Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Emailing: JournalArticle

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Log In

Join Now!

Learn More

Take the Tour

Sunday, June 4, 2006

Search this Section this Site MedLine the Web

More Search Options

Home

Journal Articles

CEConnection

Clinical Resources

Drug Updates

Job Search

Career Center

Nurse Community

Conference Calendar

MarketPlace

Advertise With Us

Index to Advertisers

Help | Site map

Online only CE special: Review evidence-based recommendations for hand

hygiene and prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).

FEATURED JOURNAL: JONA's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation. Free Online

Issue!

View the latest AJN Webcast: Shades of Grey: Depression & dispiritedness in

older adults.

Home > Library > Journal Issue > Article

3.0*

CERP:A

$24.95 Treatment Strategies for Low Back Pain Relief

The Nurse Practitioner, April 2006

Clinical Topic: Advanced practice nursing Expires: 04/30/2008

CE Collection|Add to Planner | Take Test

Treatment Strategies for Low Back Pain Relief

D’Arcy MS, CRNP, CNS

The Nurse Practitioner: The American Journal of Primary Health Care

April 2006

Volume 31 Number 4

Pages 16 - 25

© 2006 Lippincott & Wilkins, Inc. Volume 31(4), April 2006, PP

16-25

Treatment Strategies for Low Back Pain Relief

[MUSCULOSKELETAL CARE]

D’Arcy, MS, CRNP, CNS

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

D’Arcy is a Pain and Palliative Care Nurse Practitioner/Outcomes

Manager at Suburban Hospital, Bethesda Md.

AUTHOR DISCLOSURE

The author has disclosed that she has no significant relationship or

financial interest in any commercial companies that pertain to this

education activity.

FIGURE. No caption available.

One of the most frustrating patient groups for primary care practitioners

(PCPs) to treat effectively are patients with low back pain (LBP). They come

with high expectations for pain relief and expect prompt action. These

patients come in all shapes, sizes, and ages, and the pain can be the result

of a number of causes or pathologies. Low back pain is a symptom and may not

have an attributable cause or related disease. Since the pain can come from

overuse, lifting, or bending incorrectly, patients often blame themselves

for not being more careful or for lifting an object that was too heavy.

Because pain in the back can severely limit motion and functionality,

patients can get very discouraged when the pain does not get better or it

takes longer than anticipated to resolve. The effects of a seemingly minor

injury can last for weeks, causing patients to try multiple solutions in an

effort to get back to their normal activities.

Approximately 50% to 80% of all adults experience LBP 1 , which affects more

than two-thirds of the American public at some time in life. 2 Statistics

show that LBP is the fifth most common reason that patients visit a PCP 1 ,

meaning PCPs spend a great deal of time helping patients with LBP. This

article will review some common causes of LBP, both acute and chronic, and

look at treatment strategies that can help busy PCPs manage patients with

this common problem.

The Weak Link: The Back

Of all the structures in the human body, the spine seems to come with a

unique set of problems and structural anomalies. Although it is designed to

be the primary support and hold the body upright, it is not meant to support

the obese bodies of modern-day patients, nor does it adapt to physical

demands such as heavy lifting or overuse if the back muscles are not strong.

The spine itself consists of the cervical spine, thoracic spine, and the

lumbar spine. Each spinal segment includes a flattened spinal body with

structures called facets that extend from each side. The nerve roots for

each spine pass through foramina located in the facets. As people age, the

facet space can narrow and impinge on the nerve roots with arthritic

thickening and changes such as bone spurs.

The normal spine has curvatures in the cervical and the lumbar region. If

the normal curves are flattened (lordosis) or unnaturally curved (scoliosis)

the musculature in these areas can tighten or stretch, which can result in

pain. Postural correction, physical therapy, or in extreme cases, surgical

intervention, can correct some of the physical changes seen with these

conditions.

Between each spinal body is a disc with cartilage. The disc is meant to help

cushion the vertebral body and protect it from damage during movement. As we

age, the disc space between each vertebral body narrows and the cushioning

fluid decreases. This allows for more boney damage to the spine as the

vertebral bodies lose the natural protection and separation. Compression

injuries in which the spinal bodies come together with too much force can

cause the disc material to compress and extend beyond the spinal column.

This bulging disc or herniation can create pressure on nerve roots, causing

extreme pain and in some instances, depending on the location, pain that

radiates down the leg called radicular pain. With normal aging, cartilage

erodes and the vertebral bodies themselves can lose calcium, resulting in

osteoporosis. This loss of calcium in the boney structures can result in

fractures of the spinal bodies called compression fractures. These fractures

can impinge the nerve roots, which is particularly painful and difficult to

treat.

Causes of LBP

Low back pain can be caused by musculoskeletal strain that is the result of

overuse, structural damage to spinal processes caused by aging, infection,

or a malignancy.

FIGURE. Muscles of the Back

Patients at risk for LBP 1 :

* Are in poor physical condition and do not engage in regular exercise

* Are over 55 years of age

* Are workers who have engaged in hard physical labor over a period of time

(e.g. construction workers)

* Are obese

* Have reduced spinal canal dimensions, spinal stenosis

* Smoke or use other illegal substances

* Are in a lower socioeconomic group

There are some “red flags” that should not be overlooked when assessing a

patient with LBP. If a patient has had a significant weight loss or

complains of pain that worsens at night and does not resolve at rest while

lying down, a malignancy may be the source of the pain. Neurologic symptoms,

such as sudden bladder or bowel incontinence, or foot drop that worsens can

indicate progression of a spinal cord impairment or a neurologic disease.

Another red flag is severe or progressive neurologic deficit in the lower

extremities and major motor weakness. This may be indicative of cauda equina

syndrome. Other causes of LBP are kidney or urinary tract infection and

gynecologic conditions such as cystic ovaries that can cause pain in the low

back.

Assessment

When LBP is acute, most practitioners feel fairly confident about assessing

pain. However, when pain becomes chronic, practitioners may begin to see

patient presentation as identical, regardless of pain scale rating. Patients

with chronic pain learn to cope with the pain and do not often appear to be

in pain, which makes differentiating pain levels difficult. Additionally,

chronic LBP patients can have vague and multifocal complaints, and may find

it difficult to localize pain. Talking to family and friends constantly

about their pain can strain relationships and patients with chronic pain

learn when and to whom they can open up about their pain.

For a basic pain assessment, the patient should be asked to:

* Rate his pain intensity using a validated pain scale (0 to 10 numeric

scale) and indicate any changes in pain with activity or movement

* Point to the area of pain and any areas where the pain radiates

* Tell the PCP how long the pain has lasted and any event that may have

caused the pain, such as heavy lifting

* Describe the quality of the pain (e.g. sharp, dull, achy, or shooting)

* Indicate any functional impairment like inability to walk up or down steps

impact of pain on sleep, diet, social relationships, etc.

For long-term chronic LBP patients, a more formalized chronic pain

assessment tool such as the Oswestry Brief Pain Inventory or Short-Form

McGill Pain Questionnaire should be used. These expanded pain assessment

tools have body diagrams for the patient to indicate the location and type

of pain and have lists of pain descriptors that fully describe functional

limitations and daily variations. 2,3

Chronic LBP is different from acute LBP. When patients have acute LBP, the

pain resolves within 6 to 12 weeks regardless of treatment regime. 4

Patients who do not improve within that time period (about 15%), develop

chronic LBP. 5 A newer term for chronic pain is persistent pain. This is

pain that lasts beyond the expected normal healing period or greater than 3

months.

The impact of chronic LBP is tremendous. It is the leading cause of

work-related disability with 5% to 8% of individuals reporting pain of

severe intensity. 6,7 Additionally, patients who have chronic LBP are

significantly limited in their activities, may need time off from work to

rehabilitate, and often experience depression related to the ongoing pain

and disability. For many LBP patients, the ongoing stress of pain and

depression strains relationships, and divorce is common. In a recent

interview for USA Today , a chronic pain patient stated, “My husband

describes pain as almost being a third person in our marriage.” 8

At least one in eight people with chronic LBP lose time from work. 9 The

cost of chronic pain is about $62 billion/year from losses related to

reduced performance alone. 8 Although the monetary effects on society are

enormous, the personal costs and suffering take a much greater toll.

Chronic pain is very difficult to manage and control. When ongoing pain is

not relieved, patients report they cannot concentrate or sleep well, cannot

engage in hobbies or help with chores at home, nor can they exercise or work

effectively. 10 Given the impact of chronic pain on patients and families,

it is not surprising that these individuals feel cranky and irritable, are

unable to cope effectively, and often feel worthless and depressed. 10

FIGURE. Lower Spine (Lateral View)

Case Study

You are asked to see a 52-year-old female patient who originally hurt her

back while lifting furniture. She complains of steady pain that worsens with

activity, and tells you she has a really hard time standing for any period

of time. She rates her constant pain as moderate-to-severe. The pain has

been ongoing for 6 months. She is sure there must be something that will

help her pain. The pain has made it impossible for her to care for her new

home.

When you examine the patient, she has very tender point areas. Her deep

tendon reflexes are normal. She has great difficulty trying to bend forward

and when she bends side to side, the stretch on the left side is very

painful. She has impaired mobility. A straight leg raise reproduces pain in

her back.

Her magnetic resonance imaging examination shows a small herniated disc, but

the surgeon has determined that she is not yet a surgical candidate. She has

been sent for a physical therapy evaluation and a mental health evaluation

where she was found to be depressed. She could not engage in the physical

therapy program because she found it too painful.

Her former physician told her he would not give her any more opioid pain

medications; he felt “she would just have to learn to live with the pain

because she could become addicted to the opioids if she continued taking

them.” Currently, she takes naproxen (Aleve) and uses a heating pad.

This patient is typical of many chronic LBP patients. She hurt her back

during a relatively benign activity. Now she is paying a penalty that has

changed her life. She has evidence of an injury, but it is not significant

enough to merit surgical intervention at this time. Treatment options such

as physical therapy and coping support have not helped. She feels the

therapy is too painful and her depression has not been addressed adequately.

What can be done for this patient to help her regain a better quality of

life and more functionality?

Treatment Options: Overview

The treatment options for acute LBP are fairly simple and straightforward.

Current recommendations are:

* Stay active. Bedrest is not indicated for acute LBP. Recovery is enhanced

and functionality is maintained by staying as active as possible. 11,12,16

* If the patient is a good candidate, has no cardiovascular history, or

history of gastrointestinal bleeding, a short course of nonsteroidal

anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), either nonselective such as ibuprofen or

naproxen, or the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (Celebrex) could be helpful in

acute back pain. These medications should be used for the shortest period of

time possible, at the lowest effective dose, and for patients who are deemed

to be good candidates with a low-risk profile. 13

* Offer a pain medication that fits the level of pain the patient is

reporting. 14

* Try heat, ice, analgesic balms such as Ben Gay, or massage if the patient

is open to these types of therapies.

Chronic LBP is a much more complicated condition to treat since it is

persistent and will be present to some degree on a daily basis. Many

patients with chronic LBP have physical injuries and the damage will not

progress. In order to treat these patients, a multimodal approach will have

to be used with a variety of therapies.

* Patients with injuries will benefit from a physical therapy program that

stresses improving mobility. 11,15

* There is no role for NSAIDs in chronic LBP. These medications are

beneficial for short-term use in acute LBP at the lowest dose possible. The

inflammatory effect in chronic LBP is not the same as with a patient who has

acute LBP. 13 Acute injuries produce a swelling in the area and an

inflammatory response. Imagine a person gets hit with a softball—the

affected area swells, reddens, and becomes tender. Once the pain becomes

chronic, the body adapts and the inflammatory response resolves and stops.

Only the soft tissue injury or spinal injury remains, causing mechanical

problems for the patient and ongoing pain. Again using the softball injury

scenario, the swelling goes down, the red areas disappear (inflammatory

response stops), but the area itself may be tender for months.

* Many chronic LBP patients take opioids on a continuing basis and do not

become addicted. When a patient takes opioids daily for pain relief, they

are considered opioid-dependent. Addiction is a chronic, neurobiologic

disease in which individuals misuse prescription pain medication or use

illicit drugs. 16 Addicts have no control over their drug of choice. Chronic

pain patients, on the other hand, are seeking pain relief and use

prescription opioids under the direction of the prescriber to improve their

functionality. It is important that the provider does not confuse opioid

dependency with addiction.

* Add medications for sleep and depression such as a selective serotonin

norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSNRI), a selective reuptake inhibitor

(SSRI), or a tricyclic antide-pressant (TCA).

* Refer the patient to a treatment program to help build coping skills and

positive image.

* Use nonpharmacologic interventions such as heat, ice, acupuncture, or

analgesic balms if the patient is interested.

* Consider referring the patient to an interventional pain management clinic

to be evaluated for an epidural steroid injection directly on the nerve root

being compressed by the disc. If the patient is found to be a candidate for

this type of therapy, the pain clinician may perform a series of three

injections that can significantly reduce the patient’s pain. Although

research is lacking in this area, professionals continue to provide this

therapy. For a select, well-screened patient population, this approach may

have benefit. 15

Medication Management of Chronic LBP

The World Health Organization’s (WHO) analgesic step approach to pain

medication provides a general guide on how to choose a pain medication for a

particular level of pain. Although it was originally developed for cancer

pain, it is now commonly used for all types of pain. This step approach

lists the types of pain medications and adjuvant medication that should be

considered for use when patients complain of pain at certain levels (see

Figure : “WHO’s Pain Relief Ladder”).

FIGURE. WHO’s Pain Relief Ladder

A chronic pain patient in need of pain relief over a 24-hour period may

require a pain medication that provides extended relief. There are several

extended-release pain medications for severe pain including morphine (MS

Contin, Kadian), extended-release morphine (Avinza), oxycodone (OxyContin),

methadone, and fentanyl patches (Duragesic). 17 When used for pain

management, methadone does not require special licensure and is a cheaper

alternative for extended pain relief than other extended-release

formulations. It does need to be carefully titrated when increasing dosages

because of it’s extended half-life.

Shorter-acting pain medications such as hydrocodone-acetaminophen (Vicodin,

Lortab) are problematic at higher doses since the acetaminophen component of

the medication creates a dose ceiling. For normal, healthy patients with no

organ impairment, the total daily dose of acetaminophen should not exceed 4

000 mg per day. For those who consume alcohol regularly or who have impaired

drug clearance, doses should be lowered and liver functions monitored.

Duragesic patches are an extended-release form of fentanyl delivered via a

small patch. The medication patch is placed in an area with little friction

such as the abdomen, shoulder, or back, and the opioid diffuses through a

membrane into the dermis, creating a medication depot in the subdermal fat

layer. From there it is absorbed into the vascular system at a controlled

rate for dispersal to the opioid receptors located throughout the body. It

takes approximately 12 to 18 hours for onset of action, and it can take as

long as 48 hours for a steady state to begin. The patches last for 72 hours

and are then removed and replaced, rotating the sites.

There are some important patient education issues involved with fentanyl

patches. The patient should never apply heat to the area where the patch is

placed because this causes the medication to absorb faster. Fevers also

cause increased absorption and another type of pain relief should be

substituted. The patches should never be cut or folded when applying them.

Cutting makes the entire 3-day dose of medication available at once. Folding

causes irregular absorption.

TABLE. Medication Tips

Patients should be taught to dispose of the patches by folding them in half

and placing them into a closed container. There is enough residual opioid in

a used patch to yield a lethal dose for a small child or pet. If a patient

is using extended-release pain medication, he will need breakthrough

medication for the times during the day when the pain escalates.

Shorter-acting pain medications such as hydrocodone-acetaminophen,

oxycodone-acetaminophen (Percocet), or oral morphine or hydromorphone

injection (Dilaudid) are options.

Adjuvant Pain Medications

Adjuvant pain medications have additive effects for pain relief though they

are not considered primary pain relievers. Chronic pain patients often take

several medications. When the pain has a neuropathic component, described by

patients as a burning, painful tingling, shooting-type pain, there are

different pain medications that provide the best relief (see Table : “LBP

Patients with a Radicular Component”).

TABLE. LBP Patients with a Radicular Component

All of the medications listed above have special considerations when used

for adjuvant pain relief. The antidepressant medications that have the most

research support and the highest potential for side effects such as morning

hypotension are the TCAs. The SSNRIs seem to provide effective pain relief;

the SSRIs are less effective for pain relief. Duloxetine is the newest

neuropathic pain medication and the nausea and vomiting listed as side

effects are dose-related, so starting at a low dose and titrating upward

carefully can minimize the adverse effects. The most commonly seen adjuvant

medication for neuropathic pain is gabapentin, but it is often not dosed

high enough for adequate pain relief. The effective dose of gabapentin for

pain relief is approximately 1,800 mg per day. 18

Although medications are the mainstay of treating LBP, there are

nonpharmacologic options that can be used as adjunct pain relief.

Over-the-counter analgesic creams can provide increased circulation to the

painful area, helping to decrease the level of pain. Newer formulations of

these medications are sold as patches over the counter. Capsaicin cream is

made from hot peppers and is especially helpful for neuropathic pain. The

drawback of capsaicin is that it needs to be applied three or four times per

day for several weeks to see a significant decrease in pain levels.

Topical lidocaine at 5% strength is available in a patch formulation called

Lidoderm. Though this medication was originally formulated for use in

neuropathic pain, recent research indicates its success for other pain

conditions such as osteoarthritis. Though not recommended for use with LBP,

if the pain can be localized a trial of lidocaine patches placed directly

onto the painful site might prove helpful. The patient can use up to three

patches per day 12 hours on and 12 hours off.

TABLE. Case Study: Acute LBP

For most LBP patients, one type of medication alone is not sufficient.

Combining different types of medications such as opioids, antidepressants,

and topical applications may reduce the pain to a level at which the patient

can be functional. Cognitive behavioral programs can also be beneficial

since patients with chronic LBP need to develop coping styles and techniques

that will help them live with daily pain.

Prevention

There is very little that can help prevent LBP except regular conditioning

exercises designed to increase support for the muscles in the low back. 15

Patients who are overweight and deconditioned are prime candidates for LBP.

Helping a patient commit to weight control and exercise programs is the best

health maintenance. For patients who are very obese, water exercise programs

offer an option with very little stress on the joints and back.

A surgical option for pain relief in LBP patients is total disc replacement,

however not all aspects of this technique have been adequately studied. 21

Some studies indicate that there is movement in the operative segments and

degenerative changes in adjoining spinal segments. These effects are hard to

isolate and may add to the outcomes in the studies under review. Each

patient needs to be evaluated and considered for this option by a surgeon.

REFERENCES

1. Dorsi MJ, Belzberg AJ. Low Back Pain. In: Wallace MS, Staats P. Pain

Medicine and Management . New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2005:141–146. [Context

Link]

2. D’Arcy YM. Pain Assessment. Pain Assessment in Medical-Legal Aspects of

Pain and Suffering. In: Iyer, ed. Tucson, AZ: Lawyers and Judges

Publishing Company Inc: 2003. [Context Link]

3. D’Arcy, Y. Pain management and assessment. In: Iyer, P, Levin, B, Shea,

MA. Medical Legal Aspects of Medical Records . Tucson, AZ: Tucson, Lawyers

and Judges Publishing Company Inc: 2006. [Context Link]

4. Hagen KB, Hilde G. Jamvedt G, Winnem M. Bed rest for acute low back pain

and sciatica. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews . 2006 (1).

Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab001254.html . Accessed

March 10, 2006. [Context Link]

5. Von Korff M, Saunders K. The course of back pain in primary care. Spine .

1996;21:2833–2837. [Context Link]

6. Tullberg T, Blomberg S, Branth B, sson R. Manipulation does not alter

the position of the sacroiliac joint: a roentgen sterophotogrammetric

analysis. Spine . 1998; 5(23):1124–8; discussion 1129. [Context Link]

7. Elliott AM, BH, Penny KI, et al. The epidemiology of chronic pain

in the community. Lancet .1999;354:1248–1252. [Context Link]

8. Chronic pain: The enemy within. USA Today . May 9, 2005:1A–4A [Context

Link]

9. WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, et al. Lost productive time and cost due to

common pain conditions in the US workforce. JAMA . 2003;290:2443–2454.

[Context Link]

10. Chronic Pain in America: Roadblocks to Relief. Conducted for the

American Pain Society, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and Janssen

Pharmaceutica. 1999. Available at: http://www.ampainsoc.org . Accessed March

9, 2006. [Context Link]

11. Rozenberg S, Deval C, Rezvani Y, et al. Bedrest or normal activity for

patients with acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine .

2002; 27:1487. [Context Link]

12. Hagan KB, Hilde G, Jamtvedt G, Winnem M. Bed rest for acute Low back

pain and sciatica. Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews 3. 2005 [Context

Link]

13. Van Tulder MW, Scholten, RJPM, Koes BW, Deyo RA. Non-steroidal and

anti-inflammatory drugs for low-back pain. Cochrane Database of Systemic

Reviews. Volume 3, 2005. [Context Link]

14. Berry PH, Chapman CR, Covington ED, et al. Pain: Current Understanding

of Assessment, Management, and Treatment. Reston VA: National Pharmaceutical

Council, Inc. 2001. [Context Link]

15. Nelemans Pj, de Bie RA, deVet HC, Sturmans, F. Injection therapy for

subacute and chronic benign low back pain. Cochrane Review, 1999. ACP

Journal Club. V. 133(1):27, Jul–Aug, 2000. [Context Link]

16. American Society of Pain Management Nurses (ASPMN). ASPMN Position

Statement. Pain Management in Patients with Addictive Disease. ASPMN:

Pensacola FL. 2002. Available at: http://www.aspmn.org . Accessed February

16, 2006. [Context Link]

17. American Pain Society. Principles of Analgesic Use in the Treatment of

Acute Pain and Cancer Pain. Glenview IL. 2003. [Context Link]

18. Staats P, Argoff C, Brewer R, D’Arcy Y, Gallagher r, McCarberg W,

Reisner L. Neuropathic Pain: Incorporating new consensus guidelines into the

reality of practice. Advanced Studies in Medicine. s Hopkins University

School of Medicine Volume 4 (7B) July 2004. [Context Link]

19. Waddell G. Low Back Pain. In: Mersky H, Loeser J., Dubner R., eds. Low

back pain in the paths of pain . Seattle, Wash.: IASP Press; 2005:379–390.

20. Malmivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T, et al. The treatment of acute low back

pain-bed rest, exercises or normal activity? New England Journal of Medicine

1995;335:351–355.

21. De Keluver M, Oner FC, s WC. Total disc replacement for chronic low

back pain: background and a systemic review of the literature. European

Spine Journal . 2003;12(2):108–116. [Context Link]

CE Collection|Add to Planner | Take Test

*Contact Hours; Contact Hours/Advanced Pharmacology Hours

For more information about taking CE on NursingCenter, view our Help and

Accreditation Information.

Home

Job Center

Site Map Journal Articles

Nurse Community

FAQs CEConnection

Marketplace

About UsClinical Resources

Search

Your Feedback

Terms of Use | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Contact Us |

Subscribe to free eNews

Copyright ©2006 Lippincott & Wilkins, Inc., A Wolters Kluwer

Company. All rights reserved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...