Re: virus morphing & standardizing freq.

[Guest guest]

actually the time it can take the bacteria to morph under rife is no contest

compared to antibiotics.

when experimenting with strep bacteria it took about 4 minutes for morphism.

very fascinating ;;;;like watching the lava lamp breaks off into individual

bubbles.

claire

> I suspect that morphing with rife is less likely than with an antibiotic

> because the antibiotic resides continually in the body during treatment

giving the

> pathogen time to mutate and figure out what works for survival and what

does

> not. With rife the pathogen is hit with the frequency and then it is gone,

not

> giving the pathogen exposure time to play around and figure out by what

means

> it can survive. The window of opportunity during exposure of the

destroying

> force is much smaller giving the pathogen less time to mutate in a

sustainable

> fashion. Some morphing may take place in those pathogens the frequency did

not

> manage to kill.

>

> Exactly how much morphing goes on with rife is unclear. It would take a

lot

> of study and compliance with a physician and medical lab to figure it out.

I

> would like to assume that some of this type of research is going on in

countries

> where rife is legal for medical use and if anyone has info on this it

would

> be great to hear. I have not heard any actual stories where it was

suspected or

> documented that a morph occurred and the rifer was now contending with the

> new strain and if anyone has any please post! In my mind so far this all

resides

> in theory and from my reading it is a concern of a lot of people because

we

> are translating conventional medical theory to rife experience. Whether

this

> concern is based in reality I don't know.

> Barbara

>

[Guest guest]

actually the time it can take the bacteria to morph under rife is no contest

compared to antibiotics.

when experimenting with strep bacteria it took about 4 minutes for morphism.

very fascinating ;;;;like watching the lava lamp breaks off into individual

bubbles.

claire

> I suspect that morphing with rife is less likely than with an antibiotic

> because the antibiotic resides continually in the body during treatment

giving the

> pathogen time to mutate and figure out what works for survival and what

does

> not. With rife the pathogen is hit with the frequency and then it is gone,

not

> giving the pathogen exposure time to play around and figure out by what

means

> it can survive. The window of opportunity during exposure of the

destroying

> force is much smaller giving the pathogen less time to mutate in a

sustainable

> fashion. Some morphing may take place in those pathogens the frequency did

not

> manage to kill.

>

> Exactly how much morphing goes on with rife is unclear. It would take a

lot

> of study and compliance with a physician and medical lab to figure it out.

I

> would like to assume that some of this type of research is going on in

countries

> where rife is legal for medical use and if anyone has info on this it

would

> be great to hear. I have not heard any actual stories where it was

suspected or

> documented that a morph occurred and the rifer was now contending with the

> new strain and if anyone has any please post! In my mind so far this all

resides

> in theory and from my reading it is a concern of a lot of people because

we

> are translating conventional medical theory to rife experience. Whether

this

> concern is based in reality I don't know.

> Barbara

>

[Guest guest]

Dear I:

Actually " if " morphism means that this always attributesto a sturdier organism

then the answer to this could be yes...how ever without further experimentation

that is a conclusion that I would not have necessarily jumped to.

On would have to try and reculture the rife organism to observe their growth and

sadly that was something I didn't do although I did wonder at the implications

of breaking them down into their separate sphere from the chain form. I did

wonder if I could have been doing a mis service to myself by offering via

separation more organisms that would then replicate....but if they did replicate

would it be back to chain form or what ...you have to understand that after many

months of searching for the MOR I was thrilled at just having some first hand

tangible results from rifing.! But on the other hand it seems certainly

plausible that if the bacteria were stressed enough to break apart...even though

it did not burst the microbes at the first freq. (834) that it could weaken

their entire structure had I not proceeded then to the secondary MOR.

(802).....i do think that the three minute time period does us a disserve....

to stress a maximum of three minutes may be leading many of us up to

noneffective treatments. but the strength of the individual setup will have its

bearing on that.....

I would caution to remind that the gradual morphism of living organism under the

general effects that life lends itself ( such as the evolution of man and

animals themselves) is substantially different then stressed caused

morphism...the latter of course does not give the organism the time to readjust

itself safely and permanently to the causative stressors.

virus morphing & standardizing freq.

> In a message dated 5/23/2004 2:56:25 PM Mountain Daylight Time,

> h.hernandez22@... writes:

> actually the time it can take the bacteria to morph under rife is no contest

> compared to antibiotics.

> when experimenting with strep bacteria it took about 4 minutes for morphism.

> very fascinating ;;;;like watching the lava lamp breaks off into individual

> bubbles.

>

> claire

> So would you say that frequencies can contribute to frequency resistent

> bacteria that could possibly plague rifers? Did you learn anything from your

> observations that would indicate direction in applications of frequency? Are

these

> morphing bacteria living on and replicating or are they dying?

> Barbara

>

[Guest guest]

On Tue, 25 May 2004 23:52:45 EDT jdurfeeathome@... writes:

> In a message dated 5/23/2004 2:56:25 PM Mountain Daylight Time,

> h.hernandez22@... writes:

> actually the time it can take the bacteria to morph under rife is no

> contest compared to antibiotics.

> when experimenting with strep bacteria it took about 4 minutes for

> morphism.

> very fascinating ;;;;like watching the lava lamp breaks off into

> individual bubbles.

>

> claire

> So would you say that frequencies can contribute to frequency

> resistent

> bacteria that could possibly plague rifers? Did you learn anything

> from your

> observations that would indicate direction in applications of

> frequency? Are these

> morphing bacteria living on and replicating or are they dying?

> Barbara

There may be some confusion among people reading this thread (including

me), what exactly is going on here. If a bacteria changes

morphologically, that simply means it changes its form or structure. If

there is an actual mutation, that would imply a change of inheritable

characteristic via DNA.

It would not be surprising at all that a bacteria could change

morphologically under the influence of a device. The question is, would

that change be beneficial or not? Also it is a mistake to assume (with

the experimental testing equipment & conditions of most people on these

lists), that what happens under the microscope also happens in a human or

animal body. What happens under a microscope is only a starting point.

It is also a mistake, as Jim Bare has stated in previous communications,

to assume that frequencies are the only criteria for killing unwanted

bacteria in vitro or in vivo. The optimum combination of factors

including wave form, field strengths, duty cycles, and other parameters

(along with a good frequency), could be critical to success of the

effort, and even then it could vary from one device to another.

This is not easy work, the interactions of the various devices with

living matter cover numerous fields of knowledge, and it's important not

to make assumptions too quickly about anything. What can be done for now

(lacking sophisticated testing techniques), is to look at the response of

many people over the long term, and try to find patterns of what works.

That's why reports to the email lists can be valuable. But for such

reports to be helpful, they need to include more details than what is

given above about the " morphing " of the strep bacteria.

Best wishes,

Char

________________________________________________________________

The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!

Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!

Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!