Guest guest Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 Hi Ann - My husband's gut reaction was that quality of life was more important to him that quantity. I was stunned, couldn't believe that he could feel that way. But after reading and researching I found that he was not alone in his response. The thought of incontenence for the rest of his life was as depressing as the thought of impotence. However, since people in our area have found out what he's up against the outpouring of support and friendship has been overwhelming. Folks that he counted as casual friends have come by and called, offered assistance, etc. It has been heartwarming and strengthening. He has just recently started feeling the effects of hormone therapy and has taken them much better than I anticipated. I think since the onset of the symptoms has been slow, symptoms that may remain with him indefinately - I don't know --, he has had a change of heart and mind. I feel that we are at the beginning of our trek through PCa and eliminating it or at least controlling it I don't know exactly how his body will respond/react but I know that we're going to do what it takes to get him through it. I have been a lurker for several months and this is really my first contribution rather than question. Just reading the posts here and seeing the strength and compassion of others has been great for me. I would recommend checking your area for a support group. Kate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 Ann I had RRP in 1996 and whilst I wear a pad that I change daily after an evening bath - hey life is good! I had 6 months with an external catheter which was time consuming. I dried up enough to the point I only lose a few drops a day. ED can be helped with injections and pumps. Life is never the same, but we have done things we might not have done ever. We have been to the States twice, to the Greek Islands, to Teneriffe, to India. I have trained parish councillors and clerks, including a Lord! Life will be good, but honest if the doc has felt a lump, then the active surveillance may not be for your hubby. I know men who have had full scale treatments who have little or no side effects. Very few of them come on groups like this - cos they are doing well and don't need our help! I hope he gets a biopsy soon so that you know for certain the path to choose! Best wishes I Hate All Of This - How Do You Get Through It? My husband has a PSA of 9.5, he had a DRE and the Dr. said he may have felt something. We have made two additional appointments with specialists. One at Stanfor in California and the other with Dr. Krongrad Miami. Since the first Dr was not too keen on information we decided that investigation was better than a quick response to anything, including a biopsy. Still no biopsy is scheduled pending the scheduled appointments. We are more than likely putting off everything. I cannot stand any of this. Reading of incontenence, impotence, blood in the urine etc to me is worse than almost anything else. Why is everyone so against just waiting to see where the PSA goes? What kind of quality of life does one have while running to the toilet or wearing a pad or diaper? Please help me with this because I am not coping well. Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 Well I guess one has to set priorties in life. If sex and a normal body functions is what you want then wait. However if you wait too long you may pass up the chance to get rid of the disease. If so, the end isnt gonna be pretty for your man. So the way i see it its a trade off. Sex for a few years, then the messy pants and a bad ending laying in bed with a morphine drip for 6 months or take the chance to get rid of it now and live longer. Thats the long and short of it right now. Wait too long and there is no cure!Ann Meili wrote: My husband has a PSA of 9.5, he had a DRE and the Dr. said he may have felt something. We have made two additional appointments with specialists. One at Stanfor in California and the other with Dr. Krongrad Miami. Since the first Dr was not too keen on information we decided that investigation was better than a quick response to anything, including a biopsy. Still no biopsy is scheduled pending the scheduled appointments. We are more than likely putting off everything. I cannot stand any of this. Reading of incontenence, impotence, blood in the urine etc to me is worse than almost anything else. Why is everyone so against just waiting to see where the PSA goes? What kind of quality of life does one have while running to the toilet or wearing a pad or diaper? Please help me with this because I am not coping well. Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. The prostate cancer facts, a forum for survival stats, end of life, and other issues we normally don't discuss. So if your looking for this type of support information stop on by. Browse Archives at groups.google.com How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 Ann, Most surgeons will do their best to avoid harming the sphincter and the nerves. I had RRP 13 months ago and had some incontinence for about a month. Unfortunately, the cancer had left the capsule and also was in one of the seven lymph nodes the surgeon removed. I was quickly put on hormone therapy and as a result, have no idea whether the impotence is permanent or not. The surgeon told me he was able to spare one of the nerves and when I get off the hormone therapy I'll find out. My Gleason was a nine and I'm not taking any chances. All I can do, I'm going to do. Like most other cancers, PCa is best treated early on and aggressively. Good luck in your journey, Jim Pryor I Hate All Of This - How Do You Get Through It? My husband has a PSA of 9.5, he had a DRE and the Dr. said he may have felt something. We have made two additional appointments with specialists. One at Stanfor in California and the other with Dr. Krongrad Miami. Since the first Dr was not too keen on information we decided that investigation was better than a quick response to anything, including a biopsy. Still no biopsy is scheduled pending the scheduled appointments. We are more than likely putting off everything. I cannot stand any of this. Reading of incontenence, impotence, blood in the urine etc to me is worse than almost anything else. Why is everyone so against just waiting to see where the PSA goes? What kind of quality of life does one have while running to the toilet or wearing a pad or diaper? Please help me with this because I am not coping well. Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 Hi Ann. I can certainly understand your feelings. When my husband was diagnosed on January 24th we went into a bit of a tail-spin initially. Then I became an Internet-aholic and discovered so much information. And this site has been fabulous. Yes, I was troubled by the side effects of both brachytherapy and full-out surgery and we are in the final stages of decision making - we have one more appointment with the Dr who specializes in brachy and one more appointment with the surgeon who would do a full out prostectomy. I guess our thoughts are that we need to get through this, together, with love, and then get on with life. I would rather be together, dealing with incontinence and ED, than to be alone without him. Decisions are not easy but as everyone here will tell you, become informed, and stay in touch. We are all here to help each other. AnitaAnn Meili wrote: My husband has a PSA of 9.5, he had a DRE and the Dr. said he may have felt something. We have made two additional appointments with specialists. One at Stanfor in California and the other with Dr. Krongrad Miami. Since the first Dr was not too keen on information we decided that investigation was better than a quick response to anything, including a biopsy. Still no biopsy is scheduled pending the scheduled appointments. We are more than likely putting off everything. I cannot stand any of this. Reading of incontenence, impotence, blood in the urine etc to me is worse than almost anything else. Why is everyone so against just waiting to see where the PSA goes? What kind of quality of life does one have while running to the toilet or wearing a pad or diaper? Please help me with this because I am not coping well. Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 The only option we are looking at is laproscopic surgery. The doctor in Miami, Krongard, that is all he does. He was one who pioneered the surgery. He does not take most insurance and the cost is $18,000. But he seems to be the best for this type of surgery. One night in the hospital, maybe 10 days with a catheter and after that I guess one hopes for the best. Helga Wendt wrote: Hi Ann. I can certainly understand your feelings. When my husband was diagnosed on January 24th we went into a bit of a tail-spin initially. Then I became an Internet-aholic and discovered so much information. And this site has been fabulous. Yes, I was troubled by the side effects of both brachytherapy and full-out surgery and we are in the final stages of decision making - we have one more appointment with the Dr who specializes in brachy and one more appointment with the surgeon who would do a full out prostectomy. I guess our thoughts are that we need to get through this, together, with love, and then get on with life. I would rather be together, dealing with incontinence and ED, than to be alone without him. Decisions are not easy but as everyone here will tell you, become informed, and stay in touch. We are all here to help each other. AnitaAnn Meili wrote: My husband has a PSA of 9.5, he had a DRE and the Dr. said he may have felt something. We have made two additional appointments with specialists. One at Stanfor in California and the other with Dr. Krongrad Miami. Since the first Dr was not too keen on information we decided that investigation was better than a quick response to anything, including a biopsy. Still no biopsy is scheduled pending the scheduled appointments. We are more than likely putting off everything. I cannot stand any of this. Reading of incontenence, impotence, blood in the urine etc to me is worse than almost anything else. Why is everyone so against just waiting to see where the PSA goes? What kind of quality of life does one have while running to the toilet or wearing a pad or diaper? Please help me with this because I am not coping well. Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 Hi Ann & Anita: My husband is 54 and was also diagnosed with PCa in January of this year. He had a severe urinary tract infection and prostatis in December. His urologist felt a hard spot on his prostate during a DRE and recommended a biopsy just to rule out cancer. At the time I thought this was all overkill as his PSA a year earlier was .72. Any way one core out 16 came back positve. At first we were devistated but as time went on we realized how lucky we were that it was diagnosed at such an early stage. After consulting with a renown at UCLA Medical center my husband had one of two choices, bracytherapy or surgery. It wasn't much of a choice for him, he wanted the cancer out and he had a radical prostatecomy on 3/6/06. I too agonized over how we would deal with the side effects of surgery. How did we get through it? To be honest, hasn't been nearly as bad as we thought it would be. Two nights in the hospial and 10 days with a catheter. Yes he was extremely sore and he hated the catheter, but thats all a bad memory now. It's been six weeks and the incontinence is almost gone - just a few dribbles during the day. Erections are only partial, but we're doing lots of experimenting and are willing to try whatever it takes. Orgasm seems to be better than before. He's getting bored at home and is ready to go back to work. We're getting through this together and are keeping a very positive outlook for the future. KAnn Meili wrote: The only option we are looking at is laproscopic surgery. The doctor in Miami, Krongard, that is all he does. He was one who pioneered the surgery. He does not take most insurance and the cost is $18,000. But he seems to be the best for this type of surgery. One night in the hospital, maybe 10 days with a catheter and after that I guess one hopes for the best. Helga Wendt wrote: Hi Ann. I can certainly understand your feelings. When my husband was diagnosed on January 24th we went into a bit of a tail-spin initially. Then I became an Internet-aholic and discovered so much information. And this site has been fabulous. Yes, I was troubled by the side effects of both brachytherapy and full-out surgery and we are in the final stages of decision making - we have one more appointment with the Dr who specializes in brachy and one more appointment with the surgeon who would do a full out prostectomy. I guess our thoughts are that we need to get through this, together, with love, and then get on with life. I would rather be together, dealing with incontinence and ED, than to be alone without him. Decisions are not easy but as everyone here will tell you, become informed, and stay in touch. We are all here to help each other. AnitaAnn Meili wrote: My husband has a PSA of 9.5, he had a DRE and the Dr. said he may have felt something. We have made two additional appointments with specialists. One at Stanfor in California and the other with Dr. Krongrad Miami. Since the first Dr was not too keen on information we decided that investigation was better than a quick response to anything, including a biopsy. Still no biopsy is scheduled pending the scheduled appointments. We are more than likely putting off everything. I cannot stand any of this. Reading of incontenence, impotence, blood in the urine etc to me is worse than almost anything else. Why is everyone so against just waiting to see where the PSA goes? What kind of quality of life does one have while running to the toilet or wearing a pad or diaper? Please help me with this because I am not coping well. Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 Ann, I am at a loss to understand why you should be making decisions as to what treatment your husband should have and where before he is even diagnosed and before you have any information as to the suitability of the treatment. One slightly elevated PSA reading and a positive DRE is not a PCa diagnosis. Dr Strum, who works tirelessly to provide excellent advice on the P2P Mailing List and who is co-author of the best book on PCa A Primer on Prostate Cancer has always emphasized the importance of gathering all the base data available BEFORE making a treatment decision. This is an extract from a recent posting he made: <SNIP> I am always perplexed when I see such little evidence of ANALYSIS prior to such a life-altering invasive procedure. We mandate by law that the content of carbohydrate, protein & fat be indicated on the foods we eat but we have no legislation of basic requirements to ASSESS the STATUS of a man before he has his prostate removed. Years ago, when women started complaining about all the mastectomies that were being performed after a diagnosis of breast cancer, legislation was passed that required women to be seen by a medical oncologist prior to any surgery. I believe that this changed the course of how we treated a woman with breast cancer. However, for some unexplainable reason, my fellow medical oncologists are overwhelmed by the urologists and accept their role as physicians who only see the man with PC when he has advanced disease. My impressions after 40 years in cancer medicine is that medical oncologists--internists who specialize in cancer, will spend more time in analyses of a patient prior to recommending an invasive procedure. Maybe this has changed but I think not. I believe the present setting of having a man diagnosed by a urologist leads far too many men to having inappropriate RPs. Of course there are exceptions like Pat Walsh who was always very selective about the men he choose to operate on (and was criticized by his " peers " for being so selective). Yet, that is why his results were so superior to others--he selected patients appropriate for a local therapy such as RP. We blow this concept in all oncology patients when we fail to pay sufficient attention to the importance of STAGING--the determination of extent of disease. And, then to top things off, what happens to men who are analyzed as best as possible using predictive tools like nomograms & ANN (artificial neural nets) and who are found to be at significant risk for ECE(extra-capsular extension), SV(seminal vesicle involvement) or LN(lymph node involvement)? They are reflexly advised, again by urologists, to have a CT abdomen & pelvis & a 99Tc bone scan. Yet, these radiologic studies are so insensitive in their detection of PC in this context that you could flip a coin & be more accurate in your assessment. The consequences of using imaging that is so insensitive and so misleading are monumental: 1. Men are understaged & hence misdirected as to the best treatment they should have. 2. Healthcare costs are inflated to an amount that close to $500,000,000 worldwide each year. ($350 million USA & at least $150 million elsewhere) <SNIP> All the best Terry Herbert in Melbourne Australia Diagnosed ‘96: Age 54: Stage T2b: PSA 7.2: Gleason 3+3=6: No treatment. June '04: TURP. Mar '06 PSA 17.40 fPSA 23% My site is at www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za It is a tragedy of the world that no one knows what he doesn’t know, and the less a man knows, the more sure he is that he knows everything. Joyce Carey From: ProstateCancerSupport [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of Ann Meili Sent: 20 April 2006 12:59 AM To: ProstateCancerSupport Subject: Re: I Hate All Of This - How Do You Get Through It? The only option we are looking at is laproscopic surgery. The doctor in Miami, Krongard, that is all he does. He was one who pioneered the surgery. He does not take most insurance and the cost is $18,000. But he seems to be the best for this type of surgery. One night in the hospital, maybe 10 days with a catheter and after that I guess one hopes for the best. Helga Wendt wrote: Hi Ann. I can certainly understand your feelings. When my husband was diagnosed on January 24th we went into a bit of a tail-spin initially. Then I became an Internet-aholic and discovered so much information. And this site has been fabulous. Yes, I was troubled by the side effects of both brachytherapy and full-out surgery and we are in the final stages of decision making - we have one more appointment with the Dr who specializes in brachy and one more appointment with the surgeon who would do a full out prostectomy. I guess our thoughts are that we need to get through this, together, with love, and then get on with life. I would rather be together, dealing with incontinence and ED, than to be alone without him. Decisions are not easy but as everyone here will tell you, become informed, and stay in touch. We are all here to help each other. Anita Ann Meili wrote: My husband has a PSA of 9.5, he had a DRE and the Dr. said he may have felt something. We have made two additional appointments with specialists. One at Stanfor in California and the other with Dr. Krongrad Miami. Since the first Dr was not too keen on information we decided that investigation was better than a quick response to anything, including a biopsy. Still no biopsy is scheduled pending the scheduled appointments. We are more than likely putting off everything. I cannot stand any of this. Reading of incontenence, impotence, blood in the urine etc to me is worse than almost anything else. Why is everyone so against just waiting to see where the PSA goes? What kind of quality of life does one have while running to the toilet or wearing a pad or diaper? Please help me with this because I am not coping well. Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 One answer is simple....medical retirement or not. With RP he can keep his job with anything else he cannot. Terry, you know what he does for a living...I do not want to make it public. IF and a big If it comes to a dx then we only have one choice for treatment.... The other alternative is to watch and wait... anything else is eliminated by the powers that be.Terry Herbert wrote: Ann, I am at a loss to understand why you should be making decisions as to what treatment your husband should have and where before he is even diagnosed and before you have any information as to the suitability of the treatment. One slightly elevated PSA reading and a positive DRE is not a PCa diagnosis. Dr Strum, who works tirelessly to provide excellent advice on the P2P Mailing List and who is co-author of the best book on PCa A Primer on Prostate Cancer has always emphasized the importance of gathering all the base data available BEFORE making a treatment decision. This is an extract from a recent posting he made: <SNIP> I am always perplexed when I see such little evidence of ANALYSIS prior to such a life-altering invasive procedure. We mandate by law that the content of carbohydrate, protein & fat be indicated on the foods we eat but we have no legislation of basic requirements to ASSESS the STATUS of a man before he has his prostate removed. Years ago, when women started complaining about all the mastectomies that were being performed after a diagnosis of breast cancer, legislation was passed that required women to be seen by a medical oncologist prior to any surgery. I believe that this changed the course of how we treated a woman with breast cancer. However, for some unexplainable reason, my fellow medical oncologists are overwhelmed by the urologists and accept their role as physicians who only see the man with PC when he has advanced disease. My impressions after 40 years in cancer medicine is that medical oncologists--internists who specialize in cancer, will spend more time in analyses of a patient prior to recommending an invasive procedure. Maybe this has changed but I think not. I believe the present setting of having a man diagnosed by a urologist leads far too many men to having inappropriate RPs. Of course there are exceptions like Pat Walsh who was always very selective about the men he choose to operate on (and was criticized by his "peers" for being so selective). Yet, that is why his results were so superior to others--he selected patients appropriate for a local therapy such as RP. We blow this concept in all oncology patients when we fail to pay sufficient attention to the importance of STAGING--the determination of extent of disease. And, then to top things off, what happens to men who are analyzed as best as possible using predictive tools like nomograms & ANN (artificial neural nets) and who are found to be at significant risk for ECE(extra-capsular extension), SV(seminal vesicle involvement) or LN(lymph node involvement)? They are reflexly advised, again by urologists, to have a CT abdomen & pelvis & a 99Tc bone scan. Yet, these radiologic studies are so insensitive in their detection of PC in this context that you could flip a coin & be more accurate in your assessment. The consequences of using imaging that is so insensitive and so misleading are monumental: 1. Men are understaged & hence misdirected as to the best treatment they should have. 2. Healthcare costs are inflated to an amount that close to $500,000,000 worldwide each year. ($350 million USA & at least $150 million elsewhere) <SNIP> All the best Terry Herbert in Melbourne Australia Diagnosed ‘96: Age 54: Stage T2b: PSA 7.2: Gleason 3+3=6: No treatment. June '04: TURP. Mar '06 PSA 17.40 fPSA 23% My site is at www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za It is a tragedy of the world that no one knows what he doesn’t know, and the less a man knows, the more sure he is that he knows everything. Joyce Carey From: ProstateCancerSupport [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of Ann MeiliSent: 20 April 2006 12:59 AMTo: ProstateCancerSupport Subject: Re: I Hate All Of This - How Do You Get Through It? The only option we are looking at is laproscopic surgery. The doctor in Miami, Krongard, that is all he does. He was one who pioneered the surgery. He does not take most insurance and the cost is $18,000. But he seems to be the best for this type of surgery. One night in the hospital, maybe 10 days with a catheter and after that I guess one hopes for the best. Helga Wendt wrote: Hi Ann. I can certainly understand your feelings. When my husband was diagnosed on January 24th we went into a bit of a tail-spin initially. Then I became an Internet-aholic and discovered so much information. And this site has been fabulous. Yes, I was troubled by the side effects of both brachytherapy and full-out surgery and we are in the final stages of decision making - we have one more appointment with the Dr who specializes in brachy and one more appointment with the surgeon who would do a full out prostectomy. I guess our thoughts are that we need to get through this, together, with love, and then get on with life. I would rather be together, dealing with incontinence and ED, than to be alone without him. Decisions are not easy but as everyone here will tell you, become informed, and stay in touch. We are all here to help each other. AnitaAnn Meili wrote: My husband has a PSA of 9.5, he had a DRE and the Dr. said he may have felt something. We have made two additional appointments with specialists. One at Stanfor in California and the other with Dr. Krongrad Miami. Since the first Dr was not too keen on information we decided that investigation was better than a quick response to anything, including a biopsy. Still no biopsy is scheduled pending the scheduled appointments. We are more than likely putting off everything. I cannot stand any of this. Reading of incontenence, impotence, blood in the urine etc to me is worse than almost anything else. Why is everyone so against just waiting to see where the PSA goes? What kind of quality of life does one have while running to the toilet or wearing a pad or diaper? Please help me with this because I am not coping well. Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 Dear Ann, I didn’t mean to criticize your choice of treatment directly. You have highlighted a very important point in the decision making process. BUT it is also even more important to establish as much information as possible about the nature and extent of the disease IF indeed there is any because otherwise all you might do is delay the medical retirement issue and limit the effectiveness of other, more suitable treatment. To put that more clearly: If surgery is not the best treatment for a fully diagnosed tumour and as a result the treatment fails, necessitating secondary treatment, you will be faced with the medical retirement issue anyway and may have reduced the possibility of long term management of the disease. I am not saying this to frighten you or to stop you doing what you must. But I can see no reason why, IF you decide to go ahead with the biopsy and IF the result is positive, you should not have the battery of tests that Strum and others recommend BEFORE deciding on a treatment option. All the best Terry From: ProstateCancerSupport [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of Ann Meili Sent: 20 April 2006 06:24 AM To: ProstateCancerSupport Subject: RE: I Hate All Of This - How Do You Get Through It? One answer is simple....medical retirement or not. With RP he can keep his job with anything else he cannot. Terry, you know what he does for a living...I do not want to make it public. IF and a big If it comes to a dx then we only have one choice for treatment.... The other alternative is to watch and wait... anything else is eliminated by the powers that be. Terry Herbert wrote: Ann, I am at a loss to understand why you should be making decisions as to what treatment your husband should have and where before he is even diagnosed and before you have any information as to the suitability of the treatment. One slightly elevated PSA reading and a positive DRE is not a PCa diagnosis. Dr Strum, who works tirelessly to provide excellent advice on the P2P Mailing List and who is co-author of the best book on PCa A Primer on Prostate Cancer has always emphasized the importance of gathering all the base data available BEFORE making a treatment decision. This is an extract from a recent posting he made: <SNIP> I am always perplexed when I see such little evidence of ANALYSIS prior to such a life-altering invasive procedure. We mandate by law that the content of carbohydrate, protein & fat be indicated on the foods we eat but we have no legislation of basic requirements to ASSESS the STATUS of a man before he has his prostate removed. Years ago, when women started complaining about all the mastectomies that were being performed after a diagnosis of breast cancer, legislation was passed that required women to be seen by a medical oncologist prior to any surgery. I believe that this changed the course of how we treated a woman with breast cancer. However, for some unexplainable reason, my fellow medical oncologists are overwhelmed by the urologists and accept their role as physicians who only see the man with PC when he has advanced disease. My impressions after 40 years in cancer medicine is that medical oncologists--internists who specialize in cancer, will spend more time in analyses of a patient prior to recommending an invasive procedure. Maybe this has changed but I think not. I believe the present setting of having a man diagnosed by a urologist leads far too many men to having inappropriate RPs. Of course there are exceptions like Pat Walsh who was always very selective about the men he choose to operate on (and was criticized by his " peers " for being so selective). Yet, that is why his results were so superior to others--he selected patients appropriate for a local therapy such as RP. We blow this concept in all oncology patients when we fail to pay sufficient attention to the importance of STAGING--the determination of extent of disease. And, then to top things off, what happens to men who are analyzed as best as possible using predictive tools like nomograms & ANN (artificial neural nets) and who are found to be at significant risk for ECE(extra-capsular extension), SV(seminal vesicle involvement) or LN(lymph node involvement)? They are reflexly advised, again by urologists, to have a CT abdomen & pelvis & a 99Tc bone scan. Yet, these radiologic studies are so insensitive in their detection of PC in this context that you could flip a coin & be more accurate in your assessment. The consequences of using imaging that is so insensitive and so misleading are monumental: 1. Men are understaged & hence misdirected as to the best treatment they should have. 2. Healthcare costs are inflated to an amount that close to $500,000,000 worldwide each year. ($350 million USA & at least $150 million elsewhere) <SNIP> All the best Terry Herbert in Melbourne Australia Diagnosed ‘96: Age 54: Stage T2b: PSA 7.2: Gleason 3+3=6: No treatment. June '04: TURP. Mar '06 PSA 17.40 fPSA 23% My site is at www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za It is a tragedy of the world that no one knows what he doesn’t know, and the less a man knows, the more sure he is that he knows everything. Joyce Carey From: ProstateCancerSupport [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of Ann Meili Sent: 20 April 2006 12:59 AM To: ProstateCancerSupport Subject: Re: I Hate All Of This - How Do You Get Through It? The only option we are looking at is laproscopic surgery. The doctor in Miami, Krongard, that is all he does. He was one who pioneered the surgery. He does not take most insurance and the cost is $18,000. But he seems to be the best for this type of surgery. One night in the hospital, maybe 10 days with a catheter and after that I guess one hopes for the best. Helga Wendt wrote: Hi Ann. I can certainly understand your feelings. When my husband was diagnosed on January 24th we went into a bit of a tail-spin initially. Then I became an Internet-aholic and discovered so much information. And this site has been fabulous. Yes, I was troubled by the side effects of both brachytherapy and full-out surgery and we are in the final stages of decision making - we have one more appointment with the Dr who specializes in brachy and one more appointment with the surgeon who would do a full out prostectomy. I guess our thoughts are that we need to get through this, together, with love, and then get on with life. I would rather be together, dealing with incontinence and ED, than to be alone without him. Decisions are not easy but as everyone here will tell you, become informed, and stay in touch. We are all here to help each other. Anita Ann Meili wrote: My husband has a PSA of 9.5, he had a DRE and the Dr. said he may have felt something. We have made two additional appointments with specialists. One at Stanfor in California and the other with Dr. Krongrad Miami. Since the first Dr was not too keen on information we decided that investigation was better than a quick response to anything, including a biopsy. Still no biopsy is scheduled pending the scheduled appointments. We are more than likely putting off everything. I cannot stand any of this. Reading of incontenence, impotence, blood in the urine etc to me is worse than almost anything else. Why is everyone so against just waiting to see where the PSA goes? What kind of quality of life does one have while running to the toilet or wearing a pad or diaper? Please help me with this because I am not coping well. Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.