Guest guest Posted June 6, 2006 Report Posted June 6, 2006 Wow, they are gettin way ahead of where they were when I studied this last year. These guys http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/abstract/176/5/3019 are saying that Mtb prevention of IFN-g activation of macrophages is TLR-2 dependant. WHY any TLR (which is basically a microbe sensor) should be hooked up so as to even have the capacity to prevent macrophage activation, I HAVE NO EARTHLY IDEA. Kind of depressing. An interesting thing touching CFS is that they claim to have shown that the STAT1 pathway is working A-OK in Mtb-infected cells. The Mtb voodoo has a wholly separate pathway. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.