Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Posted June 15, 2006 This doctor is a famous AIDS specialist, known all over the world. If he had been treating AIDS and not Lyme patients this would never have seen the light of day. We are living in scary times for those of us with infectious diseases - and that is most of the human race. a Patient testifies treatment made her ill Hearing begins before N.C. Medical Board KAREN GARLOCH kgarloch@... RALEIGH - A 32-year-old Huntersville woman testified Wednesday that Dr. ph Jemsek treated her for chronic Lyme disease with daily antibiotics for a year and a half even though, she learned later, she didn't have the tickborne illness. told the N.C. Medical Board that she developed five infections from catheters inserted in her arms and chest for delivering the intravenous medicine. The last infection, she said, " almost took my life. " " I put my faith in Dr. Jemsek, " said , who sometimes cried as she told her story. " I held onto the hope. But looking back, I see that my symptoms only got worse. " , three other former Jemsek patients and the widower of a deceased patient testified against the Huntersville doctor Wednesday at a public hearing. The board alleges that Jemsek misdiagnosed at least 10 patients with chronic Lyme disease and treated them inappropriately with months of IV antibiotics. The 12-member board could decide to revoke, suspend or otherwise limit Jemsek's license. The charges against Jemsek, 57, are similar to those brought by other state medical boards against 30 other doctors. Like Jemsek, they believe that Lyme disease often becomes chronic, with long-lasting symptoms such as extreme fatigue, unusual pain, fever, foggy memory and numbness in the limbs. Jemsek, who also testified Wednesday, said he treats about 400 Lyme disease patients and 1,200 HIV patients at his clinic. He said he does not always rely on laboratory tests to diagnose patients with Lyme disease because current tests are not reliable. " Tests shouldn't drive us; we should drive the tests, " he said. " If you really pay attention (to what the patients tell you), you get to be pretty good diagnostically. " About 100 Lyme patients, many from Jemsek's clinic, showed up for the hearing and stood for more than an hour in the rain until the board's office opened at 8 a.m. The hearing room could hold only 60 people, so many waited in the lobby, wearing lime green bracelets or green ribbons tied around their arms to show support for the doctor. Penny Nichols, a Statesville patient, said the board should have moved the hearing to a larger space. At Wednesday's hearing, the board heard from two N.C. physicians and an epidemiologist who said Lyme disease is rare in North Carolina and that treating it with antibiotics for longer than a month is outside the norm. Dr. Garwood, an infectious disease specialist at NorthEast Medical Center in Concord, said she contacted the board about Jemsek's unusual approach to diagnosing and treating Lyme after seeing about 20 of his patients who did not appear to her to have the illness. One of those patients, who later testified, was Patti Ingram, 52, of Fort Mill, S.C., who took intravenous antibiotics for seven-and-a-half years. Garwood said she didn't think the patient had Lyme and couldn't imagine why anyone would need to take antibiotics for so long. Dr. Meera Kelley, an infectious disease specialist at Wake Med Health and Hospitals in Raleigh, reviewed records of all 10 patients cited by the board and said none appeared to have Lyme disease. Based on her review of the records, she said Jemsek did not inform patients that his approach to treatment was different from the standard. In his opening statement, board attorney Marcus Jimison said Jemsek would perform numerous tests for Lyme and then " cherry pick " results that would support his diagnosis " while ignoring everything else. " As a result, Jimison said, Jemsek " made lots and lots of money. " said her treatment, including hospitalization for the infections, cost at least $200,000. Jemsek's lawyer, Jim of Durham, said his client does inform patients that his treatment differs from what other doctors are doing. " That's why they came to Dr. Jemsek. They had sought treatment elsewhere and been denied. " Armiger, a mechanical engineer from Washington, D.C., said Jemsek carefully explained the risks of the treatment when he became a patient in June 2003. Under Jemsek's care, he said, " I did continue to slowly improve. " The board's hearing will continue today with more testimony from Jemsek. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.