Test of Everyday Attention/penny

[Guest guest]

test of everyday attention is mainstream, even paid by medicare I think

This was prescribed by a physiatrist, who is NOT a psychiatrist, but rather

is a rehab dr, for people wiht strokes, car accidents, brain injurys, and

other bodyily injuries. I call them a pain and brain dr.

She knows and believes in cfids and fibro.

she referred me for PT, vision therapy (from brain toxic stuff, I think the

cfids visual stuff would fit here too), and also test of everyday attention.

All these therapies were done at a rehab center like where stroke people

and accident people go. The test of E very day attention was administered

by a SPEECH therapist.yes seems very strange. Vision thereapy was done by a

OCCUPATIONAL thereapist. prior to vision therapy I was sent to a Neuro

opthomistrist. His notes are also useful documents stating it looks like

TBI, or traumatic brain injury.he states it was very hard to vision test me

due to attention problems

yes, my diagnosis are all infections, cfids, fibro, mold, toxic root canal,

mycoplasma so havning someone saying TBI is agreat step in documenting. TBI

is used for accident type brain injury, but saying I have those type of

cognitive problems is great on paper.

TEST OF EVERYDAY ATTENTION showed 95 % for some things and 1%tile (ABSOLUTE

lowest) for other things like short term memory or sustained attention wiht

interruptions. I suggest this testfor anybody as a good document, even if

you cannot prove you are sick /cannot diagnose your infection , this will

help show you cannot think normal., and cannot work.

with just cfids diagnosis I was able to get support from a brain injury

advocate place.(also wiht brainSPECT scan result)

amy

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>INFECTION AND INFLAMMATION

>

>

>

>

>

> INFECTION AND INFLAMMATION

>

>

> Messages In This Digest (9

> Messages)

>

>

>

>

> 1a.

>

> Re: The Gut

> From:

> dumbaussie2000

> 1b.

>

> Re: The Gut

> From:

> dumbaussie2000

> 1c.

>

> Re: The Gut

> From:

> Jaep

> 1d.

>

> Re: The Gut

> From:

> Penny Houle

>

>

> 2a.

>

> sandy /brain

> From:

> amy dent

> 2b.

>

> Re: sandy /brain

> From:

> Jaep

> 2c.

>

> Re: sandy /brain

> From:

> Penny Houle

>

>

> 3.

>

> Re: Unapproved Lyme disease treatment harmful, FDA warns

> From:

>

>

>

> 4.

>

> Re: , Diagnosic tests

> From:

>

>

>

>

> View All Topics | Create New Topic

>

>

> Messages

>

>

>

> 1a.

>

>

>

> Re: The Gut

>

> Posted by: " dumbaussie2000 "

> dumbaussie2000@...

>

>

> dumbaussie2000

>

>

>

> Sun Jul 23, 2006 6:33 pm (PST)

>

>

>

>

>

> >

>

> > It makes me wonder if this is an overreaction , we all want safe

>

>drugs , but

>

> > is there such a thing? Bismuth is effective against HP taken as

>

>an oral

>

> > compound .Anyone had any experience of this ..

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > http://www.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/07/21/lyme.disease.reut/index.html

>

> >

>

> > Unapproved Lyme disease treatment harmful, FDA warns

>

> >

>

> > WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- An unapproved compound mixed by pharmacists

>

>to treat

>

> > Lyme disease should not be used, U.S. health officials warned

>

>Friday, after

>

> > one person died and another was hospitalized earlier this year.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Back to top

>

> Reply to sender

> |

>

> Reply to group

> |

>

> Reply via web post

>

>

>

> Messages in this topic

> (6)

>

>

>

> 4.

>

>

>

> Re: , Diagnosic tests

>

> Posted by: " "

> usenethod@...

>

>

> hodolog1ca

>

>

>

> Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:10 am (PST)

>

>

>

>

>

>Sorry, no access... we're pretty spare on E. European journals here at

>

>UVA... thats to my disappointment, as they seem to be significantly

>

>more open to undiscovered chronic bacterial infections in E Europe.

>

>

>

> > , can you access this one? Looks like it's worth reading ..

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > Wiad Parazytol. 2005;51(2):109-14. Related Articles, Links

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > [Diagnostics of human granulocytic anaplasmosis]

>

>

>

> > PMID: 16838619 [PubMed - in process]

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Back to top

>

> Reply to sender

> |

>

> Reply to group

> |

>

> Reply via web post

>

>

>

> Messages in this topic

> (2)

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> New Message Search

>

>Find the message you want faster. Visit your group to try out the improved

>message search.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>Share feedback on the new changes to Groups

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Visit Your Group

>