Guest guest Posted September 24, 2004 Report Share Posted September 24, 2004 Ditto this question - I'm drinking the wonderful rich Guernsey milk from a cow due to calf in early January. Since I'm 47 (48 in Dec) and in peri-menopause, I've wondered if Daisy Mae's pregnancy hormones are a boost for me or a hindrance, or a non-issue. Thanks, Rhonda > Hey all you farmers (or otherwise knowledgeable people), > I was having a discussion last night about raw milk with some folks, > and one chimed in and said " Yes, it seems nice to drink raw milk, > organic and free or hormones like rBGH and BST, but what about the > bovine maternal hormones that are natural in the milk anyway? Those > would seem to be as bad as the other added hormones. How about it? " > Of course, I was taken off-guard. Haven't encountered this one before > (and I encounter a lot, since I have a lot of discussions about raw > milk.) Could anyone shed some light on this? > Thanks! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2004 Report Share Posted September 24, 2004 Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone also known as Bovine Somatrophin is a man-made copy of the natural " maternal hormones " . Injecting the lactating cow with it triggers her body to produce greater quantities of milk. Supposedly the synthetic version is undetectable in the milk from a cow injected with it. So the dairy cartel and their handmaidens in governent say, 'it's the same thing, so where's the harm?' Myself, I do not believe their cover story. Especially after two scientists within so-called " Health Canada " [ now there's a mis- nomer! ] were fired for blowing the whistle on the lobbying going on between Monsanto and those who were investigating the risks/harms of rBGH. The scientific work has been done already indicating that rBGH contributes to cancer in human beings who drink milk produced by cows who are injected with it. But that research has been hidden. In the book " Into the Buzzsaw ; the myth of the free press in America " one of the chapters tells how a husband and wife team of investigative reporters were obstructed then destroyed by court action for trying to get the story out of the harms rBGH is doing ... present tense = " is doing " as I write this ... to the American people. See the Dr. R Schmidt's book 'Untold Story of Milk " for more detail. In Canada, rBGH / BST is supposed to be illegal. But that doesn't stop dairy farmers here from stepping over the border to the US and bringing back all they need. The capper of the unspeakable hypocrisy of those who pretend they're 'looking after' our food supply, came a few years ago. It came out that the dairy herd of the University of British Columbia, then at Parksville BC. was using BGH on the cows and selling the milk into the co-op to be mingled with the production of all the other herds on Vancouver Island. They were doing something which they were well aware was completely illegal, got caught at it, and what happened ? Absolutely nothing. One of the hallmarks of fascism is that those with connections are " above the law " . The mendacious dairy corporations being Exhibit #1. All of which, above, is anther reason why having control of your own food supply - at ground level - is VITAL to a free people. Gordon , Burnaby British Columbia > Hey all you farmers (or otherwise knowledgeable people), > I was having a discussion last night about raw milk with some folks, > and one chimed in and said " Yes, it seems nice to drink raw milk, > organic and free or hormones like rBGH and BST, but what about the > bovine maternal hormones that are natural in the milk anyway? Those > would seem to be as bad as the other added hormones. How about it? " > Of course, I was taken off-guard. Haven't encountered this one before > (and I encounter a lot, since I have a lot of discussions about raw > milk.) Could anyone shed some light on this? > Thanks! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2004 Report Share Posted September 24, 2004 Hi ; I don't know the answer to your question exactly, although I will research a little more, but I thought I'd just throw this info out there. Maternal hormones are found in pretty high levels in milk, even higher levels than the levels found circulating in the blood. These hormones are often functional in the neonate, and seem to be absorbed pretty well by the gut. Some hormones and milk proteins seem to be nearly identical between cow and human, so it is possible there would be some activity in humans. Now it's hard to say whether the adult gut would be as permeable to uptaking hormones. There was some study where athletes were fed colostrum during training and then had some growth factor and antibody measurement taken. The colostrum caused changes in some of these things. Although, they couldn't tell if they were measuring the original cow hormones or human one. There is a group in Japan (i think) that studies the effects of bovine milk hormones on the development of prostate cancer. They believe the estrogens(or was it progesterones?) in milk cause prostate cancer. Of course they are looking at crappy milk, and there work is far from even close to conclusive, but you aren't the only one wondering how the hormone in milk affect us. I know this isn't exactly what you were looking for, but I think it is an interesting topic, so thought I'd throw in my two cents. Take care; Jill >> would be, does this natural maternal hormone really exist in raw milk, and if so, is it > significant? Is it an issue at all, or do our bodies ignore it? Is it in a small quantity? I think > my friend's point was just that perhaps the naturally occurring hormone was a bad thing. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.