Guest guest Posted November 10, 2004 Report Share Posted November 10, 2004 Has anyone here tried either of these modalities? I've heard some rave testimonials about both. Several people on some of my pet health lists have posted that their animals are completely cured of allergies (food and/or environmental) as a result of NAET, and one as a result of BioSET. I've read that NAET (I believe) is even used for the treatment of Autism. As I understand it, both " reprogram " the body to no longer see an antigen as an antigen. IOW, the antigen no longer set off an immune reaction once the body's reprogrammed via accupuncture, accupressure and other alternative modalities. NAET: http://www.naet.com/ BioSET: http://www.bioset-institute.com/ I'm thinking about using one of these modalities with my min pin Mokie, but was hoping to get some more personal anecdotes before deciding which one. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 Hi Suze, My son was getting hives of unknown origin. I tried Bioset and within a few weeks they were gone. He was getting them almost daily for about a year and had to use antihistimines to stop the cycle almost daily. It was horrible for him. It really worked incredibly. I chose bioset over NAET, because with NAET the person has to stay away from the object or food he is allergic to for over 24 hrs. With Bioset, the person doesn't have to stay away from the allergic substance. Much, Much easier with bioset! For example, if the person, or dog in your case is allergic to something in your carpet, what are you going to do??? So, I would choose Bioset. Jafa Suze Fisher <s.fisher22@...> wrote: Has anyone here tried either of these modalities? I've heard some rave testimonials about both. Several people on some of my pet health lists have posted that their animals are completely cured of allergies (food and/or environmental) as a result of NAET, and one as a result of BioSET. I've read that NAET (I believe) is even used for the treatment of Autism. As I understand it, both " reprogram " the body to no longer see an antigen as an antigen. IOW, the antigen no longer set off an immune reaction once the body's reprogrammed via accupuncture, accupressure and other alternative modalities. NAET: http://www.naet.com/ BioSET: http://www.bioset-institute.com/ I'm thinking about using one of these modalities with my min pin Mokie, but was hoping to get some more personal anecdotes before deciding which one. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 > Re: OT: BioSET or NAET as allergy treatments > > >I chose bioset over NAET, because with NAET the person has to stay >away from the object or food he is allergic to for over 24 hrs. >With Bioset, the person doesn't have to stay away from the >allergic substance. Much, Much easier with bioset! For example, >if the person, or dog in your case is allergic to something in >your carpet, what are you going to do??? So, I would choose Bioset. > >Jafa Hey, that is a really good point that I didn't think of Jafa. THanks! Did you do BioSET over the phone or in person? The only BioSET practitioner I know of at the moment who works with animals, does phone consults. I will look around to see if there's anyone one local though. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 Suze, In person. The person has to hold the vials of the substance he/she is allergic too. I don't know if the results would be as good with surrogate testing over the phone. That's getting into the energy realm in a large way. Some think it is hocky. It's up to you. Jafa Suze Fisher <s.fisher22@...> wrote: > Re: OT: BioSET or NAET as allergy treatments > > >I chose bioset over NAET, because with NAET the person has to stay >away from the object or food he is allergic to for over 24 hrs. >With Bioset, the person doesn't have to stay away from the >allergic substance. Much, Much easier with bioset! For example, >if the person, or dog in your case is allergic to something in >your carpet, what are you going to do??? So, I would choose Bioset. > >Jafa Hey, that is a really good point that I didn't think of Jafa. THanks! Did you do BioSET over the phone or in person? The only BioSET practitioner I know of at the moment who works with animals, does phone consults. I will look around to see if there's anyone one local though. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 Hi Suze, I tried something similar to NAET called something like " natural healing " which helped me get rid of dairy allergies. I can even tolerate some forms of wheat now, too. Blessings, a > Has anyone here tried either of these modalities? I've heard some rave > testimonials about both. Several people on some of my pet health lists have > posted that their animals are completely cured of allergies (food and/or > environmental) as a result of NAET, and one as a result of BioSET. I've read > that NAET (I believe) is even used for the treatment of Autism. > > As I understand it, both " reprogram " the body to no longer see an antigen as > an antigen. IOW, the antigen no longer set off an immune reaction once the > body's reprogrammed via accupuncture, accupressure and other alternative > modalities. > > NAET: http://www.naet.com/ > BioSET: http://www.bioset-institute.com/ > > I'm thinking about using one of these modalities with my min pin Mokie, but > was hoping to get some more personal anecdotes before deciding which one. > > > > Suze Fisher > Lapdog Design, Inc. > Web Design & Development > http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg > Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine > http://www.westonaprice.org > > ---------------------------- > " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause > heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- > Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt > University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. > > The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics > <http://www.thincs.org> > ---------------------------- > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 Hi Jafa, Basically, it involves having the practitioner use kinesiology to test for a weakness to a certain food, substance, etc., using a vile representing that substance placed in the other hand of the client. The practitioner then taps some areas on the client's body which clears the person for that substance. It took me a couple of sessions to release my dairy allergy. Here is a link to their work: http://www.nhseminars.com/ Very interesting stuff. ~a > > Has anyone here tried either of these modalities? I've heard some rave > > testimonials about both. Several people on some of my pet health > lists have > > posted that their animals are completely cured of allergies (food and/or > > environmental) as a result of NAET, and one as a result of BioSET. > I've read > > that NAET (I believe) is even used for the treatment of Autism. > > > > As I understand it, both " reprogram " the body to no longer see an > antigen as > > an antigen. IOW, the antigen no longer set off an immune reaction > once the > > body's reprogrammed via accupuncture, accupressure and other alternative > > modalities. > > > > NAET: http://www.naet.com/ > > BioSET: http://www.bioset-institute.com/ > > > > I'm thinking about using one of these modalities with my min pin > Mokie, but > > was hoping to get some more personal anecdotes before deciding which > one. > > > > > > > > Suze Fisher > > Lapdog Design, Inc. > > Web Design & Development > > http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg > > Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine > > http://www.westonaprice.org > > > > ---------------------------- > > " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause > > heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " > -- > > Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt > > University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. > > > > The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics > > <http://www.thincs.org> > > ---------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.