Guest guest Posted February 25, 2004 Report Share Posted February 25, 2004 Thank you, ALL for the answers I have received so far. I fully understand that each and every cell inside our body vibrates at a different frequency. That is why our liver is our liver and our heart, our heart. What I still do not understand is how the frequencies can only be affecting/killing (or mainly so) the diseased cells. Do the " normal " cells vibrate so fast, at such a high frequency, that we CANNOT hit them with our machines? Or maybe too low? Seems to me the answer is NOT that there is not enough power, especially with the unit I have. Maybe it DOES affect them, maybe it DOES vibrate them but they are so strong that the amount of time we use each frequency is not enough to kill them? I do not doubt that this therapy is working, and working extrememly well for some but if I'm going to be working with people with cancer, (or my oldest, sceptical son) how can I ever teach others and/or explain why it doesn't harm the normal cells if I don't get it? Please, someone MUST have the answer to this or can at least point me in the right direction... With light, laughter and love, I am Diane diane@... www.transitionallifecare.com What would you do if you knew you couldn't fail? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 Good evening, ALL. Just a quick note here to let everyone know, I have taken a picture of the Plasma Plus and will share it with ALMOST anyone who wishes. You will have to contact me at the address below to get a password first to view it. Sorry for the secrecy but I'm a Scorpio... honest, it has nothing to do with undeserving, prying eyes... More on the unit soon... Much love to everyone, Diane Madden diane@... www.transitionallifecare.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 J.R.: It seemed obvious to me that Diane's comment on 'Scorpio' was tongue-in-cheek, not religious. Diane is the authority on what is best for her. It shouldn't hurt to respect that. Craig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 JRA, Ted is exactly right. You ARE out of line. How in the world did you get that being a Scorpio has anything to do with religion? You, in error, made an assumption about me without asking questions first. That is unacceptable to me and until you apologize to me and Ted, I will have nothing further to do you in correspondence. Ted, thank you for you willingness to stand up for my honor. And again, you are also right about my reasons for the password and the secrecy. Just so everyone knows, we are ALL entitled to our opinions and mine is this: the FDA and other governing bodies are more than willing to allow others to die just to keep their pockets lined. I have watched it happen too many times to trade my position for another. I am willing to extend myself, willing to place myself in potential harm to help others that can't/don't know how to help themselves. Someday, I will be in the limelight, exposing this but right now, the time is not right. I still have sons at home that I do not care to potentially subject to any of this. They know their mom. They know I'm willing to risk my freedom for another's life and they are proud of me. I am proud of myself. One that note, I must go. Today begins the trial run of helping a woman with Inflammatory Breast Cancer use the machine in an attempt to extend her life long enough to watch her kids grow up. With light, laughter and love, Diane Madden diane@... www.transitionallifecare.com Look for your answers within you. Within you is the domain where you will find your peace. My peace is within me. Your peace is within you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2004 Report Share Posted February 28, 2004 I see nothing out of line w/JRAs comment. He mistook Dianes intent of privacy. It seems clear. I am careful not to use the builders names, etc, for the same reason. Mel Gibson is getting hell now for his movie, simply for portraying history, and the pain suffered by one who has beliefs in the good of mankind, and promotes forgiveness. Lets follow his example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.