Guest guest Posted October 12, 2004 Report Share Posted October 12, 2004 Tom is definitely onto something. We find with his antiparallel circuit with 12 volt coils, the tube is as bright as parallel, but the electrical and magnetic fields are much greater. This circuit effectively puts the coil secondaries in series. We call the antiparallel version the EM7V. It is a very easy mod - it takes less than 5 minutes to convert an EMEM3DV to the antiparallel EM7V. See http://www.royalrife.com/em7v.html for more information. If a person wants to use the 6 volt coils, the primaries are wired in series and outputs are the two high voltage terminals. The electrical field will be high, but the magnetic field may be reduced with low current motorcycle coils. Loyd http://www.royalrife.com Re[2]: BIOENERAY The BIOENERAY is very different from an typical EMEM device in that it uses motorcycle coils instead of automotive coils. They are designed for engines which run at higher speed and therefor are more efficient with higher frequencies. So when you run frequencies as high as 10,000Hz the output is greater. Tom also wires the coils in series instead of parallel which provides much more voltage to the plasma tube. It does not light up as bright, but the E-field is far greater. I wired the coils on my EMEM3D the same as with the BIOENERAY and at 7 feet the energy from the plasma tube just about pinned the needle on my Trifield meter (at various frequencies). So it appears to me that this device is worth looking into. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2004 Report Share Posted October 12, 2004 Hi Bil, Well it looks like I have been doing the right thing I am using Outboard coils in my dual tube EMEM.I will set mine up like 2 EM7V's I am going to put it into a wooden carry case. Re[2]: BIOENERAY > > > The BIOENERAY is very different from an typical EMEM device in that > it uses motorcycle coils instead of automotive coils. They are > designed for engines which run at higher speed and therefor are > more efficient with higher frequencies. > > So when you run frequencies as high as 10,000Hz the output is > greater. Tom also wires the coils in series instead of parallel > which provides much more voltage to the plasma tube. It does not > light up as bright, but the E-field is far greater. > > I wired the coils on my EMEM3D the same as with the BIOENERAY and > at 7 feet the energy from the plasma tube just about pinned the > needle on my Trifield meter (at various frequencies). So it > appears to me that this device is worth looking into. > > If you can't afford $800 for a top notch Rife type frequency > generator you can use the computer program FREX which is free, > and loaded with features. For somewhere around $100 Alvin can > sell you a special amplifier for use with your computer using > FREX) and a Rife device (plasma or pad). > > And there are many other freq generators to choose from, although > the digital programmable ones (much easier to use) do cost around > $500 on up (there's always ebay for those that want to get a > bargain). > > And about the mercury; well it depends on how much is added. You > can always call Tom and ask about this. It's not a sun lamp (and > you may get much more UV from spending a few minutes in sunlight). > > > Bil Green > PC 1000 > Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 > > > Monday, October 11, 2004, 7:40:32 AM, you wrote: > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 10/8/04 -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 10/8/04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2004 Report Share Posted October 13, 2004 I only mentioned sunlamp because they contain mostly mercury as apposed to a small trace of mercury in some Rife plasma tubes. With the glass being leaded, what's to worry about? Sunlight produces UV, fluorescent lights produce UV. Bil Green PC 1000 Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 9:50:58 PM, you wrote: D> Considering that people I've watched seem to not be the least bit D> bothered by looking directly at the tube, especially when they're D> holding it and/or placing it on their body.. I'd prefer no UV at all D> under any circumstances, meaning the tube cannot be quartz or even D> pyrex, which are not as opaque to UV as is leaded glass. (Quartz passes D> UV just fine..) D> The leaded glass is good, but may be getting scarce at some point, and D> most glass shops (not necessarily neon shops) are using borosilicate, D> which is not as opaque to UV as is the old leaded glass. As near as I D> can tell, the mercury helps the tube (a) run brighter) and ( ignite D> easier. Mercury has a few very very hot lines of energy as noted earlier D> - and one might even argue that those energy lines might either help or D> hinder the energy lines from the argon; certainly having mercury in the D> lamp would reduce the emissions of the argon somewhat. D> I'm gratified that Dr. Bill's tube produces no UV-A or UV-B - it must be D> leaded glass. Still, I will avoid any tube containing mercury. D> A side note, Dr. Biagioli gave an excellent talk at the Rife Conference D> in ? Las Vegas, and I'd hoped he would be back at the later conferences D> - I'd like to hear how his research is doing. D> And, Bil - there is a warning on every Sunlamp not to look into the lamp D> and/or to wear sunglasses, and to limit one's exposure to it to just ?? D> minutes. Our eyes cannot see the UV energy, but the UV energy from a D> " mercury " sunlamp is orders of magnitude higher in energy than what we D> can see. That is a different animal that the " Rife " or EMEM plasma lamps D> which may have traces of mercury in them. D> Dave D> Bil Green wrote: >> But don't you get much more UV from a few minutes of sunlight than >> from a tube which contains mostly gasses that do not produce UV? >> >> I believe sunlamps contain mostly mercury. The E-gas with mercury >> added is mostly argon and neon from what I've heard (Barry won't >> say what's in it). I'm sure Tom would supply a tube without the >> mercury if someone asked. >> >> Bil Green >> PC 1000 >> Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 >> >> >> Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 7:19:13 AM, you wrote: >> D> You'll still need a frequency generator .. The manufacturer has a good >> D> reputation (although I would personally insist on a tube with no mercury >> D> in it.. UV is bad stuff in my book.) >> >> D> - Dave >> >> >> D> sandy wrote: >>>>Has anybody tried this machine? The BIOENERAY XL3 >>>> >>>>I am still trying to decide on what to buy and this one looked good >>>>and the price seems right. >>>> >>>>Its a plasma tube and I think everything is with it that I need to >>>>start using it. >>>> >>>> >>>>Sandy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2004 Report Share Posted October 13, 2004 Hi All, My tube DOES NOT use leaded glass! Properly designed tubes and equipment do not emit UV. Dr. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2004 Report Share Posted October 14, 2004 Re: Re[2]: BIOENERAY > > Hi All, > > My tube DOES NOT use leaded glass! Properly designed tubes and equipment > do not emit UV. > > Dr. Bill Please explain how and why " properly designed tubes and equipment do not emit UV. " Thanks. Nenah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.