Guest guest Posted June 10, 2004 Report Share Posted June 10, 2004 "Toxic mold" is an expression that is never used in the Scandinavian Countries. Why ? Well... we never had "the Clevland incident" for one.. I totally agree with Mr. Connel on the matter that this is a term that is useless and only creates unneccessery fear in the public. It is right up there with "Black Mold" and "Killer Molds" If you want to express your meaning some more words are needed like " a fast growing fungi that under given circumstances has the possibilitie to produce mycotoxins" Ole Carlson Mycoteam as / Norway -----Opprinnelig melding-----Fra: Tony Havics Sendt: 10. juni 2004 00:06Til: iequality Emne: A Question on Toxic MoldWe have all heard and used the term "toxic mold".How do ya'll define it?I have my definition and support for that opinion (which I'll provide onFriday - too busy tomorrow unfortunately) but I'd be interested in how ya'llhave defined it.Tony................................................. "Tony" Havics, CHMM, CIH, PEpH25450 N. Lafayette RoadIndianapolis, IN 46254Office: Fax: This message is from pH2. This message and any attachments may containlegally privileged or confidential information, and are intended only forthe individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are notthe addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, youare not authorized to read, copy, or distribute this message and anyattachments, and we ask that you please delete this message and attachments(including all copies) and notify the sender by return e-mail or by phone at. Delivery of this message and any attachments to any personother than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waiveconfidentiality or a privilege. All personal messages express views only ofthe sender, which are not to be attributed to pH2 and may not be copied ordistributed without this statement.FAIR USE NOTICE:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as "toxic mold". Practically all mold species, however, are capable of producing compounds (ranging from penicillin to aflatoxin) which may be toxic at high doses. It is the "DOSE that makes the poison", a basic tenet of toxicology which the "chemophobes" and "fungiphobes" of the world fail to understand! - P.S. I wrote a commentary ("Mountains Out of Mold Hills") a few years ago which more fully expresses my opinion on this topic. If anyone is interested, it is available online at: www.cos-mag.com/exclusives.htm W. Mullen, PhD, FCSFS Toxicologist KEMIC BIORESEARCH Kentville Nova Scotia, B4N 4H8 Canada Tel. Fax E-mail pmullen@... Ole Carlson wrote: "Toxic mold" is an expression that is never used in the Scandinavian Countries. Why ? Well... we never had "the Clevland incident" for one.. I totally agree with Mr. Connel on the matter that this is a term that is useless and only creates unneccessery fear in the public. It is right up there with "Black Mold" and "Killer Molds" If you want to express your meaning some more words are needed like " a fast growing fungi that under given circumstances has the possibilitie to produce mycotoxins" Ole Carlson Mycoteam as / Norway -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: Tony Havics Sendt: 10. juni 2004 00:06 Til: iequality Emne: A Question on Toxic Mold We have all heard and used the term "toxic mold". How do ya'll define it? I have my definition and support for that opinion (which I'll provide on Friday - too busy tomorrow unfortunately) but I'd be interested in how ya'll have defined it. Tony .................................................. "Tony" Havics, CHMM, CIH, PE pH2 5450 N. Lafayette Road Indianapolis, IN 46254 Office: Fax: This message is from pH2. This message and any attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information, and are intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, copy, or distribute this message and any attachments, and we ask that you please delete this message and attachments (including all copies) and notify the sender by return e-mail or by phone at . Delivery of this message and any attachments to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality or a privilege. All personal messages express views only of the sender, which are not to be attributed to pH2 and may not be copied or distributed without this statement. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 , Since some people are known to react to fungal components (and bioaerosols in general) at low exposure levels, would it not also be true to say that the individual sensitivity makes the poison? Steve Temes It is the "DOSE that makes the poison", a basic tenet of toxicology which the "chemophobes" and "fungiphobes" of the world fail to understand! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 Steve I use the fact that I react ar lower levels of fungal exposure than most to find the mold. I have found, however, that most people do not understand the distribution curve around the median, but only the one number. Some of my clients are much more sensitive than I am, and some of their spouses are much less sensitive than either of us. Jim H. White SSAL Re: SV: A Question on Toxic Mold ,Since some people are known to react to fungal components (and bioaerosols in general) at low exposure levels, would it not also be true to say that the individual sensitivity makes the poison?Steve Temes It is the "DOSE that makes the poison", a basic tenet of toxicology which the "chemophobes" and "fungiphobes" of the world fail to understand!FAIR USE NOTICE:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 , You make an excellent point. I also read your commentary and enjoyed it. It must be all that clean air in canada! Shane Re: SV: A Question on Toxic Mold Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as "toxic mold". Practically all mold species, however, are capable of producing compounds (ranging from penicillin to aflatoxin) which may be toxic at high doses. It is the "DOSE that makes the poison", a basic tenet of toxicology which the "chemophobes" and "fungiphobes" of the world fail to understand!- P.S. I wrote a commentary ("Mountains Out of Mold Hills") a few years ago which more fully expresses my opinion on this topic. If anyone is interested, it is available online at: www.cos-mag.com/exclusives.htm W. Mullen, PhD, FCSFS Toxicologist KEMIC BIORESEARCH Kentville Nova Scotia, B4N 4H8 Canada Tel. Fax E-mail pmullen@...Ole Carlson wrote: "Toxic mold" is an expression that is never used in the Scandinavian Countries. Why ? Well... we never had "the Clevland incident" for one.. I totally agree with Mr. Connel on the matter that this is a term that is useless and only creates unneccessery fear in the public. It is right up there with "Black Mold" and "Killer Molds" If you want to express your meaning some more words are needed like " a fast growing fungi that under given circumstances has the possibilitie to produce mycotoxins" Ole Carlson Mycoteam as / Norway -----Opprinnelig melding-----Fra: Tony Havics Sendt: 10. juni 2004 00:06Til: iequality Emne: A Question on Toxic MoldWe have all heard and used the term "toxic mold".How do ya'll define it?I have my definition and support for that opinion (which I'll provide onFriday - too busy tomorrow unfortunately) but I'd be interested in how ya'llhave defined it.Tony................................................. "Tony" Havics, CHMM, CIH, PEpH25450 N. Lafayette RoadIndianapolis, IN 46254Office: Fax: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.