Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Actually blowing up that guy / girl is a bad idea. As there is no other

entrance, when you stick the dynamite up his ass, you are going to kindle a

lot of inflammable gases as well, causing a back explosion and killing all

in the process.

This is an apt indicated case for radical lipectomy, instead!

You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

which are strong enough.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Dear Malini,

>

> 1. This guy is stuck in the exit (there is this red light that says

" exit " ),

> right? So there must be an entry somewhere! So why blow him up, just find

> the other door! :-D

>

> 2. Okay, there is only one way in/out of the cave, and this guy (actually

> girl would have been more appropriate, since girls have larger backsides

and

> are more likely to get stuck with their head and chest out!) has a fat

> posterior - and fat is compressible to some extent - so let us all give

him

> a push, OK?

>

> 3. Instead of blowing him up (with the cave entrance) tickle him to death

> and then blow him up (a happily departed soul)!

>

> :-D

>

> Ravin '82

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually blowing up that guy / girl is a bad idea. As there is no other

entrance, when you stick the dynamite up his ass, you are going to kindle a

lot of inflammable gases as well, causing a back explosion and killing all

in the process.

This is an apt indicated case for radical lipectomy, instead!

You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

which are strong enough.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Dear Malini,

>

> 1. This guy is stuck in the exit (there is this red light that says

" exit " ),

> right? So there must be an entry somewhere! So why blow him up, just find

> the other door! :-D

>

> 2. Okay, there is only one way in/out of the cave, and this guy (actually

> girl would have been more appropriate, since girls have larger backsides

and

> are more likely to get stuck with their head and chest out!) has a fat

> posterior - and fat is compressible to some extent - so let us all give

him

> a push, OK?

>

> 3. Instead of blowing him up (with the cave entrance) tickle him to death

> and then blow him up (a happily departed soul)!

>

> :-D

>

> Ravin '82

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

inimatbly kissore !!

ashok ' 84

Shah wrote:

Actually blowing up that guy / girl is a bad idea. As there is no other

entrance, when you stick the dynamite up his ass, you are going to kindle a

lot of inflammable gases as well, causing a back explosion and killing all

in the process.

This is an apt indicated case for radical lipectomy, instead!

You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

which are strong enough.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Dear Malini,

>

> 1. This guy is stuck in the exit (there is this red light that says

" exit " ),

> right? So there must be an entry somewhere! So why blow him up, just find

> the other door! :-D

>

> 2. Okay, there is only one way in/out of the cave, and this guy (actually

> girl would have been more appropriate, since girls have larger backsides

and

> are more likely to get stuck with their head and chest out!) has a fat

> posterior - and fat is compressible to some extent - so let us all give

him

> a push, OK?

>

> 3. Instead of blowing him up (with the cave entrance) tickle him to death

> and then blow him up (a happily departed soul)!

>

> :-D

>

> Ravin '82

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

inimatbly kissore !!

ashok ' 84

Shah wrote:

Actually blowing up that guy / girl is a bad idea. As there is no other

entrance, when you stick the dynamite up his ass, you are going to kindle a

lot of inflammable gases as well, causing a back explosion and killing all

in the process.

This is an apt indicated case for radical lipectomy, instead!

You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

which are strong enough.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Dear Malini,

>

> 1. This guy is stuck in the exit (there is this red light that says

" exit " ),

> right? So there must be an entry somewhere! So why blow him up, just find

> the other door! :-D

>

> 2. Okay, there is only one way in/out of the cave, and this guy (actually

> girl would have been more appropriate, since girls have larger backsides

and

> are more likely to get stuck with their head and chest out!) has a fat

> posterior - and fat is compressible to some extent - so let us all give

him

> a push, OK?

>

> 3. Instead of blowing him up (with the cave entrance) tickle him to death

> and then blow him up (a happily departed soul)!

>

> :-D

>

> Ravin '82

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Kishore,

Hmm! Why didn't I think of this one?

> You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

> which are strong enough.

Of course, I would never have thought of pulling any appendages (that is

your style?) :-D

Has to be a guy, you wouldn't be able to pull any female appendages I'm

sure!

The best thing to do in this situation would be to use a plasma gun (or a

BFG) (ever played Quake III?) and just vaporize this gentleman/lady!

And wasn't there something to do with water filling up in the cave soon?

He/she would be a good stopper! Why bother?

:-D

Ravin '82

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Kishore,

Hmm! Why didn't I think of this one?

> You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

> which are strong enough.

Of course, I would never have thought of pulling any appendages (that is

your style?) :-D

Has to be a guy, you wouldn't be able to pull any female appendages I'm

sure!

The best thing to do in this situation would be to use a plasma gun (or a

BFG) (ever played Quake III?) and just vaporize this gentleman/lady!

And wasn't there something to do with water filling up in the cave soon?

He/she would be a good stopper! Why bother?

:-D

Ravin '82

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Kishore,

Hmm! Why didn't I think of this one?

> You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

> which are strong enough.

Of course, I would never have thought of pulling any appendages (that is

your style?) :-D

Has to be a guy, you wouldn't be able to pull any female appendages I'm

sure!

The best thing to do in this situation would be to use a plasma gun (or a

BFG) (ever played Quake III?) and just vaporize this gentleman/lady!

And wasn't there something to do with water filling up in the cave soon?

He/she would be a good stopper! Why bother?

:-D

Ravin '82

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kishore,

1. The tide is going to rise behind me, surely I can swim out of the back?

2. If water can come in (and go out), so can I?

:-|

3. If this guy is stuck bad, real bad, air can't go out if the tide comes

in, the compressed air behind him will either shoot out the guy at the exit,

or won't let the tide come in? :-D

What say you?

Ravin '82

> > Imagine you are in a cave. there are 20 people. ?There is only 1 exit.

The

> > first guy is stuck in the exit. his head and chest r out.

> > the tide will rise behind u and kill all of u in 1 hour. u have

dynamite.

> > will u blow up the cave entrance to escape (i.e. will ou kill the stuck

> guy

> > to enable all 19 to escape? give your responses. will continue in the

> > evening.

> > cheers Malini

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kishore,

1. The tide is going to rise behind me, surely I can swim out of the back?

2. If water can come in (and go out), so can I?

:-|

3. If this guy is stuck bad, real bad, air can't go out if the tide comes

in, the compressed air behind him will either shoot out the guy at the exit,

or won't let the tide come in? :-D

What say you?

Ravin '82

> > Imagine you are in a cave. there are 20 people. ?There is only 1 exit.

The

> > first guy is stuck in the exit. his head and chest r out.

> > the tide will rise behind u and kill all of u in 1 hour. u have

dynamite.

> > will u blow up the cave entrance to escape (i.e. will ou kill the stuck

> guy

> > to enable all 19 to escape? give your responses. will continue in the

> > evening.

> > cheers Malini

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kishore,

1. The tide is going to rise behind me, surely I can swim out of the back?

2. If water can come in (and go out), so can I?

:-|

3. If this guy is stuck bad, real bad, air can't go out if the tide comes

in, the compressed air behind him will either shoot out the guy at the exit,

or won't let the tide come in? :-D

What say you?

Ravin '82

> > Imagine you are in a cave. there are 20 people. ?There is only 1 exit.

The

> > first guy is stuck in the exit. his head and chest r out.

> > the tide will rise behind u and kill all of u in 1 hour. u have

dynamite.

> > will u blow up the cave entrance to escape (i.e. will ou kill the stuck

> guy

> > to enable all 19 to escape? give your responses. will continue in the

> > evening.

> > cheers Malini

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been reading the interesting responses. none of these actually came

up in the ethical discussion. Shows how fertile the minds of mgmis'ians' is.

the point being what is correct what is not. if u said blow up the guy, then

would u do it if the guy was your son? so there is no ight or wrong in this

world. all is relative. you follow the rules of society at that time. if

there was no bad there would be no good. if there ws no all there would be

no short. have a think...

Malini

We wish you a very happy day

L/M Prasad (lp1960@...)

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

Actually blowing up that guy / girl is a bad idea. As there is no other

entrance, when you stick the dynamite up his ass, you are going to kindle a

lot of inflammable gases as well, causing a back explosion and killing all

in the process.

This is an apt indicated case for radical lipectomy, instead!

You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

which are strong enough.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Dear Malini,

>

> 1. This guy is stuck in the exit (there is this red light that says

" exit " ),

> right? So there must be an entry somewhere! So why blow him up, just find

> the other door! :-D

>

> 2. Okay, there is only one way in/out of the cave, and this guy (actually

> girl would have been more appropriate, since girls have larger backsides

and

> are more likely to get stuck with their head and chest out!) has a fat

> posterior - and fat is compressible to some extent - so let us all give

him

> a push, OK?

>

> 3. Instead of blowing him up (with the cave entrance) tickle him to death

> and then blow him up (a happily departed soul)!

>

> :-D

>

> Ravin '82

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been reading the interesting responses. none of these actually came

up in the ethical discussion. Shows how fertile the minds of mgmis'ians' is.

the point being what is correct what is not. if u said blow up the guy, then

would u do it if the guy was your son? so there is no ight or wrong in this

world. all is relative. you follow the rules of society at that time. if

there was no bad there would be no good. if there ws no all there would be

no short. have a think...

Malini

We wish you a very happy day

L/M Prasad (lp1960@...)

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

Actually blowing up that guy / girl is a bad idea. As there is no other

entrance, when you stick the dynamite up his ass, you are going to kindle a

lot of inflammable gases as well, causing a back explosion and killing all

in the process.

This is an apt indicated case for radical lipectomy, instead!

You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

which are strong enough.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Dear Malini,

>

> 1. This guy is stuck in the exit (there is this red light that says

" exit " ),

> right? So there must be an entry somewhere! So why blow him up, just find

> the other door! :-D

>

> 2. Okay, there is only one way in/out of the cave, and this guy (actually

> girl would have been more appropriate, since girls have larger backsides

and

> are more likely to get stuck with their head and chest out!) has a fat

> posterior - and fat is compressible to some extent - so let us all give

him

> a push, OK?

>

> 3. Instead of blowing him up (with the cave entrance) tickle him to death

> and then blow him up (a happily departed soul)!

>

> :-D

>

> Ravin '82

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been reading the interesting responses. none of these actually came

up in the ethical discussion. Shows how fertile the minds of mgmis'ians' is.

the point being what is correct what is not. if u said blow up the guy, then

would u do it if the guy was your son? so there is no ight or wrong in this

world. all is relative. you follow the rules of society at that time. if

there was no bad there would be no good. if there ws no all there would be

no short. have a think...

Malini

We wish you a very happy day

L/M Prasad (lp1960@...)

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

Actually blowing up that guy / girl is a bad idea. As there is no other

entrance, when you stick the dynamite up his ass, you are going to kindle a

lot of inflammable gases as well, causing a back explosion and killing all

in the process.

This is an apt indicated case for radical lipectomy, instead!

You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

which are strong enough.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Dear Malini,

>

> 1. This guy is stuck in the exit (there is this red light that says

" exit " ),

> right? So there must be an entry somewhere! So why blow him up, just find

> the other door! :-D

>

> 2. Okay, there is only one way in/out of the cave, and this guy (actually

> girl would have been more appropriate, since girls have larger backsides

and

> are more likely to get stuck with their head and chest out!) has a fat

> posterior - and fat is compressible to some extent - so let us all give

him

> a push, OK?

>

> 3. Instead of blowing him up (with the cave entrance) tickle him to death

> and then blow him up (a happily departed soul)!

>

> :-D

>

> Ravin '82

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now instead of changing your name, you are changing my name!

Aisa julm mat karo bhai.

Kishore Shah

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> inimatbly kissore !!

>

> ashok ' 84

>

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now instead of changing your name, you are changing my name!

Aisa julm mat karo bhai.

Kishore Shah

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> inimatbly kissore !!

>

> ashok ' 84

>

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup! Point to ponder.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Kishore,

>

> 1. The tide is going to rise behind me, surely I can swim out of the back?

>

> 2. If water can come in (and go out), so can I?

>

> :-|

>

> 3. If this guy is stuck bad, real bad, air can't go out if the tide comes

> in, the compressed air behind him will either shoot out the guy at the

exit,

> or won't let the tide come in? :-D

>

> What say you?

>

> Ravin '82

>

> > > Imagine you are in a cave. there are 20 people. ?There is only 1 exit.

> The

> > > first guy is stuck in the exit. his head and chest r out.

> > > the tide will rise behind u and kill all of u in 1 hour. u have

> dynamite.

> > > will u blow up the cave entrance to escape (i.e. will ou kill the

stuck

> > guy

> > > to enable all 19 to escape? give your responses. will continue in the

> > > evening.

> > > cheers Malini

>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------

> Website: www.mgims.org

> ------------------------------

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup! Point to ponder.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Kishore,

>

> 1. The tide is going to rise behind me, surely I can swim out of the back?

>

> 2. If water can come in (and go out), so can I?

>

> :-|

>

> 3. If this guy is stuck bad, real bad, air can't go out if the tide comes

> in, the compressed air behind him will either shoot out the guy at the

exit,

> or won't let the tide come in? :-D

>

> What say you?

>

> Ravin '82

>

> > > Imagine you are in a cave. there are 20 people. ?There is only 1 exit.

> The

> > > first guy is stuck in the exit. his head and chest r out.

> > > the tide will rise behind u and kill all of u in 1 hour. u have

> dynamite.

> > > will u blow up the cave entrance to escape (i.e. will ou kill the

stuck

> > guy

> > > to enable all 19 to escape? give your responses. will continue in the

> > > evening.

> > > cheers Malini

>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------

> Website: www.mgims.org

> ------------------------------

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry to say malini and others -

there is only one truth -

truth is not relative -

the simple solution in this scenario is -

all nineteen people use their combined mental and physical faculties to get this

guy out and save their own lives - in doing so if they all die - they would have

done very enlightening thing - in the process there souls will be blessed and

liberated -

simple solutions -

if one understands truth life becomes very simple -

i agree with malini that good will be called only good if bad exists -

but there is only one good and and one bad - theory of relativity does not apply

here -

i openly challenge that if this argument does not die i will make you all see

the simple truth -

grow up - be enlightened - which is nothing but recognizing that there is only

one truth - this understanding makes living life very very easy -

please read mahatma gandhi's " my experiments with truth "

humbly ,

ashok 1984

p.s. yes self preservation is supremely important but not at the cost of taking

another human life - let us evolve to respect our fellow humans first - then we

will think of animal life - and then plant life - the only thing ofcourse we

don't have worry or care about right away is nonliving !!

lprasad wrote:

I have been reading the interesting responses. none of these actually came

up in the ethical discussion. Shows how fertile the minds of mgmis'ians' is.

the point being what is correct what is not. if u said blow up the guy, then

would u do it if the guy was your son? so there is no ight or wrong in this

world. all is relative. you follow the rules of society at that time. if

there was no bad there would be no good. if there ws no all there would be

no short. have a think...

Malini

We wish you a very happy day

L/M Prasad (lp1960@...)

Kishore,

1. The tide is going to rise behind me, surely I can swim out of the back?

2. If water can come in (and go out), so can I?

:-|

3. If this guy is stuck bad, real bad, air can't go out if the tide comes

in, the compressed air behind him will either shoot out the guy at the exit,

or won't let the tide come in? :-D

What say you?

Ravin '82

> > Imagine you are in a cave. there are 20 people. ?There is only 1 exit.

The

> > first guy is stuck in the exit. his head and chest r out.

> > the tide will rise behind u and kill all of u in 1 hour. u have

dynamite.

> > will u blow up the cave entrance to escape (i.e. will ou kill the stuck

> guy

> > to enable all 19 to escape? give your responses. will continue in the

> > evening.

> > cheers Malini

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

Actually blowing up that guy / girl is a bad idea. As there is no other

entrance, when you stick the dynamite up his ass, you are going to kindle a

lot of inflammable gases as well, causing a back explosion and killing all

in the process.

This is an apt indicated case for radical lipectomy, instead!

You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

which are strong enough.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Dear Malini,

>

> 1. This guy is stuck in the exit (there is this red light that says

" exit " ),

> right? So there must be an entry somewhere! So why blow him up, just find

> the other door! :-D

>

> 2. Okay, there is only one way in/out of the cave, and this guy (actually

> girl would have been more appropriate, since girls have larger backsides

and

> are more likely to get stuck with their head and chest out!) has a fat

> posterior - and fat is compressible to some extent - so let us all give

him

> a push, OK?

>

> 3. Instead of blowing him up (with the cave entrance) tickle him to death

> and then blow him up (a happily departed soul)!

>

> :-D

>

> Ravin '82

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry to say malini and others -

there is only one truth -

truth is not relative -

the simple solution in this scenario is -

all nineteen people use their combined mental and physical faculties to get this

guy out and save their own lives - in doing so if they all die - they would have

done very enlightening thing - in the process there souls will be blessed and

liberated -

simple solutions -

if one understands truth life becomes very simple -

i agree with malini that good will be called only good if bad exists -

but there is only one good and and one bad - theory of relativity does not apply

here -

i openly challenge that if this argument does not die i will make you all see

the simple truth -

grow up - be enlightened - which is nothing but recognizing that there is only

one truth - this understanding makes living life very very easy -

please read mahatma gandhi's " my experiments with truth "

humbly ,

ashok 1984

p.s. yes self preservation is supremely important but not at the cost of taking

another human life - let us evolve to respect our fellow humans first - then we

will think of animal life - and then plant life - the only thing ofcourse we

don't have worry or care about right away is nonliving !!

lprasad wrote:

I have been reading the interesting responses. none of these actually came

up in the ethical discussion. Shows how fertile the minds of mgmis'ians' is.

the point being what is correct what is not. if u said blow up the guy, then

would u do it if the guy was your son? so there is no ight or wrong in this

world. all is relative. you follow the rules of society at that time. if

there was no bad there would be no good. if there ws no all there would be

no short. have a think...

Malini

We wish you a very happy day

L/M Prasad (lp1960@...)

Kishore,

1. The tide is going to rise behind me, surely I can swim out of the back?

2. If water can come in (and go out), so can I?

:-|

3. If this guy is stuck bad, real bad, air can't go out if the tide comes

in, the compressed air behind him will either shoot out the guy at the exit,

or won't let the tide come in? :-D

What say you?

Ravin '82

> > Imagine you are in a cave. there are 20 people. ?There is only 1 exit.

The

> > first guy is stuck in the exit. his head and chest r out.

> > the tide will rise behind u and kill all of u in 1 hour. u have

dynamite.

> > will u blow up the cave entrance to escape (i.e. will ou kill the stuck

> guy

> > to enable all 19 to escape? give your responses. will continue in the

> > evening.

> > cheers Malini

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

Actually blowing up that guy / girl is a bad idea. As there is no other

entrance, when you stick the dynamite up his ass, you are going to kindle a

lot of inflammable gases as well, causing a back explosion and killing all

in the process.

This is an apt indicated case for radical lipectomy, instead!

You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

which are strong enough.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Dear Malini,

>

> 1. This guy is stuck in the exit (there is this red light that says

" exit " ),

> right? So there must be an entry somewhere! So why blow him up, just find

> the other door! :-D

>

> 2. Okay, there is only one way in/out of the cave, and this guy (actually

> girl would have been more appropriate, since girls have larger backsides

and

> are more likely to get stuck with their head and chest out!) has a fat

> posterior - and fat is compressible to some extent - so let us all give

him

> a push, OK?

>

> 3. Instead of blowing him up (with the cave entrance) tickle him to death

> and then blow him up (a happily departed soul)!

>

> :-D

>

> Ravin '82

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry to say malini and others -

there is only one truth -

truth is not relative -

the simple solution in this scenario is -

all nineteen people use their combined mental and physical faculties to get this

guy out and save their own lives - in doing so if they all die - they would have

done very enlightening thing - in the process there souls will be blessed and

liberated -

simple solutions -

if one understands truth life becomes very simple -

i agree with malini that good will be called only good if bad exists -

but there is only one good and and one bad - theory of relativity does not apply

here -

i openly challenge that if this argument does not die i will make you all see

the simple truth -

grow up - be enlightened - which is nothing but recognizing that there is only

one truth - this understanding makes living life very very easy -

please read mahatma gandhi's " my experiments with truth "

humbly ,

ashok 1984

p.s. yes self preservation is supremely important but not at the cost of taking

another human life - let us evolve to respect our fellow humans first - then we

will think of animal life - and then plant life - the only thing ofcourse we

don't have worry or care about right away is nonliving !!

lprasad wrote:

I have been reading the interesting responses. none of these actually came

up in the ethical discussion. Shows how fertile the minds of mgmis'ians' is.

the point being what is correct what is not. if u said blow up the guy, then

would u do it if the guy was your son? so there is no ight or wrong in this

world. all is relative. you follow the rules of society at that time. if

there was no bad there would be no good. if there ws no all there would be

no short. have a think...

Malini

We wish you a very happy day

L/M Prasad (lp1960@...)

Kishore,

1. The tide is going to rise behind me, surely I can swim out of the back?

2. If water can come in (and go out), so can I?

:-|

3. If this guy is stuck bad, real bad, air can't go out if the tide comes

in, the compressed air behind him will either shoot out the guy at the exit,

or won't let the tide come in? :-D

What say you?

Ravin '82

> > Imagine you are in a cave. there are 20 people. ?There is only 1 exit.

The

> > first guy is stuck in the exit. his head and chest r out.

> > the tide will rise behind u and kill all of u in 1 hour. u have

dynamite.

> > will u blow up the cave entrance to escape (i.e. will ou kill the stuck

> guy

> > to enable all 19 to escape? give your responses. will continue in the

> > evening.

> > cheers Malini

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

Actually blowing up that guy / girl is a bad idea. As there is no other

entrance, when you stick the dynamite up his ass, you are going to kindle a

lot of inflammable gases as well, causing a back explosion and killing all

in the process.

This is an apt indicated case for radical lipectomy, instead!

You could try pulling him inside too, using his limbs and any appendages

which are strong enough.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> Dear Malini,

>

> 1. This guy is stuck in the exit (there is this red light that says

" exit " ),

> right? So there must be an entry somewhere! So why blow him up, just find

> the other door! :-D

>

> 2. Okay, there is only one way in/out of the cave, and this guy (actually

> girl would have been more appropriate, since girls have larger backsides

and

> are more likely to get stuck with their head and chest out!) has a fat

> posterior - and fat is compressible to some extent - so let us all give

him

> a push, OK?

>

> 3. Instead of blowing him up (with the cave entrance) tickle him to death

> and then blow him up (a happily departed soul)!

>

> :-D

>

> Ravin '82

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are absolutely right, Malini,

It is indeed a dilemma which requires great deliberation. There is no right

or wrong answer.

A similar situation has arisen in the AIIMS. They have concocted a vaccine

which could be effective against the HIV virus and its various mutations.

However, three years ago, Maneka Gandhi, as a minister, had prohibited

animal, especially animal testing.

Since three years, this vaccine could not be tested hence its use in human

beings cannot be done, because some rule does not want to hurt innocent

animals.

Recently, the government has relaxed this rule and probably testing will

proceed under controls. But the point to be pondered here is " Should we

allow the deliberate infection of animals for the betterment of mankind " In

the process many animals are going to die or suffer. However, the benefit to

the human race will be great. Also note that no in vitro testing can be done

of this vaccine.

Kishore Shah 1974

RE: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> I have been reading the interesting responses. none of these actually came

> up in the ethical discussion. Shows how fertile the minds of mgmis'ians'

is.

> the point being what is correct what is not. if u said blow up the guy,

then

> would u do it if the guy was your son? so there is no ight or wrong in

this

> world. all is relative. you follow the rules of society at that time. if

> there was no bad there would be no good. if there ws no all there would be

> no short. have a think...

> Malini

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are absolutely right, Malini,

It is indeed a dilemma which requires great deliberation. There is no right

or wrong answer.

A similar situation has arisen in the AIIMS. They have concocted a vaccine

which could be effective against the HIV virus and its various mutations.

However, three years ago, Maneka Gandhi, as a minister, had prohibited

animal, especially animal testing.

Since three years, this vaccine could not be tested hence its use in human

beings cannot be done, because some rule does not want to hurt innocent

animals.

Recently, the government has relaxed this rule and probably testing will

proceed under controls. But the point to be pondered here is " Should we

allow the deliberate infection of animals for the betterment of mankind " In

the process many animals are going to die or suffer. However, the benefit to

the human race will be great. Also note that no in vitro testing can be done

of this vaccine.

Kishore Shah 1974

RE: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> I have been reading the interesting responses. none of these actually came

> up in the ethical discussion. Shows how fertile the minds of mgmis'ians'

is.

> the point being what is correct what is not. if u said blow up the guy,

then

> would u do it if the guy was your son? so there is no ight or wrong in

this

> world. all is relative. you follow the rules of society at that time. if

> there was no bad there would be no good. if there ws no all there would be

> no short. have a think...

> Malini

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey Kishore,

the answer is plain and simple---

let us worry about fellow human beings first before we start worrying about

animals :))

sincerely,

ashok 1984

Shah wrote:

You are absolutely right, Malini,

It is indeed a dilemma which requires great deliberation. There is no right

or wrong answer.

A similar situation has arisen in the AIIMS. They have concocted a vaccine

which could be effective against the HIV virus and its various mutations.

However, three years ago, Maneka Gandhi, as a minister, had prohibited

animal, especially animal testing.

Since three years, this vaccine could not be tested hence its use in human

beings cannot be done, because some rule does not want to hurt innocent

animals.

Recently, the government has relaxed this rule and probably testing will

proceed under controls. But the point to be pondered here is " Should we

allow the deliberate infection of animals for the betterment of mankind " In

the process many animals are going to die or suffer. However, the benefit to

the human race will be great. Also note that no in vitro testing can be done

of this vaccine.

Kishore Shah 1974

RE: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> I have been reading the interesting responses. none of these actually came

> up in the ethical discussion. Shows how fertile the minds of mgmis'ians'

is.

> the point being what is correct what is not. if u said blow up the guy,

then

> would u do it if the guy was your son? so there is no ight or wrong in

this

> world. all is relative. you follow the rules of society at that time. if

> there was no bad there would be no good. if there ws no all there would be

> no short. have a think...

> Malini

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey Kishore,

the answer is plain and simple---

let us worry about fellow human beings first before we start worrying about

animals :))

sincerely,

ashok 1984

Shah wrote:

You are absolutely right, Malini,

It is indeed a dilemma which requires great deliberation. There is no right

or wrong answer.

A similar situation has arisen in the AIIMS. They have concocted a vaccine

which could be effective against the HIV virus and its various mutations.

However, three years ago, Maneka Gandhi, as a minister, had prohibited

animal, especially animal testing.

Since three years, this vaccine could not be tested hence its use in human

beings cannot be done, because some rule does not want to hurt innocent

animals.

Recently, the government has relaxed this rule and probably testing will

proceed under controls. But the point to be pondered here is " Should we

allow the deliberate infection of animals for the betterment of mankind " In

the process many animals are going to die or suffer. However, the benefit to

the human race will be great. Also note that no in vitro testing can be done

of this vaccine.

Kishore Shah 1974

RE: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> I have been reading the interesting responses. none of these actually came

> up in the ethical discussion. Shows how fertile the minds of mgmis'ians'

is.

> the point being what is correct what is not. if u said blow up the guy,

then

> would u do it if the guy was your son? so there is no ight or wrong in

this

> world. all is relative. you follow the rules of society at that time. if

> there was no bad there would be no good. if there ws no all there would be

> no short. have a think...

> Malini

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey Kishore,

the answer is plain and simple---

let us worry about fellow human beings first before we start worrying about

animals :))

sincerely,

ashok 1984

Shah wrote:

You are absolutely right, Malini,

It is indeed a dilemma which requires great deliberation. There is no right

or wrong answer.

A similar situation has arisen in the AIIMS. They have concocted a vaccine

which could be effective against the HIV virus and its various mutations.

However, three years ago, Maneka Gandhi, as a minister, had prohibited

animal, especially animal testing.

Since three years, this vaccine could not be tested hence its use in human

beings cannot be done, because some rule does not want to hurt innocent

animals.

Recently, the government has relaxed this rule and probably testing will

proceed under controls. But the point to be pondered here is " Should we

allow the deliberate infection of animals for the betterment of mankind " In

the process many animals are going to die or suffer. However, the benefit to

the human race will be great. Also note that no in vitro testing can be done

of this vaccine.

Kishore Shah 1974

RE: Re: [KIndleLife] naro kunjara ?

> I have been reading the interesting responses. none of these actually came

> up in the ethical discussion. Shows how fertile the minds of mgmis'ians'

is.

> the point being what is correct what is not. if u said blow up the guy,

then

> would u do it if the guy was your son? so there is no ight or wrong in

this

> world. all is relative. you follow the rules of society at that time. if

> there was no bad there would be no good. if there ws no all there would be

> no short. have a think...

> Malini

---

This is a genuine mail from KS. Always check this certificate before opening

any attachments.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10-09-04

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...