quantitative differences that make qualitative differences

[Guest guest]

Heres the thread with Normans post, that I mentioned... well worth a

read to see the loose rationale he noticed in a paper (3rd post from

bottom):

http://www.cpnhelp.org/?q=searching_for_the_truth_i

The sad fact is, you have to pretty much have to get the last detail

procedural detail for every critical experiment, if you want to make

100% sure youre dealing with reality. And even then there are

disagreeing experiments that no one can explain.

We take it for granted that tetracycline does this or that, because its

never discussed anymore - and we think the (maddeningly) controversial

stuff is stuff like whether Cpn is found in alzheimers. But I've been

reading material from the 70s on antibiotic mechanisms... its nothing

but " X found Y, but this was disputed by data from Z lab... L was long

believed to be the case, but both M and N recently report data more

consistent with O... "

Its reassuring to see that all that chaos did finally get pretty much

straightened out. Maybe our contemporary chaoses will too one day.