Guest guest Posted February 29, 2004 Report Share Posted February 29, 2004 Dan, all, >D:Oh, I don't think so. The draft ended before the war, and with it most >of the protesting. Actually, I think the last major violent anti-war >protest was Kent State. I guess it stops being fun throwing rocks and >gasoline bombs at the cops once they start shooting back. The Kent State protest on May 4th capped four days of escalating events on campus and on campuses around the country. (This tumult was in response to the announcement of the illegal invasion of Cambodia, by President Nixon, on April 30. On Friday evening May 1, around 1,000 KSU students became unruly on the Main Street of Kent, Ohio on the evening of a peaceful protest on campus. Rocks were thrown at the police and several cars were destroyed. The mayor of Kent asked Governor for extra security. On Saturday May 2, the ROTC building was burned to the ground. Ohio NG troops arrived late that evening. The town and the university banned all assemblies on the campus on the morning of Monday, May 4th. However, by the late morning of this day, 3,000+ students and other persons had assembled on the KSU commons. " Shortly before noon, General Canterbury made the decision to order the demonstrators to disperse. A Kent State police officer standing by the Guard made an announcement using a bullhorn. When this had no effect, the officer was placed in a jeep along with several Guardsmen and driven across the Commons to tell the protestors that the rally was banned and that they must disperse. This was met with angry shouting and rocks, and the jeep retreated. Canterbury then ordered his men to load and lock their weapons, tear gas canisters were fired into the crowd around the Victory Bell, and the Guard began to march across the Commons to disperse the rally. The protestors moved up a steep hill, known as Blanket Hill, and then down the other side of the hill onto the Prentice Hall parking lot as well as an adjoining practice football field. Most of the Guardsmen followed the students directly and soon found themselves somewhat trapped on the practice football field because it was surrounded by a fence. Yelling and rock throwing reached a peak as the Guard remained on the field for about ten minutes. Several Guardsmen could be seen huddling together, and some Guardsmen knelt and pointed their guns, but no weapons were shot at this time. The Guard then began retracing their steps from the practice football field back up Blanket Hill. As they arrived at the top of the hill, twenty-eight of the more than seventy Guardsmen turned suddenly and fired their rifles and pistols. Many guardsmen fired into the air or the ground. However, a small portion fired directly into the crowd. Altogether between 61 and 67 shots were fired in a 13 second period. " http://dept.kent.edu/sociology/lewis/lewihen.htm *** No gasoline bombs were tossed. I think you might disagree that rock throwing shouldn't be a capital offense, or poses obvious mortal dangers to helmeted Guardsmen armed with M-16's, but, in any case, fatalities Schroeder, Scheuer, and Krause were not a part of the mob and were struck over 100 yards from where the NG fired from. Two students were killed and twelve were wounded at State in Mississippi on May 14 when a small group was backed against a woman's dormitory, a bottle was thrown, and the law enforcement officers (MSHP) fired for 30 seconds. The unfortunate and interesting fact about this incident is that the students were not protesters but simply were moving away from a phalanx of officers who had minutes before assembled to patrol the campus. Because of the layout of the campus the officers had actually caused the group to assemble, for they had, literally, marched them to a wall of the dorm. Over 400 rounds were expended. *** Protests continued throughout the time period 1970-1972, however the spring of 1970 was the last major nationwide, large-scale protest against the war. The draft was ended in late 1972. *** You bark the company line nicely. You might talk about the deficits in Iraq too, eh? Because where there are benefits there are usually deficits. D:I think that Iraq has been benefitted by the war, although benefitting the Iraqis was not its primary purpose - I agree with you there. It was waged, among other reasons, to establish a solid base of American power - and a more reliable ally than the Saudis- in the middle east, Should we ever allow their government to take the democratic form through which this possibility could exist, my prediction is that Iraq's government will ask our military to tear down its bases and remove its forces. The whole question of status of forces as a matter of formal agreement in Iraq, between Iraq and the US, is quite knotty. I rather doubt that democracy is really what the deep thinkers in the Bush cabal think should be granted to persons who's very minds are not subject to their control! LOL regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2004 Report Share Posted February 29, 2004 Dear , SC wrote: > > > *** > > No gasoline bombs were tossed. I think you might disagree that rock > throwing shouldn't be a capital offense, or poses obvious mortal > dangers to helmeted Guardsmen armed with M-16's, but, in any case, > fatalities Schroeder, Scheuer, and Krause were not a part of the mob > and were struck over 100 yards from where the NG fired from. I would agree that an iron-fisted crushing of such a rebellion was fully justified. Mob violence must not be tolerated. The correct place for any student that weekend was miles away from the protest (like, maybe, home with the folks). You hang out with radicals, you're going to get into trouble. " Avoid bad company, " your mother always preached - didn't she? To repeat, this was the last major campus uprising, which says something in itself. > (snip) > > > Should we ever allow their government to take the democratic form > through which this possibility could exist, my prediction is that > Iraq's government will ask our military to tear down its bases and > remove its forces. That obviously cannot be permitted. > > > The whole question of status of forces as a matter of formal > agreement in Iraq, between Iraq and the US, is quite knotty. > > I rather doubt that democracy is really what the deep thinkers in the > Bush cabal think should be granted to persons who's very minds are > not subject to their control! You should pardon the expression, but - duhhh.... Ya think? Democracy is a form of government (and not necessarily the best). That's all it is. It's not a sacrament. It's not God's favorite regime. And it is, or should be, clear enough that not all peoples and cultures are capable of adequate self-government. The Iraqis may be - in due time. Regards, Dan > > > LOL > > regards, > > > > " Our highest duty as human beings is to search out a means whereby beings may be freed from all kinds of unsatisfactory experience and suffering. " > > H.H. Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th. Dalai Lama > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2004 Report Share Posted February 29, 2004 Dan, >D:I would agree that an iron-fisted crushing of such a rebellion was >fully justified. Mob violence must not be tolerated. I would say that killing three persons who weren't part of the mob might be described more accurately by something other than " iron-fisted crushing " . The state of Ohio coughed up tens of millions of dollars to settle the civil case, and, the NG apologized. Obviously I do not agree that protesters should be killed. But, I'm so familiar with your own ethos that your sanction of the taking of life under those circumstances, (Kent State was an unlawful assembly of protesters,) hardly surprises me. >D:And it is, >or should be, clear enough that not all peoples and cultures are >capable of adequate self-government. The Iraqis may be - in due time. This is disingenuous. The Iraq's will be permitted to vote when they come to understand that some of their choices will not be allowed. I doubt very much this has anything to do with the capabilities you imply here. The imperative here is creating a physical platform from which to wreck more havoc on the disagreeable despots of the mid-east. Prediction. There will be plenty of protesters to shoot at when the draft is begun again next year, should Bush win his first presidential election. regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2004 Report Share Posted February 29, 2004 One of the more bizarre incidents in the days following Kent State was during the time when demonstrations were happening all over the country, campuses were being taken over, and things were really coming to a head. A very large crowd in the hundreds or even thousands assembled on the Mall in Washington and were demonstrating and camping out. Nixon reportedly got drunk and only he and his valet went to the Lincoln Memorial. He wanted to talk to the people about football and was relating to these people from the point of view of how life must have been for him as a college student in the 30's. The brothers of these people were dying. He just didn't seem to get it. After a few minutes the Secret Service and his aides arrived to disperse the crowd and get Nixon back to the White House. Very strange, and maybe shows just how out of balance he was. There is a great scene portraying this event in Oliver Stone's movie, Nixon. A movie which I believe handled his life very even handedly. My favorite scene in this movie is toward the end when Nixon is getting ready to resign and Kissinger turns to Haig and says, " Imagine what he could have been had he been loved. " In our discussion of the aborted revolution, the mores and the concepts that came out of the sixties, I think it is overlooking the 500 pound elephant in the living room not to recognize that these rebellious events grew out of the assassinations of JFK, RFK and MLK and many people knew intuitively that these killings could not have been the work of 3 crazed " lone gunmen. " If Jim Garrison did anything, he got the Zabruder film made public and we could all see for ourselves what happened, that it couldn't have been one person. On top of that, we had this completely false war, that everybody could see was built on lie on top of lie, and the never ending stream of body bags was coming off airplanes daily, and this was on television, unlike now. And the reporters in the field were reporting what was really going on, not the embedded cheerleaders we had this last time around, who never said a word about the thousands of innocent civilians and young men drafted at gun point who didn't want to be there and were just cannon fodder. It wasn't going to be for our generation like it was in the 50's, no Leave it to Beaver moms and Father Knows Best dads, no Ozzie and Harriet families, while being buried in the shadow was Jim Crow, abusive fathers from PTSD suffered in WW2, rich kids getting deferments buying their way out, and a bunch of scared, old white men deciding for the rest of us who is going to live and who is going to die so some defense contractor corporation can make huge profits. I, for one, was a year too young for the draft, but I was ready to go to Canada. I was living in Michigan, it was close by, my cousin and I had a plan. And I think that those that did go to Canada, or to jail, like Muhammad Ali, were an inspiration. They showed us real courage. As one of my favorite authors said, it's easy to risk your life. These concepts of Honor and Bravery are in large part so many words. Marketing. It takes real courage to risk your clichés. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2004 Report Share Posted March 1, 2004 , all, Thanks for the correction. >M:One of the more bizarre incidents in the days following Kent State was >during the time when demonstrations were happening all over the >country, campuses were being taken over, and things were really coming >to a head. Over 500,000 in Washington, on April 24, 1970; over 100,000 in NYC, May 8-9, May 20, 1970; several hundred thousand on the KSU anniversary in May 3-4 1971 in NYC, DC and other cities (13,000+ arrested in DC); last nationwide moratorium-on-the-war was held May 4,1972; large demonstration in DC at Nixon's inauguration. (Had to go rooting around to correct my own misimpressions. I was at the darn May 71 protest in DC. Tear-gassed but not arrested.) *** RFK was polling ahead of Nixon among likely voters at the time of his assassination. regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.