Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Posted January 21, 2008 > I guess, to find a risk ratio of 16, at least one non-encephalitis subject and 16 CMV subjects had to come down with psychosis (because you cant have a fraction of a person) - so that sounds as if it would be very highly significant. Wow, I really botched that one - what I said was waaay illogical. It would have be correct only if half the population had had a history of CMV encephalitis, which is not true at all. In reality - there were just two cases of psychosis among 63 people with prior CMV encephalitis history. That gives the rate 2/63, which is 16.6 times higher than the rate of psychosis among the normals (ie those without history of CMV encephalitis). The raw p is still under 0.05, but I also forgot the Bonferroni issues, which are significant here. In total, the CMV finding is far less impressive than I thought, on its own. If it were confirmed in a separate cohort, it would be a finding with greater confidence. Still, childhood CMV encephalitis - at least, childhood CMV encephalitis requiring hospitalization, which is the criterion in this study - doesn't appear to be one of the main causes of psychosis, because it is after all so very rare: only 63 people out of 1.2 million had childhood CMV encephalitis, whereas 2,270 of those 1.2 million had psychosis. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.