Guest guest Posted April 3, 2003 Report Share Posted April 3, 2003 Gretchen wrote: " Don't have to worry about losing the EO properties to the heat of saponification " Gretchen it is my understanding that EO properties are not much affected by heat because as you know EO are extracted using high heat and most suppliers I know state that heat does not affect the EO properties when used in soap making. Gererally the EO are added at trace, so there is not much heat to affect the EO in this manner. Heat does affect goats milk as well as other additives but not EO. hth Sherry _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2003 Report Share Posted April 3, 2003 Hi Sherry, it is not the heat that can destroy the effectiveness of an essential oil it is the sodium hydroxide. While some properties of an eo may survive the lye bath, as can be seen by the " burn " you get from peppermint or cinnamon, others will not. One of the reasons that aromatherapists use essential oils is that they contain the " essence " of the plant. They would never dream of using the chemical equivalent of the effective constituents because they believe that the whole essential oil is important. If some of the elements of the essential oil are destroyed or changed by the chemical reaction to the lye, it would not be effective for the intended purpose. I am in no way an aromatherapist, but if I were, I would hesitate making any " healing " claims for a product that the essential oil has to be subjected to this kind of harsh environment. Let's not even talk about using essential oils in a wash off product. Pat Prenty ****************************** www.essencesupply.com > Gretchen it is my understanding that EO properties are not much affected by > heat because as you know EO are extracted using high heat and most suppliers > I know state that heat does not affect the EO properties when used in soap > making. > Gererally the EO are added at trace, so there is not much heat to affect the > EO in this manner. Heat does affect goats milk as well as other additives > but not EO. > hth > Sherry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2003 Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 > I don't know about the properties being affected by heat or not...but do keep in mind that gel usually raised the temp of soap to around 200F and holds it there for some time. Sherry< At sea level, water boils at 212 degrees F. I sincerely doubt ANY soap will generate enough heat to almost come to a boil. Essential oils are distilled, which means the water has to come to a boil or close to it in order to generate steam. So the heat of distillation is hotter than the temperature of saponification. I don't know of any soap maker who uses essential oils to produce a soap with " aromatherapy " benefits who does not believe that they survive the soap making process to result in beneficial effects in the finished soap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2003 Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 > I am in no way an aromatherapist, but if I were, I would hesitate making any " healing " claims for a product that the essential oil has to be subjected to this kind of harsh environment. Let's not even talk about using essential oils in a wash off product. < As you said, you are not an aromatherapist. All of the aromatherapists I know disagree with you...and I know a lot of them. There are two organizations that certify aromatherapy products, including candles [candles burn hotter than soap heats] and body care, including soap. Aromatherapy product certifications include TAP (True Aromatherapy Product) from the National Association of Holistic Aromatherapy (NAHA) and the CAP (Certified Aromatherapy Product) from ACA. I do agree that manufacturers shouldn't make " claims " unless they actually have studied aromatherapy and know that what they " claim " is true. Apito Botanical Elements Trade Association www.botanicalelements.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 > Here's an alternative view from a aromatherapist ( 10 years standing so very experienced aromatherapist and soapmaker) friend of mine.< I was confused by the email. This person is an aromatherapist and a soapmaker but DOESN'T think there is any value in including essential oils in soap? As there are many schools of aromatherapy there are many schools of thought. So if this person says there is no value in using essential oils in soap...do they use synthetic fragrance oils instead? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 > Did this in depth when I studied aromatherapy for a year !! > Essential oils are extracted by distillation, expression, enfleurage, volatile solvent extraction, liquid carbon dioxide extraction, percolation - not all use heat. Mostly essential oils are distilled. To make it short, plants and flowers are subjected to heat which releases the aromatic material from the plant cells.< Plant components extracted with the use of solvents or enfleurage are are concretes and absolutes and are not considered " essential oils " by much of the aromatherapy community in the USA. Whomever wrote this has a position that is not the same as many aromatherapists in practice in this country. From the NAHA web site, for example: >>The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in their Vocabulary of Natural Materials (ISO/D1S9235.2) defines an essential oil as follows: " An essential oil is a product made by distillation with either water or steam or by mechanical processing of citrus rinds or by dry distillation of natural materials. Following the distillation, the essential oil is physically separated from the water phase. " Dr. Lawrence states " For an essential oil to be a true essential oil, it must be isolated by physical means only. The physical methods used are distillation (steam, steam/water and water) or expression (also known as cold pressing, a unique feature for citrus peel oils). There is one other method of oil isolation specific to a very limited number of essential oil plants. This is a maceration/distillation. In the process, the plant material is macerated in warm water to release the enzyme-bound essential oil. Examples of oils produced by maceration are onion, garlic, wintergreen, bitter almond, etc. What is NOT an Essential oil is a CO2 extract, a halohydrocarbon extract or an empyreumatic distillate. " << Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 > Well I do and she avoids Gelling of her soap entirely.< The gel phase is where the saponification takes place. If soap doesn't pass through a gel phase...how do the raw materials saponify? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 > > What benefits would those be? > > CS< What are the benefits of using an aromatherapy soap? Mental, emotional and to a limited degree, topical benefits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 Here is an example to support my position that there is an aromatherapy benefit to the use of essential oils in soap. Dr. S. Pappas is an essential oil chemist. He runs the Essential Oil University; http://www.essentialoils.org/. I doubt there is anyone who is " anyone " in the field of aromatherapy in this country who doesn't know of or heard of Dr. Pappas. Dr. Pappas is the lead instructor for " Introduction to Aromatherapy " , one of the first courses on Essential Oils and Aromatherapy for college credit, taught at Indiana University at South Bend. On his website, Essential Oil University, he sells and lists " Soaper's TOP 60 Essential Oils " [based on sales]. If the essential oils had no purpose or benefit when used in soap, I doubt one of the leading chemists and experts in the field of aromatherapy and essential oil research would sell these EOs specifically targeted at soapmakers. Having met Dr. Pappas, and participated on discussion lists with him years ago, I do believe he takes his reputation in the chemistry field as well as in the aromatherapy community VERY seriously and would never do anything to jeopardize it. If someone of his national reputation and stature believes essential oils have a benefit when in soap, that is enough to convince me...even if I didn't already know this to be true. Apito Botanical Elements Trade Association www.botanicalelements.com groups.yahoo.com/botanicalelements Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 > I love the smells of essential oils. Is that a benefit aromathereputically speaking?< Sure...that's how aromatherapy works...you inhale them and they go to the brain. You've got it. That is aromatherapy. Synthetics can also have an effect - that is called aromachology. Those effects though are thought to be limited to mood and emotion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2003 Report Share Posted April 6, 2003 >>That view doesn't seem to be shared by everyone.<< Same as I said: >Synthetics can also have an effect - that is called aromachology. >Those effects though are thought to be limited to mood and emotion.< Synthetic fragrance = aromachology; mood and emotion [i.e.psychology] " Aroma-Chology is a concept based on systematic, scientific data collected under controlled conditions. It was developed in 1989 under the leadership of the Sense of Smell Institute (formerly known as the Olfactory Research Fund). Aroma-Chology is dedicated to the study of the inter-relationship of psychology and the latest in fragrance technology to transmit through odor a variety of specific feelings (such as relaxation, exhilaration, sensuality, happiness and achievement) directly to the brain. " They defined the term, that's where it came from. They research synthetic fragrances. They are the ones who said pumkin pie and licorace smell makes men feel " romantic " . This term has been around since, as they say, 1989. +++ This " definition " for aromatherapy is their definition of aromatherapy and not that of the industry itself. I have noticed that they haven't changed it for the past 8 years in spite of continued scientific research into the effects of essential oils. Rene-Maurice Gattefosse invented the term " aromatherapy " and it has been in use since early 1900's. >Aromatherapy is a concept based largely on anecdotal individual case studies and folklore.< Largely - but not entirely. So that is correct. I'm sure the value of the double-blind, scientific method testing of pumpkin pie spice on triggering men's erections really has helped mankind!! Go Science!! :^} > It prescribes the use of natural essential oils and herbs for the treatment of various mental and physical disorders.< Incorrect that the practice of aromatherapy includes herbs...it doesn't. Just essential oils. Medical aromatherapy when practiced as a medical practice indeed does use EOs for mental and physical disorders. The practice of using aromatherapy does extend to the " emotional and mood " just like the effects of synthetics are given credit for. >It is generally used in combination with body massage, the result of which is described by advocates to heal, beautify and soothe the body and mind.< Incorrect. This " generality " is very general!! While aromatherapy is certainly used in bodywork, the practice of aromatherapy is via inhalation as well. You can also see aromatherapy " debunked " on those " quackbuster " web sites where they claim basically nothing but allopathic medicine works and aromatherapy, homeopathy, herbal medicine, etc are all nonsense. Luckily the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), the federal government's leading agency for scientific research on alternative medicine, isn't so quick to disbelieve everything that is still unproven by " current " scientific method. Apito Botanical Elements Trade Association www.botanicalelements.com groups.yahoo.com/botanicalelements Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2003 Report Share Posted April 6, 2003 > > >Luckily the National Center for Complementary and > >Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), the federal government's leading agency > >for scientific research on alternative medicine, isn't so quick to > >disbelieve everything that is still unproven by " current " scientific > >method. > > NCCAM says that " [a]romatherapy involves the use of essential oils (extracts or essences) from flowers, herbs, and trees to promote health and well-being " . > http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam/ > > There is no suggestion that aromatherapy can be used " in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or animal " nor does it say that aromatherapy can be used " to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals " , which of course are two definitions of a drug.< And drugs are generally used to suppress symptoms which is also not the goal of holistic medicine. Aromatherapy does exactly what you quoted; " promote health and well- being " . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.