Guest guest Posted March 29, 2008 Report Posted March 29, 2008 I have actually given this subject considerable thought, as I trained in Aikido for about 8 or 9 years. I found the lack of basic knowledge about contemporary science-based fitness training in Aikido and other tradition-based arts quite exasperating. In my view, the most important problems were the lack of attention to proper conditioning and warm-up practices and the related high incidence of injuries I saw. Especially worrying to me was the nearly crippling accumulation of chronic injuries I saw in most anyone who trained extensively for more than a decade or so. In my view, this kind of " remedial " knowledge is much more important for a traditional martial artist to pursue than the sort of elite, performance-enhancing knowledge mostly discussed on Supertraining - especially for teachers. A few top students might get a little benefit from performance enhancement training, but since Aikido isn't generally practiced for the purposes of fighting or competition, I don't think it is a huge issue. I think the main training focus should be getting people in the proper shape to practice and keeping them safe from injury. My main areas of concern as far as what I have seen are: a) Warmups that are inadequate, counter-productive, or even outright injurious. Practices that obviously do not accomplish what they are supposed to according to exercise science principles. Again, sometimes these are bad enough to be outright injurious. c) Lack of basic preparatory and supplemental conditioning for most Aikidoka. * Let's start with some expansion of a). What is a useful warmup? Most people seem to think static stretching is the primary element, usually in geometrically pretty positions that have little to do with functional flexibility. Most warmups I've seen are almost all passive, static stretching, with a few strength-endurance exercises and mild aerobic movements - all mixed together haphazardly. Unfortunately, brief static stretches prior to activity are nearly useless, the stretches chosen are largely irrelevant to Aikido movement, and the strength-endurance movements don't make any sense. Some practices, like precussive self-massage, are actually contraindicated as such massage actually impedes blood flow to muscles. A good warmup is not so esoteric. It is basically a logical transition between standing around doing nothing and doing whatever the activity is that you are warming up for. A good basic pattern would be a few minutes of aerobics to gradually increase blood flow and heart rate, followed by dynamic stretches, which are basically self-powered limb movements out to the edge of used ranges of motion with a mild elastic bounce at the end. These are essentially toned-down previews of the type of stretch that might/will be experienced during training - a transition stage. After that, mellower versions of specific movements about to be trained should precede each new activity - a gradual transition from not doing it to doing it. * As for , the 1000 cuts mentioned somewhere in this thread is a good example. Although this practice may have some mental value, it is hopelessly misguided from an exercise science perspective - as silly as performing 1000 consecutive snatches or shotputs. People claim that as you fatigue you will perform the cuts better due to more " relaxation " , but this is ridiculous. In fact, as you fatigue, your form will deteriorate horribly. The energy systems and neural freshness you need to perform a cut with speed and precision are out of the picture after only a few reps. After a few dozen, the muscles and nerves will be so fatigued that you'll start using different muscles and improvising completely different neural patterns to get the sword up and down by hook or crook. If the limp, slapdash movement you are performing at rep 1000 is actually better than the first few, you need a new teacher. Worse, this kind of practice is an express ticket to tendonitis, an incredibly frustrating injury that takes a long time and careful rehab from which to recover. * c) is more of an off-the-mat issue, but probably the most important one for serious students. I never had the proper conditioning for Aikido myself. I was always going through some kind of yo-yo with chronic injuries, and I did more supplemental conditioning than most. What most students I've seen need is to either stop Aikido or delay starting, and spend 6 months to a year to focus exclusively on getting into shape - it's what I'm doing right now. This is not a popular suggestion. If you look at the Russian system, you see them training kids for years with general exercise before they ever even let them touch a ball or a piece of gymnastics equipment, even though they have already been genetically screened and destined to do that particular sport. Aikido is practically acrobatics, yet people think they can just do it with no preparation. Some can, but most can't. Some of the latter just quit, and the rest muddle along with yo-yo injury problems, mostly ignoring pain and problems until they end up hobbling around with chronic pain and severe movement restrictions by their early 50s. What a serious student needs isn't that complicated, but it requires knowledge and patience. Good preparation would be building up some strength in a few basic compound weight movements, finding and permanently correcting flexibility imbalances/problems (my issue), and building up some aerobic and anaerobic endurance with varied interval training. Once a basic fitness level is reached, it could probably be maintained along with Aikido training with as little as two short sessions per week, maybe even just one strength session if the Aikido is vigorous enough. * Anyway, those are some introductory thoughts on exercise science and Aikido. I'll be happy to talk with you about it more, either on the board or off, if you'd like to send a private message. Good luck. Wilbanks Wisconsin, USA > > Greetings Everyone: > > I apologize if this question has been asked and answered before. Is > there a list of essential books that you think one should read for > high-level (super-)training? From reading some posts (I am a very new > member), I am thinking Mel Siff, and some Russian authors (Coach > mentioned them) seem required reading. Is there a list > somewhere on a website or on Amazon that I can refer to? The problem > is many times there is a lot of over-commercialization and selling, so > it is difficult to find out what is good and what is not. > > Also, are there websites where one can get at least some of the > articles that many people refer to. Google is on a project to digitize > all books/articles but we are not there yet. I am interested in many > sports medicine/performance articles but it is very difficult to find > esp if they are published in other countries. Not working in academia, > it is difficult to get access to the best journals/books etc. Please > advise if you can. > > My primary interest is martial arts (aikido, iaido, aikijujitsu, > tai-chi) and not weight-lifting/powerlifting, which seems to be the > main focus here. I'd think principles of optimal performance are > universal, hence my strong interest in joining this group. > > Best regards and thanks > > Jaideep Mukherjee, Ph. D. > Houston USA > Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.