Guest guest Posted September 28, 2004 Report Share Posted September 28, 2004 In a message dated 9/28/04 9:03:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time, teresa.blazey@... writes: They used to issue them short-handled hoes, but that was made illegal because it was, well, back-breaking. I guess the growers then didn't give the workers anything, so they still had to stoop down the rows. How embarassing. Hope they got it right this time. _____ ~~~~> So were the long-handled hoes too expensive or something? Is this on really big farms only? I've worked on a small farm and landscaping, and I'm trying to make this jive with my experience and can't. I guess I can see on a farm with hundreds or thousands of workers they could save money on hundreds or thousands of hoes, but I'm not sure if any farms employ that many people. (?) And what a dumbass farm, anyway. The workers would get much more done much faster if they had proper equipment, and save the farm money. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2004 Report Share Posted September 29, 2004 Here you go: Weeding California Fields The short-handled hoe, known as el cortito, was banned in California in 1975, the same year that the state enacted the Agricultural Labor Relations Act that gave farm workers organizing and collective bargaining rights. Workers were prohibited from using short-handled hoes--those with handles less than four feet-- for weeding and thinning crops because of the damage stooping causes to workers' backs. At the time, farmers argued that workers closer to the ground did more careful work, and some tried to get around the ban by issuing workers short-handled knives, promoting a 1978 ban on all short-handled tools. However, the 1975 ban does not apply to hand weeding, and some farmers are reportedly providing workers with no hoes when sending them to fields. According to CRLA activists, some employers prefer to have workers bending as they work in order to more easily determine who is working. The Department of Industrial Relation's Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) opposes the ban on hand weeding as an unfunded mandate that would be difficult to enforce. Labor law enforcers in the Targeted Industries Protection Program assert that hand-weeding is not a serious problem. In the California legislature, Senate Bill 587, which would ban hand weeding, was approved in committee despite the opposition of Farm Bureau and other farm organizations, who argued that in nurseries, hand weeding is necessary. CRLA, which brought the suit that led to the banning of the short-handled hoe, is under threat of Congressional defunding. California Rural Legal Assistance, an organization with 50 lawyers around the state, gets 70 percent of its $7 million annual budget from the Legal Services Corporation. Fred Alvarez, " Farm Worker Advocates dig in against Hand Weeding, " Los Angeles Times, May 22, 1995; Kerry Benson, " Hand Weeding ban moves through Senate, " Ag Alert, May 17, 1995. On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:21:27 EDT, chrismasterjohn@... <chrismasterjohn@...> wrote: > In a message dated 9/28/04 9:03:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > teresa.blazey@... writes: > They used to issue them short-handled hoes, but that was made illegal > because it was, well, back-breaking. I guess the growers then didn't > give the workers anything, so they still had to stoop down the rows. > How embarassing. Hope they got it right this time. > _____ > > ~~~~> So were the long-handled hoes too expensive or something? Is this on > really big farms only? I've worked on a small farm and landscaping, and I'm > trying to make this jive with my experience and can't. I guess I can see on a > farm with hundreds or thousands of workers they could save money on hundreds or > thousands of hoes, but I'm not sure if any farms employ that many people. (?) > > And what a dumbass farm, anyway. The workers would get much more done much > faster if they had proper equipment, and save the farm money. > > Chris > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 In a message dated 9/28/04 10:07:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time, stordock@... writes: Sure " they " got it right. What are you doing weeding by hand anyways??? That is a job for " our " wonderful herbicides that you are scientifically cajoled and encouraged to use. : P _____ ~~~~~> It would be awfully silly to think the employee doing the job and the employer that created the job would have a better idea of the proper way of doing the job than the government official who doesn't have anything to do the job, except to tax it, anyway. Obviously the government official knows best regardless of the job in question. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 In a message dated 9/28/04 9:38:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time, teresa.blazey@... writes: Here you go: ____ Thanks! LOL! I'd like to see the California legislature come up with some tool to make me use to tighten put the doors and tighten the bolts on our curb forms to prevent me from stooping and doing it with my hands. What would it look like, I wonder? Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.