Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 A force plate cannot prove a increase in store elastic energy. In fact it was previsibile you would relay on this for your argumentation, but the things are not so simple. In fact, because springs are constrained , this doesn't many anything. To prove that an arm swing enhanced stored elastic energy you must prove that the arm swing : 1. either changes the intrinsic properties of the spring 2. either causes the spring to be stretched on a larger distance. 3. EMG measures muscle activation, grossly speaking, it will probably not be relevant in describing the energy stored in a spring, which is released without **further activation** of the muscle by. Until you can prove either point 1 or 2, I will say you are speculating without any kind of support whatsoever. I wait for you top produced some evidence to your claims. (Please no vector composition again, randomly quoting a book doesnt help your case) Dan Partelly Oradea, Romania > > > > > > Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way > > coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, > > etc.) led > > me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into > > the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. > > > > Hi Ken, > > I'm not sure we can compare your well sprung paraolympian across all arm > swing circumstances. I'm suggesting that a vigorous arm upswing coordinated with > calf stretch will increase the stored elastic energy translating into a greater > calf drive and also stretch reflex activity. There should be an EMG study > somewhere to (dis)prove this. And a force plate study to indicate the > effectiveness of the arm swing. > > Not that this is the only means for such an endeavor. A wilder speculation is > that trunk rotation does also. Maybe the deleterious effect of sprinting with > the arms inside of a tight tee-shirt will demonstrate the effectiveness of a > vigorous arm swing? > > Jerry Telle > Lakewood CO USA > > ============================== > > Thanks for this insight. > > Ten years before Pistorius and the debates of Cheetah prosthetics > being a competitive advantage, Paralympian Tony Volpentest ran 22.94 on my > track > here at Lisle High School, a time faster than 97% of every able bodied prep > athlete I've trained over the past thirty-four years. Tony had neither > lower arms nor feet. > > Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way > coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, etc.) > led > me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into > the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. > > ======================== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 A force plate cannot prove a increase in store elastic energy. In fact it was previsibile you would relay on this for your argumentation, but the things are not so simple. In fact, because springs are constrained , this doesn't many anything. To prove that an arm swing enhanced stored elastic energy you must prove that the arm swing : 1. either changes the intrinsic properties of the spring 2. either causes the spring to be stretched on a larger distance. 3. EMG measures muscle activation, grossly speaking, it will probably not be relevant in describing the energy stored in a spring, which is released without **further activation** of the muscle by. Until you can prove either point 1 or 2, I will say you are speculating without any kind of support whatsoever. I wait for you top produced some evidence to your claims. (Please no vector composition again, randomly quoting a book doesnt help your case) Dan Partelly Oradea, Romania > > > > > > Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way > > coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, > > etc.) led > > me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into > > the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. > > > > Hi Ken, > > I'm not sure we can compare your well sprung paraolympian across all arm > swing circumstances. I'm suggesting that a vigorous arm upswing coordinated with > calf stretch will increase the stored elastic energy translating into a greater > calf drive and also stretch reflex activity. There should be an EMG study > somewhere to (dis)prove this. And a force plate study to indicate the > effectiveness of the arm swing. > > Not that this is the only means for such an endeavor. A wilder speculation is > that trunk rotation does also. Maybe the deleterious effect of sprinting with > the arms inside of a tight tee-shirt will demonstrate the effectiveness of a > vigorous arm swing? > > Jerry Telle > Lakewood CO USA > > ============================== > > Thanks for this insight. > > Ten years before Pistorius and the debates of Cheetah prosthetics > being a competitive advantage, Paralympian Tony Volpentest ran 22.94 on my > track > here at Lisle High School, a time faster than 97% of every able bodied prep > athlete I've trained over the past thirty-four years. Tony had neither > lower arms nor feet. > > Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way > coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, etc.) > led > me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into > the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. > > ======================== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 A force plate cannot prove a increase in store elastic energy. In fact it was previsibile you would relay on this for your argumentation, but the things are not so simple. In fact, because springs are constrained , this doesn't many anything. To prove that an arm swing enhanced stored elastic energy you must prove that the arm swing : 1. either changes the intrinsic properties of the spring 2. either causes the spring to be stretched on a larger distance. 3. EMG measures muscle activation, grossly speaking, it will probably not be relevant in describing the energy stored in a spring, which is released without **further activation** of the muscle by. Until you can prove either point 1 or 2, I will say you are speculating without any kind of support whatsoever. I wait for you top produced some evidence to your claims. (Please no vector composition again, randomly quoting a book doesnt help your case) Dan Partelly Oradea, Romania > > > > > > Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way > > coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, > > etc.) led > > me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into > > the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. > > > > Hi Ken, > > I'm not sure we can compare your well sprung paraolympian across all arm > swing circumstances. I'm suggesting that a vigorous arm upswing coordinated with > calf stretch will increase the stored elastic energy translating into a greater > calf drive and also stretch reflex activity. There should be an EMG study > somewhere to (dis)prove this. And a force plate study to indicate the > effectiveness of the arm swing. > > Not that this is the only means for such an endeavor. A wilder speculation is > that trunk rotation does also. Maybe the deleterious effect of sprinting with > the arms inside of a tight tee-shirt will demonstrate the effectiveness of a > vigorous arm swing? > > Jerry Telle > Lakewood CO USA > > ============================== > > Thanks for this insight. > > Ten years before Pistorius and the debates of Cheetah prosthetics > being a competitive advantage, Paralympian Tony Volpentest ran 22.94 on my > track > here at Lisle High School, a time faster than 97% of every able bodied prep > athlete I've trained over the past thirty-four years. Tony had neither > lower arms nor feet. > > Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way > coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, etc.) > led > me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into > the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. > > ======================== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Hello Jerry, Wouldn't it be the downward or backward driven force of the opposite arm resulting in an increase in opposite leg posterior muscle stiffening that would assist in greater spring? or am I off base. Thanks for any clarification Doug Fairbanks Boston, MA ============================= To: Supertraining From: JRTELLE@... Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:15:02 -0500 Subject: Re: Plyometric training for endurance athletes and sprinters > Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way > coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, > etc.) led > me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into > the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. > Hi Ken, I'm not sure we can compare your well sprung paraolympian across all arm swing circumstances. I'm suggesting that a vigorous arm upswing coordinated with calf stretch will increase the stored elastic energy translating into a greater calf drive and also stretch reflex activity. There should be an EMG study somewhere to (dis)prove this. And a force plate study to indicate the effectiveness of the arm swing. Not that this is the only means for such an endeavor. A wilder speculation is that trunk rotation does also. Maybe the deleterious effect of sprinting with the arms inside of a tight tee-shirt will demonstrate the effectiveness of a vigorous arm swing? Jerry Telle Lakewood CO USA ============================== Thanks for this insight. Ten years before Pistorius and the debates of Cheetah prosthetics being a competitive advantage, Paralympian Tony Volpentest ran 22.94 on my track here at Lisle High School, a time faster than 97% of every able bodied prep athlete I've trained over the past thirty-four years. Tony had neither lower arms nor feet. Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, etc.) led me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. ======================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Hello Jerry, Wouldn't it be the downward or backward driven force of the opposite arm resulting in an increase in opposite leg posterior muscle stiffening that would assist in greater spring? or am I off base. Thanks for any clarification Doug Fairbanks Boston, MA ============================= To: Supertraining From: JRTELLE@... Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:15:02 -0500 Subject: Re: Plyometric training for endurance athletes and sprinters > Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way > coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, > etc.) led > me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into > the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. > Hi Ken, I'm not sure we can compare your well sprung paraolympian across all arm swing circumstances. I'm suggesting that a vigorous arm upswing coordinated with calf stretch will increase the stored elastic energy translating into a greater calf drive and also stretch reflex activity. There should be an EMG study somewhere to (dis)prove this. And a force plate study to indicate the effectiveness of the arm swing. Not that this is the only means for such an endeavor. A wilder speculation is that trunk rotation does also. Maybe the deleterious effect of sprinting with the arms inside of a tight tee-shirt will demonstrate the effectiveness of a vigorous arm swing? Jerry Telle Lakewood CO USA ============================== Thanks for this insight. Ten years before Pistorius and the debates of Cheetah prosthetics being a competitive advantage, Paralympian Tony Volpentest ran 22.94 on my track here at Lisle High School, a time faster than 97% of every able bodied prep athlete I've trained over the past thirty-four years. Tony had neither lower arms nor feet. Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, etc.) led me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. ======================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Hello Jerry, Wouldn't it be the downward or backward driven force of the opposite arm resulting in an increase in opposite leg posterior muscle stiffening that would assist in greater spring? or am I off base. Thanks for any clarification Doug Fairbanks Boston, MA ============================= To: Supertraining From: JRTELLE@... Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:15:02 -0500 Subject: Re: Plyometric training for endurance athletes and sprinters > Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way > coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, > etc.) led > me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into > the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. > Hi Ken, I'm not sure we can compare your well sprung paraolympian across all arm swing circumstances. I'm suggesting that a vigorous arm upswing coordinated with calf stretch will increase the stored elastic energy translating into a greater calf drive and also stretch reflex activity. There should be an EMG study somewhere to (dis)prove this. And a force plate study to indicate the effectiveness of the arm swing. Not that this is the only means for such an endeavor. A wilder speculation is that trunk rotation does also. Maybe the deleterious effect of sprinting with the arms inside of a tight tee-shirt will demonstrate the effectiveness of a vigorous arm swing? Jerry Telle Lakewood CO USA ============================== Thanks for this insight. Ten years before Pistorius and the debates of Cheetah prosthetics being a competitive advantage, Paralympian Tony Volpentest ran 22.94 on my track here at Lisle High School, a time faster than 97% of every able bodied prep athlete I've trained over the past thirty-four years. Tony had neither lower arms nor feet. Tony's performances, which I couldn't explain at the time using the way coaches at my level were presenting mechanics, (arm swing, leg cycling, etc.) led me to the locomotion labs at Harvard and Rice University, and a look into the spring mass model, which you really defined quite elegantly. ======================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 HI Doug YES sorry about the over simplification. Jerry Jerry Telle CO USA > Wouldn't it be the downward or backward driven force of the opposite > arm resulting in an increase in opposite leg posterior muscle > stiffening that would assist in greater spring? or am I off base. > > Thanks for any clarification Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Although track coaches have for years yelled at runners to " pump your arms " in an effort to pick up speed at the end of a race when they are fading, the arms are probably just providing a balancing and coordination effect. It might appear that they contribute to an increased leg turnover, but what you are really seeing is the runner simply summoning up a last ditch kick. Jon Haddan Irvine, CA Subject: Re: Plyometric training for endurance athletes and sprinters To: " group " <supertraining > Date: Friday, February 20, 2009, 11:38 AM Hello Jerry, Wouldn't it be the downward or backward driven force of the opposite arm resulting in an increase in opposite leg posterior muscle stiffening that would assist in greater spring? or am I off base. Thanks for any clarification Doug Fairbanks Boston, MA ============ ========= ======== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Although track coaches have for years yelled at runners to " pump your arms " in an effort to pick up speed at the end of a race when they are fading, the arms are probably just providing a balancing and coordination effect. It might appear that they contribute to an increased leg turnover, but what you are really seeing is the runner simply summoning up a last ditch kick. Jon Haddan Irvine, CA Subject: Re: Plyometric training for endurance athletes and sprinters To: " group " <supertraining > Date: Friday, February 20, 2009, 11:38 AM Hello Jerry, Wouldn't it be the downward or backward driven force of the opposite arm resulting in an increase in opposite leg posterior muscle stiffening that would assist in greater spring? or am I off base. Thanks for any clarification Doug Fairbanks Boston, MA ============ ========= ======== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.