Guest guest Posted August 4, 2004 Report Share Posted August 4, 2004 I avoid using frequencies over 1mhz unless I am trying to effect cell function - either kill specific cells or stimulate their growth or function in some way. On only one occassion recently did I get an indication that the frequency needed was higher than 20mhz which is as high as I can use the FSCAN DIRP to test candidate frequencies. In that case, the frequency needed appeared to be in the 28mhz range and I used an octave in the 14mhz range. Jeff Sutherland Message: 12 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:26:33 +1000 Subject: Re: Frequency Accuracy Jeff, Jim, and other list members what do you find to be the highest frequency used for treating sick people? I have a chip for my project that will produce sine waves to 50Mhz but the is a cheaper on that will work to 15Mhz which looks too low for me. Can I have suggestions on upper frequency ranges please? My project looks as though it will not be able to be built as a kit because they don't make DIL packages anymore only small surface mount chips! The project is coming along well though. Once I proved that it works as described I will look at possible manufacture and construction, I would then program the units at home and test them! Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2004 Report Share Posted August 5, 2004 jdurfeeathome@... wrote: > Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:26:33 +1000 > > Subject: Re: Frequency Accuracy > what do you find to be the highest > frequency used for treating sick people? I > > The Multiple Wave Oscillator that is being used in my neck of the woods by a > number of people with cancer is reported to work at in a range from 1hertz to > 24megahurtz, simultaneously, like a shotgun! Average length of treatment is 30 > minutes 3 times a week. A light device is being used in conjunction with it > and is compared to a rifle. No ill effects have been noted. The results are > impressive. > > I wish there were more people out there looking into MWO, building them and > doing experiments. I think it is a significant tool. > Barbara Barbara & friends, I feel it's prudent to bring more information to light on this subject, so I'll offer my understanding. Unfortunately, not everyone can handle the " MWO " exposure; there are reports of electro-sensitivity reactions and adversely affected well-being by some individuals when exposed to the wide-spectrum EM / RF chaotic noise signal. One particular report is on the Electro-sensitivity discussions page here: http://www.stenulson.net/althealth/es-disc.htm With this in mind, it might be good to research further before advocating or offering blanket endorsements for devices using the label " MWO " ... their operational mode can be an extreme 'stressor factor' for those already dealing with health challenges, and can result in aggravated electro-sensitivity from which recovery can take many months. Let's be careful in our research.... Be Well!! Bruce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2004 Report Share Posted August 5, 2004 Hello, there are several makings of the Multiple Wave Oscillator. The one most according to the original by Lakhovsky is made in the netherlands (see my website under Alternativ and Bioresonance) There is a *Violoet Ray* lamp with it, as well as two *Mats* . But the main thing are the large Lakhovsky antennas. They consist of rings of different materials, and at the ends, they have knobs. The rings are tuned from C to C. The frequency ranges from 200 to 300 MHz. Very good results are obtained. And it works also very good together with Rife machines. So far, people who are electrosensitive do not have complaints whatsoever. We are now testing a new development in Rifing. In stead of sitting hours behind a machine, we now have small portable boxes, where certain frequencies are stored in programs. At the moment there are 22 different program types, but custum types are also possible. There are boxes with one or two programmes. The boxes, the sixe of a large cigarette case, can be hung on a trousers belt. Inside the box, a large spool sends the rife frequencies. It works on two AA batteries of 1.5 V. A total of 129 frequencies can de stored, as a proprogrammed set. We are now testing a set for fat burning and obesitas, for pain relief and one against electrosensibility. Greetings, Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus Re: Frequency Accuracy > > what do you find to be the highest > > frequency used for treating sick people? I > > > > The Multiple Wave Oscillator that is being used in my neck of the woods by a > > number of people with cancer is reported to work at in a range from 1hertz to > > 24megahurtz, simultaneously, like a shotgun! Average length of treatment is 30 > > minutes 3 times a week. A light device is being used in conjunction with it > > and is compared to a rifle. No ill effects have been noted. The results are > > impressive. > > > > I wish there were more people out there looking into MWO, building them and > > doing experiments. I think it is a significant tool. > > Barbara > > Barbara & friends, > > I feel it's prudent to bring more information to light on this subject, > so I'll offer my understanding. > > Unfortunately, not everyone can handle the " MWO " exposure; there are > reports of electro-sensitivity reactions and adversely affected > well-being by some individuals when exposed to the wide-spectrum EM / RF > chaotic noise signal. One particular report is on the > Electro-sensitivity discussions page here: > > http://www.stenulson.net/althealth/es-disc.htm > > With this in mind, it might be good to research further before > advocating or offering blanket endorsements for devices using the label > " MWO " ... their operational mode can be an extreme 'stressor factor' for > those already dealing with health challenges, and can result in > aggravated electro-sensitivity from which recovery can take many months. > > Let's be careful in our research.... > > Be Well!! > > Bruce > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2004 Report Share Posted August 5, 2004 Hello, there are several makings of the Multiple Wave Oscillator. The one most according to the original by Lakhovsky is made in the netherlands (see my website under Alternativ and Bioresonance) There is a *Violoet Ray* lamp with it, as well as two *Mats* . But the main thing are the large Lakhovsky antennas. They consist of rings of different materials, and at the ends, they have knobs. The rings are tuned from C to C. The frequency ranges from 200 to 300 MHz. Very good results are obtained. And it works also very good together with Rife machines. So far, people who are electrosensitive do not have complaints whatsoever. We are now testing a new development in Rifing. In stead of sitting hours behind a machine, we now have small portable boxes, where certain frequencies are stored in programs. At the moment there are 22 different program types, but custum types are also possible. There are boxes with one or two programmes. The boxes, the sixe of a large cigarette case, can be hung on a trousers belt. Inside the box, a large spool sends the rife frequencies. It works on two AA batteries of 1.5 V. A total of 129 frequencies can de stored, as a proprogrammed set. We are now testing a set for fat burning and obesitas, for pain relief and one against electrosensibility. Greetings, Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus Re: Frequency Accuracy > > what do you find to be the highest > > frequency used for treating sick people? I > > > > The Multiple Wave Oscillator that is being used in my neck of the woods by a > > number of people with cancer is reported to work at in a range from 1hertz to > > 24megahurtz, simultaneously, like a shotgun! Average length of treatment is 30 > > minutes 3 times a week. A light device is being used in conjunction with it > > and is compared to a rifle. No ill effects have been noted. The results are > > impressive. > > > > I wish there were more people out there looking into MWO, building them and > > doing experiments. I think it is a significant tool. > > Barbara > > Barbara & friends, > > I feel it's prudent to bring more information to light on this subject, > so I'll offer my understanding. > > Unfortunately, not everyone can handle the " MWO " exposure; there are > reports of electro-sensitivity reactions and adversely affected > well-being by some individuals when exposed to the wide-spectrum EM / RF > chaotic noise signal. One particular report is on the > Electro-sensitivity discussions page here: > > http://www.stenulson.net/althealth/es-disc.htm > > With this in mind, it might be good to research further before > advocating or offering blanket endorsements for devices using the label > " MWO " ... their operational mode can be an extreme 'stressor factor' for > those already dealing with health challenges, and can result in > aggravated electro-sensitivity from which recovery can take many months. > > Let's be careful in our research.... > > Be Well!! > > Bruce > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2004 Report Share Posted August 5, 2004 Hello, no, I do not know what materials are used here, but I do know, that when they are not tuned correctly, the working is not as powerful as can be. The oscillator is not the important part. It is the antennas who do the work. Greetings, Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus Frequency Accuracy - how high > In a message dated 8/5/2004 9:37:35 AM Mountain Daylight Time, > charles@... writes: > They consist of rings of different materials, and at the ends, they have > knobs. > Can you tell me what materials the rings are made of? The oscillator I use > claims frequencies to 24mHz. and also has large semi circular rings that appear > the same as in your picture but made of copper. > Thanks > Barbara > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2004 Report Share Posted August 6, 2004 Hi Barbara, the Multi Wave Oscillator has been around for a long time I haven't looked into them too much. One thing I do know is that the EMEM devices use a impulse waveform and a impulse has every frequency in it. This may well be why they are effective as well. I will have to have a look into MWO's to see how easy/hard they are to make / tune and use. We may also be able to use information on MRI's to enhance the effectiveness of any treatment if it can align the atomic structure, this would mean less energy to do the job!!! Healing is one of the most important responabilities we as humans all carry, it is so unfortunate that so many work to making us all ill!! Keep up the good work Barbara. Re: Frequency Accuracy > what do you find to be the highest > frequency used for treating sick people? I > > The Multiple Wave Oscillator that is being used in my neck of the woods by a > number of people with cancer is reported to work at in a range from 1hertz to > 24megahurtz, simultaneously, like a shotgun! Average length of treatment is 30 > minutes 3 times a week. A light device is being used in conjunction with it > and is compared to a rifle. No ill effects have been noted. The results are > impressive. > > I wish there were more people out there looking into MWO, building them and > doing experiments. I think it is a significant tool. > Barbara --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.734 / Virus Database: 488 - Release Date: 8/4/04 -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.734 / Virus Database: 488 - Release Date: 8/4/04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2004 Report Share Posted August 6, 2004 Hi Barbara. I know there are multiple type MWO`s machines out there . Can you supply me with the make and manufacture of those units in youre area or advise if this is a home made item. Also If any list member can recommend a good machine on the market .I would appreciate the feedback Thx...............Graham Dilks jdurfeeathome@... wrote: > Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:26:33 +1000 > > Subject: Re: Frequency Accuracy > what do you find to be the highest > frequency used for treating sick people? I > > The Multiple Wave Oscillator that is being used in my neck of the > woods by a > number of people with cancer is reported to work at in a range from > 1hertz to > 24megahurtz, simultaneously, like a shotgun! Average length of > treatment is 30 > minutes 3 times a week. A light device is being used in conjunction > with it > and is compared to a rifle. No ill effects have been noted. The > results are > impressive. > > I wish there were more people out there looking into MWO, building > them and > doing experiments. I think it is a significant tool. > Barbara > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2004 Report Share Posted August 7, 2004 Hello Graham Dilks, look at www.medivation.nl They sell around the world. As fas as I know, they are the only ones with the tuned Lakhovsky antennas, which are more powerful. Greetings, Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl checked by Norton Antivirus Re: Frequency Accuracy > > what do you find to be the highest > > frequency used for treating sick people? I > > > > The Multiple Wave Oscillator that is being used in my neck of the > > woods by a > > number of people with cancer is reported to work at in a range from > > 1hertz to > > 24megahurtz, simultaneously, like a shotgun! Average length of > > treatment is 30 > > minutes 3 times a week. A light device is being used in conjunction > > with it > > and is compared to a rifle. No ill effects have been noted. The > > results are > > impressive. > > > > I wish there were more people out there looking into MWO, building > > them and > > doing experiments. I think it is a significant tool. > > Barbara > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.