Re: WHAT ARE THESE? JUSTIFICATION

[Guest guest]

Also, Cath...

The reason I sought out you and or W & R is this:

Most of us here, were led to believe something, by the system.

Turns out, these meds & the system's bogus dx's actually hurt us.

So with this in mind:

Yes, I could have jumped on the net, to look-up the info on these

med rx's.

However, I simply did not know if what I would happen to read off

the net, would be the truth, & something I could pass on to sister's

family, is all.

I humbly wanted your valuable input.

You should take the compliment, not offense.

So, thanks for the rx link, I will use it & other tools from now on.

So sorry you took offense about persons time. I just really wanted

trusted help from you.

Ya know, most of us here know very little about 'you' - none of us

know what you do outside of W & R. For all we know, this (W & R) could

have been your only j.o.b.

Again Cath, I am sorry you took offense.

Kev

[Guest guest]

Dear Keven,

You said:

<<The reason I sought out you and or W & R is this:

Most of us here, were led to believe something, by the system.

Turns out, these meds & the system's bogus dx's actually hurt us.

So with this in mind:

Yes, I could have jumped on the net, to look-up the info on these

med rx's.

However, I simply did not know if what I would happen to read off

the net, would be the truth, & something I could pass on to sister's

family, is all.

I humbly wanted your valuable input.

You should take the compliment, not offense.>>

** Understood. With the kind of question you were asking (what type of

drugs they were) you'll get a straight answer online.

You said:

<<So, thanks for the rx link, I will use it & other tools from now on.

So sorry you took offense about persons time. I just really wanted

trusted help from you.>>

** There is no need to hold all questions back. But I prefer that

people look up the ones that require no interpretation.

You said:

<<Ya know, most of us here know very little about 'you' - none of us

know what you do outside of W & R. For all we know, this (W & R) could

have been your only j.o.b.>>

** I couldn't imagine anyone assuming this anymore than I would think

that this is the only mailing list people are on. Suffice it to say my life

is quite full and it isc a challenge to keep up with everything.

You said:

<<Again Cath, I am sorry you took offense.>>

** It's not a big issue, Keven. I just wanted to not be harboring

resentment so I thought I'd clear the air.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

Cath has written:

** It's not a big issue, Keven. I just wanted to not be harboring

> resentment so I thought I'd clear the air.

Kev wrote:

Ya know, most of us here know very little about 'you' - none of us

know what you do outside of W & R. For all we know, this (W & R) could

have been your only j.o.b.

Cath had written:

** I couldn't imagine anyone assuming this anymore than I would think

that this is the only mailing list people are on. Suffice it to say

my life

is quite full and it isc a challenge to keep up with everything.

> Regards,

>

Dear .

If you'd allow me the opportunity to Cath, may I please do the same:

>>From the socialWandR site: you've seen this already, possibly:

Cath,

I recieved a call from her Mom, in hysterics, asking me for help and

to figure out these meds.

So I posted to W & R as I did.

I tried to do this during my work hours.

I did not mean for you to get offended.

PLEASE, this is the LAST thing I need on top of my shoulders right

now, is to upset you & W & R...

Kev

** Ummm, this IS the only " mailing list " I am on. However, not

all members set up their yahoo groups preferences or options the

exact same way. imho, I see a difference between mailing 'lists'

and message boards, or receiving all mail messeges (posts) vs.

reading from the homesite as I & others choose to do.

Again, sorry to bombard your mailbox or 'inbox' with E-tasks which

can be done by persons themselves.

Hugs,

Kev