Guest guest Posted March 16, 2008 Report Share Posted March 16, 2008 Pat, GCFI regulations are very minimal. There is a requirement in most asbestos regulations that GFIs shall be used when water is being used. But the jurisdiction can be limited to only schools. For general industry, the requirement is even further limited and is referenced to the NEC when OSHA was passed. 1970. Back then, the requirement was mainly for grounded cords. Further, OSHA enforcement is rather ambiguous. Here is a real case. OSHA cited a chicken farm (in NC) for not having grounded electrical cords (note - not GFI) in chicken coops where a lot of water and waste is present on the floor. The chicken farm owner lied to OSHA and said they fixed or replaced all the cords. 1 year later, an employee was electrocuted. OSHA cited the employer for a repeat violation. However, they did were not able to sustain a WILLFUL violation because (according to the review commission-politically appointed officials) the employer did not WILLFULLY INTEND to KILL the employee. So, what does this mean? Well, not using grounded cords (even if it kills an employee) is only a de-minimous violation. Further complicating this issue is whether double insulated tools offer " equivalent " protection to GFIs. Some interpretations allow DI tools rather than GFIs. There is not a specific requirement for GFIs in the OSHA regs for all " wet " operations. You may be able to imply a " general duty " requirement, but that is unlikely to stand up to enforcement. Worked on a legal case of an asbestos containment fire, where the incoming power was not GFI. A short cause a $2,000,000 fire. OSHA did not cite the employer for non GFIs because it was dry removal. All very confusing and illogical. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.