Guest guest Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 From: mail@... Date: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 04:14:22 PM Here is the most recent Policy Page from the Center for Public Policy Priorities. A version of this document complete with any graphics and illustrations is available on our web site at http://www.cppp.org/products/PP183.html . Thanks for your interest in our work. Center for Public Policy Priorities 900 Lydia Street Austin, Texas, 78702 PH: FAX: 512.320-0227 www.cppp.org March 5, 2003 Contact: Anne Dunkelberg, Dunkelberg@... No. 183 CHILDREN'S MEDICAID SIMPLIFICATION THREATENED This Policy Page presents the executive summary of a new report by the Center for Public Policy Priorities on the impact of Senate Bill 43 of the 77th Texas legislature, Children's Medicaid Simplification. The Center gratefully acknowledges the support of the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured in producing this report. The full report, entitled Simplified Eligibility for Children's Medicaid in Texas: A Status Report at Nine Months can be accessed at www.cppp.org, or at www.kff.org. Also provided below is a quick update on the major reversals of Children's Medicaid Simplification that have been proposed so far by members of the Texas Legislature and in conjunction with the proposed HHSC budget cuts. UPDATE ON CHILDREN'S MEDICAID SIMPLIFICATION IN TEXAS The Comptroller's " E-Texas " report recommends postponing the extension of continuous eligibility under children's Medicaid from the current 6 months to 12 months until June 2005. Representative Dianne Delisi, Chair of the House Select Committee on State Health care Expenditures, has filed HB 728 which (as filed) would enact this change. The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) budget under the spending target set by the Legislative Leadership would repeal some major components of Children's Medicaid Simplification (described below), and would hold continuous eligibility at 6 months. According to HHSC's estimates, holding continuous eligibility at 6 months (instead of going to 12, as required by S.B. 43) would reduce children's Medicaid caseloads by over 221,000 in 2005, and reduce HHSC spending by approximately $255 million GR (state dollars) in 2004 and 2005. In January, the Texas Conservative Coalition's State Finance Task Force Report recommended repealing the continuous eligibility requirement to grant children on Medicaid a one-time 3-month period of eligibility to allow for orientation to the program, to be followed by month-to-month eligibility thereafter. Many familiar with the Legislature expect that efforts will be made to eliminate continuous eligibility in this manner. The HHSC budget under the spending target would also reinstate mandatory face-to-face interviews at a DHS office to apply for children's Medicaid; and reinstate documentation of assets for children's Medicaid. HHSC estimates these provisions would further reduce children's Medicaid caseloads in 2005 by another 180,000; that is, the combined effect of all HHSC proposals to roll back Children's Medicaid Simplification would be enrollment of 400,000 fewer children than projected under current law for 2005. Disturbingly, HHSC proposes to maintain the mandatory face-to-face interviews and increased documentation requirements even if funding levels for the agency are restored. No one is suggesting that these below-poverty children will receive insurance from any other source. SIMPLIFIED ELIGIBILITY FOR CHILDREN'S MEDICAID IN TEXAS: A STATUS REPORT AT NINE MONTHS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2002, Texas implemented a number of changes to its Medicaid program designed to make it simpler and easier for families to apply for coverage on their children's behalf, as well as to renew their children's coverage after they are successfully enrolled. The changes have resulted in dramatic increases in Medicaid enrollment among eligible children -- between September 2001 and September 2002, an additional 350,000 children secured Medicaid coverage, an increase of 30 percent. Despite the early and dramatic success of the state's simplification efforts, it is not clear that the progress will continue. The state currently is implementing a new requirement under which parents will not be able to use the state's new, simplified mail-in renewal process unless the state has documented that their children are current with all recommended check-ups. The requirement presents a number of challenges for the Medicaid program and could make it more difficult for many families to keep their eligible children enrolled in coverage. In addition, the very success of the state's simplification efforts will likely tempt Texas lawmakers, facing inadequate revenues to support state services in 2004 and 2005, to re-impose procedural barriers to child Medicaid participation as a means of reducing Medicaid spending. Medicaid Barriers Lead to Simplification Law Prior to Texas' implementation of SCHIP in 2000, about 600,000 of the estimated 1.4 million uninsured children in the state - close to half -- were believed to be in families income-eligible for Medicaid. When it first implemented SCHIP, the state opted to make it easy for families to enroll their children in coverage by allowing them to mail-in application and renewal forms, allowing self-declaration of assets, streamlining documentation requirements, and offering 12 months of continuous eligibility. In contrast, the families with children eligible for Medicaid enjoyed none of these simplifications. The barriers generated by the far more onerous Medicaid enrollment process were starkly apparent. In the first 10 months of SCHIP operations, 97,512 children applying for SCHIP were referred to Medicaid because their family income fell below the SCHIP eligibility level. Of these, only 24,299 (26%) successfully navigated the Medicaid application process and were enrolled in Medicaid. In 2001, Texas lawmakers concluded that children's Medicaid application and renewal processes should be reformed to match the SCHIP model, and adopted legislation which made the enrollment procedures nearly identical (Medicaid eligibility was set at 6 months, rather than 12). While they streamlined enrollment procedures on the one hand, the lawmakers also added two new requirements to Medicaid that increased the chances families would find it difficult to renew their children's coverage. As a condition of using the mail-in renewal process in Medicaid, parents must attend an orientation session and they must keep their children up to date on recommended check-ups. Parents failing to meet these standards can be required to go to the welfare office for a face-to-face interview to renew their children's coverage. In comparison, the parents of children on SCHIP are not required to attend an orientation session or demonstrate they have kept their children up-to-date with check ups as a condition of being allowed to use a mail-in renewal form. Simplification Improves Medicaid Participation Dramatically After the implementation of Texas's Medicaid simplification law, the number of children enrolled in Medicaid surged upward. By September 2002, enrollment had jumped 30 percent over the prior year's level and the number of children with Medicaid coverage had reached more than 1.5 million children. Over this same period, the number of adults on Medicaid (who did not enjoy the same simplifications) increased only 6%, suggesting that it was primarily the simplifications that generated the enrollment increases among children rather than economic conditions that also would have driven enrollment increases among adults. The enrollment among children has increased in large part because of significant improvements in the rate at which families' successfully complete the initial application process under the simplified policies. In the 16-month period prior to implementation, the average monthly approval rate for applications was 57.5%. After implementation of the state's simplification law, the application approval rate increased to 70.1%. Since simplification, the state also has experienced an increase in the rate at which families successfully complete the process for renewing their children's coverage. The renewal rate increased from 73 percent in the four-month period preceding implementation of simplification to 78 percent in the first nine months following simplification. The New Health Care Orientation Requirement To date, the requirement that parents of newly-enrolled Medicaid children attend a " health care orientation " (HCO) session or lose the opportunity to renew their children's coverage using a mail-in form does not appear to have adversely affected renewal rates. The HCO informs parents of the value of check-ups for children, as well as of the benefits of establishing a stable relationship with a primary care provider and using that provider (rather than the emergency room) to secure care. The HCO has been delivered to 75 percent or more of parents within 60 days of enrollment, and to 84 percent within 120 days. EPSDT Requirement Presents a Challenge In contrast, the requirement that parents assure their children are current with their check-ups as a condition of using the mail-in renewal process could pose more challenges. (The series of check-ups are known in Texas as the " Texas Health Steps " or " THSteps " check ups, and they are determined by the Medicaid EPSDT requirement for children.) Although it is not possible to provide data on the effect of the requirement because it is only now being implemented, it appears likely that the state will find it difficult to monitor the extent to which parents have complied with the requirement. In the latest evaluation of Texas Medicaid Managed Care data, only 49% of well-child check-ups found in children's medical records were correctly entered in their HMOs' computer files. Fee-for-service Medicaid data also historically have been dated and incomplete. In addition, chronic shortages of providers willing to conduct THSteps check-ups in many areas of the state may make it difficult for even the most willing parents to comply with the requirement; a recent survey by the Texas Medical Association shows that only 49 percent of Texas physicians are accepting new Medicaid patients, down from 66.8 percent two years ago. Texas EPSDT Statistics Fiscal year Participant Ratio 1991 .18 1992 .25 1993 .29 1994 .35 1995 .43 1996 .51 1997 .55 1998 .66 1999* .62 2000 .63 2001 .52 *new methodology began Source: HCFA/CMS 416 reports Texas' Participant Ratios for THSteps medical check-ups improved from 1991-1998, but from 1999 to 2001 the ratios dropped from the 1998 level of .66, to .52 in 2001. According to the Texas Department of Health, just under half the decline from 1998 to 1999 was due to the changes in federal methodology for EPSDT reporting, and the rest is thought to be the result of actual decline combined with unreliable Medicaid Managed Care check-up data. With so little certainty, it is impossible to know to what extent these unimpressive statistics are due to inadequate data collection and reporting, rather than actual low check-up utilization. In either case, the statistics suggest the magnitude of the challenge faced by the state in implementing this aspect of the law. Conclusion Texas' simplification efforts in Medicaid have been a major success in removing barriers to participation, as evidenced by a 30 percent increase in children's Medicaid enrollment from September 2001 to 2002. The next six to nine months will reveal how well the Medicaid program's procedures for implementing the new EPSDT requirement can compensate for the shortcomings of data systems and provider networks. However, the greatest challenge to the success of eligibility simplification is the state's looming revenue shortfall. Texas lawmakers are likely to consider reversals or even outright repeal of children's eligibility simplification as they attempt to write a budget within projected revenues. To keep the promise of the 2001 eligibility simplification legislation will undoubtedly require the identification of additional revenues. The 2003 Legislative session will thus put to the test Texans' commitment to child health care access. You are encouraged to copy and distribute this edition of THE POLICY PAGE The CPPP is a 501c(3) non-profit, non-partisan organization. Consider a tax-deductible donation to the center - visit www.cppp.org/order/support.html . ____________________________________________________ IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.