's 434Khz and Holt's 434Mhz

[Guest guest]

The_Comeback_Kid wrote:

Any correlation (harmonic or otherwise) between Dr. Hulda 's use

of 434khz for what she believes to be the primary cause of cancer/hiv,

and Dr. Holt's use of 434MHZ for his cancer protocol?

believes the human intestinal fluke to be the primary pathogen

(flatworm) responsible for cancer and hiv with one other co-factor

being present. She states it is Fasciolopsis buskii.

Any relationship between these 2 frequencies?

One needs to understand the principles of Holts treatments and use of 434 MHz.

He is not attempting to evicerate cancer through resonance, but push the cancer

into a growth phase in the absence of its primary food source, glucose. Any

harmonics of 434 MHz should be of concern. For a better understanding of this

see: http://truerife.com/egbt.pdf

Mike http://www.truerife.com

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

I don't believe there is any relationship whatsoever. There is a 1000 times

difference in the frequencies. 434 MHz is an ISM band frequency for

Australia.

To Quote:

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:T3ZSe7o__AsJ:www.autoid.org/1_2003%2520

Documents/oct/104sc4wg2n0146_AllSet_Pres.ppt+Australia+ISM+frequency & hl=en & i

e=UTF-8

>The following bands: 433.05-434.79 MHz (centre frequency 433.92 MHz) in

>Region 1 except in the countries mentioned in No. 5.280, are designated

>for industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) applications.

In other words Dr. Holt's device is operates on a frequency allocated by

the Australian govt. for such devices.

The published literature is replete with multiple accounts of the effects

of pulsed EM fields on cancer. This does include the effects utilized by

Dr. Holt.

However.... a significant problem arrises when one tries to make some sort

of assumptions about a single isolated EM field effect. Saying one should

stay away from harmonics or subharmonics of 434 MHz is one of them.

What happens in the body due to the use of pulsed EM fields is complex - a

whole cascade of effects occur. Cumulatively they can, and frequently are,

extremely beneficial. As Dr. Holt has found, it is also possible to take

advantage of these physiologic effects and destroy cancer cells. As I have

stated before there are effects from pulsed EM fields that are frequency

dependent, and there are effects that are field dependent.

Jim Bare

>The_Comeback_Kid wrote:

>Any correlation (harmonic or otherwise) between Dr. Hulda 's use

>of 434khz for what she believes to be the primary cause of cancer/hiv,

>and Dr. Holt's use of 434MHZ for his cancer protocol?

[Guest guest]

I doubt that there is any connection.

Dr. 's frequency is the MOR for the fluke. Dr. Holt's frequency heats

tumors and other tissues, but we do not know that it is a MOR for anything.

Loyd http://www.royalrife.com

's 434khz and Holt's 434Mhz

Any correlation (harmonic or otherwise) between Dr. Hulda 's use of

434khz for what she believes to be the primary cause of cancer/hiv, and Dr.

Holt's use of 434MHZ for his cancer protocol?

believes the human intestinal fluke to be the primary pathogen

(flatworm) responsible for cancer and hiv with one other co-factor being

present. She states it is Fasciolopsis buskii.

Any relationship between these 2 frequencies?

[Guest guest]

There is no harmonic relationship here, therefore a relationship does

not exist within the current context. The freq used by Holt( 434 mhz)

is widely used in therapeutic applications in Europe( so I am told).

I am not quite clear on the significance of Jim Bare's comments

regarding the allocation of 434mhz to an ISM band in Australia.

The success of Holt treatment is, and is not claimed to be, a variant

of Rife's MOR effect. The concept of destuctive resonance does not

seem to appear in the scant reports of Holt's work.

However, he has been shunned and ridiculed by Big Med and academia,

somewhat predictably.