Re: TO : DR. Ian MacLeod Re: Contact Pad

[Guest guest]

Dear Ian,

When you say you are creating a natural environment in which the cells

regenerate according to their own genetic programming, do you mean that you

expose the cells to their natural vibratory/resonant frequency signature? If so,

is it based on the resonant frequency of the norma cell as a whole or the

healthy DNA?

Thanks

Reza

Ian MacLeod wrote:

Dear ,

We are creating a " natural " environment in which the cells regenerate according

to their own genetic programming and instruction sets.

Yours,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of the truth

through relentless research and infinite patience.

[Guest guest]

Dear Ian,

I have a few questions

1) Is this one reason you find sine waves work better than square waves

because of not being disruptive to the normal cells in the regenerative process

as the square waves?

2) Do you find that the resonant frequency of the cell in a tissue of an organ

being the same as that of the organ itself? I mean, if the liver cell has a

particular resonant frequency signature of say " X " , does the liver as a whole

also demonstrate the same resonant frequency of " X " too?

3) Are the frequency signatures of cells of tissues/organs, classified on the

basis of their embryologic origin? That is, do you find the organs derived from

the mesoderm/endoderm/ectoderm share the same frequency signature or is it more

organ dependent?

Thanks

Reza

Ian MacLeod wrote:

Dear Reza,

We expose cells and cell groups (CeFams) to their required resonant frequency so

as to overwrite the existing signature with a better one. Once the cells or

CeFams have taken on the new signature healing begins at an amazing rate via

cellular regeneration ... which is actually taking place on a molecular and

sub-molecular level.

Respects,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

Physical Therapist wrote:

Dear Ian,

When you say you are creating a natural environment in which the cells

regenerate according to their own genetic programming, do you mean that you

expose the cells to their natural vibratory/resonant frequency signature? If so,

is it based on the resonant frequency of the norma cell as a whole or the

healthy DNA?

Thanks

Reza

Ian MacLeod wrote:

Dear ,

We are creating a " natural " environment in which the cells regenerate according

to their own genetic programming and instruction sets.

Yours,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of the truth

through relentless research and infinite patience.

[Guest guest]

Hi Reza,

Your questions are excellent, and a pleasure to answer:

1. Yes, as the sinusoidal waveform is natural to the body, to the cells,

CeFams, and even to the molecules themselves, it is the most natural waveform

for application of a " corrective " frequency. It is best suited to promote a

stable environment in which to regenerate and heal.

2. No, there is no organic commonality insofar as the natural resident

frequency (NRf) is concerned. The classification process involves the

identification of key CeFams throughouth the body and this is unique to each

individual, being determinable through a counter-resonance process which allows

us to determine the " Natural Root Frequency " which never changes, is always

constant, and is the denominator to all CeFam NRf throughout the body.

3. No, the frequency signatures are more collectively identified according to

their molecular and atomic makeup rather than embryolic origin.

Keep up the excellent questions my friend,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

Physical Therapist wrote:

Dear Ian,

I have a few questions

1) Is this one reason you find sine waves work better than square waves because

of not being disruptive to the normal cells in the regenerative process as the

square waves?

2) Do you find that the resonant frequency of the cell in a tissue of an organ

being the same as that of the organ itself? I mean, if the liver cell has a

particular resonant frequency signature of say " X " , does the liver as a whole

also demonstrate the same resonant frequency of " X " too?

3) Are the frequency signatures of cells of tissues/organs, classified on the

basis of their embryologic origin? That is, do you find the organs derived from

the mesoderm/endoderm/ectoderm share the same frequency signature or is it more

organ dependent?

Thanks

Reza

Ian MacLeod wrote:

Dear Reza,

We expose cells and cell groups (CeFams) to their required resonant frequency so

as to overwrite the existing signature with a better one. Once the cells or

CeFams have taken on the new signature healing begins at an amazing rate via

cellular regeneration ... which is actually taking place on a molecular and

sub-molecular level.

Respects,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

Physical Therapist wrote:

Dear Ian,

When you say you are creating a natural environment in which the cells

regenerate according to their own genetic programming, do you mean that you

expose the cells to their natural vibratory/resonant frequency signature? If so,

is it based on the resonant frequency of the norma cell as a whole or the

healthy DNA?

Thanks

Reza

Ian MacLeod wrote:

Dear ,

We are creating a " natural " environment in which the cells regenerate according

to their own genetic programming and instruction sets.

Yours,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of the truth

through relentless research and infinite patience.

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of the truth

through relentless research and infinite patience.

---------------------------------

Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs.Try it free.