takes time and research to pick viable alternatives. Regards, Bruce Guilmette, PhD Survive Cancer Foundation, Inc. http://survivecancerfoundation.org <http://survivecancerfoundation.org/> Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own. Matt 6:34 (NIV) _____ From: Rife [mailto:Rife ] On Behalf Of Josh Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 9:41 PM To: Rife Subject: Re: Bone Cancer Then how did you survive stage 3 and 4 cancer? Josh skype: jkenn337 email: jkenn337kutztown (DOT) <mailto:jkenn337%40kutztown.edu> edu aol: kutztownstudent msn messenger: kenn6498kuhotmail (DOT) <mailto:kenn6498ku%40hotmail.com> com .. <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=302533/grpspId=1600060814/msgId= 18486/stime=1159772716/nc1=3848642/nc2=3848541/nc3=3> Quote
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2006 Report Posted October 3, 2006 I tried to go to the site it stated I didn't have access to that page Terry _____ From: Rife [mailto:Rife ] On Behalf Of comdyne@... Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 6:52 AM To: Rife Subject: RE: Bone Cancer I re-published a book by an English oncologist who, in the first quarter of the last century, was curing the vast majority of his cancer patients using natural methods. He refused to operate on tumors unless absolutely necessary I added definitions to the medical terms he used and in a very few areas I added commentary as much more is known today about cancer than was understood during his time period. Dr. Bell's writing skills were remarkable as he drove home the concept of what causes cancer and how it can be eliminated. The book is spectacular and transcribing it was a labor of love. I added my own 33 page treatise which is titled 'The Truth About Cancer' which is the last section of the book. Most of your questions about this dreaded disease are answered in this work. http://www.lulu com/items/volume_10/225000/225756/2/preview/cancer_preview_B_rtf.rtf -- Re: Bone Cancer Here we see the problems that arise when you treat the symptom but not the cause. If it were me, I would use the Dr. Schulze " Incurables " program. Go to www.herbdoc.com for information. She needs to get the lymph moving, cleanse the bowel/ liver/ gallbladder/ kidneys, and take in immune building nutrition. Kathy -- donald eheman <dehemanyahoo (DOT) <mailto:deheman%40yahoo.com> com> wrote: Sylvia Go to : http://www.cancertu <http://www.cancertu <http://www.cancertutor.com> tor.com> tor.com Don Sylvia <forrestgal2000@ <mailto:forrestgal2000%40hotmail.com> hotmail.com> wrote: Can anyone out here give me information about treating bone cancer? A very close friend of mine had breast cancer, and now almost five years later, the doctors tell her she has a spot on her liver, lung, and on her bones. They have given her 2 to 7 years to live. I truely beleive there is a way to prove the doctors wrong. I would greatly appreciate any information anyone might have to share. God Bless You. Sylvia Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.