Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Posted March 1, 2006 ,I'm kind of with you on the liver thing, the oral agents pose unique risks.Still, on the lipid stuff, I think over all, this is a concern. "Male sex" is an independent risk for coronary vascular disease, and native testosterone is probably the culprit. I doubt that various anabolic steroid preparations are significantly different in terms of possible cardiovascular problems, and certainly, as you suggest, more studies are needed.Many, like you, are more than capable of following your individual results, and making appropriate life style adjustments. A "negative" study may still promote health, by encouraging men to follow their blood lipid, and PSA, carefully when on anabolics.I went back on a month ago, after two years off. We'll see.On Mar 1, 2006, at 1:45 PM, PozHealth wrote:Grunfeld says the adverse effects of the steroids were clear-cut within the first 12 weeks. "HDL plummets. LDL goes up. This predisposes people to an increased risk of heart attack. Furthermore, we found grade III and grade IV liver toxicity in some men, which means a very significant risk of serious liver damage." The men's testosterone levels were also depressed. These effects were not seen in men taking placebo, according to Grunfeld. Barrowpozbod@... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.